{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://web.archive.org/web/20140221043157/http://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/Article.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1502=47748", "Grassley Health Care Provisions Advance in Key Committee Bill", "2013-12-12", "2013", "2013-12", "Republican", "House", "IA", "Charles Grassley", "G000386", "web.archive.org", null, null, "legacy", "WASHINGTON \u2013 Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa today received key committee approval of his measures to increase fair treatment of Iowa doctors in Medicare, improve spending for health care oversight, and increase the transparency of Medicare payments to doctors, among other measures.  \n\u00a0  \n\u201cThese provisions increase value and transparency in federal health care programs,\u201d Grassley said.\u00a0 \u201cIt\u2019s important to advance bipartisan measures that make Medicare and Medicaid work better for beneficiaries and taxpayers.\u201d  \n\u00a0  \nGrassley filed amendments that were accepted during the Finance Committee\u2019s consideration of a Medicare physician payment bill.\u00a0 Grassley amendments passed by the committee include:  \n\u00a0  \n--A provision to provide for the improved use of funds received by the Department Health and Human Services for oversight and investigative activities.\u00a0 The department\u2019s Office of the Inspector General protects the integrity of HHS programs and the health and welfare of the people they serve.\u00a0 The inspector general\u2019s office is responsible for providing oversight of nearly $1 trillion in HHS spending oversight, or about $0.24 of every federal dollar. Its responsibilities have grown with expanded programs including the Affordable Care Act.\u00a0 Grassley\u2019s provision allows the inspector general to receive and retain three percent of all collections pursuant to civil debt collection actions related to false claims or frauds involving the Medicare program.  \n\u00a0  \n--A provision to help Iowa providers who are geographically disadvantaged by Medicare compared to those in other areas of the country.\u00a0\u00a0 Under current law, the Medicare fee schedule is adjusted geographically for three factors to reflect differences in the cost of resources needed to produce physician services: physician work, practice expense, and medical malpractice insurance.\u00a0\u00a0 The Grassley amendment makes permanent the existing floor 1.0 on the physician work index under the Medicare physician fee schedule, which helps Iowa providers receive fair reimbursement relative to their peers in other parts of the country, so they are encouraged to continue serving Iowans.  \n\u00a0  \n--An extension of provisions to help rural hospitals.\u00a0 Grassley and Sen. Chuck Schumer included language to continue the Medicare-dependent hospital program and enhanced low-volume Medicare adjustment for prospective payment system hospitals.\u00a0 These provisions are helpful for rural hospitals in low population areas that are more dependent on Medicare than their urban counterparts and provide valuable health care to their communities.  \n\u00a0  \n--Language that would make Medicare claims data available to the public.\u00a0 Both the House and Senate versions of legislation addressing the Medicare physician payment formula include the key provisions from Grassley and Sen. Ron Wyden\u2019s Medicare Data Access for Transparency and Accountability Act (Medicare DATA Act). This would establish a free, searchable Medicare payment database that would be readily available to the public online at no cost.\u00a0 Today\u2019s action is the first time the legislation has passed out of the committee.  \n\u00a0  \n\u201cTransparency draws in the public and invites analysis of policy and spending,\u201d Grassley said. \u201cMore transparency has made a difference in accountability in the tax-exempt sector, and it does the same wherever it\u2019s applied in health care.\u201d  \n\u00a0  \n--A fix to a provision in the underlying bill that created a potential disincentive for providers to participate in Medicaid.\u00a0\u00a0 Doctors are increasingly reluctant to participate in Medicaid, yet their participation is critical to the level of service provided by the program.  \n\u00a0  \n--A provision directing a study by the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) of individuals whose shifting income and other changing status makes it difficult to track their eligibility for Medicaid or transitional medical assistance.\u00a0 \u201cUnderstanding the volatility in income for these individuals will be helpful in informing future policy making,\u201d Grassley said.  \n\u00a0  \nGrassley also spoke in favor of an amendment from Sen. Debbie Stabenow to establish criteria for Federally Qualified Community Behavioral Health Centers to ensure the centers cover a broad range of mental health services, including 24-hour crisis care, increased integration of physical, mental and substance abuse treatment so they are treated simultaneously rather than separately, and expanded support for families of people living with mental health issues.  \n\u00a0  \nOn the underlying bill approved by the committee on voice vote today, Grassley said he supported repeal of the sustainable growth rate and the replacement bill but urged caution and careful analysis of the replacement bill\u2019s effects, especially on certain kinds of providers. \u00a0  \n\u00a0  \n\u201cIf it ends up that the formula in this bill hurts mostly rural providers or mostly providers who treat complex patients or mostly providers who are specialists or mostly providers who are already high quality performers, we can come back and fix it legislatively, even though we all know the winners under the formula will fight against any change,\u201d Grassley said.\u00a0 \u201cThe bill does provide the Secretary authority to fix the problem herself if Congress doesn\u2019t act.\u00a0 Therefore, we could be dependent on the Secretary\u2019s use of her authority to fix problems as they arise.\u00a0 However, the bill does not allow for judicial review of the Secretary\u2019s use of this broad authority if providers think this authority is being used in an arbitrary manner.\u00a0 I am supportive of the bill but remain concerned with the uncertainty of how it will ultimately be implemented.\u201d \u00a0  \n\u00a0  \nGrassley is former chairman and ranking member of the Finance Committee, with jurisdiction over Medicare and Medicaid.\u00a0 He is a senior member of the committee.  \n\u00a0  \n\n-30-", 1, "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z", "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://web.archive.org/web/20140221043157/http://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/Article.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1502=47748"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 1.2850770726799965, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}