url,title,date,year,month,party,chamber,state,member_name,bioguide_id,domain,scraper,source,date_source,text,has_text,collected_at,updated_at
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-vasquez-announce-10-million-to-rebuild-roads-outside-of-wipp-in-carlsbad,"Heinrich, Vasquez Announce $10 Million to Rebuild Roads Outside of WIPP in Carlsbad",2026-09-28,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee and Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and U.S. Representative Gabe Vasquez (N.M.) announced $10 million in federal funding to repair the US 285 Relief Route, a critical road for freight trucks transporting nuclear materials to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad.

In January, Heinrich announced he had successfully included $10 million in Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) Appropriations to improve roads leading to and from WIPP, through recommended payments from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to the State of New Mexico. Since joining the Senate Appropriations Committee, Heinrich has been a steadfast advocate for appropriating these funds. This will be the first time that funds have been appropriated for this purpose since 2014. These repairs will improve safety for WIPP workers, shipments, and the surrounding communities.

Earlier this year, Heinrich also introduced the WIPP Economic Assistance Assurance Act to amend the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act to ensure sustained, inflation-adjusted funding for New Mexico communities to maintain vital infrastructure projects, such as road maintenance and repairs for the duration of WIPP’s operation.

“Last appropriations cycle, I fought like hell to secure this funding – to get New Mexico more of the funding we deserve for our role in maintaining the nation’s only deep geologic repository for radioactive defense waste. I am extremely proud to have succeeded in delivering this $10 million to help rebuild the roads to, from, and around WIPP and strengthen the infrastructure that workers and the Carlsbad community rely on every day,” said Heinrich. “But our work isn’t done. I’ll keep fighting to increase the federal government’s support of road and infrastructure improvements in New Mexico, including through my WIPP Economic Assistance Assurance Act.”

“New Mexico and WIPP are the backbone of our nation’s nuclear program,” said Vasquez. “The hardworking New Mexicans who run WIPP provide a critical service to the entire country – and the least the DOE can do is hold up their end of the bargain and meet their safety needs. I’m proud to have worked with Senator Heinrich to deliver this funding, and I’ll continue to deliver for the needs of our district.”

WIPP, located near Carlsbad, New Mexico, is the nation’s only deep geologic repository for the disposal of transuranic waste generated by the United States’ nuclear weapons program. Since opening in 1999, WIPP has played a critical role in supporting the national defense mission by managing legacy nuclear materials and supporting national security-related cleanup efforts across the U.S. Department of Energy.

###",1,2026-09-29T11:07:12Z,2026-09-29T11:08:49Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-calls-on-senate-leadership-to-establish-bipartisan-select-committee-on-ai/,Luján Calls on Senate Leadership to Establish Bipartisan Select Committee on AI,2026-09-28,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to establish a bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (AI) to ensure that Congress can meet the unprecedented pace, scale, and rapidly advancing challenges associated with AI.

“AI is accelerating faster than our existing legislative processes, committee structures, and technical capacity can consistently evaluate and respond. The recent news of increasing incidents makes it clear that this is no longer a theoretical concern,” wrote Senator Luján.

“A bipartisan Select Committee on AI would complement, not displace, the work of existing committees. This approach would dedicate a platform to develop novel AI policy recommendations, hold hearings, and help coordinate across existing committees,” continued Senator Luján.

“Establishing this bipartisan Committee gives Congress the institutional capacity to pull in expertise to understand this technology, drive its benefits, anticipate its consequences, and act with the urgency and responsibility that is demanded of us in our elected roles,” concluded Senator Luján.

The full text of the letter is available here and below.

Dear Leader Thune and Leader Schumer:

I respectfully write today to urge the establishment of a bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (AI) to ensure that Congress can meet the unprecedented pace, scale, and breadth of challenges presented by a rapidly advancing artificial intelligence landscape.

AI is accelerating faster than our existing legislative processes, committee structures, and technical capacity can consistently evaluate and respond. The recent news of increasing incidents makes it clear that this is no longer a theoretical concern. In July, AI agents operating during cybersecurity evaluations were not properly maintained within their intended environments, allowing them unauthorized access to external systems. In independent testing by the United Kingdom’s AI Security Institute, frontier models repeatedly took unsanctioned actions against real people and organizations, including deceptive attempts to inject malicious code into external projects.

At the same time, leading AI researchers and developers are publicly warning that this technology is advancing beyond our ability to reliably understand or control it. Over 1,300 employees from frontier AI companies recently called for the United States to develop the technical and governance tools necessary to deliberately pace frontier AI development. Researchers and leaders at top AI laboratories have also publicly raised the possibility of catastrophic outcomes, suggesting there’s a 10% to 20% chance of existential risks associated with these platforms. These warnings, going back as far as the early 2000s, deserve our full attention and serious examination—not because Congress should assume any prediction to be correct, but because we should listen to the developers when they say our existing governing structure, safeguards, and defenses are not sufficient.

We are seeing this threat landscape continue to broaden. Just last week, Anthropic shared their threat intelligence report documenting AI-enabled cyber operations, influence operations, surveillance, biological misuse, conventional weapons development, and increasingly autonomous attacks. In some cases, AI systems have been used to automate reconnaissance, exploitation, and data theft simultaneously against multiple victims. These developments touch nearly every major area of policy: national security, economic competitiveness, cybersecurity, biotechnology, energy, communications, financial markets, workforce development, and more.

Our challenge is not a lack of congressional interest; it is that AI does not fit neatly within a single policy lane. As delineated above, each committee has an essential role to play, but the results become fragmented and competitive rather than working together to develop a common technical understanding and comprehensive legislative framework. Task forces, caucuses, and working groups have helped educate and build consensus, but they are not a substitute for a standing institution with the capacity to develop broad and deep expertise, conduct sustained oversight, and translate findings into durable and bipartisan legislation.

A bipartisan Select Committee on AI would complement, not displace, the work of existing committees. This approach would dedicate a platform to develop novel AI policy recommendations, hold hearings, and help coordinate across existing committees. We have the responsibility to understand and safely guide these technologies that are reshaping our economy, innovation, and national security before events force us to only react. Establishing this bipartisan Committee gives Congress the institutional capacity to pull in expertise to understand this technology, drive its benefits, anticipate its consequences, and act with the urgency and responsibility that is demanded of us in our elected roles.

I respectfully urge your prompt consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

###",1,2026-09-29T11:07:12Z,2026-09-29T11:08:49Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-statement-commemorating-national-public-lands-day,Heinrich Statement Commemorating National Public Lands Day,2026-09-26,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released the following statement on National Public Lands Day:

“Our public lands are part of our shared identity – they are a physical manifestation of our Jeffersonian democracy and belong to all of us, no matter where you come from or how much money you have.

“But over the past two years, our public lands have been under relentless attacks. President Trump is trying to rip public lands from public hands, negotiating behind closed doors to sell off our national treasures to private equity firms and foreign mining companies, leaving our public lands behind a for sale sign.

“To rub even more salt in the wound: our national parks are facing billions of dollars in deferred maintenance and severe staff shortages, while $1.8 billion of your taxpayer dollars are being spent on President Trump’s D.C. vanity projects. That’s bullshit.

“On this National Public Lands Day, go out and enjoy our public lands. Then share why they matter to you and continue to fight to protect these lands for future generations.”

As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Heinrich is leading the fight in Congress to protect our public lands, expand access to national parks, and hold the Trump administration accountable for its attacks on our treasured places — from efforts to erase history in our national parks to diverting funding to Trump’s vanity projects.

This month, Heinrich joined a bipartisan group of 153 lawmakers in urging the Department of the Interior (DOI) to abandon a proposed transfer of federally managed public land within Yosemite National Park that would facilitate private access to and development of an 83-acre parcel adjacent to the park known as Hazel Green Ranch. During a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing, Heinrich criticized the Trump administration for its plan to exchange public land in Yosemite National Park for private development.

This month, Heinrich led his Senate colleagues in sending a letter to DOI Secretary Doug Burgum demanding that the Trump administration stop work on President Trump’s commemorative arch on federal property, which federal officials have admitted will harm historic sites on public lands, including Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial.

This month, Heinrich spoke in support of the Roadless Rule at a New Mexico Wild community event, encouraging New Mexicans to submit public comment in support of preserving the Roadless Rule. The public has until October 6, 2026 to submit comments on the Trump administration’s repeal of the Roadless Rule, which is the last chance for Americans to voice their opposition and help keep millions of acres of public lands in public hands. You can read more about Heinrich’s actions to protect the Roadless Rule here.

Last month, Heinrich led his colleagues in opposing the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) proposal to overturn the 2024 Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation rule (the 2024 Waste Prevention Rule). The move will increase pollution on public lands, reduce domestic energy supply, expose nearby communities to avoidable health risks, and waste publicly owned natural gas, costing Americans tens of millions in foregone revenue.

Last month, Heinrich joined top Senate Democrats in sending a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) Acting Comptroller General Orice Williams Brown to audit and assess the full scope and cost of the White House ballroom project.

Last month, Heinrich sent a letter requesting that the DOI Deputy Inspector General Caryl Brzymialkiewicz investigate what Department officials knew – and when they knew it – about engineering failures at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and whether Department employees withheld evidence from federal prosecutors.

In July, Heinrich criticized legislation that removes protections for public lands, emphasizing the need for bipartisan collaboration within the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Heinrich additionally fact-checked Trump administration actions that undo protections for the Chaco Canyon Cultural Protection Zone. You can read about Heinrich’s actions to protect Chaco Canyon here and here.

In July, Heinrich sent a letter to DOI Secretary Doug Burgum and U.S Park Chief of Police Scott Brecht demanding answers and transparency about the U.S. Park Police’s new vehicle pursuit policy following news reports that an innocent bystander, Nolberto Armando Sanabria Meza, a 46-year-old food delivery driver, was hit and tragically killed in D.C. by a driver being chased by U.S. Park Police.

In June, Heinrich helped advance the America the Beautiful Act, bipartisan legislation introduced by U.S. Senators Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Angus King (I-Maine) to reauthorize the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund, out of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

In June, Heinrich sent a letter demanding answers from DOI Secretary Doug Burgum about the Trump administration redirecting tens of millions of dollars from fees paid to the NPS to fund President Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C. – including redirecting funds collected at New Mexico sites such as Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Bandelier National Monument.

In April, during a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing to examine the Trump administration’s Budget Request for the DOI Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27), Heinrich grilled DOI Secretary Doug Burgum about the Department’s draconian staff cuts at the NPS.

In March, Heinrich joined lawmakers in filing an amicus brief that would put a stop to President Trump’s plan to construct a commemorative arch on federal property. The amicus brief argues that the President’s plan is illegal unless Congress authorizes it.

In March, Heinrich led his colleagues in delivering remarks on the Senate floor in condemning and drawing attention to the Trump administration’s efforts to erase American history from public lands.

In March, Heinrich sent a letter to DOI demanding answers from the NPS following reports that NPS staff across the country are removing signage from national parks about slavery, Tribal history, and climate change.

In February, Heinrich led his colleagues in calling on DOI Secretary Doug Burgum to halt efforts to create the Department’s new U.S. Wildland Fire Service (USWFS), citing potential life-or-death consequences that could come as a result of decoupling wildfire management from land management agencies, and emphasizing concerns related to recent reductions in staffing, combined with improperly severing wildfire management from land stewardship.

Last December, during a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks hearing to consider 26 pending bills, Heinrich criticized the Trump administration for removing fee-free admission on Juneteenth and Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.

Last October, Heinrich delivered remarks on the Senate floor, criticizing Republicans for pushing forward Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions of disapproval targeting BLM Resource Management Plans (RMPs) that would undo protections for national parks, including the Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve.

Last October, during the government shutdown, Heinrich urged the DOI Secretary Doug Burgum to classify the Department’s staff as essential during the Republican government shutdown to maintain the health and safety of Americans who visit public lands, wildlife refuges, and national park sites.

In June of 2025, Heinrich successfully fought Senate Republican provisions to sell off public lands in the Big Bad Bill, lead an amendment to prevent the privatization of our public lands, hosted a roundtable and sounded the alarm about New Mexico public lands that were at risk of being sold off by Republicans, continuously uplifted New Mexicans’ voices who called his office to raise their concern with Republicans’ plan to sell off these lands, and released a statement immediately criticizing Senate Republicans’ plan to sell off public lands following the release of the reconciliation text.

In June of 2025, Heinrich blasted the Trump administration for its plans to transfer national park units to state control, criticizing the administration for “cutting off our access to public lands and devastating state economies in the process, overwhelming state budgets and dismantling the systems that keep public lands running.”

In June of 2025, Heinrich grilled the DOI Secretary Doug Burgum over the Trump administration’s Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) budget request for the Department, which slashes funding for national parks and guts staffing for the agency.

In May of 2025, Heinrich sent a letter to DOI Secretary Doug Burgum, demanding answers from the Trump administration regarding its plans to transfer National Park System units from federal management. The letter follows Heinrich’s questioning of Secretary Burgum during a Senate Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, where Burgum failed to provide sufficient answers on the Trump administration’s plan to transfer hundreds of sites managed by the NPS to the states.

In January of 2025, Heinrich’s Simplifying Outdoor Access for Recreation (SOAR) Act and Every Kid Outdoors Extension Act, which extends free access to national parks and other public lands to all American fourth grade students and their families through 2031 — were signed into law as part of the Expanding Public Lands Outdoor Recreation Experiences (EXPLORE) Act. The broader bipartisan package bolsters outdoor recreation and promotes public lands in New Mexico and across the United States.",1,2026-09-27T10:23:37Z,2026-09-27T10:25:08Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-whitehouse-joint-statement-on-permitting-deal-to-deliver-lower-energy-costs-good-paying-jobs-and-responsible-growth,"Heinrich, Whitehouse Joint Statement on Permitting Deal to Deliver Lower Energy Costs, Good-Paying Jobs, and Responsible Growth",2026-09-25,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, issued the following statement on the status of a permitting reform deal:

“To be clear: permitting negotiations are ongoing, many of the major hurdles have been overcome, and we believe there is a good deal to be had. We’re focused on getting Americans cheaper energy, good-paying jobs, and responsible growth. To get that right, we need good, strong, legislative text and deliberation.

“Our goal is to deliver for Americans struggling to pay their utility bills. And to do that, we must give Senators the opportunity to read and engage with legislation before they’re asked to vote on it. Rushing that process isn’t just unhelpful, it could sabotage the entire effort.

“We are talking about major changes to how America builds energy and infrastructure. Getting that right has to matter more than election-year deadlines. We are committed to doing what’s needed to get this across the finish line in this Congress, and we look forward to working with the White House and our fellow Members to do that.”",1,2026-09-26T09:43:57Z,2026-09-26T09:44:55Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-legislation-to-secure-americas-satellite-systems-unanimously-passes-senate/,Luján Legislation to Secure America’s Satellite Systems Unanimously Passes Senate,2026-09-25,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – This week, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed the Secure Space Act, legislation led by U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Media, and U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Chair of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Media. The bipartisan Secure Space Act would protect America’s satellite systems from foreign threats and strengthen national security.

“As satellite technology continues to advance, so do the threats to our national security, and we must act swiftly to safeguard our critical infrastructure,” said Senator Luján. “I’m proud that the Senate unanimously passed my Secure Space Act, legislation that blocks satellite licenses for untrusted entities and protects our skies from foreign adversaries. This legislation is necessary to defend our communications networks from foreign entities that seek to undermine our security and technological leadership.”

Background:

The Secure Space Act prohibits the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from granting satellite licenses or U.S. market access for foreign-licensed satellite systems to any entity or its affiliates that produce or provide communications equipment or services deemed a national security risk.

The legislation amends the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 to extend this prohibition to both geostationary and non-geostationary orbit satellite systems, including gateway stations. It applies to new licenses and authorizations issued after the bill’s enactment and requires the FCC to establish implementing regulations within one year.

Click here to read text of the bill.

###",1,2026-09-26T09:43:57Z,2026-09-26T09:44:55Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-trumps-illegal-pocket-recissions-that-strips-nearly-1-billion-from-american-families/,Luján Statement on Trump’s Illegal Pocket Recissions that Strips Nearly $1 Billion From American Families,2026-09-25,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) issued the following statement after the Trump administration released an illegal “pocket rescission” that would strip nearly $1 billion in funds meant to support American families:

“Donald Trump and Russ Vought are illegally stripping away nearly $1 billion in funding for kids, K-12 students, small businesses, and families across America.

“At a time when families are being squeezed by the rising costs of food, fuel, and other essentials, these cuts will only make life harder for New Mexicans.

“Senate Democrats will fight back against these illegal cuts, defend Congress’ authority, and lower costs for families.”

###",1,2026-09-29T11:07:12Z,2026-09-29T11:08:49Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-moreno-introduce-bipartisan-resolution-to-recognize-september-as-latin-music-appreciation-month/,"Luján, Moreno Introduce Bipartisan Resolution to Recognize September as Latin Music Appreciation Month",2026-09-24,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) introduced a bipartisan resolution to celebrate the contributions of Hispanics and Latinos to the musical heritage of the United States and to designate September 2026 as Latin Music Appreciation Month. The resolution recognizes various Latin music styles, instruments, artists, bands, and journalists who have inspired and influenced American culture for generations. U.S. Representative Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) plans to lead the resolution in the House of Representatives.

“As one of the only Hispanics in the United States Senate, I’m honored to introduce this bipartisan resolution that recognizes and celebrates Hispanic and Latino achievements in music and culture,” said Senator Luján. “Across the U.S. and around the world, Hispanic and Latino artists have made significant contributions to musical heritage and driven cultural trends. This month, we can all take a moment to celebrate Hispanic and Latino artists and inspire future generations of artists and performers.”

“Latin music is woven into the story of our nation, and its influence reaches communities across the United States and around the world. You can hear it everywhere, from reggaetón at celebrations to Latin ballads at weddings. It is the soundtrack of our lives. That’s why I’ve worked to ensure more Latino artists are a part of the prestigious National Recording Registry at the Library of Congress. Alongside Senator Luján, I look forward to calling September ‘Latin Music Appreciation Month’ to honor the artists who have shaped our nation’s culture,” said Representative Castro.

“Latin music is one of the fastest-growing forces in the American music industry, driving streams, filling stadiums, topping the charts, and creating jobs for artists, producers, songwriters, and crews across the country,” said Nathaly Maurice, Founder and President of Operativo, who helped spearhead the effort alongside legendary music producer and executive Emilio Estefan. “This resolution recognizes what the industry already knows: Latin music is essential to the business of American music. We’re grateful to Senators Luján and Moreno for coming together across party lines to honor the artists and professionals who built that success and the next generation working to carry it forward.”

Full text of the resolution is available HERE.

###",1,2026-09-25T10:04:52Z,2026-09-25T10:05:46Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-voting-for-the-14th-time-to-end-trumps-war-with-iran/,Luján Statement on Voting for the 14th Time to End Trump’s War with Iran,2026-09-24,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) issued the following statement after voting for the 14th time to end President Trump’s war with Iran:

“I just voted for the 14th time to end Donald Trump’s disastrous war with Iran and bring our troops home.

“At least 19 servicemembers have lost their lives, many remain in harm’s way, gas is over $4.53 a gallon, and record diesel prices are squeezing our farmers and working families.

“I’ve opposed this war since day one, and I won’t stop fighting to bring our troops home and lower costs for New Mexicans.”

###",1,2026-09-25T10:04:52Z,2026-09-25T10:05:46Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-introduces-legislation-to-support-investments-to-build-a-more-resilient-reliable-grid,"Heinrich Introduces Legislation to Support Investments to Build a More Resilient, Reliable Grid",2026-09-23,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"The bill creates an investment tax credit to boost construction of significant transmission projects across the nation, could create 1 million jobs & help cut electricity costs by 0ver $27 billion annually

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, introduced the Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act, legislation to incentivize the construction of new electric transmission infrastructure to help meet growing electricity demand, strengthen the grid, and lower costs for customers.

The Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act will provide a targeted 30% investment tax credit (ITC) to support investments in large-scale transmission projects and grid-enhancing technologies that help to provide consumers with low-cost, reliable electricity.

At a time when energy costs are already through the roof, Americans need solutions that can bring down the cost of electricity while making sure our grid can keep up with growing demand. According to an analysis by ACORE and Grid Strategies, a 30% investment tax credit for transmission projects would create more than 1 million new American jobs building and maintaining transmission projects. Transmission expansion could save American families and businesses up to $27.7 billion per year on their residential electricity bills, according to Grid Strategies and Americans for a Clean Energy Grid (ACEG).

“As our energy demand increases, we need to improve our grid infrastructure and invest in building more transmission lines that deliver on the promise of reliable, affordable, and clean power,” said Heinrich. “At a time when families are already facing sky-high energy costs, we need to make sure our investments in the grid actually help bring those costs down. My Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act will do just that by incentivizing private investors to put their capital behind building critical energy infrastructure projects, creating long-term certainty, starting from planning to the construction of transmission projects.”

The Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act could be applied for the following investments:

Large significant transmission lines and line upgrades that cross certain geographic jurisdictions or are at least 100 miles which are:

At least 500 MW in capacity

At least 345 kV AC or 200 kV DC in voltage

Generator-tie lines and network upgrades to connect additional electricity supply and storage to the grid.

