{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://www.capito.senate.gov/news/press-releases/video-capito-urges-support-for-cra-resolution-blocking-harmful-clean-power-plan-regulations-", "VIDEO: Capito Urges Support for CRA Resolution Blocking Harmful Clean Power Plan Regulations", "2015-11-17", "2015", "2015-11", "Republican", "House", "WV", "Shelley Capito", "C001047", "www.capito.senate.gov", null, null, "legacy", "11.17.15\n\t\t\t VIDEO: Capito Urges Support for CRA Resolution Blocking Harmful Clean Power Plan Regulations  \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t\n\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n        \n\t\t\t\t Congress should pass this resolution and place this critical issue squarely on President Obamas desk. Americas economic future is at stake. It is time to send a clear signal that enough is enough. - Senator Capito\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t \nWASHINGTON, D.C.  U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) spoke on the Senate floor this morning in support of the bipartisan resolution she introduced with Senator Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) under the Congressional Review Act to block harmful Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for existing power plants. The Senate will vote today on this resolution along with a bipartisan resolution introduced by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to stop regulations that attack new coal-fired energy plants and their workers.\r\nVideo of Senator Capitos speech and the remarks as prepared for delivery are included below.\r\nRemarks as prepared for delivery:\r\nThank you, Mister President.\r\nToday, I rise to speak in support of my resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act against EPAs greenhouse gas regulation targeting existing power sources.\r\nI am proud to have the support of Senator Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and 47 cosponsors in this bipartisan effort to stop the existing coal plant rule.\r\nWe have had a lot of discussion about this. It affects all of our states differently. But I think its important to talk not just about what this does to our individual states, but what its going to do to the country as a whole.\r\nIf the administrations proposed Clean Power Plan moves forward, hardship will be felt across the country.\r\nFewer job opportunities, higher power bills and less reliable electricity will result.\r\nWest Virginia, and other coal producing states like Kentucky and Wyoming, are feeling the pain caused by prior EPA regulations.\r\nNearly 7,000 WARN notices, or notifications to employees under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act that they could be laid off within 60 days, have been issued at West Virginia mining facilities in 2015. More than 2,600 of those were issued last month alone.\r\nOur neighboring state of Kentucky lost more than 10 percent of its coal jobs during the first quarter of this year. Kentuckys coal employment now stands at its lowest level since the 1920s.\r\n\r\nThe Energy Information Administrations most recent annual coal report for 2013 showed that the average number of coal mine employees dropped by roughly 10 percent in other coal producing states like Alabama, Utah and Virginia.\r\n\r\nAccording to the Mine Safety and Health Administration, coal mining employment nationally has dropped by a massive 31 percent in just the last four years.\r\n\r\n\r\n---\r\n\r\nThe impact of the war on coal extends far beyond the coal industry.\r\n\r\nThese regulations are affecting all aspects of Americans lives.\r\n\r\nLast month, West Virginias governor announced that most state agencies would have to endure four percent cuts, largely because of shrinking energy tax revenues.\r\n\r\nFor the first time in many years, the governor cut our education budget in the state of West Virginia because of this war on coal.\r\n\r\nThat means less money for roads, for schools and for health care services.\r\n\r\nBut the terrible impact that prior regulations have had on West Virginia and the nation would get far worse if EPAs Clean Power Plan goes into effect.\r\n\r\n---\r\n\r\nThe Clean Power Plan is the most expensive environmental regulation that EPA has ever proposed on our nations power sector.\r\n\r\nCompliance spending is estimated to total $29 billion to $39 billion per year.\r\n\r\nHousehold spending power  the money that American families have in their pockets - will be reduced by $64 billion to $79 billion by this rule.\r\n\r\nA new study by the National Economic Research Associates (NERA), a respected economic analysis firm, of the final rule found that electricity prices in West Virginia would increase between 13 and 22 percent.\r\n\r\nBut West Virginia will certainly not be alone in enduring higher energy prices and job loss.\r\n\r\nNERA projects that all of the lower 48 states will see their electricity prices go up under the Clean Power Plan.\r\n\r\nAs many as 41 states could see electricity prices increase by at least 10 percent.\r\n\r\nTwenty-eight states could see electricity prices increase by at least 20 percent.\r\n\r\nWhat does that mean for our nations economy?\r\n\r\nThe National Rural Electric Cooperative Association found that a 10 percent increase in electricity prices could mean 1.2 million jobs lost across the country.\r\n\r\nHalf a million of those lost jobs would be in rural communities.\r\n\r\nThe National Black Chamber of Commerce found that the Clean Power Plan would increase poverty among blacks by 23 percent and poverty among Hispanics by 26 percent.\r\n\r\nAffordable energy matters, especially to those living on fixed incomes. Households earning less than $30,000 per year spend an average of 23 percent of their income on energy costs.