{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["https://www.murray.senate.gov/murray-sanders-baldwin-demand-reversal-explanation-of-trump-admins-banned-word-list-that-threatens-families-access-to-head-start-programs-nationwide/", "Murray, Sanders, Baldwin Demand Reversal, Explanation of Trump Admin\u2019s \u201cBanned Word\u201d List That Threatens Families\u2019 Access to Head Start Programs Nationwide", "2025-12-19", "2025", "2025-12", "Democrat", "Senate", "WA", "Patty Murray", "M001111", "www.murray.senate.gov", "murray", "https://www.murray.senate.gov/category/press-releases/", "scraper", "Washington, D.C. \u2014 Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee; Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP); and Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Ranking Member of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies, sent a letter to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calling on him to immediately reverse and explain the Department of Health and Human Services\u2019 (HHS) guidance prohibiting the use of nearly 200 words associated with \u201cDEI\u201d in Head Start funding applications\u2014including words like \u201cwomen,\u201d \u201cdisability,\u201d \u201cTribal,\u201d and \u201cmental health.\u201d The Department has threatened that funding could be denied for Head Start centers if these words are used\u2014despite the fact that the bipartisan statute authorizing the Head Start program specifically requires Head Start centers to work to meet goals associated with these words.\n\n\u201cWe write to express our outrage at recent U.S. Health and Human Services actions to prohibit Head Start grantees from providing services that are clearly permitted under the law, like training teachers on how best to care for children with disabilities or enabling Tribes to serve their own members. As part of enforcing your illegal guidance banning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), the Office of Head Start has now prohibited nearly 200 words and phrases,\u201d write the Senators. \u201cYour actions directly conflict with the statutory requirements established by Congress on a bipartisan basis under the Head Start Act to provide community-driven services and supportive classrooms for children with disabilities, and they force Head Start grantees to make an impossible and unacceptable choice between complying with the law or bending to the Administration\u2019s unlawful DEI ban to keep their funding. The chaos you are creating is already jeopardizing services for nearly 700,000 young children across this country.\u201d\n\nThe Senators note that a Trump administration policy banning \u201cDEI\u201d initiatives \u201cwas accompanied by a list of nearly 200 banned words and phrases, such as \u2018disability,\u2019 \u2018women,\u2019 \u2018Tribal,\u2019 and \u2018mental health\u2019\u2014all words that are explicitly referenced in the Head Start Act and that are integral to fulfilling the program\u2019s statutory purpose.\u201d\n\nHHS has claimed in court that there is no \u201ccredible threat of enforcement\u201d in regard to their own policy banning DEI, but the American Civil Liberties Union has found evidence that the Trump Administration has been enforcing the \u201cbanned words\u201d\u2014actively rejecting or modifying grant applications based on the policy. The Senators further detail: \u201cCourt filings document instances in which programs were instructed to remove trainings on supporting children with autism, and in which Tribal programs were directed to remove preferences for Tribal members from their eligibility criteria. These directives directly contradict the Head Start Act, which explicitly permits American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start programs to prioritize Tribal membership or other criteria selected by the Tribe. Further news reporting show that OHS has been directing Head Start programs to remove phrases that the Administration interprets as similar to DEI, creating additional, arbitrary hurdles for grant applications.\u201d\n\nThe Senators continue, explaining how banning specific words and phrases is fundamentally at odds with the clear requirements and permissible activities outlined in the Head Start Act. The Senators detail multiple examples of how the policy threatens to impact families served by the program: \u201cBanning the usage of the words \u2018disability,\u2019 \u2018inclusive,\u2019 and \u2018accessibility\u2019 conflicts with Head Start programs\u2019 requirements in meeting the needs of children with disabilities and \u2018providing disability-related services for children\u2019 as required in Sections 645 and 650 of the Head Start Act.\u201d\n\n\u201cThis ban is the latest in a long series of attacks from this administration on Head Start and early childhood education programs, which have created chaos and uncertainty for families nationwide,\u201d the Senators continue\u2014noting that the Trump administration illegally impounded funding for the programs earlier this year, which cause centers to temporarily close.