Innovative technologies such as advanced transmission conductors and grid-enhancing technologies.

The Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act would provide a 10-year tax credit. Starting in 2026, all qualifying transmission projects that are placed in service would qualify for the credit and any qualifying project that starts construction before December 31, 2036, could claim the credit. The Grid Resiliency Tax Credit would support investments in new transmission projects, modifications to existing transmission projects, interconnection, subcomponents, and grid-enhancing technologies.

The Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act is endorsed by the National Rural Electric Cooperative (NRECA), Berkshire Hathaway Energy, the American Public Power Association (APPA), the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), the Edison Electric Institute (EEI), Oceti Sakowin Power Authority (OSPA), Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC), the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), SouthWestern Power Group, Pattern Energy, ACORE, Americans for a Clean Energy Grid (ACEG), and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

“Investing in transmission infrastructure is critically important to meet soaring electricity demand and maintain a reliable grid. As electric cooperatives make the investments necessary to achieve these goals, having access to the transmission investment tax credit is crucial to reducing costs for consumers. We appreciate Sen. Heinrich’s leadership on this issue and his commitment to ensuring that all Americans reap the benefits of this critical federal resource,” said Jim Matheson, CEO of the NationalRural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA).

“We applaud Sen. Heinrich’s reintroduction of the Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act, which would leverage private capital to build the new transmission capacity needed to meet today’s surging electricity demand. If enacted into law, the Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act would unleash historic grid infrastructure investment, enhance system security and reliability, and help keep electricity prices affordable for the customers we serve,” said Patrick Reiten, Senior Vice President of Berkshire Hathaway Energy.

“Customers nationwide are facing rising electricity costs, including increasing transmission costs, which are reflected in monthly bills. Senator Heinrich’s bill would help address that challenge by reducing transmission investment expenses, including for public power utilities, which would access the credit’s benefits through elective pay. This allows community-owned, not-for-profit public power utilities to receive the full investment incentive, keeping benefits local, supporting grid reliability, and reducing customers’ transmission rates,” said Scott Corwin, President and CEO of the American Public Power Association (APPA).

“IBEW members proudly build, operate, and maintain our nation's bulk electric grid, and Sen. Heinrich's proposed tax credit will spur the massive transmission buildout that our country urgently needs. This bill will catalyze private investment to create thousands of good-paying jobs for the lineworkers who build these projects while improving reliability and lowering costs for consumers, and the IBEW looks forward to working with Congress to pass this important legislation,” said Kenneth Cooper, International President of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW).

“Across the Great Plains, Tribal lands hold some of the strongest renewable energy potential in the country, but inadequate transmission capacity remains one of the biggest barriers to bringing that power to market. The Oceti Sakowin Power Authority strongly supports the Resiliency Tax Credit Act, and we thank Senator Heinrich for his efforts to accelerate investment in the high-voltage transmission infrastructure our country urgently needs. Expanding transmission is fundamental to unlocking Tribal clean energy resources, advancing energy sovereignty, meeting America’s growing energy needs, and creating lasting economic opportunity for Tribal communities,” said Lyle Jack, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Oceti Sakowin Power Authority (OSPA), a Tribal utility authority owned by seven Sioux Tribes in South Dakota.

“The Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC) supports Senator Martin Heinrich's legislation establishing a 30% investment tax credit for qualifying transmission infrastructure. Expanding the nation's transmission system is essential. Rising demand, mounting reliability pressures, and long interconnection queues all point to the same conclusion: America needs more wires, substations, and switchyards, and it needs them soon. By taking a technology-neutral approach, the bill focuses on the infrastructure itself rather than any generation resource. That is the right frame. Every customer and every resource depend on a stronger grid,”said Vern Lund, CEO of the Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC).

“America's electric grid is under mounting strain from record demand growth, and the tools to relieve that strain — including grid-enhancing technologies like advanced conductors — already exist and are ready for deployment. What's needed now is a policy framework that makes building them easier,"" said Will Hupman, SVP of Government Affairs of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). ""Sen. Heinrich's Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act does exactly that, offering an investment tax credit for qualified, regionally significant electric power transmission or generator-tie lines that meet rigorous performance standards for capacity, efficiency, and resilience. By providing an incentive to deploy high-performing transmission technology rather than just new poles and wires, Senator Heinrich's legislation will help deliver the faster capacity expansion our economy needs.”

“Our country cannot meet our ever-growing energy needs without more modern transmission. But the patient capital required to work through the approval process, and then the high cost of construction, limits who is willing to take on necessary and large transmission projects. An Investment Tax Credit is one of the best vehicles to bring key investors and developers to the table to grow our grid. We deeply thank Senator Heinrich for his continued dedication and work to this end and are so appreciative for how much he prioritizes smart, needed transmission policy,” said Darryl Sockwell, General Manager of SouthWestern Power Group.

“A stable policy environment is key to unlocking investment in American energy infrastructure to strengthen grid reliability, support economic growth, and deliver affordable energy to communities across the country. Meeting growing energy demand requires significant investment in transmission, which serves to both improve reliability and provide the backbone to efficiently utilize both existing and new generation assets. Senator Heinrich’s Grid Resiliency Tax Credit Act recognizes the critical role transmission plays in advancing these priorities,” said Hunter Armistead, CEO of Pattern Energy.

“We need to add enough electricity supply to our grid by 2030 to power New York City 15 times over. That pace of growth is unlike anything we’ve seen, and this bill is a constructive step toward preparing our grid to affordably and reliably deliver that power,” said Ray Long, President and CEO of ACORE. “We at ACORE look forward to working across the aisles of Congress to deliver bipartisan solutions to grid modernization, permitting reform, and energy security.”

“This bill supports smart investments to help us build the grid that Americans deserve,” said Grace Henley, tax attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “We need a resilient grid for the 21st century that delivers affordable, clean, and reliable energy across the nation.”

A fact sheet of the bill is here.

The full text of the bill is here.

This Congress, as Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Heinrich has introduced multiple bills aimed at strengthening our electrical grid and lowering energy costs for families.

Last month, Heinrich introduced the GRID Savings Act, legislation that aims to ensure that the biggest new electricity users play by the same basic rules that have applied to new power plants for two decades, while increasing transparency, protecting grid reliability, and making sure that families and businesses aren’t left paying for infrastructure that only serves new, high-demand customers. Last week, Heinrich took to the Senate floor to encourage his colleagues to put the GRID Savings Act up for a vote, however, Senate Republicans blocked the effort.

In July, Heinrich introduced the Grid Connection and Congestion Management Act, which would require grid operators to establish a fast-track process for connecting new energy projects to the electric grid, reducing delays and easing congestion.",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-kim-introduce-legislation-to-address-rising-costs-of-school-meals-help-end-childhood-hunger-in-america,"Heinrich, Kim Introduce Legislation to Address Rising Costs of School Meals, Help End Childhood Hunger in America",2026-09-23,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies, and U.S. Senator Andy Kim (D-N.J.) introduced the Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act, legislation to make it easier for students to access quality, nutritious school meals.

School meals help shape lifelong healthy eating habits, and research shows that students who participate in school meal programs have better overall diet quality than nonparticipants. But as the cost of food and equipment continues to rise, school districts are struggling to keep up. The Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act will give school districts the certainty they need to strengthen their meal programs, provide nutritious meals to students, and plan for the future.

“New Mexico has shown that when we make healthy school meals available to every student, we give kids a better chance to focus, learn, and succeed. But schools across the country are facing a financial crisis, with the skyrocketing cost of food, equipment, and labor making it harder to put nutritious meals on the table. My Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act will give schools the resources and certainty they need to serve healthy meals, buy more food from local farmers, and make sure every kid in America has the food they need to learn and thrive,” said Heinrich.

“Kids can’t learn if they’re hungry, and our schools can’t get them nutritious food if they’re struggling with stretched budgets. As a parent, I know there’s nothing more important than being there for your kid; as a Senator, I know there’s nothing more important than using our voice to stand up for all kids. I’m proud to work with Senator Heinrich to introduce this bill and hope our colleagues join us in standing up for America’s kids,” said Kim.

Under federal law, approximately 71% of all New Mexican students qualify for free or reduced-price meals. New Mexico enacted universal free school meals in 2023 when Senate Bill 4 was signed into law, which covers the cost of universal school meals after federal reimbursements to ensure all students receive free meals.

In the School Nutrition Association’s School Year (SY) 2025-26 School Nutrition Trends Report, nearly all respondents reported challenges related to costs. 99% of respondents cited the need for more funding for their programs with 98% reporting challenges with the cost of food; 95% reported challenges with the cost of labor; and 95% also reported challenges with the cost of equipment. Additionally, over half of respondents shared that they have “serious concern” about the financial sustainability of their program in three years.

A new report found that meal revenues — including federal reimbursements, paid meals, and à la carte sales — covered only an average of 81% of program expenses. A July 2026 report also revealed that 35% of school meal programs operated at a deficit at the end of the 2023-24 school year, nearly double the 18% reported in 2021–22.

The Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act permanently increases the federal reimbursement level for all free, reduced-price, and paid-rate school meals by 45 cents for every lunch served and 28 cents for every breakfast served, with a yearly adjustment— making it easier for school districts to provide healthy meals to students.

The full text of the bill is here.

This legislation is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Cory Booker (D-N.M.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.).

The Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act has the support of more than a dozen organizations in New Mexico and across the country, including the School Nutrition Association, New Mexico School Nutrition Association, New Mexico Appleseed, Roadrunner Food Bank, Farm to Table New Mexico, Center for Science in the Public Interest, Urban School Food Alliance, New Mexico Voices for Children, Chef Ann Foundation, National Farm to School Network, American Heart Association, National Education Association, National Education Association-NM, Superintendent of Santa Fe Public Schools, Food Research & Action Center, and National Parent Teacher Association, Share Our Strength - No Kid Hungry campaign.

""With prices rising for everything from fresh produce to kitchen equipment and skilled labor, federal reimbursements no longer cover the cost of preparing healthy school meals,"" said School Nutrition Association President Ashley Powell, PhD, RD, FAND, SNS. ""To meet updated federal nutrition standards, schools need additional funds to purchase more fresh, whole foods and invest in kitchen upgrades and culinary training. The Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act will ensure school meal programs have the necessary resources to fuel students for success in and out of the classroom.""

""The New Mexico School Nutrition Association proudly supports Senator Martin Heinrich's Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act. School nutrition professionals across our state see firsthand how critical a well-nourished day is to a child’s ability to focus, learn, and grow. By permanently increasing federal reimbursement rates for school meals, this legislation provides our school food authorities with the vital resources they need to combat rising food costs, enhance daily menus, and successfully sustain New Mexico's commitment to universal free school meals. We applaud Senator Heinrich’s continued leadership in ensuring that no child has to face the school day on an empty stomach,"" said New Mexico School Nutrition Association Legislative Chair and Director of Student Nutrition at Hobbs Municipal Schools Sonya Moore, SNS.

“Roadrunner Food Bank is once again honored and committed to endorse Senator Heinrich’s Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act. We believe that every child should have consistent access to the nutritious meals they need to be successful in school and in life. By increasing reimbursement for school breakfasts and lunches, this legislation will help reduce childhood food insecurity in every state. It will also help strengthen New Mexico’s own groundbreaking universal school meals program,” said Roadrunner Food Bank President and CEO Dana Yost.

“One of the most powerful tools we have in education is the USDA school meal program. It is an evidence-based antidote to chronic absenteeism, low academic performance, and disruptive classroom behavior. USDA school meals provide critical nutrition to children for brain growth, focus, and behavior at school. Ample research shows that there is a high correlation between USDA school breakfast and lunch with higher test scores, improved attendance rates and even better behavior in class. We are grateful to Senator Heinrich for making sure kids cannot just show up to school, but thrive when they are there,” said Child Poverty Expert and Founder of New Mexico Appleseed Jennifer Ramo.

“As one of the first states to provide healthy school meals to every student, we know the significant value of federal meal reimbursements through the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. With federal cuts impacting SNAP enrollment and rising costs of food, it's more important than ever to increase the reimbursements for school meal programs so we can continue to keep our students fed and ready to learn,” said Director of Policy at New Mexico Voices for Children Emily Wildau.

""Every child deserves to come to school ready to learn, and we know that is much harder when a child is hungry,” said Superintendent of Santa Fe Public Schools Dr. Christine Griffin. “At SFPS, we see every day the difference healthy school meals make for our students and families. Universal school meals remove one more barrier for students, ease some of the financial pressure on families, and allow our kids to focus on learning instead of worrying about their next meal. We appreciate Senator Martin Heinrich’s continued support for school nutrition programs and his understanding that taking care of our students is an important part of helping them succeed.”

“Increasing investment in school meals is one of the best ways to ensure every kid gets the nutrition they need to thrive, and that school nutrition professionals have the resources to do the local purchasing and healthy menu planning they strive for,” said National Farm to School Network Executive Director Jessica Gudmundson.

""Schools want to cook healthier food for students, but the outdated federal meal reimbursement rate is holding them back,” said Chef Ann Foundation CEO and Co-Founder Mara Fleishman. “Raising this rate is the most direct way we can help all schools in every state unlock better meals for kids and fairer wages for our essential school food professionals. We believe passing this legislation is an absolutely necessary step toward prioritizing children's health in America, and we're grateful to Senator Heinrich for championing this critical effort.""

“Healthy school meals are an investment in student success. By increasing federal reimbursements, the Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act would provide schools with more resources to keep pace with the growing demand for school meals and help ensure children have the nutrition they need for their health and learning. We applaud Sen. Heinrich for reintroducing this bill and urge Members of Congress to co-sponsor this important legislation that would fuel bright futures for our nation’s children,” said President of the Food Research & Action Center (FRAC) Crystal FitzSimons.

""For students to achieve their academic dreams, school breakfasts and lunches are as essential as reading and math. As schools face pressure from rising costs, they need more resources to continue providing the healthy food that families can count on,"" said Director for Share Our Strength and Its No Kid Hungry Campaign Claire Borzne. ""Increasing the federal reimbursement rate for meals is an investment in our future that will help schools continue to prepare meals that fuel kids so that they can learn, grow and thrive.""

“Students cannot learn without adequate nutrition and for far too many children, school meals are a necessity and often the most nutritious meals they receive,” said Dr. Bill Datema, president of National PTA. “Our association applauds Senator Heinrich for reintroducing the Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act. Federal investments are critical to help schools feed students breakfast and lunch and provide healthier options.”

###",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-cotton-introduce-bipartisan-legislation-to-improve-medicare-patients-access-to-timely-necessary-care/,"Luján, Cotton Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Improve Medicare Patients’ Access to Timely, Necessary Care",2026-09-23,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) introduced the Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act, legislation to improve Medicare patients’ access to timely and medically necessary care by making the Medicare coverage determination process more predictable, transparent, and rooted in medical evidence.

National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) and Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) are the Medicare policies that determine whether specific medical services, procedures, and devices are considered reasonable and necessary for coverage within a Medicare Administrative Contractor’s (MAC) jurisdiction. The current process for issuing and updating coverage decisions can result in lengthy delays and uncertainty for patients and providers, even as medical evidence and technology continue to advance. By establishing clearer timelines, increasing transparency, and improving oversight, the Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act would help ensure Medicare patients have timely access to medically necessary items and services.

“Medicare beneficiaries should not have to wait years for cutting edge treatments while medical science and technology advance rapidly,” said Senator Luján. “Patients deserve a coverage process that is timely, transparent, and informed by qualified health experts. My Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act will bring greater accountability and certainty to Medicare coverage decisions so patients can access the care they need without unnecessary delays.”

“Arkansas seniors deserve access to high-quality medical treatments, and they shouldn’t have to wait on the slow clock of government to obtain coverage for them. Our bill would require Medicare administrators to give seniors prompt, transparent decisions about their coverage, ensuring they can address their health concerns in a timely manner,” said Senator Cotton.

Specifically, the Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act would:

Establish a predictable timeframe for coverage decisions: Medicare Administrative Contractors would be required to determine whether formal LCD requests and reconsideration requests are complete within 60 days.

Increase transparency in the coverage decision process: Medicare Administrative Contractors would be required to hold public meetings on proposed LCDs, provide advance notice of meeting agendas, seek input from an expert panel that includes patients, physicians, and industry stakeholders, and make meeting records publicly available.

Ensure logical outgrowth of draft LCDs: Final LCDs would be required to be a logical outgrowth of the draft LCD. Any updates to an LCD that are not a logical outgrowth of the draft must be reissued as a draft LCD before finalization.

Strengthening oversight of Medicare coverage decisions: Would provide for additional review by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services following the completion of certain reconsideration requests.

“Patients should not face delays in care because Medicare coverage decisions are developed through processes that lack transparency, consistency, or meaningful stakeholder input,” said Dr. Zhai, College of American Pathologists. “Local Coverage Determinations play an important role in ensuring access to medically necessary services, and it is critical that these policies are based on clear evidence and informed by practicing physicians and patients. This legislation represents an important step toward improving the LCD process by strengthening transparency, increasing accountability, and creating more opportunities for stakeholder engagement. These reforms will help ensure coverage decisions are made through a fair, predictable, and evidence-based process. We commend the bipartisan Senate sponsors for advancing this legislation and for recognizing the importance of timely, transparent coverage policies that support patient access to medically necessary care.”

“Medicare beneficiaries should not have to wait months or years for a decision on whether they can access a technology or service that may be medically necessary to maintain their health, mobility, independence, and quality of life. Timely, transparent, and accountable coverage decisions are essential to a Medicare program that keeps pace with advances in technology and the needs of beneficiaries. The ITEM Coalition commends Senators Luján and Cotton for recognizing that timely access to Medicare coverage is not simply an administrative issue; it is fundamental to ensuring that beneficiaries can access the care and technologies they need,” said Michael Barnett, J.D., ITEM Coalition Co-Coordinator.

“The American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) commends Senators Luján and Cotton for their bipartisan leadership on the Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act. Medicare beneficiaries and their physicians deserve timely, transparent, and evidence-based coverage decisions. This legislation would establish clearer timelines for coverage decisions and ensure physicians and other stakeholders have meaningful opportunities to provide input throughout Medicare’s Local Coverage Determination process,” said Patrick A. DeHeer, DPM, APMA President.

“Timely Medicare coverage is critical to ensuring patients can benefit from the latest lifesaving, life-changing medtech,” said Scott Whitaker, president and CEO of AdvaMed, the medtech association. “By setting clear expectations for Local Coverage Determination reviews and strengthening transparency and accountability, the Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act would help reduce unnecessary delays and make the process more predictable for patients, providers, and innovators. AdvaMed strongly supports this bipartisan legislation and thanks Senators Luján and Cotton and Representatives Dunn, Tenney, Barragán, and Foushee for their leadership.”

Full text of the legislation is available here.

###",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-van-hollen-colleagues-push-trump-to-negotiate-ai-guardrails-with-xi/,"Luján, Van Hollen, Colleagues Push Trump to Negotiate AI Guardrails with Xi",2026-09-23,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Senators’ letter calls for global cooperation on AI development to preserve public safety and human control

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) joined U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and 15 colleagues in calling on President Donald Trump to negotiate a formal agreement between the U.S. and China on guardrails and global standards for the development, testing, and use of frontier Artificial Intelligence (AI) models with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The lawmakers also urged President Trump to consider enacting a mutual pause in frontier AI development to prevent potential cyberattacks, the development of biological weapons, and other dangerous activities that could threaten humanity.

Senators Luján and Van Hollen were joined in sending this letter by Senators Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.).

The lawmakers begin, “We write concerning public reporting that your administration plans to have discussions about artificial intelligence with China during the upcoming summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping currently planned for September 24, 2026. We support this dialogue and encourage you to have those discussions at the highest level. As extraordinary as the promise of some of AI’s advanced capabilities are, safety incidents make clear that both national and international infrastructure is threatened by unregulated testing and release of AI models. It is incumbent upon both governments to discuss necessary guardrails and global standards for the development, testing, and use of AI in order to mitigate the risks of unfettered advancement. As you prepare for the upcoming summit, we urge you to engage with President Xi directly to discuss efforts to avoid the potential harms of this technology for the safety and benefit of the world. America leads in AI innovation, and we must lead the world in AI safety and international cooperation, including by working with China to develop a formal agreement that would slow down, and potentially enact a mutual pause in, frontier AI development to prevent cyberattacks, the development of biological weapons, and other dangerous activities that threaten the lives of the American people and humanity writ large.”

They note specifically, “The conversations should include specific focus on the standards needed for development and testing processes, oversight and monitoring of models, enforcing human control over the use of autonomous systems, and technological verification of any agreed upon terms to ensure that an agreement is being enforced. Protecting American safety and leadership in AI will require international cooperation with many countries, but it must start with serious engagement by your administration and China at this summit.”

“AI technology is too powerful, and its risks too many, for the U.S. and China to forgo discussions on parameters around its development and use. What our two countries develop as guardrails will serve as a standard for how the technology is used worldwide. Given how quickly AI technology is developing and how transformative it may be, we cannot delay our pursuit of diplomatic efforts to mitigate its risks. Those efforts must start with direct engagement with China to ensure the safety and well-being of all people as AI innovation continues,” the lawmakers conclude.

The full text of the letter is available here and below.

