{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases/miss-lawmakers-seek-withdrawal-bidens-latest-147-billion-student-loan-transfer", "MISS. LAWMAKERS SEEK WITHDRAWAL OF BIDEN\u2019S LATEST $147 BILLION STUDENT LOAN TRANSFER SCHEME", "2024-05-22", "2024", "2024-05", "Republican", "House", "MS", "Michael Guest", "G000591", "guest.house.gov", "guest", "https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases", "scraper", "Wicker, Hyde-Smith, Kelly, Guest & Ezell Among 129 Lawmakers Deriding Latest Ed Dept. Loan Forgiveness Plan\n\nWASHINGTON, D.C. \u2013 U.S. Senators Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) and U.S. Representatives Trent Kelly (R-Miss.), Michael Guest (R-Miss.), and Mike Ezell (R-Miss.) registered their opposition to the Biden administration\u2019s latest attempt to transfer student loan debt onto American taxpayers.\n\nThe Mississippi lawmakers are among 39 Senators and 90 House Members who signed a letter seeking the withdrawal of the U.S. Department of Education\u2019s proposed student loan transfer rule, which will cost hard-working Americans an additional $147 billion and bring the total student loan debt transferred to taxpayers to as much as $1 trillion.\n\n\u201cThe latest Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) proposed by your Department of Education (Department) on April 17, 2024, represents the latest in a string of reckless attempts to transfer as much as $1 trillion of student loan debt from those who willingly borrowed to those who did not or have already repaid their loans. We strongly urge you to withdraw it,\u201d wrote the lawmakers.\n\n\u201cIn addition to the fiscally irresponsible nature of this backdoor attempt to enact \u2018free\u2019 college, the administration continues to use borrowers as political pawns knowing full well these proposed actions are illegal. The Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear that there is zero authority to write-off federal student loans en masse last June when the Department\u2019s \u2018Plan A\u2019 was ruled unconstitutional,\u201d the lawmakers said.\n\nThe letter is sharply critical of the Biden administration for prioritizing dubious student loan forgiveness schemes while failing to properly implement the new Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) program. These continued delays prevent students and families from accessing crucial financial aid information as they choose the college they can afford to attend.\n\n\u201cInstead of exacerbating the problems of inflated college costs and low-value degrees, we urge you to withdraw this NPRM and work with Congress. It is past time that we fix our nation\u2019s broken higher education financing system,\u201d the lawmakers concluded.\n\nU.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-La.), ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, and U.S. Representative Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), chairwoman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, spearheaded the letter.\n\nRead the signed letter here or below.\n\nDear Secretary Cardona:\n\nThe latest Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) proposed by your Department of Education (Department) on April 17, 2024, represents the latest in a string of reckless attempts to transfer as much as $1 trillion of student loan debt from those who willingly borrowed to those who did not or have already repaid their loans. We strongly urge you to withdraw it.\n\nThe Biden administration describes this regulation as \u201ctargeted relief,\u201d yet the Department\u2019s own estimates show the opposite. This is even broader than the Department\u2019s first attempt: at an estimated price tag of $147 billion, taxpayers are being forced to take on the debt of nearly 28 million borrowers. Moreover, while the Department likely does not wish to highlight how much their proposal would help the wealthy, outside estimates show that borrowers eligible for \u201crelief\u201d under certain provisions in this proposal will have a typical income of over $300,000. Unfortunately, the Department did not include its own analysis of the distributional effect of these regulations.\n\nIn addition to the fiscally irresponsible nature of this backdoor attempt to enact \u201cfree\u201d college, the administration continues to use borrowers as political pawns knowing full well these proposed actions are illegal. The Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear that there is zero authority to write-off federal student loans en masse last June when the Department\u2019s \u201cPlan A\u201d was ruled unconstitutional.\n\nFurther, this regulation is only part of the Department\u2019s \u201cPlan B.\u201d The Department notes that the long-anticipated regulation to \u201ccancel\u201d loans for borrowers facing \u201chardship\u201d\u2014a broad term defined under the NPRM to grant the Department full authority to cancel any loan it pleases\u2014is still forthcoming. According to budget experts, those additional changes would bring the total cost of the Department\u2019s \u201cPlan B\u201d to nearly $750 billion, at almost double the cost of \u201cPlan A.\u201d\n\n\u201cPlan B\u201d hinges on creating these extensive regulations based on scant statutory text written in 1965. That text, which describes how the then Commissioner of Education at the Department of Health Education and Welfare could \u201cenforce, pay, compromise, waive, or release any right, title, claim, lien, or demand, however acquired, including any equity or any right or redemption\u201d under the Federal Loan Insurance Program. It is certain that drafters in 1965 through the last reauthorization in 2008, did not contemplate that these words would be used to cancel massive portions of student loan balances. This statute has no history of broad use by any previous Secretary and was previously deemed by this administration as less likely to hold up in court than \u201cPlan A.\u201d\n\nWhile the administration dedicated resources needed to draft this proposal to benefit those who already were able to attend college, it simultaneously failed to competently implement the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). The FAFSA is a simple 36-question form that helps the nation\u2019s neediest current and prospective college attendees understand what federal financial aid is available to them. Failure to make the FAFSA available to these prospective students on time will have life-long consequences for many young Americans. We already know, as of March 29, FAFSA completion for seniors in high school is down by 40 percent. Those who do not file will likely not attend college next year and maybe never will.\n\nInstead of exacerbating the problems of inflated college costs and low-value degrees, we urge you to withdraw this NPRM and work with Congress. It is past time that we fix our nation\u2019s broken higher education financing system.\n\n###", 1, "2026-04-04T05:28:40Z", "2026-04-04T05:30:10Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases/miss-lawmakers-seek-withdrawal-bidens-latest-147-billion-student-loan-transfer"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 1.216159900650382, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}