\r\n\r\nThese families will suffer most under the administrations policies.\r\n\r\nEnergy reliability also matters.\r\n\r\nCoal is a source of base load generation, and the administration wants to replace coal with intermittent sources.\r\n\r\nWhat does that mean?\r\n\r\nOn a hot day, when air conditioners are running and factories are operating, we can be confident that a coal-fired power plant will be supplying the electricity needed to cool our homes and keep our businesses running.\r\n\r\nIn the cold winter of 2014, when demand for electric heat surged, coal was the energy source that utilities relied on to keep families warm.\r\n\r\nRenewable sources can play an important role in our countrys energy mix, but there will always be times when the wind doesnt blow or the sun doesnt shine.\r\n\r\nIt is critical that we preserve more reliable energy sources to meet the demand of powering our economy.\r\n\r\n---\r\n\r\nInnovation, not across the board regulation, should be our focus.\r\n\r\nBut these regulations will not spur innovation.\r\n\r\nThe Clean Power Plan sets a standard for new plants that cannot be met by the best commercially available technology. That not only flies in the face of the Clean Air Act, but also makes gradual improvements in technology that would improve our environment impossible to implement.\r\n\r\nThe effect will be to instead choke off our most reliable and affordable source of energy and devastate the livelihoods of many folks around this country.\r\n\r\nPrior to this administration, our country did a laudable job in protecting and improving our environment while promoting economic growth.\r\n\r\nLast week marked the 25th anniversary of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments, which were signed into law by President George H.W. Bush and supported by senators across the political spectrum.\r\n\r\nOur air is now the cleanest it has been in decades. We continue to reduce harmful pollutants like sulfur dioxide, as our energy consumption increases and our population grows.\r\n\r\nSince 2005, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions have fallen by 13 percent. According to EIA, West Virginia emitted 19 percent less carbon dioxide from energy production in 2013 than it did in 2000.\r\n\r\nWe should continue to protect our environment, but not at the expense of our families, our communities and our economy. \r\n\r\n ----\r\n\r\nWith this rulemaking, the EPA is attempting to impose the same type of cap-and-trade system that Congress rejected just five years ago.\r\n\r\nHaving failed at its attempt to pass cap-and-trade legislation, the administration is taking a second bite at the apple by claiming authority under the Clean Air Act to impose a regulatory cap-and-trade program.\r\n\r\nThis raises an obvious question  if EPA had cap-and-trade authority all along, why did the administration go to such great lengths to attempt to pass cap-and-trade legislation?\r\n\r\nThe answer is clear: the Clean Air Act does not authorize a mandatory carbon cap-and-trade program.\r\n\r\nWith its Clean Power Plan, EPA ignores forty-years of history and prior regulations that, consistent with the law, always based standards on controls installed at an existing plant.\r\n\r\nLet me be clear: in the 40-year history of the Clean Air Act, EPA has never issued an existing plant program like this one. As one EPA official summed it up to the New York Times: The legal interpretation is challenging. This effectively hasnt been done.\r\n\r\nRather than regulate existing plants using the best available technology, EPA is instead attempting to regulate the entire energy grid.\r\n\r\nThis has not been done before because the Clean Air Act does not authorize EPA to do it.\r\n\r\nBoth states and the private sector are doing what they can to fight back against this regulatory overreach.\r\n\r\nWest Virginia is one of 27 states that have filed lawsuits seeking to block this rule.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, 24 national trade associations, 37 rural electric cooperatives, 10 major companies and three labor union representing 878,000 members are challenging the EPAs final Clean Power Plan in court.\r\n\r\n--\r\n\r\nIn less than two weeks, international climate negotiations will begin.\r\n\r\nThe world is watching to see whether the United States will foolishly move forward with costly regulations that will do virtually nothing to protect our environment.\r\n\r\nUnder the Congressional Review Act, the Senate now has the chance to take a real up or down vote on whether EPAs Clean Power Plan can and should move forward. This is a legally binding resolution that, if successful, will prevent the Clean Power Plan or a similar rule from taking effect.\r\n\r\nPassing this resolution will send a clear message to the world that a majority of the U.S. Congress does not stand behind the presidents efforts to address climate change with economically catastrophic regulations.\r\n\r\nPassing this resolution will also demonstrate to the American people that the Senate understands the need for affordable and reliable energy.\r\n\r\nCongress should pass this resolution and place this critical issue squarely on President Obamas desk.\r\n\r\nAmericas economic future is at stake.\r\n\r\nIt is time to send a clear signal that enough is enough.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n  Clickhereor the image above for video of Senator Capitos speech.\n\r\n###", 1, "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z", "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://www.capito.senate.gov/news/press-releases/video-capito-urges-support-for-cra-resolution-blocking-harmful-clean-power-plan-regulations-"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 1.6303951852023602, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}