{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://web.archive.org/web/20140221043139/http://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/Article.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1502=47768", "Grassley, Reed Seeks Answers on Expungement of Investor Complaints", "2013-12-16", "2013", "2013-12", "Republican", "House", "IA", "Charles Grassley", "G000386", "web.archive.org", null, null, "legacy", "WASHINGTON, DC \u2013 In an effort to protect investors and the integrity of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority\u2019s (FINRA) BrokerCheck program, U.S. Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) today sent a bipartisan letter asking FINRA to clarify and strengthen standards for expungement of investor complaints against brokers. Citing a recent Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association (PIABA) study, which found that FINRA arbitrators granted expungement relief in 96.9% of cases from May 2009 through December 2011, the U.S. Senators said they are concerned about the number of times investor complaints may be expunged, or removed, from publicly available broker records maintained by FINRA via BrokerCheck. The Senators wrote: \u201cWe share FINRA\u2019s view that \u2018expungement is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted only under appropriate circumstances,\u2019 and that it should be permitted \u2018only when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value.\u2019\u00a0 However, we believe that meaningful investor protection includes the disclosure of whether a customer dispute was settled.\u00a0\u00a0 Not just for transparency sake, but also to help prospective investors make informed decisions about which individuals or firms with whom to do business.\u201d In an effort to determine if the high percentage of expungements are warranted, the Senators asked FINRA to publicly detail the number of instances in which FINRA has questioned or challenged the provision of expungement relief and provide a detailed description of the circumstances of each case.\u00a0 The Senators also asked FINRA to respond to the recommended changes cited in the PIABA study and explain whether FINRA intends to adopt each recommendation.\u00a0 Full text of the letter follows (PDF attached here): December 16, 2013 Mr. Richard G. Ketchum  \nChairman and Chief Executive Officer  \nFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority  \n1735 K Street, NW  \nWashington, DC 20006 Dear Mr. Ketchum: Given our interest in improving transparency of our financial markets, we are writing in response to a recent Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association (PIABA) study, which raises concerns about the number of times investor complaints may be expunged, or removed, from publicly available broker records maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).\u00a0 FINRA provides information to investors through BrokerCheck, which FINRA believes, \u201cshould be the first resource investors turn to when choosing whether to do business or continue to do business with a particular firm or individual.\u201d\u00a0 However, as the PIABA study indicates, this system may not enable investors to easily obtain all the information necessary to determine whether to hire a particular FINRA registered broker.\u00a0 According to the PIABA study, expungement relief was granted in 96.9% of cases from May 2009 through December 2011. We share FINRA\u2019s view that \u201cexpungement is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted only under appropriate circumstances,\u201d and that it should be permitted \u201conly when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value.\u201d\u00a0 However, we believe that meaningful investor protection includes the disclosure of whether a customer dispute was settled.\u00a0\u00a0 Not just for transparency sake, but also to help prospective investors make informed decisions about which individuals or firms with whom to do business. Given our interest in fair financial markets and transparency, we request that you provide a response to each of the five recommendations cited in the PIABA study and explain whether and why or why not FINRA intends to adopt each recommendation.\u00a0 Additionally, please provide: 1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The number of instances in which FINRA has questioned or challenged the provision of expungement relief and a detailed description of the circumstances of each case. 2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Any draft legislative language that would be necessary to provide FINRA with the authority to ensure that expungment relief is provided \u201conly when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value,\u201d if you do not believe such authority already exists. Please provide a response by January 6, 2014.\u00a0 Thank you for your attention to this important matter.\u00a0 Sincerely, Jack Reed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0  \nCharles E. Grassley", 1, "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z", "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://web.archive.org/web/20140221043139/http://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/Article.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1502=47768"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.9281891398131847, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}