\n\n\u201cLet\u2019s be clear: banning these words and restricting the ability of Head Start programs to provide the services and support they are obligated to by law\u2014all in an attempt to ban \u2018DEI\u2019\u2014doesn\u2019t only defy federal law and mandates that Congress created and funds on a bipartisan basis, it puts the vital support that kids and families across the country count on at serious risk. This is unacceptable. For more than 60 years, Head Start has provided high-quality early education and comprehensive services to more than 40 million children and working-class families. Your actions threaten that legacy and the families who rely on these services today,\u201d the Senators conclude.\n\nFull text of the letter is available HERE and below:\n\nDear Secretary Kennedy:\n\nWe write to express our outrage at recent U.S. Health and Human Services (Department) actions to prohibit Head Start grantees from providing services that are clearly permitted under the law, like training teachers on how best to care for children with disabilities or enabling Tribes to serve their own members. As part of enforcing your illegal guidance banning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), the Office of Head Start has now prohibited nearly 200 words and phrases. Your actions directly conflict with the statutory requirements established by Congress on a bipartisan basis under the Head Start Act to provide community-driven services and supportive classrooms for children with disabilities, and they force Head Start grantees to make an impossible and unacceptable choice between complying with the law or bending to the Administration\u2019s unlawful DEI ban to keep their funding. The chaos you are creating is already jeopardizing services for nearly 700,000 young children across this country.\n\nOn March 18, 2025, the Office of Head Start (OHS) notified all Head Start programs that \u201cthe use of federal funding for any training and technical assistance or other program expenditures that promote or take part in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives\u201d will not be approved and that any questions should be directed to regional offices. The policy was accompanied by a list of nearly 200 banned words and phrases, such as \u201cdisability,\u201d \u201cwomen,\u201d \u201cTribal,\u201d and \u201cmental health\u201d\u2014all words that are explicitly referenced in the Head Start Act and that are integral to fulfilling the program\u2019s statutory purpose. The ambiguous policy was not accompanied by clarification on what the Administration considers \u201cDEI,\u201d and Head Start programs were left with no meaningful guidance on compliance. Meanwhile, the Administration eliminated staff in regional offices, leaving 800 Head Start programs across 22 states without dedicated support staff to assist with grant applications and local day-to-day operations.\n\nWhile the Department has claimed in court that there is no \u201ccredible threat of enforcement,\u201d the facts demonstrate otherwise. On December 5, 2025, the American Civil Liberties Union provided additional evidence that the Trump Administration has been enforcing the banned words policy and rejecting or modifying grant applications as a result. Court filings document instances in which programs were instructed to remove trainings on supporting children with autism, and in which Tribal programs were directed to remove preferences for Tribal members from their eligibility criteria. These directives directly contradict the Head Start Act, which explicitly permits American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start programs to prioritize Tribal membership or other criteria selected by the Tribe. Further news reporting show that OHS has been directing Head Start programs to remove phrases that the Administration interprets as similar to DEI, creating additional, arbitrary hurdles for grant applications.\n\nThe list of banned words is fundamentally at odds with the clear requirements and permissible activities outlined in the Head Start Act. For example:\n\nBanning the usage of the word \u201cwomen\u201d from Head Start grant applications conflicts with the statutory requirement for Early Head Start programs to serve pregnant women. Head Start agencies need to submit \u201c\u2026a description of how the needs of pregnant women, and of infants and toddlers, will be addressed\u2026\u201d in their application, as outlined under section 645 of the Head Start Act.\n\nBanning the usage of the words \u201cdisability,\u201d \u201cinclusive,\u201d and \u201caccessibility\u201d conflicts with Head Start programs\u2019 requirements in meeting the needs of children with disabilities and \u201cproviding disability-related services for children\u201d as required in Sections 645 and 650 of the Head Start Act.\n\nBanning \u201cculturally appropriate\u201d conflicts with the Secretary\u2019s role in establishing Head Start program performance standards with measures that are \u201c\u2026developmentally, linguistically, and culturally appropriate services for the population served\u2026\u201d as required under section 641A of the Head Start Act.