President Trump:

We write concerning public reporting that your administration plans to have discussions about artificial intelligence with China during the upcoming summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping currently planned for September 24, 2026. We support this dialogue and encourage you to have those discussions at the highest level. As extraordinary as the promise of some of AI’s advanced capabilities are, safety incidents make clear that both national and international infrastructure is threatened by unregulated testing and release of AI models. It is incumbent upon both governments to discuss necessary guardrails and global standards for the development, testing, and use of AI in order to mitigate the risks of unfettered advancement. As you prepare for the upcoming summit, we urge you to engage with President Xi directly to discuss efforts to avoid the potential harms of this technology for the safety and benefit of the world. America leads in AI innovation, and we must lead the world in AI safety and international cooperation, including by working with China to develop a formal agreement that would slow down, and potentially enact a mutual pause in, frontier AI development to prevent cyberattacks, the development of biological weapons, and other dangerous activities that threaten the lives of the American people and humanity writ large.

The development, release, and proper and improper use of AI present several risks unique to this technology. Testing AI models without constant monitoring and safe sandboxing has resulted in security breaks. Current publicly available models are concerningly capable of detecting and exploiting cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Companies developing AI have even more powerful models internally. An international race between the U.S. and China to advance these capabilities without safety guardrails, as is currently unfolding, poses unnecessary and dangerous risks to the American people. CIA Director John Ratcliffe recently said that it would “not be misplaced” to refer to the capabilities of AI as “akin to digital nuclear weapons.” At the same time, despite serious warnings from those in your administration and bipartisan Congressional action, your administration has loosened export controls of semiconductors to China and refused to close relevant loopholes on the remaining regulations, enabling China to access the U.S. chips it needs to accelerate its own AI development. Both countries are currently integrating AI tools into military and defense applications, including in autonomous and unmanned systems, which Congress and AI developers alike have warned against without significant safeguards. AI has many applications and many of them are tools we will find beneficial, but its significant dangers and potential use in lethal applications without meaningful human control must be addressed, in part, through international cooperation.

In addition, efforts to engage with China should not stop the U.S. from constructing and implementing guardrails domestically, and Congress and U.S. companies should not wait to do so. In fact, both the U.S. and the Chinese government have already put some guardrails in place, but these provisions are not sufficient on their own. Your administration has implemented a voluntary testing scheme before the public release of advanced AI models. China reportedly has put in place several testing and capability restrictions, including registration and safety requirements for certain applications, although consistent implementation remains uncertain. The mutual recognition between the two countries that AI poses significant risks both during development and after release should be the foundation of discussions centered on reaching concrete terms for an international safety agreement. The conversations should include specific focus on the standards needed for development and testing processes, oversight and monitoring of models, enforcing human control over the use of autonomous systems, and technological verification of any agreed upon terms to ensure that an agreement is being enforced. Protecting American safety and leadership in AI will require international cooperation with many countries, but it must start with serious engagement by your administration and China at this summit.

While advanced AI may be new, engagement between two superpowers over a technology that poses an existential threat is not. The U.S. and Soviet Union, over decades, negotiated and implemented multiple nuclear arms control agreements with each other, despite many deep-seated ideological differences during the Cold War. At the core of those agreements were verification mechanisms to ensure both countries were complying. Like those agreements that have helped keep the world safe from mutually assured destruction, identifying and coming to terms with the technical specifications for AI safety will require some of the smartest minds in the world committed to diplomacy. We encourage you to embrace these challenges because the stakes are existential, and our response must match the moment.

The experts building frontier AI models have also been raising concerns for some time that the capabilities of AI models may soon accelerate beyond our ability to understand or control them. In July, over 1,300 employees of frontier AI companies, who are uniquely aware of AI’s potential and risks, called on the U.S. government to engage in an international effort to create the tools necessary to pace the frontier of AI development, particularly as increased automation of AI research may lead to even faster advancement. We should take these warnings seriously. Former Treasury Secretaries Henry Paulson and Robert Rubin recently published an op-ed calling for you and President Xi to work on an “ACT” — AI Cooperation Treaty.” We may not get another moment to take the actions necessary to protect our citizens and people around the world.

AI technology is too powerful, and its risks too many, for the U.S. and China to forgo discussions on parameters around its development and use. What our two countries develop as guardrails will serve as a standard for how the technology is used worldwide. Given how quickly AI technology is developing and how transformative it may be, we cannot delay our pursuit of diplomatic efforts to mitigate its risks. Those efforts must start with direct engagement with China to ensure the safety and well-being of all people as AI innovation continues.

###",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/watch-lujan-delivers-major-win-for-new-mexicos-land-grant-communities-and-traditional-uses/,WATCH: Luján Delivers Major Win for New Mexico’s Land Grant Communities and Traditional Uses,2026-09-23,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) led the unanimous Senate passage of the New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act, legislation to strengthen cooperation between the federal government and land grant communities. There are 27 community land grant-mercedes that are recognized as political subdivisions under New Mexico law. The legislation was introduced by Senator Luján and U.S. Representative Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.).

WATCH: Luján Secures Unanimous Consent Request on U.S. Senate Floor

Senator Luján has championed this legislation for years, previously passing it through the House of Representatives while serving in the House and continuing that effort in the Senate.

“Land grant communities in New Mexico have cared for our lands, sustained our communities, and preserved traditions deeply rooted in our state’s history and culture,” said Senator Luján. “For too long, these communities have faced unnecessary barriers when working with the federal government. This legislation has been years in the making, and I’m proud that we are one step closer toward making this law. This is about making sure the people who have cared for these lands for generations have a stronger voice in the decisions that affect their communities, livelihoods, and traditions.”

“The New Mexico Land Grant Council is excited that Senate Bill 1363, the New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act, passed the United States Senate today. The Bill has been in the works for over a decade, and Senator Luján has been a tireless advocate fighting for its passage. The Bill provides a mechanism for land grant-merced communities to get meaningful recognition of their connection to, and traditional use of former common lands now managed by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management in New Mexico,” said Chairman Juan Sánchez, New Mexico Land Grant Council.

“El Consejo de Las Mercedes is pleased that the U.S. Senate passed Senate Bill 1363 today. The New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act is a monumental step forward to ensuring that land grant-merced communities have continued access to traditional uses on our historic lands that are now under the control of the Federal Government,” said Jason Quintana, President, El Consejo de Las Mercedes.

“I am so excited to here that our Traditional Use legislation was passed by the U.S. Senate. This is truly an accomplishment for our land grants and our traditional communities. This will allow to work more closely with federal and state agencies to accomplish great things for our gente. Que vivan las Mercedes!” said Andrea Padilla, President Town of Tome Land Grant.

The New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act:

Directs the United States Department of the Interior (DOI) and Department of Agriculture (USDA), through a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the New Mexico Land Grant Council, to clarify existing agency processes that qualified land grant-mercedes may use to seek authorization for historical or traditional uses on Federal public lands, including permit requirements and associated fees;

Clarifies that the MOU does not directly authorize any uses or activities on Federal public lands;

Directs the DOI and USDA to consult with Tribes when the MOU is entered into, extended, renewed or revised;

Ensures that the MOU contains a description of the notice and comment procedures on agency land management planning decisions, and that qualified land grant-mercedes, the New Mexico Land Grant Council, and Tribes are notified of opportunities to comment on and be involved in agency land management planning decisions; and

Requires the DOI and the USDA to evaluate impacts on historical or traditional uses in Federal land use planning.

In April 2025, Senator Luján and Representative Leger Fernández reintroduced the New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act. In December 2025, the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources passed the legislation.

A summary of the bill is available HERE. Full text of the legislation is available HERE.

###",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-demands-trump-admin-immediately-halt-construction-of-trumps-250-foot-arch,Heinrich Demands Trump Admin Immediately Halt Construction of Trump’s 250-Foot Arch,2026-09-22,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, led his Senate colleagues in sending a letter to Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary Doug Burgum demanding that the Trump administration stop work on President Trump’s commemorative arch on federal property, which federal officials have admitted will harm historic sites on public lands, including Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial.

“We write with our continued concern that President Trump’s proposed 250-foot Triumphal Arch will cast a shadow over some of our nation’s most historic monuments and memorials, as indicated in the National Park Service’s (NPS) own assessment, and to renew our call for you to immediately halt work on the project,” the lawmakers began.

Late last year, the President unveiled a plan to build a towering arch near a number of historic sites and landmarks, including Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial. In response, Heinrich and his colleagues raised significant concerns about the legality of the arch and its impact on neighboring historic sites—demanding the administration halt construction of the President’s latest vanity project. Those concerns have proven to be accurate. NPS’ own assessment now confirms what we all have known to be true.

“Last month—under requirements set forth in section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act—NPS concluded that the President’s illegal arch could adversely affect 37 historic sites in and around the nation’s capital,” the lawmakers continued. “The proposed arch would have the most pronounced impact on the Memorial Avenue Corridor Cultural Landscape, Arlington Memorial Bridge, and Arlington National Cemetery Historic District. Other historic sites built decades ago, such as National Mall, U.S. Capitol, and Washington Monument, would also be affected by the construction of the arch. Section 106 is clear: the administration must seek to “avoid, minimize, or mitigate,” adverse harm to historic sites.”

“Putting the President’s ego ahead of these memorials adds another stain on this administration’s legacy,” the lawmakers continued.

The lawmakers ended their letter by demanding that the Trump administration halt work on its 250-foot arch.

In April, Heinrich voted against a resolution in Senate Republicans’ budget resolution that allowed for the construction of Trump’s arch.

In March, Heinrich joined lawmakers in filing an amicus brief that would stop President Trump’s plan to construct a commemorative arch on federal property. The amicus brief argues that President Trump’s plan is illegal unless Congress authorizes it.

In addition to Heinrich, the letter was signed by U.S. Senators Angus King (I-Maine), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).

You can read the letter here and below.

We write with our continued concern that President Trump’s proposed 250-foot Triumphal Arch will cast a shadow over some of our nation’s most historic monuments and memorials, as indicated in the National Park Service’s (NPS) own assessment, and to renew our call for you to immediately halt work on the project.

Late last year, the President unveiled a plan to build a towering arch near a number of historic sites and landmarks, including Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial. In response, we raised significant concerns about the legality of the arch and its impact on neighboring historic sites—demanding the Administration halt construction of the President’s latest vanity project. Those concerns have proven to be accurate. NPS’ own assessment now confirms what we all have known to be true.

Last month—under requirements set forth in section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act—NPS concluded that the President’s illegal arch could adversely affect 37 historic sites in and around the nation’s capital. According to the assessment, the arch would impact the “integrity” of historic sites and change “character-defining visual and spatial relationships.” The proposed arch would have the most pronounced impact on the Memorial Avenue Corridor Cultural Landscape, Arlington Memorial Bridge, and Arlington National Cemetery Historic District. Other historic sites built decades ago, such as National Mall, U.S. Capitol, and Washington Monument, would also be affected by the construction of the arch. Section 106 is clear: the Administration must seek to “avoid, minimize, or mitigate,” adverse harm to historic sites.

This threat is no longer hypothetical. You recently announced that the Administration intends to begin excavation work on the arch within two weeks despite the project lacking final approval from the National Capital Planning Commission and required reviews of aviation safety and historic preservation impacts. The next day, the veterans challenging the arch in federal court asked the court to intervene before ground is broken, and U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ordered the Administration to provide 48 hours’ notice before undertaking any activity on Memorial Circle other than on-site information gathering. We share that same concern, and it underscores the urgency of our request.

Historic sites in and around the nation’s capital have been carefully planned over decades and hold significant symbolic value to the nation and our shared history as Americans. In particular, the Lincoln Memorial, Arlington National Cemetery, and Arlington House form a single memorial landscape honoring the unity of our nation, its military history, and the ultimate sacrifice of service members who gave their lives to our nation. Putting the President’s ego ahead of these memorials adds another stain on this Administration’s legacy.

The Department should adhere to the highest standards in avoiding adverse impacts to some of our nation’s most sacred memorials. We demand the Administration immediately halt work on the arch in light of the unavoidable damage it will do to these memorials to honor those who gave the greatest sacrifice for our nation’s freedom.",1,2026-09-23T09:45:16Z,2026-09-23T09:46:14Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-joins-bipartisan-congressional-push-to-stop-proposed-yosemite-land-transfer-to-trump-donor,Heinrich Joins Bipartisan Congressional Push to Stop Proposed Yosemite Land Transfer to Trump Donor,2026-09-22,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — This week, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, joined a bipartisan group of 153 lawmakers in urging the Department of the Interior (DOI) to abandon a proposed transfer of federally managed public land within Yosemite National Park that would facilitate private access to and development of an 83-acre parcel adjacent to the park known as Hazel Green Ranch. U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), along with U.S. Representatives Jim Costa (D-Calif.) and Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), led the effort.

In their letter to the Department of the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the lawmakers condemned recent reporting that indicated the Trump administration is considering a proposal to exchange or convey an interest in an approximately quarter-mile strip of federally managed public land within Yosemite to facilitate access to private property owned by Kingsbarn, a company whose chief executive officer began making a series of donations to Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee in late 2024 — shortly after Kingsbarn acquired the Hazel Green Ranch property.

“At its core, this proposal appears to provide a private benefit at the expense of land that belongs to all Americans,” the lawmakers wrote. “Any decision to relinquish public land to private ownership should be supported by a clear and compelling public benefit, not merely the economic interests of a private party.”

The lawmakers also raised concerns about the Department’s proposal to use Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) authority to facilitate the exchange. The letter noted that the Senate Interior-Environment Appropriations Subcommittee did not agree to move forward with the project due to congressional objections.

“Public lands belong in public hands,” the lawmakers concluded. “Protection of public lands is a bipartisan issue, overwhelmingly supported by the American people from all walks of life.”

As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Heinrich is leading efforts to protect our public lands and to hold the Trump administration accountable for their attacks on these treasured places.

In July, Heinrich criticized legislation that removes protections for public lands, emphasizing the need for bipartisan collaboration within the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

In June, Heinrich helped advance the America the Beautiful Act, bipartisan legislation introduced by U.S. Senators Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Angus King (I-Maine) to reauthorize the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund, out of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

In March, Heinrich led his colleagues in delivering remarks on the Senate floor in condemning and drawing attention to the Trump administration’s efforts to erase American history from public lands.

In October of 2025, Heinrich delivered remarks on the Senate floor, criticizing Republicans for pushing forward Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions of disapproval targeting Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Resource Management Plans (RMPs) that would undo protections for national parks, including the Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve.

In July of 2025, Heinrich blasted the Trump administration for its plans to transfer national park units to state control, criticizing the administration for “cutting off our access to public lands and devastating state economies in the process, overwhelming state budgets and dismantling the systems that keep public lands running.”

In June of 2025, Heinrich successfully fought Senate Republican provisions to sell off public lands in the Big Bad Bill, and led an amendment to prevent the privatization of our public lands.

In May of 2025, Heinrich sent a letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, demanding answers from the Trump administration regarding its plans to transfer National Park System units from federal management. The letter follows Heinrich’s questioning of Secretary Burgum during a Senate Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, where Burgum failed to provide sufficient answers on the Trump administration’s plan to transfer hundreds of sites managed by the NPS to the states.

Full letter is available here and below:

Dear Secretary Burgum:

Yosemite National Park is a cornerstone of the National Park System and is one of California’s crown jewels. President Theodore Roosevelt once said that “nothing in the world is more beautiful than the Yosemite” and that our national parks should be “preserved” and “their majestic beauty all unmarred.” Yosemite is a national treasure preserved for the benefit of the American people. Its continued beauty, status as a wildlife sanctuary, and source of enjoyment is contingent upon preservation and proper maintenance of its land—not parts being sold off to enrich nearby private property owners. We are extremely concerned that the Department of the Interior is considering selling off portions of the park to private development and we strongly oppose the proposed land transfer.

Recent reporting indicates that since early 2025, the Department of the Interior and the National Park Service have been considering a proposal to exchange or convey an interest in an approximately quarter-mile strip of federally managed public land within Yosemite National Park to facilitate access to an 83-acre privately owned ranch. This is not the first time this property has sought to have private access to Yosemite, with federal courts blocking this right to access in both 2007 and 2012. Now that the ranch has a new owner, they are once again seeking to acquire this land to enhance the value of their property, and the political leadership at DOI is pressuring career staff to approve the exchange.

At its core, this proposal appears to provide a private benefit at the expense of land that belongs to all Americans. This transaction does not seek to expand public access to Yosemite, improve visitor services, or address transportation deficiencies in park access. Rather, this land exchange seeks to merely cut down on driving time for a select few on private property. Any decision to relinquish public land to private ownership should be supported by a clear and compelling public benefit, not merely the economic interests of a private party.

We were alarmed that the Department submitted to Congress a proposal to use money from the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) authority to facilitate this exchange. That fund exists to acquire and protect public lands for the benefit of the American public—not sell them off to corporate developers. In response to the Department’s request to fund this exchange through the LWCF, the Senate Interior-Environment Appropriations Subcommittee did not agree to move forward on this project due to our objection.

Further, in response to inquiries from Congress, the Department indicated that it has not identified any land to be exchanged for the parcel of Yosemite National Park that the Department is seeking to sell to the private developer. This gives further credence to the notion that this exchange is not being done in the public interest, but rather solely to benefit a private developer. In its justification for the LWCF proposal, the Department indicated that this exchange was a “priority,” while providing no compelling explanation for why it was in the interest of the United States to pursue this exchange. Instead, when explaining the need for the project, the Department simply stated that the private landowner requested an interest in federally owned property within the national park.

Public lands belong in public hands. Protection of public lands is a bipartisan issue, overwhelmingly supported by the American people from all walks of life. We oppose any effort to privatize, sell off, give away, or otherwise undermine the continued existence of public lands, in Yosemite or across the country. We ask that you honor congressional objections and abandon this effort to sell off a piece of Yosemite National Park.

Sincerely,",1,2026-09-23T09:45:16Z,2026-09-23T09:46:14Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-trumps-unconstitutional-press-ban/,Luján Statement on Trump’s Unconstitutional Press Ban,2026-09-21,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Senate Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Media, issued the following statement on President Trump’s decision to ban journalists from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House:

“This is an outrageous attack on the First Amendment. The White House press corps show up to work every day on behalf of the American people to hold public officials accountable.

“President Trump doesn’t like when the press report on his countless broken promises and failures, so he is trying to get rid of them. It’s page one in the authoritarian handbook.”

###",1,2026-09-22T09:42:49Z,2026-09-22T09:44:35Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-demands-transparency-on-hundreds-of-millions-in-taxpayer-dollars-spent-paying-employees-not-to-work,Heinrich Demands Transparency on Hundreds of Millions in Taxpayer Dollars Spent Paying Employees Not to Work,2026-09-18,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"Recent reporting from POLITICO states that the Interiorspent more than $150 million on administrative leave for employees in 2025

WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, sent a letter to the Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary Doug Burgum demanding more information on why the Interior spent more than $150 million in paid administrative leave last year, according to recent reporting.

“I write to request detailed information regarding the Department of the Interior’s (Department or DOI) misguided reductions in workforce under the deferred resignation program (DRP). It is clear from recent reporting that the Department’s downsizing was executed poorly and costly to taxpayers, to say nothing of its impact to the Department’s mission,” Heinrich began.

In his letter, Heinrich demanded clarity on the Interior’s use of its deferred resignation program, and the total amount the Interior spent on employees placed on paid administrative leave due to the deferred resignation program since the start of the administration.

“More than one year has passed since the Trump administration introduced the DRP, but Congress and the American people still do not know the full extent of its impact,” Heinrich continued.

Heinrich specifically requested that the Interior disclose the number of employees placed on paid administrative leave since the start of the Trump administration, the total amount spent on employees placed on paid administrative leave due to the program, and a breakdown on the employees who were offered and accepted the program’s benefits and early retirement.

Read the full text of the letter here and below.

Secretary Burgum:

I write to request detailed information regarding the Department of the Interior’s (Department or DOI) misguided reductions in workforce under the deferred resignation program (DRP). It is clear from recent reporting that the Department’s downsizing was executed poorly and costly to taxpayers, to say nothing of its impact to the Department’s mission.

According to a recent report, the Department paid employees more than $150 million in paid administrative leave to stay at home from the start of the administration through December 31, 2025. Of the 1,764 employees put on administrative leave, more than two-thirds – 1,468 – participated in the DRP and mostly worked in locations outside of the Beltway—from New Mexico to Ohio to North Carolina. Additionally, it appears the Department continues to utilize the DRP. In April 2026, the Department announced a new round of DRPs and voluntary early retirement offers to employees.

More than one year has passed since the Trump administration introduced the DRP , but Congress and the American people still do not know the full extent of its impact. To understand the Department’s use of the DRP and the total cost shouldered by taxpayers as a result, I request the following data and information by October 1, 2026:

The number of employees placed on paid administrative leave since the start of the administration. In responding to this question, please provide the office, agency, or bureau the employee works or worked in; reason for placing the person on administrative leave (e.g., DRP); their grade or level; position title; salary or pay rate; duty station; and the number of days of leave.

The total amount the Department spent (salaries and benefits) on employees placed on paid administrative leave due to the deferred resignation program, since the start of the administration.

