{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://web.archive.org/web/20131204114624/http://stutzman.house.gov/press_releases/285", "Stutzman and Colleagues Urge Continued Farm Bill Separation", "2013-10-30", "2013", "2013-10", "Republican", "House", "IN", "Marlin Stutzman", "S001188", "web.archive.org", null, null, "legacy", "Stutzman and Colleagues Urge Continued Farm Bill Separation \n                       House Members request Farm Bill conferees keep farm and food stamp policy separate \n                      \r\n                      \tWashington, D.C. \u2013 As the Farm Bill Conference Committee meets for the first time today, U.S. Congressman Marlin Stutzman led a group of 27 members of the House in urging the committee to keep farm policy and food stamp policy separate.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tStutzman and his colleagues in the House asked the committee to maintain the separate reauthorization dates for food stamp and farm policy programs to ensure that each program receives separate consideration on its own merits in the future.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u201cWashington is $17 trillion in debt and taxpayers deserve an honest conversation about how Congress spends their money,\u201d said Stutzman. \u201cInstead of passing trillion dollar spending packages that are Farm Bills in name only, we should consider food stamps and farm policy separately. That\u2019s exactly what the House did earlier this year and the Conference Committee shouldn\u2019t reverse this historic victory for transparency.\u201d\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tIn the letter, members write in part, \u201cOur constituents deserve a Congress that thoughtfully and separately considers the legislation that it passes. It\u2019s just common sense. And in a historic move this summer, the House of Representatives did just that. For the first time in nearly 40 years, the House voted on and passed separate and substantive reform bills governing farm and food stamp policy.\u201d\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u201cNow that substantial reforms have been made, we request the Conference Committee adopt the separate reauthorization timelines, three years for food stamps and five years for farm policy, in order to ensure that these policies are debated and voted on apart from each other in the future. It\u2019s time to do this right.\u201d\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tThe full text of the letter and a list of cosigners can be found below. An electronic copy of the letter is available here.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tDear Conferees,\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tWe write to express our strong support for maintaining the separate reauthorization timelines that were included in the House-passed Farm Bill, H.R. 2642, the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013 and the House-passed food stamp reauthorization bill, H.R. 3102, the Nutrition Reform and Work Opportunity Act of 2013.\u00a0\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tAs you know, for decades reauthorization bills for farm policy and food stamp policy have been combined together. Because of this union, mutually-assured and dramatic growth has occurred with respect to both policies. As a combined piece of legislation, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected the Senate Farm Bill to cost nearly one trillion dollars over ten years \u2013 with an astonishing 80 percent of this spending going towards the food stamp program. This kind of \u201cFarm Bill\u201d can hardly be called a Farm Bill at all.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tThe American people are tired of this type of out-of-control spending and irresponsible \u201csausage-making.\u201d Our constituents deserve a Congress that thoughtfully and separately considers the legislation that it passes. It\u2019s just common sense. And in a historic move this summer, the House of Representatives did just that. For the first time in nearly 40 years, the House voted on and passed separate and substantive reform bills governing farm and food stamp policy.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tThe House-passed Farm Bill, H.R. 2642 enacted major changes to the farm safety-net by eliminating direct payments, repealing or consolidating more than 100 programs administered by the USDA and saving taxpayers $12.8 billion over ten years, in addition to the $6 billion in sequestration cuts already made to Farm Bill programs. The separate House-passed food stamp reauthorization bill, H.R. 3102 also pursued dramatic reform, saving taxpayers nearly $40 billion over ten years. This was done by scaling back automatic qualifications for the food stamp program known as categorical eligibility, eliminating the ability for states to waive work requirements for able-bodied adults without children, by giving states the opportunity to establish similar successful TANF-style work provisions on parents with dependents, clarifying states\u2019 ability to require drug-testing for applicants and preventing certain convicted felons from receiving benefits.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tTransparency is the surest way to guarantee good public policy and that our constituents\u2019 voices are heard in the halls of Congress. Now that substantial reforms have been made, we request the Conference Committee adopt the separate reauthorization timelines, three years for food stamps and five years for farm policy, in order to ensure that these policies are debated and voted on apart from each other in the future. It\u2019s time to do this right.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tWe strongly urge you to adopt these historic changes and thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.\r\n                      \r\n                      \t\u00a0\r\n                      \r\n                      \tMarlin Stutzman (IN-3), Joe Barton (TX-6), Kerry Bentivolio (MI-11), Jim Bridenstine (OK-1), Paul Broun (GA-10), Ron DeSantis (FL-6), Jeff Duncan (SC-3), John Fleming (LA-4), Trent Franks (AZ-8), Louie Gohmert (TX-1), Paul Gosar (AZ-4), Bill Huizenga (MI-2),Jim Jordan (OH-4), Raul Labrador (ID-1), Doug Lamborn (CO-5), Cynthia Lummis (WY- At Large), Thomas Massie (KY-4), Tom McClintock (CA-4), Mick Mulvaney (SC-5), Joe Pitts (PA-16), Mike Pompeo (KA-4), Matt Salmon (AZ-5), Steve Scalise (LA-1), David Schweikert (AZ-6), Chris Stewart (UT-2), Randy Weber (TX-14), Lynn Westmoreland (GA-3).", 1, "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z", "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://web.archive.org/web/20131204114624/http://stutzman.house.gov/press_releases/285"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 1.5342161059379578, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}