{"database": "press", "table": "releases", "rows": [["http://nolan.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/business-north-obama-administration-denies-mineral-lease-renewals-sought-by", "Business North: Obama administration denies mineral lease renewals sought by Twin Metals", "2016-12-16", "2016", "2016-12", "Democrat", "House", "MN", "Rick Nolan", "N000127", "nolan.house.gov", null, null, "legacy", "Mineral leases near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness will not be renewed, the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture announced Thursday.The federal agencies cited broad concerns from thousands of public comments and input about potential impacts of mining. They also initiated steps to withdraw key portions of the watershed from new mineral permits and leases.Affected is land near Ely where Twin Metals Minnesota has conducted extensive research and found rich concentrations of copper, nickel and other precious metals. The firm previously filed a lawsuit challenging the agencies\u2019 authority to deny mineral leases.\n\t\u201cThe Boundary Waters is a natural treasure, special to the 150,000 who canoe, fish, and recreate there each year, and is the economic life blood to local business that depend on a pristine natural resource,\u201d USDA Sectetary Tom Vilsack said in a prepared statement. \u201cI have asked Interior to take a time out, conduct a careful environmental analysis and engage the public on whether future mining should be authorized on any federal land next door to the Boundary Waters.\u201d\n\t\u201cTwin Metals is greatly disappointed in the action announced today by the BLM and the USFS to deny renewal of two of the company\u2019s long-standing and valid mineral leases in Minnesota, and to initiate actions to withdraw federal lands and minerals from future exploration and development,\" Twin Metals responded Thursday afternoon in a news release. \"If allowed to stand, the BLM-USFS actions will have a devastating impact on the future economy of the Iron Range and all of Northeast Minnesota, eliminating the promise of thousands of good-paying jobs and billions of dollars in investment in the region. Further, this unprecedented decision is contrary to the overwhelming majority of local and regional citizens and communities who support mining and believe mining can be done responsibly in this region.\"\n\tThe agency said Congress set aside the Boundary Waters more than 50 years ago \u201cin recognition of its irreplaceable resources. Today, more than 150,000 annual visitors help drive the local economy through tourism and outdoor recreation.\u201d\n\t\u201cThere's a reason that the Boundary Waters is one of the most visited wilderness area in America: it's an incredible place,\u201d said U.S. Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell. \u201cToday's best available science is helping us understand the value of the land and water and potential impacts of development in places like the Boundary Waters. This is the right action to take to avoid irrevocably damaging this watershed and its recreation-based economy, while also taking the time and space to review whether to further protect the area from all new mining.\u201d\n\tTwin Metals Minnesota filed its lawsuit Sept. 12 in U.S. District Court in Minnesota. It followed a decision by Gov. Mark Dayton to order the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) not to authorize or enter into any new state access agreements or lease agreements for mining operations on state lands in close proximity to the Boundary Waters. The U.S. Forest Service later expressed concern about renewing two Twin Metals Minnesota non-ferrous mining leases because of the lands\u2019 close proximity to the BWCA.\n\tThe lawsuit seeks to invalidate a opinion by Department of the Interior (DOI) Solicitor Hilary Tompkins, who instructing the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that it has the discretion to deny renewal of Twin Metals\u2019 federal mineral leases. The lawsuit challenges the solicitor\u2019s opinion as being inconsistent with federal law, the terms of Twin Metals\u2019 leases, and the federal government\u2019s established precedent in supporting and renewing the leases over five decades.\n\t\u201cThe solicitor\u2019s opinion has cast a cloud of uncertainty over Twin Metals\u2019 federal mineral rights creating significant challenges for the company to engage in long-term planning, investment, development, or operational decisions,\u201d Ian Duckworth, chief operating officer of Twin Metals, said in September. \u201cAffirming the validity of Twin Metals\u2019 federal mineral leases would eliminate that uncertainty and facilitate responsible project development activities moving forward.\u201d\n\tThe company said the leases in question were issued by the federal government in 1966 with a right of unlimited, successive 10-year renewals. The leases were renewed by the BLM without controversy in 1989 and 2004. Twin Metals filed the pending lease renewal application in mid-2013.\n\tIn not consenting to the lease renewals, the Forest Service cited the potential risk of environmental contamination of the surrounding watershed as a key concern.\n\t\u201cThe two leases are located directly adjacent to and within three miles of the BWCAW, respectively. It is well established that acid mine drainage is a significant environmental risk at sulfide ore mine sites like the one proposed for these leased lands and in a water-based ecosystem like the Boundary Waters because contaminated water could have dramatic impacts to aquatic life, sport fisheries, and recreation-based uses and communities,\u201d the agency wrote.