Provide the following information related to the Department’s April 2026 announcement of DRPs and voluntary early retirement offers:

A detailed breakdown of employees offered the deferred resignation program and early retirement. Please provide the following as part of your response: which office, agency, or bureau the employee works in; their grade or level; position title; salary or pay rate; and duty station.

The number of employees that have accepted the deferred resignation program and early retirement and are now or have been previously on paid administrative leave. Please provide the following as part of your response: which office, agency, or bureau the employee works in; their grade or level; position title; salary or pay rate; and duty station.

Thank you for your attention to this request. Should you have any questions, please contact my staff at (202) 224-4971.",1,2026-09-19T09:11:33Z,2026-09-19T09:12:45Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-offers-his-grid-savings-act-to-force-ai-data-centers-to-pay-for-grid-upgrades-highlights-how-husted-backed-bill-falls-short,"Heinrich Offers His GRID Savings Act to Force AI Data Centers to Pay for Grid Upgrades, Highlights How Husted-Backed Bill Falls Short",2026-09-17,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, took to the Senate floor to object to Senate passage of the Ratepayer Protection Act, legislation offered by U.S. Senator Jon Husted (R-Ohio), and pass Heinrich's GRID Savings Act instead.

While the Husted-backed legislation relies on a voluntary framework and fails to adequately protect American families from AI data center-caused increases in energy costs, Heinrich's legislation forces large load customers—like data centers—to pay for the facilities needed to connect them to the grid. Unfortunately, U.S. Senator Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) objected to Heinrich's request to pass the GRID Savings Act.

“When I open my electricity bill, and read to see how much I owe for the month, it doesn’t say I ‘may’ pay that amount. It doesn’t say I ‘should’ pay that amount. It’s not optional. Just like every other bill-paying American out there, I open that bill and I have to pay it. The same needs to be true for AI data centers,” said Heinrich. “If hyperscalers and other big tech companies need expensive new facilities and more energy, they should pay for it—not our hardworking families and small businesses.”

Heinrich continued, “The Senator from Ohio and I agree on that principle. And plenty of big tech companies have said that’s their plan. But it’s not enough to just take their word for it. And it’s not enough for us to just tell states to consider making data centers pay for grid upgrades. Rather than voluntary pledges or suggestions to states, Congress needs to pass real legislation with real teeth.”

VIDEO: U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, urges his colleagues to pass his GRID Savings Act to force data centers to pay for their grid upgrades, rather than pass along those costs to families, September 17, 2026.

A video of Heinrich’s floor speech can be found here.

A transcript of Heinrich’s remarks as delivered is below:

M. President, reserving the right to object—

The Senator from Ohio and I agree on one thing: AI data centers could mean higher costs for American families.

And in a lot of places, they already do.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas found that data center demand has already pushed electricity prices across the nation up by two to six percent – a number that they expect to increase to 20 to 30 percent by 2028.

In the mid-Atlantic region, that means an extra $840 a year per family in the next two years. $840.

We expect to see increases like this across the country as more AI data centers come online. But the Ratepayer Protection Act falls short of what we need to do to respond.

When I open my mail and unfold my electricity bill, and read how much I owe for the month, it doesn’t say I “may” pay that amount.

It doesn’t say I “should” pay that amount.

It’s not optional.

Just like every other bill-paying American family out there, I open that bill and I have to pay it.

The same needs to be true for AI data centers.

If hyperscalers and other big tech developers need expensive new facilities and more energy, they should pay for it—not our hardworking families and small businesses.

I think the Senator from Ohio and I agree on that principle. And plenty of big tech companies have said that’s their plan.

But it’s not enough to just take their word for it.

It’s not enough for us to tell states to consider making data centers pay for grid upgrades.

Rather than voluntary pledges or suggestions to states, Congress needs to pass real legislation with real teeth.

That’s why I introduced the GRID Savings Act to require, not a voluntary agreement, large load customers—like data centers—to pay for the facilities needed to connect them to the grid.

Not to consider it. Not to make pledges about it.

To actually do it. To pay for the upgrades they need.

That way, we can ensure reliable, low-cost energy to power our everyday lives.

?My bill is what is needed to start to bring down energy prices.

We also need to do more to get data centers to actually engage with communities from the beginning to the very end.

We need to conserve local resources, especially water.

And we need to protect communities from air pollution by using clean energy and battery storage.

But we’re not going to get there with the bill the Senator from Ohio has proposed, and therefore, Mr. President, I object.

Mr. President, as if in legislative session, and notwithstanding, I would ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources be discharged from further consideration of S.5199, the GRID Savings Act, and that the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration. Further, that the bill be considered read a third time and passed, and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.",1,2026-09-18T09:27:43Z,2026-09-18T09:29:09Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/200-days-into-trumps-38-billion-war-with-iran-new-mexicans-are-paying-the-price/,"200 Days Into Trump’s $38 Billion War With Iran, New Mexicans Are Paying the Price",2026-09-17,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Donald Trump: “It’s small potatoes for us. It’s not a big thing.” 9/4/26

New Mexico Diesel Prices Hit Record-High Under Donald Trump

Washington, D.C. — Two hundred days ago, President Trump launched the United States into a reckless war with Iran with no plan, no strategy, and no end game. Although he repeatedly assured the American people of a quick and decisive victory. His timeline has moved again and again: from “total and complete victory” and a war “won” in its “first hour,” to promising success in “two or three days,” “two weeks,” “three weeks,” “four weeks,” “five weeks,” or “six weeks.” He later announced an agreement with Iran that he said achieved “everything we set out to accomplish,” only to declare that agreement “over” just weeks later. Now, 200 days into the war, he’s claiming his war will be over “shortly after” the November election.

“New Mexicans are still paying the price for Donald Trump’s 200-day war in Iran, with no end in sight. This war has cost taxpayers nearly $40 billion, driven up prices for families, depleted critical resources, and put our service members in harm’s way,” said Senator Luján. “Yet as this war continues to spiral out of control, Congressional Republicans have repeatedly refused to stand up to President Trump.”

“New Mexicans should not have to pay more at the pump and at the grocery store for a war they never wanted,” Senator Luján continued. “I will keep fighting to end this war and stop New Mexico families from being forced to foot the bill for this reckless president.”

Americans are paying for every additional day this war drags on. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the Department of Defense had already incurred approximately $38 billion in costs as of August 1—before the last month and a half of fighting. CBO estimates that every additional month of this war could add another $2 billion to $3 billion to the price tag, not including costs to repair the vast damage Iran has inflicted on our bases or what it will cost to rebuild our depleted munitions supply.

Americans have also already spent more than $107 billion extra on gasoline and diesel because of Trump’s war, amounting to over $820 per household. The New Mexico average for gas has surged to $4.47 per gallon while diesel has reached a high of $6.34 per gallon. Higher gas and diesel prices are also pushing up Americans’ costs on everything from groceries to home energy to air travel.

Two hundred days into the conflict, Americans are facing billions in federal costs, nearly two-thirds say going to war was the wrong decision—and there is still no end in sight.

February

President Donald Trump: “I can go long and take over the whole thing, or end it in two or three days.” [Axios, 2/28/26]

March

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth: “We can say four weeks, but it could be six, it could be eight, it could be three.” [Press Briefing, 3/4/26]

President Donald Trump: “We’ve already won in many ways, but we haven’t won enough.” [Speech, 3/9/26]

President Donald Trump: “We had to do a little excursion, if you don’t mind, a little excursion to take care of nuclear weaponry in the hands of maniacs. But other than that, in a couple of weeks and won’t be much longer, it’s moving along fast. We’re way ahead of schedule. Did you know that, Mr. Speaker? I’m trying to save a lot of money by being ahead of schedule. We’re way ahead of schedule.” [Remarks,3/17/26]

President Donald Trump: “Well, I think we’re going to end it. I can’t tell you for sure. You know, I don’t like to say this, we’ve won this – this war has been won.” [Press Conference, 3/24/26]

President Donald Trump: “We estimated it would take approximately four to six weeks to achieve our mission, and we’re way ahead of schedule. If you look at what we’ve done in terms of the destruction of that country, I mean, we’re way ahead. Think of it, they have no Navy, and they had good ships. 154 ships have been shot down and are resting very nicely at the bottom of the sea. And we did that in a matter of less than a week, because we have the greatest military in the world by far, nobody even close. So, we estimated it would take approximately four to six weeks to achieve our mission. 26 days in, we’re extremely – really a lot ahead of schedule.” [Cabinet Meeting, 3/26/26]

President Donald Trump: “I would say that within two weeks, maybe two weeks, maybe three, we’re hitting them very hard. Last night we knocked out tremendous amounts of missile making facilities. We, as you probably read or wrote, we’ll be gone.” [Remarks, 3/31/26]

April

President Donald Trump: “The war is going to be over in three days. My prediction.” [Remarks, 4/1/26]

President Donald Trump: “We are the winner. We won.” [Press Conference,4/6/26]

President Donald Trump: “If you told me that we were going to be at only 92 a barrel, $92 a barrel, I would have been very surprised. And you know what? I’m very happy and it’s going to come dropping down very big as soon as it’s over and I think it can be over very soon. If they’re smart, it will end soon.” [Fox Business,4/15/26]

President Donald Trump: “I will say the war in Iran is going along swimmingly. We can do whatever we want. And it should be ending pretty soon. It was perfect. [Speech, 4/16/26]

President Donald Trump: “We won everything. We have all the cards.” [Press Gaggle, 4/25/26]

May

President Donald Trump: “We’ve taken out much of what we’d have to do,probably another two weeks, two weeks, maybe three weeks.” [Interview,5/4/26]

Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “The operation is over.” [Press Briefing, 5/5/26]

President Donald Trump: “I think we’re going to be finished with that very quickly and they won’t have a nuclear weapon and hopefully we’re going to get it done in a very nice manner.” [Remarks, 5/19/26]

June

Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “The war is over.” [Committee Hearing, 6/2/26]

President Donald Trump: “You’re really going to win it over the next two weeks when we declare total victory. It’ll be a total victory. It’ll happen very soon.” [Tele-Rally, 6/8/26]

President Donald Trump: “Two or three days.” [Press Gaggle, 6/9/26]

President Donald Trump: “I don’t know if you heard, but we ended the war with Iran today.” [Tele-Rally, 6/11/26]

Defense Secretary Pete Hesgeth: “We’re on the verge of a deal.” [CBS News Face the Nation, 6/14/26]

President Donald Trump: “On Sunday, we reached an agreement with Iran that achieves everything we set out to accomplish—everything and much more.” [Press Conference, 6/17/26]

July

President Donald Trump: “We have many ways we can win, but we’ve already won militarily. They have very little left, and they want to make a deal so badly.” [Press Gaggle, 7/9/26]

President Donald Trump: “We’ll have Iran defeated soon. They’ll be defeated very soon.” [Remarks, 7/15/26]

President Donald Trump: “We are, likewise, winning big in Iran, and you will see the fruits of that labor very shortly.” [Remarks, 7/17/26]

August

President Donald Trump: “We’re moving along very nicely.” [Press Gaggle,8/5/26]

President Donald Trump: “Some good things are going to happen very soon. They’ve already happened.” [Remarks, 8/16/26]

President Donald Trump: “I have no time schedule…I’m not in a hurry.” [Fox News,8/17/26]

President Donald Trump: “But right now, I think the situation is so good.” [Press Gaggle, 8/19/26]

September

President Donald Trump: “It’s small potatoes for us. It’s not a big thing.” [Press Briefing, 9/4/26]

President Donald Trump: “The war will be over very shortly after the election.” [Speech, 9/9/26]

###",1,2026-09-18T09:27:43Z,2026-09-18T09:29:09Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/as-home-heating-season-approaches-lujan-bipartisan-colleagues-urge-trump-admin-to-swiftly-release-liheap-funding/,"As Home-Heating Season Approaches, Luján, Bipartisan Colleagues Urge Trump Admin. to Swiftly Release LIHEAP Funding",2026-09-17,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – With energy costs rising and winter approaching, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) joined U.S. Senators Jack Reed (D-RI), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) in leading a bipartisan push for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to release funds for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) as swiftly and at the highest level possible.

Appropriators worked on a bipartisan basis to make roughly $4 billion in federal LIHEAP funds available for the coming year.

Thirty-one U.S. Senators joined in calling on HHS to swiftly distribute LIHEAP aid before winter home-heating bills arrive to help states and eligible households manage their energy costs.

LIHEAP provides financial assistance to income-eligible homeowners and renters to help with energy bills and for reconnection of energy service. The program is targeted to assist vulnerable households facing high energy burdens—the share of a household’s income that goes toward their energy bills. Low-income homes generally spend the biggest percentage of their income on utility bills. However, factors such as income, weather, housing stock, fuel type, and energy-efficiency can all impact a household’s energy burden.

“As you know, the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (P.L. 119-103) requires the Department of Health and Human Services to distribute no less than 90 percent of its total LIHEAP allotment by November 1, 2026. Given the extraordinary pressure consumers will face this winter, we ask that you make this distribution well before the deadline,” the 31 U.S. Senators wrote.

In addition to Luján, Reed, Collins, and Murkowski, the letter was signed by U.S. Senators Angela D. Alsobrooks (D-MD), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Chris Coons (D-DE), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Mark Warner (D-VA), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Peter Welch (D-VT), Angus S. King, Jr. (I-ME), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NM), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Gary Peters (D-MI), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Tina Smith (D-MN), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

The bipartisan group of Senators say the federal government should put preparation ahead of politics and ensure LIHEAP funding is allocated in a timely manner to keep vulnerable citizens safe and warm during winter by helping low-income households and seniors on fixed incomes pay their energy bills. The program also helps reduce energy costs through improved energy efficiency initiatives.

Nationwide, an estimated 6 million households received assistance with heating and cooling costs through LIHEAP over the last year. And more households may need heating assistance this winter as temperatures drop and the cost of oil, gas, propane, and other residential fuels rise.

States and tribes typically receive their LIHEAP allocations from HHS by early November. Eligibility for LIHEAP is based on income, family size, and the availability of resources. While eligibility varies by state, most applicants must have a household income below 150 percent of the federal poverty guideline or 60 percent of the state median income.

LIHEAP applications are open for all income-eligible households. Senior citizens and those receiving Social Security Disability or SSI benefits are encouraged to apply as early as possible, but applications will be open to everyone through spring of 2027 — or until the funding is exhausted. To find your state agency, visit HHS’s LIHEAP State Map of Contacts.

LIHEAP provides direct payments to utility companies on behalf of approved applicants with demonstrated need.

According to a new forecast from the National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA), heating will be more expensive for allU.S. households this year, but some homes will be hit with steeper increases than others.

Heating oil costs are projected to soar by 31.3 percent this winter, the largest increase among the major heating fuels.

Overall, the average American household is projected to spend an average of $1,030 to heat their homes this winter, an 8.7 percent increase over last year.

Full text of the letter follows:

Dear Secretary Kennedy:

As you know, the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (P.L. 119-103) requires the Department of Health and Human Services to distribute no less than 90 percent of its total LIHEAP allotment by November 1, 2026. Given the extraordinary pressure consumers will face this winter, we ask that you make this distribution well before the deadline.

October marks the start of the heating season for many states, and with temperatures already dropping, low-income families and seniors are feeling additional strains on their household budgets. As the main federal program benefiting these individuals with their energy bills, LIHEAP provides critical assistance to vulnerable families and seniors during the cold winter and hot summer months. State agencies and tribes are already activating their LIHEAP programs for the coming winter. A quick release of funding will ensure no gaps in assistance.

We look forward to working with you on this critical program. Thank you for your attention to our concerns and those of our constituents.

Sincerely,",1,2026-09-18T09:27:43Z,2026-09-18T09:29:09Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-eviscerates-trump-admin-official-for-lying-under-oath-about-the-illegal-political-cancelation-of-energy-project-grants-in-states-that-didnt-vote-for-trump-in-2024,"Heinrich Eviscerates Trump Admin Official For Lying Under Oath About the Illegal, Political Cancelation of Energy Project Grants in States That Didn’t Vote for Trump in 2024",2026-09-17,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"Heinrich to Fitzsimmons on his congressional testimony contradicting DOE lawyers admitting projects were canceled for political reasons: “I find your testimony completely uncredible”

WASHINGTON – During a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing to receive testimony on pending legislation, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Committee, questioned Alex Fitzsimmons, U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Associate Deputy Secretary of Energy, and Dr. Sarah J. Ryker, Associate Director for the Geology, Energy, and Minerals Mission Area at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), on the Trump administration’s plan to sell off a part of Yosemite National Park to a private equity-owned firm, the Trump administration’s efforts to roll back efficiency standards, and the Trump administration’s illegal cancelation of energy projects grants in states that didn’t vote for President Trump in 2024.

VIDEO: Ranking Member Heinrich (D-N.M.), questions Associate Deputy Secretary of Energy Alex Fitzsimmons and Associate Director for the Geology, Energy, and Minerals Mission Area at the (USGS) Dr. Sarah J. Ryker during a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing to receive testimony on pending legislation, September 16, 2026.

On the Trump Administration’s Plan to Transfer Part of Yosemite National Park to a Private Equity-Owned Property

Heinrich began his line of questioning by asking about the Trump administration’s plan to sell off land in Yosemite National Park to a private equity-owned development, “Dr. Riker, the Land and Water Conservation Fund exists to acquire land for public conservation and recreational purposes. It was not authorized to facilitate private commercial development yet. The Department of the Interior is currently considering this land trade within Yosemite National Park, using funds from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to facilitate commercial development. Can you share with this Committee the Department's reasoning behind why they would move forward with this?”

Ryker responded, “Ranking Member, thank you for the question. I do not oversee or participate in those decisions by the Department, but I'll be happy to take your question back for response by the Department.”

Heinrich followed, “I would appreciate that. I would love to hear from Secretary Burgum some rationale for this. I know Burgum hasn't been in front of this committee for a number of months, but I think that both myself and the California delegation have very serious concerns about whether this is an appropriate use of the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and if this is just good for Yosemite National Park. It is one of our iconic national parks, and we should think very carefully about transferring land from a national park unit like this to commercial developers.”

On Energy Efficiency Standards

Heinrich continued, asking the Trump administration about repealing energy efficiency standards, which undermine domestic manufacturing and support China’s manufacturing, “Mr. Fitzsimmons, one of the concerns that has been raised to us repeatedly from industry groups is that rolling back some of these efficiency rules will facilitate an advantage for Chinese manufacturers’ cheaper, more poorly made manufacturing goods. Is that something that the administration is considering? And do you have concerns about that line of reasoning?”

Fitzsimmons answered, “Senator, we would say that trade issues should be addressed through trade remedies and trade policies that are in the jurisdiction of other agencies, not the Appliance Standards Program. The Appliance Standards Program is designed to increase energy efficiency and, in our view, balance consumer choice. And so, our guiding principle here is consumer choice. And if those groups are concerned about trade issues, there are other avenues to address the trade aspects.”

Heinrich followed, underscoring why the Trump administration should be concerned with appliance standards that benefit our adversaries, “But if the net effect is to make a Chinese heat pump, for example, mini-split dominant in the market at the expense of American manufacturing, shouldn't that be something that the Department of Energy is also concerned with?”

Fitzsimmons answered, “The net effect for us is making sure that products that consumers want to buy are not regulated out of the market, that they have the choice to choose which products they want. Trade issues, as I said, should be addressed through trade policies, not the appliance standards program.”

Heinrich followed, stressing the fact that updated energy efficiency standards support American-made manufacturing and should be supported by DOE, “Well, I want to make it very clear that members of this committee think that American manufacturing is something that the Department of Energy should be thinking about each and every day.”

On the Trump Administration Illegally Canceling Energy Project Grants in States That Didn’t Vote for President Trump in 2024

Heinrich continued, asking Fitzsimmons about the Trump administration canceling energy project grants in states that didn’t vote for President Trump in 2024, and whether he lied under oath about the nature of these cancelations, “Mr. Fitzsimmons, in a House Energy and Commerce hearing earlier this year, you were asked directly whether political retribution was a factor in the $8 billion of funding that DOE canceled in grant cancelations, and at that time you responded, it is certainly not a factor. Those were your words. More recently, DOE's own lawyers have now testified in court that cancelations were quote ‘based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient state.’ Do you stand by your earlier testimony?

Fitzsimmons answered, “I do.”

Heinrich followed, “And so, why would DOE's lawyers make that statement?”

Fitzsimmons continued, “I can tell you about the process that we use. The process does not involve politics.”

Heinrich interjected, blasting Fitzsimmons for the costly impact the cancelations had on New Mexico, “Well, I would just tell you that I find that not credible. New Mexico saw $135 million dollars in projects canceled, 10 different projects, and I think based on the testimony in court, the impression of the people of New Mexico is those projects were canceled because the state of New Mexico did not vote for the current president of the United States.”

Fitzsimmons followed, “Do you have a question?”

Heinrich asked, “Yeah, why is your testimony in contradiction of the DOE's own lawyers?”

Fitzsimmons doubled down, “It is not in contradiction at all. You're conflating two different issues between the timing of announcements and the process that we use to make decisions. We make decisions based on what is technologically feasible and economically viable, based on physics and math, not on politics.”