\n\nBanning the use of \u201cmental health\u201d will undermine the statutory obligations of programs to provide mental health services and promote partnerships with substance abuse and mental health treatment agencies to strengthen family and community environments under section 642B of the Head Start Act.\n\nBanning the word \u201cTribal\u201d is an egregious violation of Tribal sovereignty and contradicts many of the explicit requirements to consult Tribal governments, Indian Tribes, or Tribal organizations in administering the American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start programs, the Head Start Act, such as sections 641, 645, 649, 658D, and 658O.\n\nThis ban is the latest in a long series of attacks from this administration on Head Start and early childhood education programs, which have created chaos and uncertainty for families nationwide. On July 23, 2025, the Government Accountability Office found that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services violated the Impoundment Control Act by withholding over $825 million of Head Start funding between January and April. This administration\u2019s decision to block funding for Head Start created chaos, forced programs to draw up plans to lay off staff, forced parents to stress about back up plans, and even caused some programs to temporarily close their doors. The constant chaos and uncertainty facing 1,600 Head Start grantees undermines the early education and care of tens of thousands of children and their families nationwide.\n\nLet\u2019s be clear: banning these words and restricting the ability of Head Start programs to provide the services and support they are obligated to by law\u2014all in an attempt to ban \u201cDEI\u201d\u2014doesn\u2019t only defy federal law and mandates that Congress created and funds on a bipartisan basis, it puts the vital support that kids and families across the country count on at serious risk. This is unacceptable. For more than 60 years, Head Start has provided high-quality early education and comprehensive services to more than 40 million children and working-class families. Your actions threaten that legacy and the families who rely on these services today.\n\nAs Secretary, you are legally obligated to administer Head Start in accordance with the statute Congress enacted, not to condition funding on compliance with unlawful and undefined policy directives.\n\nHead Start grantees, educators, young children, and families deserve answers. Please provide a written response to the questions no later than 10 days from receipt:\n\nPlease provide all guidance, directives and communications related to banned words and phrases and other anti-DEI policies, pursuant to the January 20 executive order \u201cEnding Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing,\u201d that have been communicated to Head Start grantees.\n\nHow did the Administration decide on the banned words list and how did it evaluate the list\u2019s contradictions with the statutory requirements of the Head Start Act?\n\nFor each term, please provide the Administration\u2019s analysis explaining how its inclusion does not conflict with the Head Start Act.\n\nHow many Head Start grantees have been instructed to remove words or content from their grant applications as a result of this guidance?\n\nHow many grantees have had to wait for funding beyond the first day of the annual funding cycle because of banned words?\n\nTo what extent does the Administration rely on artificial intelligence to review grant applications and identify banned words?\n\nHow many drawdown requests in the Payment Management System have required modification to comply with the banned words policy?\n\nHave any grantees been denied funding due to the Administration\u2019s banned DEI list? If so, how many and under what circumstances?\n\nWhen did the Administration begin implementing the banned words list in its grant review process?\n\nDoes HHS apply or plan to apply the banned words policy to other HHS-administered grant programs, including the Child Care and Development Block Grant?\n\nIf not, please explain why Head Start has been singled out for this policy.\n\nIf so, please identify each affected program and provide the corresponding guidance.\n\nHow has HHS assessed the impact of the banned words policy on American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start programs administered by Tribes and Tribal organizations?\n\nDid HHS consult with Tribes prior to implementing this policy, as required under the Head Start Act and federal Tribal consultation obligations?\n\nIf not, why not?\n\nWe expect the Department to immediately reverse course, comply with the bipartisan law Congress enacted, and ensure Head Start programs can continue providing comprehensive services to children and families without fear of arbitrary enforcement or funding retaliation.\n\nSincerely,\n\n###", 1, "2026-03-30T01:40:41Z", "2026-04-06T20:09:11Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["https://www.murray.senate.gov/murray-sanders-baldwin-demand-reversal-explanation-of-trump-admins-banned-word-list-that-threatens-families-access-to-head-start-programs-nationwide/"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.8783978410065174, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}