{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://watsoncoleman.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/watson-coleman-and-swalwell-lead-letter-to-require-equality-for-women-in-maternity-care-insurance-coverage", "Watson Coleman and Swalwell Lead Letter to Require Equality for Women in Maternity Care Insurance Coverage", "2021-07-07", "2021", "2021-07", "Democrat", "House", "NJ", "Bonnie Watson Coleman", "W000822", "watsoncoleman.house.gov", "watsoncoleman", "https://watsoncoleman.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases", "scraper", "Representatives Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12) and Eric Swalwell (CA-15) today led 40 of their colleagues in asking Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra to issue guidance that federally-funded and federally-administered health insurers must cover all pregnancy and pregnancy-related services, including coverage of maternity care for dependents.\n\n\u201cIt would be illogical and contrary to the ACA to require coverage of some costs, including prenatal care, but not the most significant costs, including those for labor and delivery,\u201d the Members wrote. \u201cWe applaud the Biden Administration\u2019s work to expand access to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. We urge you to continue your work and issue further guidance that all costs related to pregnancy should be covered for insured individuals\u2019 dependent children.\u201d\n\nThe Affordable Care Act (ACA) was instrumental in expanding access to and improving the quality of insurance coverage for pregnant and birthing people. Prior to the ACA, most individual market plans did not include any maternity care, while other insurers sold separate maternity coverage for an additional fee. The ACA resulted in the uninsured rate among new mothers decreasing by 41 percent between 2012-2013 and 2015-2016.\n\nThe Department of Health and Human Services clarified in 2015 that plans covering dependent children must cover women\u2019s preventive care services, including prenatal care, for the dependent child. However, that coverage is not comprehensive and significant costs like labor and delivery are often excluded.\n\nThe Members\u2019 letter argues that failing to cover all of the costs of a dependent child, including for maternity care, violates Section 1557 of the ACA\u2019s policy against gender discrimination. It further notes that allowing insurers to exclude all aspects of maternity care for dependents disproportionately impacts women of color.\n\nJoining Reps. Watson Coleman and Swalwell on the letter are Reps. Cooper, Nadler, Tonko, Cohen, Moore, Grijalva, Wild, McCollum, Hayes, Maloney, Beatty, Brownley, Pressley, Schakowsky, Pocan, Lee, Speier, Chu, Bernice Johnson, Johnson, Vel\u00e1zquez, C\u00e1rdenas, McBath, Carson, DeSaulnier, Dean, Cicilline, Bass, Norton, Lawson, Meng, Roybal-Allard, Auchincloss, Clarke, Kelly, Bush, Lawrence, Allred, Williams, and Gallego.\n\nThe letter is supported by the National Women\u2019s Law Center, the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, NARAL Pro-Choice America, and March of Dimes.\n\nThe full text of the House letter can be found below:\n\nThe Honorable Xavier Becerra\n\nDepartment of Health and Human Services\n\n200 Independence Avenue, Southwest\n\nWashington, D.C. 20201\n\nDear Secretary Becerra:\n\nWe urge you to clarify and issue guidance that federally funded or federally administered health insurers must cover all pregnancy and pregnancy-related services, including coverage of maternity care for dependents.\n\nThe Affordable Care Act (ACA) was instrumental in expanding access to and improving the quality of insurance coverage for pregnant and birthing people. Prior to the ACA, most individual market plans did not include any maternity care, while other insurers sold separate maternity coverage for an additional fee. The ACA resulted in the uninsured rate among new mothers decreasing by 41 percent between 2012-2013 and 2015-2016.\n\nAbout 4.2 million women ages 19 to 25 have coverage as dependents on their parent\u2019s employer insurance plan. Many women give birth to their first child in this age range: almost half of women with some college education have children before 25 and the median age to have children is 24 for women with a high school diploma or less. Although most job-based health plans must cover pregnancy-related care for employees and their spouses, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should make clear that insurance companies covered by the ACA must provide all aspects of maternity coverage to dependent children.\n\nRoutine tests and services, including chromosomal screenings and ultrasounds for office visits, as well as labor and delivery costs, are not routinely covered for adult dependents. A North Carolina state health plan for 2021, for example, even specifically excludes maternity care for dependent children. This requires pregnant people to pay out of pocket for these services, and some of these costs can be crippling. The average hospital bill for a vaginal delivery costs $30,570, while those who undergo a C-section delivery stay in the hospital an average of three days and on average are billed $47,360.\n\nSection 1557 of the ACA broadly prohibits sex discrimination and applies to most health insurance companies, which are considered \u201ccovered entities\u201d because they receive federal financial assistance through various programs, including the premium tax credits. While the Pregnancy Discrimination Act only applies to employees and their spouses, Section 1557 prohibits exclusion of maternity care for dependents of any covered health insurer because it prohibits sex discrimination against all enrollees and beneficiaries. By failing to cover maternity care for dependent children, insurers would be denying coverage on the basis of sex as only women incur the costs of bearing children.\n\nFurthermore, removing this discriminatory policy would disproportionately benefit communities of color. Black women are more than three times more likely to have a maternal death than white women in the United States and research has shown that allowing young adults to stay on their parents\u2019 health insurance plans until age 26 is associated with increased early prenatal care, more adequate prenatal care, and a lower rate of preterm birth.\n\nFinally, in 2015, HHS clarified that plans covering dependent children needed to cover pregnant individuals\u2019 preventive care services, including prenatal care, for the dependent child. It would be illogical and contrary to the ACA to require coverage of some costs, including prenatal care, but not the most significant costs, including those for labor and delivery.\n\nWe applaud the Biden Administration\u2019s work to expand access to healthcare during the COVID- 19 pandemic. We urge you to continue your work and issue further guidance that all costs related to pregnancy should be covered for insured individuals\u2019 dependent children.\n\nThank you for your consideration.", 1, "2026-03-30T01:40:41Z", "2026-04-06T20:03:51Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://watsoncoleman.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/watson-coleman-and-swalwell-lead-letter-to-require-equality-for-women-in-maternity-care-insurance-coverage"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.7614409551024437, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}