Heinrich concluded, “I find your testimony completely uncredible.”",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-sounds-off-on-trump-admin-plan-to-sell-off-part-of-yosemite-national-park-raises-alarm-on-senate-republicans-attacks-on-energy-efficiency-standards-and-tribal-protections,"Heinrich Sounds Off on Trump Admin Plan to Sell Off Part of Yosemite National Park, Raises Alarm on Senate Republicans’ Attacks on Energy Efficiency Standards and Tribal Protections",2026-09-17,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — This week, during a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Hearing, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Committee, raised the alarm on the Trump administration’s proposed plan to sell off part of Yosemite National Park to a private equity-owned development, countered legislation proposed by U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), Chairman of the Committee, which would dismantle the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Appliance Standards Program and raise consumer costs, and exposed the lack of Tribal protections in proposed hydropower licensing legislation from U.S. Senator Steve Daines (R-Mont.).

VIDEO: U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, delivers opening remarks during a Committee hearing to consider pending legislation, September 16, 2026.

Heinrich began by expressing serious concern over the Department of the Interior’s (DOI) proposal to exchange public land in Yosemite National Park for private development, requesting $300,000 in funds from the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to facilitate the land transfer.

“The LWCF exists to protect public lands and waters and expand recreational access nationwide for the public benefit, not to enrich private interests,” said Heinrich. “The protection of public lands is a bipartisan issue, and we will continue to raise our concerns over this proposal and demand that the Department provide transparency.”

Heinrich also slammed two bills led by U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, that threaten to repeal energy efficiency standards, make it virtually impossible for DOE to set future standards, and raise consumer costs — S. 5338, the Energy Efficiency Reform Act, and S. 1658, the Liberating Incandescent Technology (LIT) Act, submitting several letters of opposition from consumer advocacy and industry groups into the record.

“The Chairman's bill would make it virtually impossible for DOE to set future efficiency standards, forgoing significant additional savings for consumers. The bill could also increase electricity demand by 32 gigawatts in 2040, at a time when we desperately need more electrons on the grid. Furthermore, the bill would eliminate several existing standards and give the administration the authority to cancel standards as it sees fit,” said Heinrich on the Energy Efficiency Reform Act.

On the LIT Act, “Families in New Mexico are not clamoring for incandescent light bulbs. Most people just want to be able to afford their energy bills. The LIT Act aims to walk back a commonsense rule that has saved consumers an estimated $3 billion — billion with a ‘B’— and is supported by industry as well.”

Heirich also expressed disappointment that Lee would not consider bipartisan legislation to weatherize American’s homes, “Rather than turning back the clock on progress, I had hoped this hearing would offer a chance to consider several bipartisan bills to help more families lower their energy bills through the popular weatherization assistance program. I hope the Chair will work with me to advance weatherization legislation.”

Heinrich concluded his remarks by criticizing the lack of appropriate witnesses present at the hearing to answer questions on S. 5048, the Hydropower Licensing Affordability Act, referencing concerns from Tribal Nations and Tribal organizations on how provisions of the bill would strip protections from reservation lands and treaty resources.

“I share the Tribes’ concerns, and if an appropriate witness from the Department of Interior or the Department of Commerce were present today, I would ask them to confirm that the bill would limit Tribal rights, including fishing rights and if the bill could lead to an increase in litigation,” said Heinrich.

A video of Heinrich’s opening remarks is here.

Heinrich’s full remarks as delivered are below:

Before I begin to address the bills in today’s legislative hearing, I want to raise my deep concern over the Department of the Interior’s consideration of trading away National Park land in Yosemite National Park to a private equity-owned development.

What is equally alarming is that the Department filed a Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) request for $300,000 to support the transfer of this National Park Service land.

LWCF exists to protect public lands and expand recreational access nationwide for the public benefit, not to enrich private equity.

We also don’t know what private land would be exchanged for the parcel, which indicates that the exchange is likely not in the public interest. How can it be, if we don’t even know where it is?

The protection of public lands and particularly our National Parks is a bipartisan issue, and we will continue to raise our concerns over this proposal and demand that the Department provide more transparency.

With that, I would like to address the bills in today’s hearing.

I am glad to see a number of the bills included on today’s agenda.

In particular, Senator Bennet’s Glenwood Hot Springs Protection Act would ensure that Glenwood, Colorado’s famous hot springs are not threatened by a proposed mine expansion that could disrupt the groundwater hydrology at the springs.

This is a great example of locally driven public land management, and I hope this committee can move this bill forward soon.

I’m also glad to see Senator Durbin’s Gateway Arch National Park Boundary Revision Act on the agenda.

The communities in the St. Louis area have long supported the growth of this park to encompass both sides of the Mississippi River and add new park land in neighboring Illinois, and this bill would do just that.

I am concerned that we find the Energy Efficiency “Reform” Act on the agenda today.

The Chairman’s bill would thoroughly dismantle the Department of Energy’s Appliance Standards Program. This is a successful, bipartisan program that has been providing real savings for American families for 50 years.

Thanks to the Appliance Standards Program, American households save almost $600 a year on their utility bills, all while having better performing and wide-ranging options of home appliances.

The Chairman's bill would make virtually impossible for DOE to set future efficiency standards, forgoing significant additional savings for consumers.

The bill would also increase electricity demand by as much as 32 gigawatts in 2040, at a time when we desperately need more electrons on the grid.

Furthermore, the bill would eliminate several existing standards and give the administration the authority to cancel standards as it sees fit.

This type of “backsliding” on existing standards has been opposed by industry leaders because it would undermine domestic manufacturing and allow Chinese products to flood the market.

Groups such as the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, and the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers have all submitted public comments to the Department of Energy opposing the very backsliding this bill authorizes.

I would ask for unanimous consent to submit three letters of opposition to S. 5338 for the record.

The first letter is from consumer groups including Consumer Reports, the Consumer Federation of America, and the National Consumer Law Center. The second is from seven public health organizations, and the third is from 60 environmental organizations.

Additionally, I am deeply concerned by S. 1658, the “Liberating Incandescent Technology Act” or LIT Act, which would repeal energy efficiency standards for light bulbs.

Families in New Mexico are not clamoring for incandescent light bulbs. Most people just want to be able to afford their energy bills.

The LIT Act aims to walk back a commonsense rule that has saved consumers an estimated $3 billion — billion with a “B” — and is supported by industry as well.

So, I would ask for unanimous consent to submit a letter of opposition to S. 1568 for the record from the National Electrical Manufacturers Association and the American Lighting Association.

The letter states that ""the sole beneficiaries of the LIT Act would be foreign companies positioned to flood American markets with low performance, low-quality, and potentially unsafe products.""

Rather than turning back the clock on progress, I had hoped this hearing would offer a chance to consider several bipartisan bills to help more families lower their energy bills through the popular weatherization assistance program.

I hope the Chair will work with me to advance weatherization legislation sponsored by Senators Reed, Murkowski, Collins, Shaheen, Coons, and Gallego in the very near term.

Lastly, I am disappointed that we do not have a witness present who can speak to S. 5048, the Hydropower Licensing Affordability Act.

Intended to “streamline” hydropower project approvals by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the bill would significantly weaken Tribal protections.

Chairman Lee and I were copied on a letter from Tribal Nations and Tribal organizations opposed to this bill.

The letter details how the provisions of S. 5048 would strip protections from reservation lands and treaty resources, including fishing; threaten important cultural sites; undermine water quality for fish and people; and increase litigation.

I share the Tribes’ concerns, and if an appropriate witness from the Department of Interior or the Department of Commerce were present today, I would ask them to confirm that the bill would limit Tribal rights, including fishing rights and if the bill could lead to an increase in litigation.

But there is no one from these agencies today, and FERC only provided written testimony, so I will be submitting these questions for the record to FERC, and I expect to receive answers to them prior to this bill being included on a future business meeting agenda.

Thank you to all the witnesses who are here today, and I yield back the rest of my time.",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-heinrich-statement-commemorating-hispanic-heritage-month,Sen. Heinrich Statement Commemorating Hispanic Heritage Month,2026-09-16,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) released the following statement commemorating Hispanic Heritage Month, which is celebrated from September 15 through October 15. Heinrich is a cosponsor of a bipartisan resolution recognizing Hispanic Heritage Month.

“As we celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month, we honor the remarkable contributions Hispanics and Latinos have made to our country and our communities. From Senator Dennis Chaves to María Dolores Gonzales to Eva Enciñias, the story of New Mexico is infused with the resilience, connectedness, and brilliance of incredible Hispanic leaders. Hispanic heritage is also embedded in the fabric of our everyday lives — from our traditions, values, and the querencia that connects us to our lands to the food we eat, the art we create, and the collaborative ways we innovate.

“Celebrating the richness of this cultural inheritance, in this moment, also must include standing up with Hispanic and Latino communities to protect their rights, dignity, and access to opportunities. Together, we can and must push back against the Trump administration as it continues trying to defund programs for bilingual students and Hispanic-owned small businesses, slashing healthcare and nutrition programs families rely on, and unlawfully targeting Hispanics and Latinos with out-of-control immigration enforcement tactics.

“New Mexico families work hard, look out for one another, and build a better future for the next generation together. Resilience and tenacity are who we are. But every family deserves the opportunity to feel secure in their community, provide for the people they love, and build a future here at home.

“This month and every month, I’ll continue working to protect the programs New Mexicans rely on, fight back against the Trump administration’s attack on programs that benefit Hispanic and Latino children and businesses, lift up the successes of Hispanic innovators and leaders, and push for the policies that give every family a fair shot at succeed.”

###",1,2026-09-17T09:52:05Z,2026-09-17T09:53:00Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/icymi-lujan-defends-new-mexico-against-trumps-threats/,ICYMI: Luján Defends New Mexico Against Trump’s Threats,2026-09-16,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. – In Case You Missed It: Following Donald Trump’s threats to rename New Mexico, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) led the New Mexico Congressional Delegation in defending New Mexico’s name and making clear that the President does not have the authority to rename the state unilaterally.

Senator Luján led U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) in calling on Apple and Google to publicly commit to keeping New Mexico’s name on Apple Maps and Google Maps, regardless of pressure from President Trump.

The push to protect New Mexico’s name garnered national and local coverage. See what they’re saying:

Washington Post: New Mexico leaders ask Apple and Google not to use ‘New America’ on their maps

New Mexico congressional leaders asked Google and Apple on Thursday not to rename their state “New America” on the platforms’ maps should President Donald Trump demand it. The delegation’s five members, Sens. Ben Ray Luján and Martin Heinrich, and Reps. Melanie Stansbury, Teresa Leger Fernández and Gabe Vasquez, are all Democrats.

The Hill: New Mexico Democrats call on Apple, Google to keep state’s name on map

A group of Democratic lawmakers who represent New Mexico urged Apple and Google on Thursday not to adopt President Trump’s proposed renaming of the state to “New America” on their map platforms. The Democratic lawmakers behind this request included Sens. Ben Ray Luján and Martin Heinrich and Reps. Melanie Stansbury, Teresa Leger Fernández and Gabe Vasquez.

The Washington Sun: New Mexico Lawmakers Urge Apple, Google to Publicly Reject Trump’s ‘New America’ Name

New Mexico lawmakers are calling on Apple and Google to keep using New Mexico on their map applications rather than President Donald Trump’s suggested name for the state, “New America.” In a letter sent Thursday, Democratic Sens. Ben Ray Luján and Martin Heinrich and Reps. Teresa Leger Fernández, Melanie Stansbury and Gabe Vasquez urged the tech companies to “publicly commit” to keeping their state’s name unchanged by Sept. 18.

The Independent: New Mexico leaders beg Apple and Google not to rename their state on apps like Trump wants

Lawmakers from New Mexico have urged Apple and Google not to rename the state on their mapping apps after President Donald Trump suggested restyling it as “New America.” The state’s delegation includes Senators Ben Ray Luján and Martin Heinrich, and Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández, Melanie Stansbury and Gabe Vasquez.

Source NM: New Mexico congressional delegation asks Google, Apple to commit to keeping state’s name on maps

New Mexico’s congressional delegation on Thursday called upon major tech companies Apple and Google to commit to ensuring New Mexico retains its name on the companies’ maps. New Mexico state and federal officials swiftly rebuked Trump’s post, with U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), who leads the Thursday letter, writing on social media that, “It’s New Mexico, always has been and always will be. Just like how you’ll always be a sinvergüenza and corrupt.”

Santa Fe New Mexican: New Mexico lawmakers call on Apple, Google, not to change state to ‘New America’ on maps

New Mexico’s congressional delegation is seeking to ensure Apple and Google keep New Mexico New Mexico. In a letter sent Thursday, U.S. Sens. Ben Ray Luján and Martin Heinrich, along with U.S. Reps. Teresa Leger Fernández, Melanie Stansbury and Gabe Vasquez — all Democrats — called on the companies to commit to continuing to label the state as New Mexico on their popular online map services.

KVIA: NM delegates call on Apple, Google to keep New Mexico’s name on all mapping services

A group of New Mexico delegates sent a letter to the CEOs of Apple and Google to commit to keeping New Mexico’s name on their platforms mapping services. The request from U.S. Senator Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM), U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Congressman Gabe Vasquez (D-NM), Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernande (D-NM), and Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury stated, “Let us be clear: the President has no legal authority to rename New Mexico. Our state’s name belongs to the people of New Mexico and is rooted in our history and our Constitution, which clearly states that the ‘name of this state is New Mexico'”.

Albuquerque Journal: NM congressional delegation urges Google, Apple not to use ‘New America’ on maps

New Mexicans are used to national confusion about the state’s location and whether it’s actually part of the United States — or a foreign country. But members of the state’s congressional delegation don’t want any further mix-ups — or sovereignty slights — after President Donald Trump’s recent social media posts suggesting New Mexico be renamed “New America.” In a Thursday letter, members of the state’s all-Democratic delegation urged the chief executive officers of Google and Apple to publicly commit by next week that they would not change the name of New Mexico on their mapping services.",1,2026-09-17T09:52:05Z,2026-09-17T09:53:00Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-the-news-lujan-hits-the-road-in-new-mexico-fighting-for-families-farmers-and-communities/,"IN THE NEWS: Luján Hits the Road in New Mexico, Fighting for Families, Farmers, and Communities",2026-09-16,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. – During the August and September state work period, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) traveled thousands of miles across New Mexico to hear directly from New Mexicans and highlight his work to lower costs, protect access to food and health care, support farmers and ranchers, strengthen consumer protections, and deliver for communities across the state.

His visits included Albuquerque, Santa Fe, Taos, Gallup, Grants, Las Cruces, Farmington, Derry, Tierra Amarilla, Las Vegas, and communities across New Mexico.

Senator Luján met with families, health care providers, farmers, local leaders, advocates, and small businesses to discuss the challenges facing New Mexicans and how he is working to address them in Washington.

See what New Mexico media are reporting on Senator Luján’s work across the state:

Source NM – New Mexico food banks describe significant increase in demand after federal food aid cuts

Officials from New Mexico food banks say recent changes to the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, as well as rising grocery costs, have dramatically increased demand at community food distribution centers across the state. A leader of Roadrunner Food Bank, the largest food bank in New Mexico, told U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) during a roundtable Tuesday that demand increased 79% at the food bank between January 2025 and January 2026, which is the most-recent data available.

NM Political Report – Luján, hospital leaders talk Medicaid ‘headwinds’ and rural health gaps at Rio Rancho roundtable

U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico, told hospital administrators at Presbyterian Rust Medical Center that Republican-backed federal Medicaid cuts won’t just hurt New Mexicans enrolled in the program — they’ll raise care and insurance costs for everyone else, too.

Cibola Citizen – Luján Visits Grants Pantry as Local Families Brace for SNAP Changes

U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján visited the Grants Community Pantry Thursday, August 20, meeting with local families, food assistance workers and service providers as changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as SNAP, begin raising concerns across rural New Mexico. The visit came as Cibola County continues to struggle with high levels of poverty, particularly among children. Recent Census and KIDS COUNT data indicate approximately 41.6% of children in the county live below the federal poverty line – roughly four in every 10 children.

Los Alamos Daily Post – Luján Highlights Efforts To Strengthen Care For Seniors And Protect Nutrition Assistance For New Mexicans

Last week in Farmington and Grants, U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) held events highlighting his efforts to expand access to home and long-term care for older New Mexicans and people with disabilities and protect nutrition assistance for New Mexico families.

Gallup Sun – Luján Hosts Forum In Gallup To Raise Awareness Of Expanded Reca Compensation

U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., led a public outreach forum in Gallup Aug. 19 to raise awareness about expanded compensation available through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and help New Mexicans understand how they can apply for compensation. During the forum, Luján joined local leaders and advocates to provide information about expanded eligibility under RECA and the resources available to help New Mexicans apply for compensation.

KSJE – U.S. Senator “RECA, Public Lands, Stroke Survivors, & More!” : With Ben Ray Lujan, & Scott Michlin

The interview with Senator Ben Ray Luján focuses on healthcare, support for family caregivers, stroke research and rehabilitation, and the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA). Luján discusses his personal experience surviving a stroke and explains his efforts to improve stroke prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation services.

Taos News – Ticket scammers on the rise Sen. Ben Ray Lujan helps spearhead effort to protect fans, artists and venues

It all comes down to consumer safety. That’s one of the reasons U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) got involved in a growing issue involving fraudulent ticket sales. Luján put together a group of representatives from the New Mexico entertainment industry for a roundtable conversation about the issue Monday (Aug. 31) at the Taos Mesa Brewing Mothership, west of El Prado. From venues, popular music artists, associations and even the Santa Fe Opera, the participants showed how wide-ranging the issue has affected their profession. Sen. Luján’s purpose for the meeting was to unveil newly introduced legislation to ban speculative ticketing and protect ticket buyers from scams and unfair practices, a statement from the senator’s office reads.

KFOX – Sen. Ben Ray Lujan hears Southern NM chile growers’ concerns over rising costs

Southern New Mexico chile farmers met with U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Lujan on Tuesday to highlight the pressures facing one of the state’s signature crops. The New Mexico Democrat visited Sierra County on Tuesday, where organizers said the purpose of the visit was to hear directly from local chile producers about the challenges they face and the support they need. “In New Mexico we have a lot of what they call specialty crops, these are high-cost crops, like our chile,” Lujan said.

Albuquerque Journal – Domenici conference gathers policy experts, candidates

New Mexico State University’s Domenici Public Policy Conference returned after an eight-year hiatus this week, as a dozen presenters, including subject experts, past and present political officials and 2026 election candidates gave hourlong talks and took questions from NMSU students. U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., also upheld bipartisan collaboration in his Wednesday keynote address over lunch, rooting it in the legacy of New Mexico’s finest leaders as well as President Ronald Reagan and his friendship with Democratic House Speaker Thomas “Tip” O’Neill. “Bringing people together with different approaches creates a better outcome,” Luján said, arguing further that it would be key to solving difficult policy challenges, such as supporting utility-scale renewable energy production.",1,2026-09-17T09:52:05Z,2026-09-17T09:53:00Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-capito-champion-bipartisan-legislation-to-protect-ticket-buyers-from-ticket-scams/,"Luján, Capito Champion Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Ticket Buyers from Ticket Scams",2026-09-16,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) introduced the Guaranteeing Honest Ownership in Secondary Ticketing (GHOST) Act, legislation to protect fans and concertgoers from deceptive ticket resale practices by prohibiting resellers from selling tickets they do not actually possess.

“I’m proud to introduce this legislation to protect ticket buyers because when New Mexicans spend their hard-earned money on a concert or event, they deserve to know the ticket they are buying actually exists,” said Senator Luján. “Too often, fans are misled into purchasing tickets from resellers who don’t even have them. That’s why I introduced the GHOST Act to protect consumers, hold bad actors accountable, and bring greater transparency and fairness to the ticket marketplace.”

“West Virginians who spend their hard-earned money on tickets to see their favorite artist, team, or event should be able to trust that the tickets they’re purchasing actually exist. Unfortunately, deceptive practices in the resale market can leave consumers paying inflated prices for tickets that sellers don’t even possess. I’m proud to support this legislation, which includes commonsense protections that will bring greater transparency and accountability to the ticket marketplace and ensure a fairer ticket-buying experience,” Senator Capito said.

Too often, consumers unknowingly purchase “speculative” or “ghost” tickets listed by resellers who do not actually have the tickets they are advertising. In some cases, buyers may not learn until shortly before an event that their tickets are unavailable, leaving them with little time to find legitimate replacements that may be sold out or significantly more expensive. Currently, there is no federal law specifically prohibiting speculative ticketing. The GHOST Act would establish nationwide protections to prevent resellers from advertising and selling tickets they do not possess.

Specifically, the GHOST Act would:

Ban ticket resellers from selling tickets they do not have actual possession of;

Empower the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to take action against violators and seek injunctive and monetary relief;

Require the FTC to establish a website where consumers can report potential violations of the GHOST Act and the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act of 2016; and

Allow state attorneys general to bring actions to enforce the law.

The legislation is supported by the National Independent Venue Association (NIVA).

Full bill text is available here.

