{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=38B992B4-F1CA-4C6B-B008-D35E1433C4AE", "Graham: Watergate-Style Investigation Needed for Jack Smith, Judge Boasberg\u2019s Constitutional Abuses", "2025-10-31", "2025", "2025-10", "Republican", "Senate", "SC", "Lindsey Graham", "G000359", "www.lgraham.senate.gov", "graham", "https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases", "scraper", "WASHINGTON \u2013 U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) today made this statement after it was made public that Special Counsel Jack Smith subpoenaed Graham\u2019s official and campaign phone records. U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg issued a gag order to Verizon, Graham\u2019s carrier, instructing them not to notify Graham of the subpoena because \u201csuch disclosure will result in the destruction of evidence or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation.\u201d However, if an official phone number is subpoenaed, the carrier is required to inform the Senate. Verizon did not.\n\n\u201cIt is now clear that my official and campaign phone records were subpoenaed by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Worse, a judicial gag order was issued prohibiting me from being informed of the subpoena for at least a year because Judge Boasberg believed that if I were informed, it would lead to witness tampering and destruction of evidence. That is legal slander. I would like to know the factual predicate for issuing the gag order.\n\n\u201cMy carrier, Verizon, was extremely irresponsible by complying with this subpoena. Instead, they should have followed AT&T\u2019s example and declined to turn over the records because it is a violation of the speech and debate clause of the U.S. Constitution. I also expect the House of Representatives to investigate Judge Boasberg\u2019s potential misconduct, which could be grounds for his impeachment.\n\n\u201cThe misconduct here is worthy of a Watergate-style investigation. It is my firm belief that there should be a Senate Select Committee formed to get to the bottom of this constitutional abuse and potential ethical and legal misconduct by Jack Smith as well as any potential judicial misconduct by Judge Boasberg. This model served the nation well during Watergate, and it is appropriate for the gravity of the offenses. This fishing expedition against at least ten Republican U.S. Senators by Special Counsel Jack Smith is the biggest violation of separation of powers in our nation\u2019s history.\n\n\u201cThe driver of this outrageous conduct was a desire to stop President Trump\u2019s 2024 campaign for president. Three days after Donald Trump announced he would seek the presidency on November 15, 2022, Jack Smith was appointed special counsel. Within months, 91 felony indictments were issued primarily in the deepest blue jurisdictions of the country against President Trump. What was a trickle before his announcement became an avalanche all because he dared seek the presidency again. I am convinced that if Donald Trump had chosen not to run, none of this would have happened.\u201d", 1, "2026-03-30T01:40:41Z", "2026-04-06T19:32:54Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=38B992B4-F1CA-4C6B-B008-D35E1433C4AE"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.9179310873150826, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}