{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2656", "Trahan, Schiff Request Briefing from TikTok Ahead of Midterms on Strategy to Combat Election Disinformation", "2022-10-27", "2022", "2022-10", "Democrat", "House", "MA", "Lori Trahan", "T000482", "trahan.house.gov", "trahan", "https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentquery.aspx?DocumentTypeID=27", "scraper", "WASHINGTON, DC \u2013 Today, Congresswoman Lori Trahan (MA-03), a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee\u2019s Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee, and Congressman Adam Schiff (CA-28) requested a briefing from TikTok on its strategy to curb misinformation, disinformation, and the potential incitement of violence on the platform ahead of the 2022 and 2024 U.S. elections.\n\nIn a letter to TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, Trahan and Schiff stressed their concerns about TikTok\u2019s ability to regulate disinformation as a video-only platform, its commitment to proactively removing disinformation content and users who repeatedly promote it, and its commitment to enforcing those policies before, during, and after election days.\n\n\u201cWith the perceived lack of strong enforcement, bad actors have already begun to use TikTok to spread distrust and doubt in our upcoming midterm elections, including preemptive claims of voter fraud. We believe that TikTok needs to be more transparent about how the platform\u2019s automated and human systems flag and remove content, and the effectiveness of their systems, especially regarding content related to the Midterm Elections,\u201d the lawmakers wrote in the letter.\n\nWhile TikTok\u2019s video-only medium makes certain content harder to detect, fact-check, and moderate, the platform was able to remove nearly 350,000 videos in 2020 that promoted election misinformation and disinformation. However, a study from NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights found TikTok\u2019s enforcement strategies to be \u201chaphazard,\u201d and presented election deniers with a number of simple ways to get around the platform\u2019s content bans \u2013 raising questions about how effective and consistent TikTok\u2019s enforcement strategy is.\n\nFurthermore, Trahan and Schiff are urging TikTok to take a year-round approach to combating election misinformation and disinformation, in order to protect the platform and its users against threats that arise outside of regular election cycles. The members wrote that in particular, the events of January 6th prove that social media platforms need continued infrastructure to combat threats, misinformation, and disinformation.\n\nSpecifically, the members are seeking answers to the following questions:\n\nAs a video-only social media platform, what is TikTok doing regarding detection and enforcement that is different from other mixed content platforms?\n\nHow will your company be more transparent on its enforcement of its community guidelines regarding election integrity, and transparent with the public about actions it has taken?\n\nWill your company commit to sharing data and metrics on the effectiveness of your enforcement systems in relation to US elections and political speech?\n\nHow will TikTok address mis-and-disinformation made by political actors or verified accounts, and how will they be treated differently, if at all, compared to ordinary users?\n\nWill TikTok commit to keeping these election integrity plans in place beyond election day and keeping Congress fully informed about potential changes?\n\nClick HERE to read the letter or read the full text below:\n\nDear Mr. Chew:\n\nWe write to TikTok as concerned Members of Congress, seeking further information about the social media platform\u2019s preparation for, and response to, the spread of misinformation and disinformation, or the potential incitement to violence on your platform in advance of the 2022 and 2024 United States Elections. We have already seen how videos with disinformation have spread on this platform in our country and other countries during election cycles and continue to be concerned with the company\u2019s ability to react efficiently and effectively to misinformation and disinformation, or to any potential incitement of violence.\n\nWe commend TikTok for taking down over 347,225 videos in 2020 in the United States for \u201celection misinformation, disinformation, or manipulated media.\u201d We understand that as a video-based platform TikTok has its own set of challenges for content moderation and monitoring, as well as enforcing community guidelines. The video medium makes certain content more difficult to detect, monitor, fact-check, and moderate.\n\nFollowing the 2020 election cycle, TikTok released a report on what the company believed it could improve for the next election. This included proactively detecting disinformation, preventing repeat offenders from circumventing the rules, educating creators and brands on political ads, and launching their in-app election guide sooner. Of these four goals, only two were mentioned in the recent \u201cOur Commitment to Election Integrity\u201d report: launching their in-app guide sooner and improved training for creators. While we appreciate the steps that TikTok has taken to outline their plan, we feel that a number of questions were left unanswered by the initial report and the subsequent report on misinformation.\n\nA study from NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights claims that although TikTok has enacted policies regarding election misinformation, TikTok\u2019s \u201chaphazard enforcement has failed to slow the spread\u201d of election deniers. The study found that the terms and hashtags that were banned were quite random \u2014 \u201celection fraud,\u201d for example, was not a searchable term, but \u201cballot trafficking\u201d was allowed. Users have taken advantage of this believed TikTok inconsistency and have found creative ways to circumvent TikTok\u2019s bans since the 2020 election. Some methods include simply changing hashtags from \u201c#StopTheSteal\u201d to \u201c#StopTheSteall\u201d which have allowed millions of users to view election misinformation videos this year, until TikTok was notified and took down the posts. With the perceived lack of strong enforcement, bad actors have already begun to use TikTok to spread distrust and doubt in our upcoming midterm elections, including preemptive claims of voter fraud. We believe that TikTok needs to be more transparent about how the platform\u2019s automated and human systems flag and remove content, and the effectiveness of their systems, especially regarding content related to the Midterm Elections.\n\nAlthough we appreciate the heightened focus on the 2022 and 2024 elections, we believe that TikTok needs to commit to taking action on election and political misinformation year-round. We do not think that major social media apps, including TikTok, should focus on disinformation only during the leadup to elections. As mentioned by the recent report from the Bipartisan Policy Center, in order to fully support our democracy, social media platforms need to incorporate their election efforts into their permanent plans and community guidelines. Over 120 civil rights and democracy groups have called on the major social media companies to \u201cconsistently enforce civic integrity policies during both election and non-election cycles.\u201d We now know from whistleblowers that it was an active decision for social media companies to remove disinformation security measures after the November 2020 election, even though there were continued threats to our democracy and to the legitimacy of our elections. The events of January 6th prove that social media platforms need continued infrastructure to combat threats, misinformation, and disinformation on their platforms.\n\nThank you for your time and attention on this matter. We request a briefing on election integrity and misinformation on your platform before the midterm elections. We would also appreciate answers to the following questions:\n\nAs a video-only social media platform, what is TikTok doing regarding detection and enforcement that is different from other mixed content platforms?\n\nHow will your company be more transparent on its enforcement of its community guidelines regarding election integrity, and transparent with the public about actions it has taken?\n\nWill your company commit to sharing data and metrics on the effectiveness of your enforcement systems in relation to US elections and political speech?\n\nHow will TikTok address mis-and-disinformation made by political actors or verified accounts, and how will they be treated differently, if at all, compared to ordinary users?\n\nWill TikTok commit to keeping these election integrity plans in place beyond election day and keeping Congress fully informed about potential changes?\n\nSincerely,\n\n###", 1, "2026-04-06T14:24:52Z", "2026-04-06T15:54:40Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2656"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.8624980691820383, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}