###",1,2026-09-17T09:52:05Z,2026-09-17T09:53:00Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-partisan-republican-farm-bill/,Luján Statement on Partisan Republican Farm Bill,2026-09-16,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"GOP No-Shows Previously Derailed Republican Farm Bill, Failed to Earn the Support of Committee Democrats

Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, issued the following statement after Senate Republicans voted to advance the Republican Farm Bill in committee:

“For generations, the Farm Bil has been a bipartisan commitment to our nation’s farmers, ranchers, growers, rural communities, and every family that depends on them to put food on the table. Today, that bipartisan promise was abandoned by Senate Republicans who pushed through a partisan bill.

“Families are already struggling with President Trump’s trade war, tariffs, and skyrocketing costs. Farmers and ranchers are paying more to keep their operations running, and families are paying more at the grocery store. This bill does nothing to meet the urgency of this crisis.

“After Republicans gutted our nation’s food programs, this bill does nothing to reverse those devastating cuts or meet our responsibility to eliminate hunger in America. And at a time when farmers and ranchers are struggling, it fails to make the investments in agriculture that producers need.

“The Farm Bill should be a bipartisan process. It should bring together everyone – Republicans and Democrats – who want to support the people who grow our food, strengthen rural communities, and ensure families don’t go hungry. That is the Farm Bill that New Mexicans deserve, and that is the Farm Bill that I will continue fighting for.”

###",1,2026-09-17T09:52:05Z,2026-09-17T09:53:00Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-leads-fight-to-protect-state-and-tribal-gaming-rights-votes-against-advancing-clarity-act,"Heinrich Leads Fight to Protect State & Tribal Gaming Rights, Votes Against Advancing CLARITY Act",2026-09-15,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"Heinrich to introduce an amendment to protect Indian Gaming Regulatory Act & Tribal-state compacts & prohibit CFTC-registered entities from online sports betting & casino-style gaming

WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) released the following statement after voting against advancing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), legislation that fails to protect state regulatory authority and Tribal gaming rights from prediction markets’ unlawful online sports and casino-style gaming.

“The legislation we voted on today undermines Tribal sovereignty and states’ police powers. And it directly threatens Tribes’ gaming revenues, which would mean less government services funding across Indian Country. That’s a lose-lose,” said Heinrich. “Giving prediction markets a free pass to sidestep existing law and Tribal sovereignty is wrong, in every conceivable way. That is not to say I oppose digital asset market structure legislation. But what that legislation absolutely must include is commonsense protections for state and Tribal gaming rights, including an Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and Tribal-state compact savings clause and a ban on prediction contracts that function like sports bets or casino games.”

Heinrich plans to introduce an amendment to the CLARITY Act that provides:

An Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and Tribal-state compacts savings clause; and

Prohibitions on Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)-registered entities from listing prediction contracts that resemble sports bets or casino-style gaming products.

The rapid expansion of sports event contracts and casino-style gaming through prediction markets threatens Tribal gaming revenues and the sovereignty of Tribal nations that rely on gaming to fund essential government services, including health care, public safety, education, housing, and social services. By offering products that function like sports bets while operating outside the regulatory framework governing gaming, prediction markets could divert a significant share of revenue away from Tribal governments.

Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) of 1988, gaming on Tribal lands is subject to a carefully negotiated framework that protects Tribal sovereignty and establishes the roles of Tribal, state, and federal governments. Following the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Tribes also began entering the legal sports betting market through agreements with states.

Prediction markets are now attempting to offer sports betting nationwide by classifying sports and event contracts as financial products rather than gambling. These markets operate under the authority of the CFTC, which has asserted jurisdiction over prediction contracts and treated them as financial derivatives rather than sports wagers.

The CLARITY Act could further entrench this loophole. By creating exemptions from federal securities regulation for certain digital asset platforms and decentralized finance infrastructure, the bill could allow prediction markets to expand sports betting and casino-style gaming nationwide without complying with the state- and Tribal-based regulatory frameworks that govern legal gaming.

Without clear protections for Tribal and state gaming rights, prediction markets could compete directly with Tribal gaming while avoiding the laws and agreements designed to protect Tribal sovereignty. Congress should ensure that digital asset market structure legislation does not create a federal pathway for companies to circumvent IGRA, Tribal-state gaming compacts, or state gaming laws.

In addition to the amendment Heinrich plans to introduce, Heinrich cosponsored another amendment to the CLARITY Act that would stop stablecoin companies from offering rewards or interest like a bank does, which could hurt local banks, reduce the money they have available to lend to families and small businesses, and increase the amount of funds in stablecoin accounts that are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The amendment is led by U.S. Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), and Jack Reed (D-R.I.).

In July, Heinrich led a letter urging the leadership of the U.S. Senate Committees on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; and Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry to regulate prediction markets offering nationwide sports and event wagering. The letter is supported by the Indian Gaming Association (IGA), National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), Santa Ana Pueblo, Sandia Pueblo, Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo, Laguna Pueblo, San Felipe Pueblo, Kewa Pueblo, Cochiti Pueblo, Acoma Pueblo, Jemez Pueblo, Santa Clara Pueblo, Taos Pueblo, Tesuque Pueblo, Zia Pueblo, Isleta Pueblo, Pojoaque Pueblo, and Mescalero Apache Tribe.

###",1,2026-09-16T09:43:13Z,2026-09-16T09:44:22Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-meets-with-cadets-at-new-mexico-youth-challenge-academy-and-new-mexico-military-institute-tours-newly-renovated-health-science-center_expanded-nursing-program-at-eastern-nm-university-roswell,"Heinrich Meets with Cadets at New Mexico Youth Challenge Academy & New Mexico Military Institute, Tours Newly Renovated Health Science Center & Expanded Nursing Program at Eastern NM University-Roswell",2026-09-15,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"ROSWELL, N.M. — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, met with cadets at the New Mexico Youth Challenge Academy and the New Mexico Military Institute, and toured Eastern NM University-Roswell's (ENMU-R) newly renovated health science center, automotive and welding technology center, and expanded nursing program.

Heinrich toured the New Mexico Youth Challenge Academy campus and met with cadets enrolled at the academy. While there, he also discussed an $87.5 million increase in federal funding he secured for the academy and programs like it across the country to help students earn their high school diploma, while also receiving advanced workforce training in the skilled trades and industry-recognized certifications.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) meets with cadets at the New Mexico Youth Challenge Academy, September 8, 2026.

Heinrich also met with the leadership of the New Mexico Military Institute (NMMI) to discuss federal funding opportunities for the institute, military academy pathways for New Mexicans, and campus modernization needs. Heinrich also met with cadets enrolled at NMMI. Heinrich nominates New Mexicans to the Military Service Academies each year and provides an online informational session and application process for those interested.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) meets with cadets at the New Mexico Military Institute, September 8, 2026.

Additionally, Heinrich toured Eastern New Mexico University-Roswell's (ENMU-Roswell) newly renovated health science center, automotive and welding technology center, and expanded nursing program. ENMU-Roswell's nursing program is ranked first in New Mexico.

While there, Heinrich met with Rocio Rugelio from Las Cruces. Rocio participated in ENMU-Roswell's Adult Education Program before enrolling at ENMU-Roswell with the goal of earning a degree in Early Childhood Education and making a positive difference in the lives of young children and families.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) tours Eastern NM University-Roswell's newly renovated health science center and expanded nursing program, September 8, 2026.

Heinrich successfully protected programs that make higher education more affordable for students in New Mexico. This includes:

Maintaining the maximum Pell Grant award at $7,395;

Funding federal TRIO programs at $1.2 billion to serve low-income individuals, first-generation college students, and individuals with disabilities; and

Funding the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) grant program at $388 million to support first-generation and low-income students with the resources they need to get their high school and college degrees.

Heinrich also successfully ensured that the Postsecondary Student Success Grant maintained $45 million in funding. This program provides investments in evidence-based initiatives aimed at enhancing retention and completion rates for college students.

In 2020, Heinrich secured $1.5 million for ENMU-Roswell’s “Dream. Achieve. Succeed” program. The program partners the university with local school districts in Chaves and surrounding counties to improve college readiness and academic success for disadvantaged and low-income students.

As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Heinrich advocated for maintaining maximum Pell Grant awards and funding federal programs utilized by two-year and minority-serving community college systems in New Mexico.

###",1,2026-09-16T09:43:13Z,2026-09-16T09:44:22Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-lujan-introduce-privileged-resolution-seeking-answers-on-west-bank-violence,"Heinrich, Luján Introduce Privileged Resolution Seeking Answers on West Bank Violence",2026-09-15,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) introduced a 502B privileged resolution requiring the U.S. Department of State to report to Congress on increasing violence in the West Bank, including the killings of Americans in the West Bank. Nine Americans have been killed in the West Bank in recent years – and more detained – and none have received accountability or justice from either the Israeli or U.S. Governments.

The resolution would require the State Department to provide information and assessments related to investigations of the killing of U.S. citizens by violent Israeli settlers or Israeli security forces in the West Bank, as well as an assessment of the human rights situation in the West Bank, specifically related to the detention of Palestinian children.

""The United States cannot look the other way when Americans are killed or when Palestinians are subjected to violence and displacement, and neither can Israel. We must send a clear message to the Trump administration and the Israeli government: New Mexicans will not stand by while U.S. citizens are killed by violent Israeli settlers and the Israeli military,” said Heinrich. ""We need to end the bloodshed and work toward lasting peace in the region. That starts with holding President Netanyahu accountable for the human rights abuses taking place in the West Bank and making clear that American taxpayers will not provide a blank check for the Israeli government to kill U.S. citizens and kill and displace Palestinians. This resolution will get us closer to real accountability from the Trump Administration and the Israeli Government.”

“We have a responsibility to protect Americans abroad and seek justice when Americans are killed,” said Luján. “The escalating violence in the West Bank and lack of accountability for the deaths of American citizens are deeply concerning. This resolution will help us get the answers we need, demand accountability, and ensure that we have a better assessment of the human rights situation in the West Bank.”

The resolution is led by U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

Alongside Heinrich and Luján, the resolution is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ed Markey (D-Mass), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Chris Murphy (D-N.J.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.).

The full text of the resolution is available here.

###",1,2026-09-24T09:44:48Z,2026-09-24T09:45:52Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-joins-roundtable-with-new-mexico-voices-for-children-and-wk-kellogg-foundation-tours-presbyterian-kaseman-hospitals-food-pharmacy-speaks-at-array-technologies-new-facility-ribbon-cutting-urges-new-mexicans-to-raise-their-voices-for-roadless-rule,"Heinrich Joins Roundtable with New Mexico Voices for Children and W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Tours Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital’s Food Pharmacy, Speaks at ARRAY Technologies’ New Facility Ribbon Cutting, Urges New Mexicans to Raise Their Voices for Roadless Rule",2026-09-11,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, participated in an event in Albuquerque on improving the well-being of children and families, toured Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital’s food pharmacy, joined a ribbon-cutting ceremony for ARRAY Technologies’ solar manufacturing facility, and spoke in support of protecting the Roadless Rule at a New Mexico Wild community event.

Heinrich began the day participating in a roundtable event hosted in partnership with New Mexico Voices for Children and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, along with representatives from the UNM School of Medicine, Changing Women Initiative, Future Focused Education, and Breath of My Heart, to discuss New Mexico Voices for Children’s Roadmap Report and policy solutions to improve the well-being of children and families in New Mexico.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) joins a roundtable to discuss policy solutions to improve the well-being of children and families in New Mexico, September 9, 2026.

“I got involved early in the conversation around universal pre-K and early childhood education in New Mexico because we need to invest in our greatest asset: the next generation,” said Heinrich, a member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee. “Right now, we’re seeing the Trump administration walk away from investing in our children and families. We need to be thinking about the future. That’s why I’ve long championed legislation and funded programs that give our children a strong start and ensure they have access to high-quality care. We’ve done some incredible things here in New Mexico over the last few years, but we’re just getting started. I’ll keep pushing to make sure every child in our state has the opportunity to succeed.”

Notably, in 2014, Heinrich was the first member of the New Mexico Congressional Delegation to publicly support unlocking investments from the state’s Land Grant Permanent Fund to sustainably support early childhood education. After the New Mexico Legislature and voters in the state passed the necessary state constitutional amendment to unlock these investments, Heinrich successfully led the effort to secure Congressional authorization of the amendment through his New Mexico Education Enhancement Act, which passed in the Omnibus Appropriations Agreement for Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23).

For more information on the efforts Heinrich has championed to bolster childhood education in New Mexico, click here.

Following the roundtable event, Heinrich toured Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital’s food pharmacy, hearing directly from families who receive the program’s food distribution services about the program’s impact.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) tours Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital’s food pharmacy, September 9, 2026.

While touring the food pharmacy, Heinrich highlighted the need to build on programs like Presbyterian’s that are making nutritious food more accessible to New Mexico families.

“It's time to rebuild our food system in a different way that really serves people's health,” said Heinrich. “We need to thoughtfully look at some of our food deserts in this state and find ways to make fruits and vegetables accessible in those places, while also supporting our local farmers. Presbyterian’s food pharmacy program proves how valuable a fresh fruit and vegetable kind of diet is for New Mexicans, and we should learn from that.”

Last month, Heinrich cosponsored the Accountable Produce is Medicine Act of 2026, which would require the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to test a new bundled-payment model that integrates Food is Medicine services into chronic disease care. Participating programs would provide eligible Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP patients with health assessments, care coordination, telehealth and remote monitoring, nutrition counseling, lifestyle support, and healthy, nutrient-dense foods.

In December of 2024, Heinrich introduced the FOOD for Health Act, which aimed to reduce nutrition-related chronic diseases and address food insecurity by supporting the production of nutritious food.

In 2018, Heinrich voted in favor of the 2018 Farm Bill, which established the first federal Produce Prescription Program under the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP) program, which provides federal grants to increase the purchase and consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables among low-income households.

Heinrich also joined a ribbon-cutting ceremony to officially open ARRAY Technologies’ Westside Albuquerque facility. The new $50 million facility will triple ARRAY’s solar tracker manufacturing capacity in New Mexico – shortening energy delivery times, lowering costs for consumers, and creating over 300 good-paying jobs in New Mexico.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, joins a ribbon-cutting ceremony for ARRAY Technologies’ Solar manufacturing facility, September 9, 2026.

“Array Technologies’ new $50 million facility on Albuquerque’s West Side is a testament to the strength of our workforce and New Mexico’s leadership in unlocking our country’s clean energy future,” said Heinrich, Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. “This new facility will employ more than 300 New Mexicans and create high-skilled jobs, from welders to tooling and die technicians. It’s proof that when we invest in American-made energy, we’re not just building the technologies that will power our future — we’re creating good-paying jobs, strengthening local economies, and helping lower electricity costs for families and small businesses. And this is just the beginning.”

Heinrich has long supported ARRAY Technologies and investments that have spurred solar development.

In April 2022, Heinrich met with New Mexico solar industry leaders, including ARRAY Technologies, to hear how a solar tariff petition filed with the Department of Commerce would severely harm the state’s solar industry and the hard-working New Mexicans who work in the industry, and later led the charge to prevent the Biden administration from moving forward with the tariffs.

In June 2022, Heinrich delivered keynote remarks at the American Solar Energy Society’s 51st Annual National Solar Conference, SOLAR 2022, hosted at the University of New Mexico, highlighting the importance of accelerating the deployment of residential and utility-scale solar across New Mexico and the nation.

In July 2022, Heinrich passed the CHIPS and Science Act, which invested in domestic solar manufacturing through tax credits and semiconductor funding.

In August 2022, Heinrich helped pass the Inflation Reduction Act, which included the 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit, to subsidize the production of five types of goods: solar energy components, wind energy components, battery components, inverters, and critical minerals.

In April 2024, Heinrich delivered keynote remarks during New Mexico’s first Business-to-Business Electrify New Mexico event, hosted by the Renewable Energy Industries Association of New Mexico, celebrating ARRAY Technologies’ expansion and growth in the state.

In April 2024, Heinrich welcomed U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm to New Mexico to highlight how investments from the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS and Science Act created a manufacturing boom and helped position New Mexico as a national leader in an American-made clean energy future, touring ARRAY Technologies’ manufacturing plant in NE Albuquerque.

In June 2024, Heinrich, as Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC), hosted a hearing on how investments in clean energy have helped create an economic boom, uplifting ARRAY Technologies for expanding in New Mexico.

Heinrich ended the day speaking in support of the Roadless Rule at a New Mexico Wild community event, emphasizing the importance of fighting to preserve the Roadless Rule. The public now has until October 6 to submit comments on the Trump administration’s proposed plan to rescind the Roadless Rule.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, speaks at New Mexico Wild’s event on protecting the Roadless Rule, September 9, 2026.

“Public input makes for better governance. It gets all the facts on the table. It gets people’s opinions on the table, and generally the outcome benefits from that,” said Heinrich, Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. ""We saw that during the public process that led to the Roadless Rule in the late 1990s, when there were tons of people in those hearings — and now, after more than 20 years of management under the Roadless Rule, the comments are 99 percent supportive. And yet, this Forest Service and this administration doesn’t have the decency to hold a single public hearing. Public process is at the heart of good democracy and good governance, and we won’t accept anything less than that.”

Last month, Heinrich released a statement reacting to the Trump administration’s announcement that the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) has filed a proposed rule to rescind the Roadless Rule, calling roadless areas irreplaceable and criticizing the administration for its attack on public lands.

Earlier this summer, Heinrich hosted a press conference on Senate Republicans’ efforts to repeal the Roadless Rule and spoke out against the Trump administration’s efforts to rescind the Roadless Rule.

Additionally, Heinrich wrote an op-ed in Outside News about how the Roadless Rule helps conserve our public lands and prevent wildfires – and how it represents years of input from Americans who have made it clear they want the Roadless Rule to stay in place.

In May, Heinrich and the N.M. Congressional Delegation urged New Mexicans to voice their opposition to the looming Roadless Rule repeal.

In February, Heinrich attended the “Camo at the Capitol Day” rally in the Roundhouse where he stated, “It makes me incredibly proud to be a New Mexican. They’ll never take our public lands from our public hands.”

Last September, Heinrich and the N.M. Congressional Delegation sent a letter to USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins requesting that New Mexico be excluded from the Trump administration’s proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.

During a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hearing to examine pending legislation, Heinrich brought attention to the Trump administration’s refusal to take public opinion into account prior to repealing the Roadless Rule.

In June 2025, Heinrich released a statement slamming USDA Secretary Rollins’ efforts to rescind the Roadless Rule.

###",1,2026-09-12T09:02:30Z,2026-09-12T09:03:27Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-statement-on-the-25th-anniversary-of-the-september-11th-terrorist-attacks,Heinrich Statement on the 25th Anniversary of the September 11th Terrorist Attacks,2026-09-11,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) issued the following statement in recognition of the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

“Today, we honor and mourn all those who lost their lives at the World Trade Center, in the Pentagon, and in the fields of Western Pennsylvania. We honor the first responders and countless others who risked their lives or made the ultimate sacrifice to help neighbors and strangers in a moment of unfathomable tragedy.

“We remember the way our country came together, through the grief, with determined, united resilience. And we honor the military service members who served in Afghanistan, Iraq, and around the world in the years that followed, and the allies and interpreters who supported their work. We know the sacrifices of our service members, their families, and our allies extended far beyond the battlefield.

“Now, 25 years following the tragic events of September 11, 2001, we say again: We will never forget. We must always strive to carry the spirit of service, unity, and compassion we witnessed in New York, Virginia, and the skies above Pennsylvania on that day and across the country in the weeks that followed. And we will remember the heavy cost of endless wars as we strive to ensure that future generations do not bear the same burdens.”

###",1,2026-09-12T09:02:30Z,2026-09-12T09:03:27Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-the-25th-anniversary-of-9-11-terrorist-attacks/,Luján Statement on the 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Terrorist Attacks,2026-09-11,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) issued the following statement on the 25th anniversary of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001:

“September 11, 2001, remains one of the most tragic days in our nation’s history. Twenty-five years later, we remember the nearly 3,000 people who lost their lives and the families and loved ones whose lives were forever changed.

“In the face of unimaginable loss, Americans showed extraordinary courage, compassion, and bravery. First responders and ordinary citizens ran toward danger to save others, while communities across the country came together to support those who were grieving.

“Today and every day, we honor the memory of every person who never made it home. We will never forget.”

###",1,2026-09-12T09:02:30Z,2026-09-12T09:03:27Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-southern-new-mexico-lujan-delivers-keynote-at-domenici-public-policy-conference-highlights-support-for-new-mexico-chile-farmers/,"In Southern New Mexico, Luján Delivers Keynote at Domenici Public Policy Conference, Highlights Support for New Mexico Chile Farmers",2026-09-10,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO – This week, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) was in Southern New Mexico to engage with students and community leaders on the issues facing New Mexico and the country and highlight his continued support for New Mexico farmers.

Keynote Address at Domenici Public Policy Conference

At New Mexico State University on Wednesday, Senator Luján delivered the luncheon keynote address at the Domenici Public Policy Conference and took questions from students on issues impacting New Mexicans and Americans across the country. Senator Luján’s address focused on his work on behalf of New Mexicans and his continued commitment to deliver for communities across the state.

