{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://walkinshaw.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=793", "ICYMI: Op-Ed by Rep. James Walkinshaw: This is the cost of Trump\u2019s ever-widening immigration trap", "2026-08-31", "2026", "2026-08", "Democrat", "House", "VA", "James R. Walkinshaw", "W000831", "walkinshaw.house.gov", "walkinshaw", "https://walkinshaw.house.gov/news/documentquery.aspx?DocumentTypeID=27", "scraper", "In an op-ed published by MSNOW on August 31, 2026, Congressman James Walkinshaw (VA-11) underscores that Trump is closing legal immigration pathways while scaling mass deportation efforts.\n\nRead the op-ed below or online at MSNOW.\n\n\u201cHow many more dads have to die?\u201d\n\nLorenzo Salgado Araujo\u2019s son asked me that question shortly after his 52-year-old father was fatally shot last month by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer.\n\nFor decades, Lorenzo worked construction in Texas to provide for his family. Looking into the eyes of Lorenzo\u2019s two grieving sons, I could see the human cost of President Donald Trump\u2019s mass deportation agenda.\n\nEarlier this year, I traveled to Minneapolis, where the community was grieving Renee Good, a U.S. citizen and mother killed by ICE. After I returned to Washington, I said there would be more deaths if the Trump administration continued its aggressive and unaccountable mass deportation policies.\n\nSadly, I was right.\n\nAt least 10 people have died in encounters with immigration agents since Trump\u2019s crackdown began. Alex Pretti, a U.S. citizen and Department of Veterans Affairs intensive care nurse, was killed in Minneapolis in January by Border Patrol agents. In July, Johan Sebasti\u00e1n Dur\u00e1n Guerrero, a 25-year-old father of a 3-year-old daughter, was fatally shot during an ICE operation in Biddeford, Maine.\n\nThese deaths, hundreds of miles apart, are the foreseeable consequence of immigration enforcement policies that demand arbitrary arrest totals and disregard common sense, constitutional limits and the value of human life.\n\nWorse, the administration is preparing to widen its campaign. Officials are preparing to revoke up to 200,000 business and tourism visas held by people who have sought or are seeking asylum, the Associated Press reported this week. This will be the largest mass revocation of visas in U.S. history.\n\nBut Trump\u2019s immigration trap reaches far beyond people seeking asylum. It ensnares families trying to reunite legally, visa holders facing new uncertainties, longtime workers who have built lives and businesses here and U.S. citizens caught in reckless immigration operations.\n\nFirst, the administration closes legal doors. In January, the State Department paused immigrant visa issuances to applicants from 75 countries. A federal court vacated that policy on Aug. 21. The visa revocation plan now under consideration would take the approach even further.\n\nFederal law allows people seeking protection to apply for asylum regardless of their current immigration status. Claims that do not meet the law should be denied. But an asylum application is not wrong. It is a request for the fair, individualized process our nation\u2019s law requires.\n\nBut after legal avenues are blocked, Trump\u2019s mass deportation apparatus closes in.\n\nWhite House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump\u2019s immigration policy, has publicly said the administration\u2019s target is 3,000 immigration arrests a day. Local law enforcement agencies don\u2019t operate on quotas for good reason. A quota does not consider who someone is or whether they pose a threat. It merely asks how many. By that standard, a father driving his construction crew to a job site counts the same as a violent criminal. So does a man on his way to work in Maine. So does a 5-year-old child. All help meet the arbitrary quota.\n\nFive-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos was caught in that trap. Photos went viral earlier this year when ICE detained Liam, an innocent in a blue bunny hat, with his father despite a pending asylum case and no order directing their removal at the time. Ordering their release, U.S. District Judge Fred Biery wrote that the case grew from an \u201cill-conceived and incompetently-implemented government pursuit of daily deportation quotas, apparently even if it requires traumatizing children.\u201d\n\nThe administration says it is targeting \u201cthe worst of the worst.\u201d But the facts tell a different story. The overwhelming majority of individuals detained by ICE have committed no violent crime. In fact, the focus on quotas has caused ICE and other federal law enforcement agencies to relax their focus on public safety, reassigning investigators away from fentanyl and child sex trafficking work.\n\nThat\u2019s not what Americans want. Half of Americans say this deportation campaign has gone too far, including nearly one-quarter of the people who voted for Trump in 2024, according to Politico polling conducted Aug. 8-12. Gallup polling in June found that 73% say immigration is a good thing for the country. They want secure borders, rules people can understand, timely decisions and enforcement focused on genuine threats to public safety.\n\nAs the only House Democrat serving on both the homeland security and oversight committees, I have watched accountability inside ICE collapse. In a closed-door briefing in July, ICE officials told members of Congress that the agency had received 56 excessive-force complaints since Trump returned to office. Thirty-two were cleared and the rest were still under investigation as of the briefing. One officer had been referred for possible discipline. No officer had actually been disciplined as of that briefing. Think about that: ICE has 22,000 officers, and not one has faced disciplinary action for violating use-of-force policies.\n\nLast year, Republicans approved $170 billion to expand immigration enforcement. In June, they added an additional $70 billion in funding for ICE and Border Patrol through 2029.\n\nInstead of making these agencies come back to Congress each year and answer for their actions and how they use the money, Republicans locked in funding for years. They did it without adding commonsense reforms such as requiring judicial warrants before agents enter homes, mandating body cameras, and seeking independent investigations when someone is hurt or killed.\n\nThat was a choice. The Republican majority chose the blank check, and it has refused to work with Democrats on the lifesaving reforms we are still seeking.\n\nCongress can fund border security and still demand accountability from the agencies that carry it out. It should reopen legal doors, replace arbitrary arrest quotas with focused enforcement, and require judicial warrants, body cameras and independent investigations when people are hurt or killed.", 1, "2026-09-01T09:48:49Z", "2026-09-01T09:49:51Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://walkinshaw.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=793"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 1.3681799173355103, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}