\n\tLast summer, the Forest Service held two listening sessions and a 30-day public input period related to the potential lease renewals and received more than 30,000 comments.\n\t\u201cThe decision to withhold consent and study the impacts of this type of mining near the Boundary Waters echoes the concerns of many in the area, including former Vice President Walter Mondale and Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton, who has similarly said that the state will not authorize or enter into any new state access or lease agreements for mining operations near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area,\u201d the agency said.\n\tLate in November, the industry said a poll revealed wide-scale support for nonferrous mining. By large margins, Northeastern Minnesotans support the development of new copper-nickel mines and oppose new federal restrictions on mining throughout the region, said the poll, which was conducted by Twin Metals and the industry trade group Mining Minnesota.\n\t\u201cSupport for the mining economy and for the development of copper-nickel mining projects is overwhelming across northeastern Minnesota and the Iron Range,\u201d Bob McFarlin, Twin Metals spokesperson, said of the findings. \u201cThis extraordinary support reflects a strong belief that copper-nickel mining can help revitalize the region\u2019s economy, protect the environment and create jobs for generations of Minnesotans.\u201d\n\tBeyond Thursday's ruling, the Forest Service also submitted an application to the Secretary of the Interior to withdraw key portions of the watershed that flows into the BWCAW from new mineral permits and leases.\n\t\u00a0\n\tTwin Metals, which is owned by Antofagasta PLC, has invested more than $400 million in acquisition, exploration, technical, environmental and other project development activities. The company has said it did so while relying on the federal government\u2019s repeated affirmation of the validity of the mineral leases.\n\tThe agencies went a step further in its Thursday announcement.\n\t\u201cBLM will review the withdrawal application and issue a notice in the Federal Register to segregate the lands \u2013 essentially, place them in a 'time out' \u2013 for up to two years, subject to valid existing rights. To preserve the status quo during that 'time out,' no new mineral exploration or development applications would be accepted while a thorough, scientific environmental analysis is conducted. Upon publication of the Federal Register notice, there will be an initial 90-day public review period for the proposed withdrawal and additional analysis during the segregation period that will include further public involvement, including public meetings,\u201d said the government\u2019s news release.\n\tDuring the segregation period, BLM and the Forest Service will conduct an environmental analysis to determine if the lands should be withdrawn for a period of 20 years. This process will invite participation by the public, tribes, environmental groups, industry, state and local government, as well as other stakeholders. By law, the Department of the Interior can only withdraw these lands for a maximum of 20 years. Only Congress can legislate a permanent withdrawal.\n\tThe segregation or any future withdrawal would not prohibit ongoing or future mining activities on any valid existing rights or prohibit any other authorized uses on private lands. Other National Forest management activities that are not related to mineral exploration or development, including permits, licenses, and cooperative agreements compatible with the intended use on the lands, would still be permissible at the discretion of the authorized officer.\n\tTwin Metals said it is assessing the impact of the agencies\u2019 lease renewal decision, adding that the company is \"committed to progressing our project forward and will continue to pursue legal avenues to protect our contractual mineral rights.\u201d\n\tMinnesota's Republican Party blamed Democrats for the decision.\n\t\"In a cruel attack on Iron Range families right before Christmas, Democrats effectively killed the Twin Metals' mining project today and likely all future mining with an order from the Obama administration,\" Chairman Keith Downey said in a prepared statement. \"The Democrats' cynical and pathetic show of rejecting the \"kill mining\" Resolution 54 at their State Central Committee meeting last Saturday is the absolute worst of politics.\u00a0 Shamefully, Mark Dayton, Rick Nolan and Amy Klobuchar claim to support mining, all the while they must have known that this order was coming. It is no coincidence that this order effectively accomplishes the intensions of Resolution 54. The order requires that equipment must be removed from the site and all activity shut down. We'll say it again, watch what Democrats do, not what they say, when it comes to killing mining and destroying the economy of Northeastern Minnesota.\"", 1, "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z", "2026-03-30T12:14:52Z"]], "columns": ["url", "title", "date", "year", "month", "party", "chamber", "state", "member_name", "bioguide_id", "domain", "scraper", "source", "date_source", "text", "has_text", "collected_at", "updated_at"], "primary_keys": ["url"], "primary_key_values": ["http://nolan.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/business-north-obama-administration-denies-mineral-lease-renewals-sought-by"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.7714759558439255, "source": "dwillis/congress-press", "source_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press", "license": "MIT", "license_url": "https://github.com/dwillis/congress-press/blob/main/LICENSE"}