“It was an honor to deliver the keynote address at the Domenici Public Policy Conference and speak directly with students about the issues shaping New Mexico and our country,” said Senator Luján. “The Domenici Public Policy Conference exemplifies a commitment to public service and thoughtful debate, and I was proud to join students and community leaders who share a dedication to making life better for New Mexicans. I was especially grateful for the opportunity to hear from students and discuss the work ahead to build a stronger future for New Mexico.”

Supporting New Mexico’s Chile Producers

During his visit to Derry on Tuesday, Senator Luján visited Ogaz Farms to see firsthand the challenges chile producers are facing. Senator Luján heard directly from local producers about the stresses impacting their operations and discussed his efforts to support specialty crop producers across New Mexico. In June, Senator Luján introduced the Cultivating Horticultural Innovation in Local Economies (CHILE) Act, legislation to strengthen support for specialty crop producers, including New Mexico farmers who grow chile and other specialty crops that are vital to the state’s agricultural economy.

“This week in Derry, I had the honor of meeting with New Mexico chile producers at the height of harvest season,” said Senator Luján. “I heard directly from chile producers about the challenges they are facing and highlighted my efforts to ensure they get the assistance they need. New Mexico’s chile producers are an important part of our state’s culture and economy, and I’ll continue working to support our specialty crop producers and deliver the resources they need to succeed.”

###",1,2026-09-11T09:25:29Z,2026-09-11T09:27:08Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-n-m-delegation-call-on-apple-google-to-keep-new-mexicos-name-on-mapping-services/,"Luján, N.M. Delegation Call on Apple, Google to Keep New Mexico’s Name on Mapping Services",2026-09-10,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"N.M. Delegation Demands Commitment Following Trump’s Post to Rename New Mexico “New America”

Luján’s Reaction Following Trump’s Post: It’s New Mexico, always has been and always will be. Just like how you’ll always be a sinvergüenza and corrupt.

Santa Fe, N.M. – Today, U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) called on Apple and Google to publicly commit to keeping New Mexico’s name on their mapping services following President Trump’s threatening post that the state be renamed “New America.”

In a letter to Apple CEO John Ternus and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Senator Luján and the New Mexico Delegation clearly state that President Trump does not have the legal authority to unilaterally rename New Mexico and calls on the companies to commit to continuing to identify the state as New Mexico on Apple Maps and Google Maps, regardless of pressure from the Trump administration.

Over Labor Day weekend, President Trump published a series of erratic social media posts, including posts suggesting that New Mexico be renamed “New America.” President Trump has previously directed the federal government to use new names for geographic features, including the Gulf of Mexico, Denali, and Lake Ontario.

“Let us be clear: the President has no legal authority to rename New Mexico. Our state’s name belongs to the people of New Mexico and is rooted in our history and our Constitution, which clearly states that ‘the name of this state is New Mexico,’” wrote the lawmakers.

“We ask each of you to publicly commit that Apple Maps and Google Maps will continue to identify the State of New Mexico as New Mexico, regardless of what the President posts on social media, what executive order he attempts to issue, or what pressure he puts on your companies,” continued the lawmakers.

Full text of the letter is available here and below.

Dear Mr. Ternus and Mr. Pichai:

This weekend, rather than addressing the affordability crisis, ending his illegal war in Iran that has driven up gas prices, removing tariffs that are raising costs for American families, or honoring our nation’s workers, President Trump published more than a hundred posts to his Truth Social account. In several of them, the President suggested renaming our home state of New Mexico, “New America.”

Let us be clear: the President has no legal authority to rename New Mexico. Our state’s name belongs to the people of New Mexico and is rooted in our history and our Constitution, which clearly states that “the name of this state is New Mexico.” The United States Constitution does not give the President the power to unilaterally rename a state and an executive order cannot amend New Mexico’s Constitution or change the legal identity of our state. Changing New Mexico’s name would require changing our state Constitution through New Mexico’s own constitutional process.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time President Trump has attempted to unilaterally rename a place. In 2025, through an executive order, the President directed the federal government to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America” and Denali to “Mount McKinley.” Most recently, the President ordered the federal government to refer to Lake Ontario as “Lake America.”

In each case, your companies soon updated your mapping services to reflect the President’s whims. According to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the President even reached out to Apple directly, pressuring the company to change Lake Ontario to “Lake America.”

This is disappointing but unsurprising. Both of your companies have significant business interests before the federal government. These include antitrust enforcement, tariffs, regulation of artificial intelligence and online platforms, and federal contracting opportunities. This is not the first time your companies have made concessions to this President and this Administration. For example, after the January 6 attack on the United States Capitol and our democracy, YouTube suspended President Trump from its platform. President Trump subsequently sued over that decision. Last year, Google agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle that lawsuit with $22 million directed toward the President’s new White House ballroom. In addition, both Google and Apple are among the corporations that have donated to the ballroom project – a project that has not been authorized by the United States Congress.

Because of this history, we ask each of you to publicly commit that Apple Maps and Google Maps will continue to identify the State of New Mexico as New Mexico, regardless of what the President posts on social media, what executive order he attempts to issue, or what pressure he puts on your companies.

Again, the name has belonged to the people of New Mexico since before the United States existed. It should not become a political football to be negotiated between an unhinged President and two of the most powerful technology companies in the world.

We ask for your public commitment to maintaining New Mexico’s name by September 18.

###",1,2026-09-11T09:25:29Z,2026-09-11T09:27:08Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/as-oil-hits-100-a-barrel-heinrich-details-how-trumps-war-in-iran-will-continue-to-harm-working-families,"As Oil Hits $100 a Barrel, Heinrich Details How Trump’s War in Iran Will Continue to Harm Working Families",2026-09-09,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"Report outlines how Trump’s war in Iran continues to strain the United States’ Strategic Petroleum Reserve, threatening to further hike gasoline prices

WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released a report detailing how draining the United States’ oil reserves to historic lows as a result of President Trump’s ongoing war in Iran — a war that financially benefits him — will cause prices at the pump to continue to rise.

In the report, Heinrich spells out how the historically low U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) endangers critical energy infrastructure, risking the United States’ ability to release more oil from the SPR and threatening our energy security. As President Trump’s war with Iran continues, a depleted SPR could cause gasoline prices to potentially rise to $6 per gallon according to oil executives, putting a greater financial strain on working families. This report follows the Joint Economic Committee’s (JEC) August 2026 report, which found that Trump is financially benefitting from his ongoing war in Iran and has gained $15.5 million from oil and gas stocks.

“Instead of tackling rising energy prices or ending his war in Iran, President Trump is irresponsibly draining our fuel reserves. That's making things worse, not better. And working families could be forced to pay more at the pump as a result,” said Heinrich.

The SPR was created in 1975 to mitigate the impacts of global crises on consumers, protecting the economy from severe oil shortages and price surges. It’s designed to hold up to 713.5 million barrels of crude oil spread across 60 salt caverns in Texas and Louisiana and is the largest reported government-owned stockpile in the world.

In April 2026, the U.S. — at the direction of President Trump — released 172 million barrels of crude oil from the SPR. The decision to release oil came as Trump’s war with Iran caused gas prices to surge from $3 per gallon to over $5 per gallon in some parts of the country. The SPR is now at its lowest level since its inception.

In June 2026, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report warning that the SPR is at risk of failing to safeguard the U.S. from severe petroleum supply disruptions.

Read the spotlight report here.",1,2026-09-10T09:25:58Z,2026-09-10T09:27:09Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-celebrates-first-ever-permit-issued-under-his-good-samaritan-mine-cleanup-law,Heinrich Celebrates First-Ever Permit Issued Under His Good Samaritan Mine Cleanup Law,2026-09-09,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, today celebrated the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) issuance of the first-ever permit under the Good Samaritan Remediation of Abandoned Hardrock Mines Pilot Program — established by legislation he authored and championed alongside U.S. Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) to remove a longstanding legal barrier to cleaning up abandoned mines. The House companion legislation was led by U.S. Representatives Celeste Maloy (R-Utah), Mary Peltola (D-Alaska), and Susie Lee (D-Nev.).

The permit authorizes Trout Unlimited to move forward with the Bodie Mine Project in Okanogan County, Washington, marking the first time a Good Samaritan has received federal authorization under the pilot program created by Heinrich’s bipartisan Good Samaritan Remediation of Abandoned Hardrock Mines Act, which was signed into law in December 2024.

For decades, nonprofits, state and local governments, and other groups willing to clean up abandoned hardrock mines faced a major obstacle: under existing environmental liability laws, organizations could potentially become legally liable for pollution they did not create simply by attempting to remediate it. Heinrich’s legislation created a new permitting pathway that provides eligible Good Samaritans with protections from certain liability risks while they carry out approved cleanup projects.

“This is a landmark moment — and proof that our Good Samaritan law is working. After more than 25 years of hard work to break down the legal barriers standing in the way of abandoned mine cleanup, we are finally seeing volunteers get to work restoring polluted lands and waters without taking on liability for contamination they didn’t cause,” said Heinrich. “The first Good Samaritan permit has now been issued, and this is just the beginning. We can now use this new tool to clean up more abandoned mines, improve water quality, and make communities across New Mexico and the West safer and healthier.”

The Bodie Mine Project will address legacy mine contamination along approximately 400 feet of Toroda Creek. Under the permit, Trout Unlimited will excavate and remove up to 790 tons of contaminated soil and sediment, reconstruct and stabilize the streambank, and restore native vegetation. The project is expected to prevent approximately 104 tons of contaminated tailings from eroding into Toroda Creek each year. Just last week, Heinrich, Risch, Maloy, and Lee sent a bipartisan letter to EPA supporting the Bodie Mine Project and urging the agency to move forward with implementation of the new pilot program.

“This law simply does not happen without the bipartisan work of Senators Heinrich and Risch. Senator Heinrich, in particular, was a force of nature in his advocacy and effectiveness. Anyone who cares about clean water owes him a debt of gratitude,” said Chris Wood, President and CEO of Trout Unlimited.

The project demonstrates exactly the kind of collaborative conservation effort Heinrich’s legislation was designed to enable: a non-liable conservation organization to address pollution left behind by historic mining. As required by the law, the EPA completed an environmental assessment for the Bodie Mine Project.

Heinrich first introduced the Good Samaritan legislation with Risch in 2022 after years of bipartisan efforts to address the liability barriers preventing voluntary abandoned mine cleanups. The legislation passed the Senate unanimously before passing the House and being signed into law on December 17, 2024.

In 2021, Heinrich championed a provision in the Infrastructure Law to establish the first-ever abandoned hardrock mine reclamation program in the Department of the Interior. With the passage of the Good Samaritan legislation, public-private partnerships can use this program to jumpstart abandoned mine cleanups.

The United States has hundreds of thousands of abandoned hardrock mine features, with at least 33,000 posing environmental hazards, according to the Government Accountability Office. Heinrich’s law established a pilot permitting program specifically designed to help lower-risk projects move forward while maintaining federal oversight.",1,2026-09-10T09:25:58Z,2026-09-10T09:27:09Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/news-ballistics-technology-heinrich-secured-helps-law-enforcement-identify-suspect-in-roswell-murders,NEWS: Ballistics Technology Heinrich Secured Helps Law Enforcement Identify Suspect in Roswell Murders,2026-09-09,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"Heinrich secured more than $1 million to expand NIBIN technology across New Mexico, including a new machine in Roswell that investigators used to connect ballistic evidence in multiple homicides

ROSWELL, N.M. — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) today highlighted the critical role that new ballistics testing machines he secured helped law enforcement identify and arrest a suspect accused of two murders in the community.

According to the New Mexico Department of Justice, the Roswell Police Department used the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network (NIBIN) machine to identify a connection between ballistic evidence recovered in two of the homicides and a firearm recovered from the suspect’s home.

“This is exactly why I fought to bring this technology to communities like Roswell,” said Heinrich. “When someone commits a violent crime with a firearm, law enforcement needs every possible tool to identify that weapon, connect it to other crimes, and get a dangerous criminal off the streets before they can hurt anyone else. That is what these investments are designed to do — help law enforcement solve crimes faster and keep New Mexicans safe.”

In the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Appropriations process, Heinrich secured more than $1 million to purchase four new NIBIN machines for law enforcement agencies in Roswell, Las Cruces, Farmington, and Gallup. The investment expanded access to advanced ballistic intelligence beyond Albuquerque and Santa Fe and established a statewide network connecting local law enforcement agencies with the New Mexico Department of Justice’s Crime Gun Intelligence Center.

Before Heinrich secured the funding, New Mexico had only three NIBIN machines — two in Albuquerque and one in Santa Fe. The new Roswell machine has given law enforcement in southeastern New Mexico direct access to the technology, eliminating the need to transport evidence long distances for testing.

NIBIN machines use highly technical imaging to analyze the markings left on spent cartridge casings and determine whether they are associated with other firearms-related crimes. That information is shared with the New Mexico Department of Justice’s Crime Gun Intelligence Center, where trained analysts can identify connections between crimes, firearms, and suspects and provide intelligence back to local law enforcement.

The New Mexico Department of Justice has credited Heinrich’s federal investment with helping establish the statewide Crime Gun Intelligence Center, which uses forensic firearm evidence to find connections between crimes across New Mexico. The four new NIBIN machines are located in Roswell, Farmington, Gallup, and Doña Ana County. Since the machines were installed, the Crime Gun Intelligence Center has processed more than 2,000 ballistic acquisitions, generating leads in over 527 criminal incidents across New Mexico, with 41% resulting in an arrest.

Heinrich also secured language in the FY2024 Appropriations bills directing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to expand access to NIBIN for state and local agencies in the Southwest Border region.

Background on Heinrich’s work to support law enforcement’s ability to solve violent crime and keep New Mexicans safe:

Heinrich has made securing resources for New Mexico law enforcement and first responders a priority on the Senate Appropriations Committee. Through the FY2022, FY2023, and FY2024 appropriations processes, Heinrich delivered $48.9 million for law enforcement and first responders across New Mexico.

In October 2024, Heinrich previously highlighted the machines as a critical tool for helping law enforcement “solve the crimes that happen before those same criminals can do more harm” in Las Cruces.

The New Mexico Department of Justice’s Crime Gun Intelligence Center now uses the network of NIBIN machines to connect firearm evidence from crimes across the state, helping investigators identify suspects, witnesses, and patterns that might otherwise go undetected.

###",1,2026-09-10T09:25:58Z,2026-09-10T09:27:09Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/icymi-lujan-n-m-delegation-call-on-doj-inspector-general-to-expand-investigation-into-dea-fentanyl-practices-in-new-mexico/,"ICYMI: Luján, N.M. Delegation Call on DOJ Inspector General to Expand Investigation into DEA Fentanyl Practices in New Mexico",2026-09-08,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"NEW MEXICO – In Case You Missed It: U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) called on the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Inspector General (OIG) to expand its recently announced review of federal fentanyl investigations to examine Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) practices dating back before 2024, with a specific focus on the DEA’s fentanyl practices in New Mexico.

The Delegation’s request follows whistleblower complaints alleging that DEA agents allowed large quantities of fentanyl to reach New Mexico communities instead of seizing the drugs. On August 17th, the DOJ OIG announced a review of federal fentanyl investigations, including cases where investigators allowed fentanyl shipments to continue rather than seizing them. In the letter, the lawmakers point to whistleblower allegations that raise concerns that DEA’s practice of allowing fentanyl to “walk” may extend further than the OIG’s current two-year review period. Additionally, the lawmakers call on the DOJ OIG to examine whether the DEA’s decisions led to increased overdose deaths throughout New Mexico.

“One of the whistleblowers claims that the DEA surveilled a drug trafficker ‘who made repeated deliveries of fentanyl from Phoenix to Albuquerque between 2022 and 2023.’ There is reason to suspect that the DEA’s policies of allowing fentanyl to ‘walk’ stretches back before 2023. For that reason, we believe the OIG should expand its scope of review.” wrote the lawmakers.

“The people of New Mexico deserve answers as to why the agency charged with seizing drugs instead allowed deadly pills to flood their streets. We ask that the DOJ OIG conduct a full and thorough investigation to bring some measure of accountability to actions carried out by DEA,” continued the lawmakers.

In July, the New Mexico Delegation demanded answers from U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole on why the DEA allowed large quantities of fentanyl to circulate unseized in New Mexico communities.

The full text of the letter is available here and below:

Dear Inspector General Berthiaume:

We write regarding the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General’s (DOJ OIG) August 17, 2026’s announcement that it would review “investigations involving the trafficking of substances containing fentanyl… when federal investigators have knowledge, specific information, or probable cause to believe that fentanyl will be transported or distributed to or from, or stored at, a specified identifiable location.” While we are pleased to see OIG initiate this investigation we ask that the Office expand the scope of its review to investigations before 2024 with a specific focus on investigations undertaken by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) within New Mexico.

As you know, current and former DEA agents filed whistleblower complaints alleging that agents within the Agency allowed drug traffickers to deliver hundreds of thousands of fentanyl pills onto the streets of New Mexico. One of the whistleblowers claims that the DEA surveilled a drug trafficker “who made repeated deliveries of fentanyl from Phoenix to Albuquerque between 2022 and 2023.” There is reason to suspect that the DEA’s policies of allowing fentanyl to “walk” stretches back before 2023. For that reason, we believe the OIG should expand its scope of review.

Sadly, New Mexico remains a hotbed of fentanyl trafficking and overdose deaths. Federal data show that overdose deaths fell throughout the country in 2025, yet, in New Mexico deaths rose by 21 percent. This increase correlates with the time period during which the DEA’s allowed traffickers to flood the streets with deadly fentanyl pills. Thus, we ask that the OIG examine whether the DEA’s decisions led to increased overdose deaths throughout the state.

The people of New Mexico deserve answers as to why the agency charged with seizing drugs instead allowed deadly pills to flood their streets. We ask that the DOJ OIG conduct a full and thorough investigation to bring some measure of accountability to actions carried out by DEA. Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Sincerely,

###",1,2026-09-09T09:27:09Z,2026-09-09T09:29:04Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-celebration-of-labor-day/,Luján Statement on Celebration of Labor Day,2026-09-07,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) issued the following statement recognizing New Mexico workers in honor of Labor Day:

“This Labor Day, we recognize the hardworking New Mexicans who keep our communities strong. We celebrate the generations of New Mexican workers who have fought for fair pay, safer workplaces, and better opportunity for working families.

“As the son of a union ironworker and a public school administrator, I understand the dignity of hard work, the importance of a good-paying job, and the necessity for a safe workplace. I remain committed to standing up to protect workers’ rights, expand opportunity, and ensure every New Mexican can build a better future for themselves.”

###",1,2026-09-08T09:24:24Z,2026-09-08T09:26:10Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-statement-honoring-labor-day,Heinrich Statement Honoring Labor Day,2026-09-07,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) released the following statement honoring Labor Day.

“Today we honor the skilled workers who built our country and keep it running. We recognize all those, past and present, who have fought for labor protections and the right to organize. And we commit to creating an economy where hard work pays off.

“As the son of an IBEW lineman and a wheel factory worker, I know how hard my parents worked to provide for our family. And I know that it was my dad’s union job that gave us a ticket to the middle class.

“But even as union workers across New Mexico are building a future for their families and supporting our communities — lighting our homes, schools, and offices, and building the clean energy infrastructure that will power our economy for generations — too many others are working harder and falling further behind — asked to do more with far less.

“I am committed to delivering policies that bring costs down and support the folks working hard for our communities. And I will continue holding President Trump accountable for the rising prices caused by his tariffs, war with Iran, and other reckless economic policies.”

###",1,2026-09-09T09:27:09Z,2026-09-09T09:29:04Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-nm-delegation-press-va-secretary-to-ensure-new-mexico-veterans-are-not-harmed-by-agency-reorganization,"Heinrich, N.M. Delegation Press VA Secretary to Ensure New Mexico Veterans Are Not Harmed by Agency Reorganization",2026-09-04,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and members of the N.M. Congressional Delegation, including U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.), sent a letter pressing U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Doug Collins to ensure New Mexico veterans’ unique needs are not diminished in the agency’s planned reorganization of the Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN) structure into five regional networks under the VA RISE Initiative.

New Mexico is home to more than 125,000 veterans, many of whom live in rural communities where access to healthcare is already limited. Veterans across the state face unique challenges, including long distances to VA medical centers, shortages of specialty care providers, and limited broadband access for telehealth services. New Mexico also has a disproportionately high share of Native American, Hispanic, and Latino veterans, whose healthcare needs are best served through culturally competent care and strong partnerships with Tribal governments and the Indian Health Service (IHS). New Mexico also has a particular need for local decision-making and resources that reflect the unique needs of veterans in geographically isolated areas.

“While we appreciate the Department's efforts to modernize its healthcare delivery system, any restructuring must improve —not weaken — the quality, accessibility, and responsiveness of care for veterans living in rural communities,” the N.M. Congressional Delegation wrote to VA Secretary Collins.

While New Mexico was previously aligned under VISN 22 and 17, veterans and stakeholders repeatedly expressed concerns that the state's priorities were overshadowed by larger population centers within the VISN. Resource allocation, executive attention, and operational decision-making often favored larger facilities, leaving New Mexico veterans underrepresented despite facing some of the greatest barriers to care. Differences in geography, demographics, and healthcare infrastructure between New Mexico and the rest of the VISN complicated efforts to tailor services to the state's unique needs.

In the letter, the N.M. Congressional Delegation urged VA leadership to ensure that the unique needs of New Mexico’s veterans are addressed and that past hurdles to adequate healthcare do not persist as the agency establishes a new five-VISN structure.

“The success of this reorganization should ultimately be measured not by administrative efficiencies alone, but by whether veterans experience faster access to care, improved health outcomes, and greater confidence in the VA healthcare system. New Mexico's unique geography and veteran population require sustained attention and dedicated leadership to ensure that organizational changes do not unintentionally widen existing disparities in access to care,” the N.M. Congressional Delegation underscored.

The N.M. Congressional Delegation concluded the letter by requesting that the VA provide an overview of how New Mexico's unique healthcare needs will be incorporated into the new VISN structure, including what safeguards will be implemented to ensure the state receives equitable resources, leadership engagement, accessible community care, expanded telehealth and rural outreach, and stronger partnerships with Tribal governments and the IHS following the reorganization. The Delegation also requested that the VA prioritize recruiting and retaining healthcare professionals in rural communities and maintain transparent, New Mexico-specific metrics to ensure veterans receive timely, high-quality care.

The full text of the letter is here and below:

Dear Secretary Collins,

As the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) undertakes its planned reorganization of the Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN) structure into five regional networks under the VA RISE Initiative, I write to emphasize the importance of ensuring that the unique needs of New Mexico's veterans are not diminished within a larger organizational framework. While we appreciate the Department's efforts to modernize its healthcare delivery system, any restructuring must improve—not weaken—the quality, accessibility, and responsiveness of care for veterans living in rural communities.

New Mexico is home to more than 125,000 veterans, many of whom reside in geographically isolated areas where access to healthcare is already limited. Veterans in my state face unique challenges, including long travel distances to VA medical centers, shortages of specialty care providers, limited broadband access for telehealth services, and a disproportionately high percentage of Native American, Hispanic, and Latino veterans whose healthcare needs are best served through culturally competent care and strong partnerships with Tribal governments and the Indian Health Service. Additionally, New Mexico has one of the nation's highest concentrations of rural veterans, making local decision-making and resource allocation particularly important.

While New Mexico was previously aligned under VISN 22 and 17, veterans and stakeholders repeatedly expressed concerns that the state's priorities were overshadowed by larger population centers within the VISN. Resource allocation, executive attention, and operational decision-making often favored larger facilities, leaving New Mexico veterans feeling underrepresented despite facing some of the greatest barriers to care. Differences in geography, demographics, and healthcare infrastructure between New Mexico and the rest of the VISN complicated efforts to tailor services to the state's unique needs.

As the Department establishes a new five-VISN structure, I urge VA leadership to ensure that the unique needs of New Mexico’s veterans are prioritized and that past hurdles to adequate health care do not persist. Specifically, I request that the Department:

Establish dedicated regional leadership responsible for advocating exclusively for New Mexico's veterans and ensuring the state's healthcare priorities remain visible within the larger VISN structure.

Preserve and expand access to community care where VA facilities remain geographically inaccessible, while maintaining strong oversight to ensure timely, high-quality care.

Continue investments in telehealth infrastructure, mobile health care services, and rural outreach programs to better serve veterans in remote communities.

Strengthen partnerships with Tribal governments, Tribal health systems, and the Indian Health Service to improve coordination of care for Native American veterans.

Prioritize recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals in rural New Mexico facilities through targeted workforce initiatives.

Maintain transparent performance metrics specific to New Mexico, including appointment wait times, specialty care access, community care utilization, and veteran satisfaction, so Congress and veterans can evaluate whether the reorganization is producing meaningful improvements.

The success of this reorganization should ultimately be measured not by administrative efficiencies alone, but by whether veterans experience faster access to care, improved health outcomes, and greater confidence in the VA healthcare system. New Mexico's unique geography and veteran population require sustained attention and dedicated leadership to ensure that organizational changes do not unintentionally widen existing disparities in access to care.

We respectfully request that the Department provide an overview of how New Mexico's unique healthcare needs will be incorporated into the new VISN structure, including what safeguards will be implemented to ensure the state receives equitable resources, leadership engagement, and operational support following the reorganization.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter and for your continued commitment to serving those who have worn our nation's uniform. We look forward to working with you to ensure that every New Mexico veteran receives the high-quality healthcare they have earned.

Sincerely,

###",1,2026-09-05T08:49:07Z,2026-09-05T08:50:44Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-releases-fact-sheet-highlighting-how-clean-energy-is-keeping-the-lights-on-during-extreme-heat,Heinrich Releases Fact Sheet Highlighting How Clean Energy is Keeping the Lights on During Extreme Heat,2026-09-04,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released a new fact sheet detailing how clean energy and energy storage resources have lessened the likelihood of power outages this summer and strengthened the reliability of the nation’s electric grid.

This summer, as our grid is constrained the most due to increased energy usage, communities across the United States have faced dangerous, record-breaking heat, making reliable electricity a matter of public health and safety. During extreme heat, power outages can leave people without air conditioning for hours or even days, putting older adults, children, and other vulnerable Americans at serious risk.

Despite clean energy being the cheapest, fastest source to deploy, the Trump administration has continuously blocked clean energy projects from connecting to the grid. If those actions continue, over 90% of planned new electricity generation capacity could be prevented from coming online in the next several years, straining our energy grid even further and increasing the likelihood of power outages.

“Extreme heat is putting more pressure on our electric grid, and Americans need to know that when they flip the switch, the power will be there. Clean, American-made energy can help us meet growing demand, lower energy costs, strengthen the grid, and keep the lights and air conditioning on,” said Heinrich. “That is why it makes no sense that President Trump continues to block and stall new clean energy projects from connecting to the grid. Every summer, our grid faces an increase in demand, leaving communities across the country at risk of power outages that can be life-threatening. We should be building more reliable, affordable energy – not putting up more roadblocks.”

The fact sheet finds that clean energy resources are already helping meet growing electricity demand and improve grid reliability. Between June 2025 and May 2026, as more clean energy sources connected to the grid, these sources increased available energy capacity, reducing the likelihood of power outages in regions across the country.

Read the fact sheet here.",1,2026-09-05T08:49:07Z,2026-09-05T08:50:44Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-n-m-delegation-call-on-doj-inspector-general-to-expand-investigation-into-dea-fentanyl-practices-in-new-mexico/,"Luján, N.M. Delegation Call on DOJ Inspector General to Expand Investigation into DEA Fentanyl Practices in New Mexico",2026-09-04,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"NEW MEXICO – Today, U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) called on the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Inspector General (OIG) to expand its recently announced review of federal fentanyl investigations to examine Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) practices dating back before 2024, with a specific focus on the DEA’s fentanyl practices in New Mexico.

The Delegation’s request follows whistleblower complaints alleging that DEA agents allowed large quantities of fentanyl to reach New Mexico communities instead of seizing the drugs. On August 17th, the DOJ OIG announced a review of federal fentanyl investigations, including cases where investigators allowed fentanyl shipments to continue rather than seizing them. In the letter, the lawmakers point to whistleblower allegations that raise concerns that DEA’s practice of allowing fentanyl to “walk” may extend further than the OIG’s current two-year review period. Additionally, the lawmakers call on the DOJ OIG to examine whether the DEA’s decisions led to increased overdose deaths throughout New Mexico.

“One of the whistleblowers claims that the DEA surveilled a drug trafficker ‘who made repeated deliveries of fentanyl from Phoenix to Albuquerque between 2022 and 2023.’ There is reason to suspect that the DEA’s policies of allowing fentanyl to ‘walk’ stretches back before 2023. For that reason, we believe the OIG should expand its scope of review.” wrote the lawmakers.

“The people of New Mexico deserve answers as to why the agency charged with seizing drugs instead allowed deadly pills to flood their streets. We ask that the DOJ OIG conduct a full and thorough investigation to bring some measure of accountability to actions carried out by DEA,” continued the lawmakers.

In July, the New Mexico Delegation demanded answers from U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole on why the DEA allowed large quantities of fentanyl to circulate unseized in New Mexico communities.

The full text of the letter is available here and below:

Dear Inspector General Berthiaume:

We write regarding the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General’s (DOJ OIG) August 17, 2026’s announcement that it would review “investigations involving the trafficking of substances containing fentanyl… when federal investigators have knowledge, specific information, or probable cause to believe that fentanyl will be transported or distributed to or from, or stored at, a specified identifiable location.” While we are pleased to see OIG initiate this investigation we ask that the Office expand the scope of its review to investigations before 2024 with a specific focus on investigations undertaken by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) within New Mexico.

As you know, current and former DEA agents filed whistleblower complaints alleging that agents within the Agency allowed drug traffickers to deliver hundreds of thousands of fentanyl pills onto the streets of New Mexico. One of the whistleblowers claims that the DEA surveilled a drug trafficker “who made repeated deliveries of fentanyl from Phoenix to Albuquerque between 2022 and 2023.” There is reason to suspect that the DEA’s policies of allowing fentanyl to “walk” stretches back before 2023. For that reason, we believe the OIG should expand its scope of review.

Sadly, New Mexico remains a hotbed of fentanyl trafficking and overdose deaths. Federal data show that overdose deaths fell throughout the country in 2025, yet, in New Mexico deaths rose by 21 percent. This increase correlates with the time period during which the DEA’s allowed traffickers to flood the streets with deadly fentanyl pills. Thus, we ask that the OIG examine whether the DEA’s decisions led to increased overdose deaths throughout the state.

The people of New Mexico deserve answers as to why the agency charged with seizing drugs instead allowed deadly pills to flood their streets. We ask that the DOJ OIG conduct a full and thorough investigation to bring some measure of accountability to actions carried out by DEA. Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Sincerely,

###",1,2026-09-05T08:49:07Z,2026-09-05T08:50:44Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/n-m-delegation-presses-va-secretary-to-ensure-new-mexico-veterans-are-not-harmed-by-agency-reorganization/,N.M. Delegation Presses VA Secretary to Ensure New Mexico Veterans Are Not Harmed by Agency Reorganization,2026-09-04,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and members of the N.M. Congressional Delegation, including U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.), sent a letter pressing U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Doug Collins to ensure New Mexico veterans’ unique needs are not diminished in the agency’s planned reorganization of the Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN) structure into five regional networks under the VA RISE Initiative.

New Mexico is home to more than 125,000 veterans, many of whom live in rural communities where access to healthcare is already limited. Veterans across the state face unique challenges, including long distances to VA medical centers, shortages of specialty care providers, and limited broadband access for telehealth services. New Mexico also has a disproportionately high share of Native American, Hispanic, and Latino veterans, whose healthcare needs are best served through culturally competent care and strong partnerships with Tribal governments and the Indian Health Service (IHS). New Mexico also has a particular need for local decision-making and resources that reflect the unique needs of veterans in geographically isolated areas.

“While we appreciate the Department’s efforts to modernize its healthcare delivery system, any restructuring must improve —not weaken — the quality, accessibility, and responsiveness of care for veterans living in rural communities,” the N.M. Congressional Delegation wrote to VA Secretary Collins.

While New Mexico was previously aligned under VISN 22 and 17, veterans and stakeholders repeatedly expressed concerns that the state’s priorities were overshadowed by larger population centers within the VISN. Resource allocation, executive attention, and operational decision-making often favored larger facilities, leaving New Mexico veterans underrepresented despite facing some of the greatest barriers to care. Differences in geography, demographics, and healthcare infrastructure between New Mexico and the rest of the VISN complicated efforts to tailor services to the state’s unique needs.

In the letter, the N.M. Congressional Delegation urged VA leadership to ensure that the unique needs of New Mexico’s veterans are addressed and that past hurdles to adequate healthcare do not persist as the agency establishes a new five-VISN structure.

“The success of this reorganization should ultimately be measured not by administrative efficiencies alone, but by whether veterans experience faster access to care, improved health outcomes, and greater confidence in the VA healthcare system. New Mexico’s unique geography and veteran population require sustained attention and dedicated leadership to ensure that organizational changes do not unintentionally widen existing disparities in access to care,” the N.M. Congressional Delegation underscored.

The N.M. Congressional Delegation concluded the letter by requesting that the VA provide an overview of how New Mexico’s unique healthcare needs will be incorporated into the new VISN structure, including what safeguards will be implemented to ensure the state receives equitable resources, leadership engagement, accessible community care, expanded telehealth and rural outreach, and stronger partnerships with Tribal governments and the IHS following the reorganization. The Delegation also requested that the VA prioritize recruiting and retaining healthcare professionals in rural communities and maintain transparent, New Mexico-specific metrics to ensure veterans receive timely, high-quality care.

The full text of the letter is here and below:

Dear Secretary Collins,

As the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) undertakes its planned reorganization of the Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN) structure into five regional networks under the VA RISE Initiative, I write to emphasize the importance of ensuring that the unique needs of New Mexico’s veterans are not diminished within a larger organizational framework. While we appreciate the Department’s efforts to modernize its healthcare delivery system, any restructuring must improve—not weaken—the quality, accessibility, and responsiveness of care for veterans living in rural communities.

New Mexico is home to more than 125,000 veterans, many of whom reside in geographically isolated areas where access to healthcare is already limited. Veterans in my state face unique challenges, including long travel distances to VA medical centers, shortages of specialty care providers, limited broadband access for telehealth services, and a disproportionately high percentage of Native American, Hispanic, and Latino veterans whose healthcare needs are best served through culturally competent care and strong partnerships with Tribal governments and the Indian Health Service. Additionally, New Mexico has one of the nation’s highest concentrations of rural veterans, making local decision-making and resource allocation particularly important.

While New Mexico was previously aligned under VISN 22 and 17, veterans and stakeholders repeatedly expressed concerns that the state’s priorities were overshadowed by larger population centers within the VISN. Resource allocation, executive attention, and operational decision-making often favored larger facilities, leaving New Mexico veterans feeling underrepresented despite facing some of the greatest barriers to care. Differences in geography, demographics, and healthcare infrastructure between New Mexico and the rest of the VISN complicated efforts to tailor services to the state’s unique needs.

As the Department establishes a new five-VISN structure, I urge VA leadership to ensure that the unique needs of New Mexico’s veterans are prioritized and that past hurdles to adequate health care do not persist. Specifically, I request that the Department:

Establish dedicated regional leadership responsible for advocating exclusively for New Mexico’s veterans and ensuring the state’s healthcare priorities remain visible within the larger VISN structure.

Preserve and expand access to community care where VA facilities remain geographically inaccessible, while maintaining strong oversight to ensure timely, high-quality care.

Continue investments in telehealth infrastructure, mobile health care services, and rural outreach programs to better serve veterans in remote communities.

Strengthen partnerships with Tribal governments, Tribal health systems, and the Indian Health Service to improve coordination of care for Native American veterans.

Prioritize recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals in rural New Mexico facilities through targeted workforce initiatives.

Maintain transparent performance metrics specific to New Mexico, including appointment wait times, specialty care access, community care utilization, and veteran satisfaction, so Congress and veterans can evaluate whether the reorganization is producing meaningful improvements.

The success of this reorganization should ultimately be measured not by administrative efficiencies alone, but by whether veterans experience faster access to care, improved health outcomes, and greater confidence in the VA healthcare system. New Mexico’s unique geography and veteran population require sustained attention and dedicated leadership to ensure that organizational changes do not unintentionally widen existing disparities in access to care.

We respectfully request that the Department provide an overview of how New Mexico’s unique healthcare needs will be incorporated into the new VISN structure, including what safeguards will be implemented to ensure the state receives equitable resources, leadership engagement, and operational support following the reorganization.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter and for your continued commitment to serving those who have worn our nation’s uniform. We look forward to working with you to ensure that every New Mexico veteran receives the high-quality healthcare they have earned.

Sincerely,

###",1,2026-09-05T08:49:07Z,2026-09-05T08:50:44Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-armstrong-introduce-legislation-to-give-tribes-more-flexibility-to-hire-qualified-native-language-educators-preserve-native-languages,"Heinrich, Armstrong Introduce Legislation to Give Tribes More Flexibility to Hire Qualified Native Language Educators, Preserve Native Languages",2026-09-03,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Alan Armstrong (R-Okla.) introduced the Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act, bipartisan legislation to give Tribal Head Start programs greater authority to determine how qualified educators can meet Head Start teaching requirements — helping Tribes hire more Native language educators and bring more fluent Native language speakers into the classroom. Tribal Head Start programs play a critical role in preserving and promoting Native languages, cultures, and traditions. But federal credentialing requirements can prevent Tribal programs from hiring qualified educators — particularly in communities with limited access to higher education.

“Preserving Native languages is essential to maintaining cultural identity,” said Heinrich. “But today, federal requirements can prevent Tribal Head Start programs from hiring the people best equipped to pass those languages, cultures, and traditions on to the next generation. My Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act will give Tribes more flexibility to determine who is qualified to teach in their own communities and create more pathways for fluent Native language speakers and other qualified educators to enter the classroom. This is about making sure Tribal communities have the authority and resources they need to keep their languages and cultures strong for generations to come.”

“Native languages are at the heart of Tribal culture, identity, and community. I’m proud to work across the aisle to strengthen Tribal Head Start programs and open more pathways for teachers to enter the classroom, helping Tribes preserve their languages and pass them on to the next generation,” said Armstrong.

According to a recent U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) study, nearly all Tribal Head Start programs report difficulty hiring and retaining staff. These staffing challenges can limit programs’ ability to enroll eligible children and provide Native language education.

New Mexico is at a critical junction when it comes to preserving Native languages. A Navajo Times study found that 93% of Navajo people were considered fluent in the language in 1980. By 2010, that figure had fallen to 53%, and projections estimate it could drop to just 30% by 2030.

Heinrich and Armstrong’s Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act helps address these challenges by giving Tribes flexibility in credentialing Tribal Head Start educators. This flexibility will allow Tribal Head Start programs to hire more Native language educators in Head Start classrooms while maintaining health, safety, and professional standards.

Under the Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act, Tribes could:

Waive certain degree requirements that fail to recognize the knowledge and language skills of elders and fluent Native language speakers.

Waive certain verification visit requirements that can be particularly difficult for educators and programs in remote Tribal communities.

Recognize early childhood education certificates as an alternative pathway to qualification, including certificates earned through institutions of higher education available in Tribal communities, such as Tribal colleges and universities. These certificates can exceed the qualifications of typical Head Start credentials without requiring a verification visit.

Create more pathways for qualified Tribal community members to enter the Head Start workforce, allowing educators to earn credentials and build their professional qualifications through institutions and programs that are accessible in their own communities.

The Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act is endorsed by the Pueblo of Isleta, Pueblo of Santo Domingo, National Indian Head Start Directors Association, National Indian Education Association, and American Indian Higher Education Consortium, National Congress of American Indians, and the National Head Start Association (NHSA).

""Our Head Start program is a vital resource for the Pueblo of Isleta. This critical legislation expands opportunities for Isleta tribal members to work with Head Start program here at home, while making it possible for youngest children to be taught by members of our community,” said Governor Jiron, Pueblo of Isleta.

“American Indians and Alaska Natives face unique challenges accessing higher education. Even when they do obtain credentials, they face further challenges returning to work in their Tribal communities, which may be unable to offer compensation competitive with opportunities outside the community,” said Governor Raymond Aguilar, Jr., Pueblo of Santo Domingo. “The Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act would create a unique credentialing framework designed to support Native educators in obtaining credentials through flexible and supportive pathways. The result will be Tribal Head Start classrooms staffed by Native educators who pass on our culture, traditions, core values, and language to our children and families. The Santo Domingo Pueblo supports Senator Heinrich and Senator Armstrong in this legislative effort.”

“Early childhood education is the foundation of healthy Tribal communities. But overly restrictive degree requirements are making it harder for the very people best equipped to teach Tribal children to become Head Start educators. The strongest teachers combine professional preparation with the language, culture, and community knowledge that Native children deserve. The Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act provides a commonsense, bipartisan solution, without compromising quality, by expanding the types of pathways early educators can take to include Early Childhood Education certificates, which can be earned from a Tribal College or University. NIHSDA applauds Senators Heinrich and Armstrong for their leadership in advancing legislation that will help Tribal programs recruit and retain educators, strengthen culturally grounded early childhood education, and ensure more Native children receive the strong start they deserve,” said the National Indian Head Start Directors Association.

“The National Indian Education Association strongly supports the Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act. Tribal communities know what their children need to thrive, and that includes educators who bring not only professional preparation, but also the language, culture, knowledge, and relationships that are essential to strong early learning. S. 5299 recognizes the realities facing Tribal Head Start programs by creating meaningful pathways for talented educators to enter the classroom, grow professionally, and earn credentials without asking communities to choose between cultural knowledge and academic preparation. This legislation strengthens the Native educator pipeline, supports Tribal self-determination, and helps ensure our youngest Native learners are surrounded by educators who know their communities, languages, and cultures,” said Kerry D. Bird, President of the National Indian Education Association.

“Head Start and Early Head Start programs, especially in the American Indian and Alaska Native communities, continually struggle to create a consistent workforce pool of degree-qualified educators. The Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act would not only address workforce shortages but also create a flexible pathway to obtain credentials for Head Start staff in Tribal communities, in particular by recognizing credentials issued by Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs). These institutions provide targeted credential pathways for educators who incorporate their culture, customs, and language with the respective Tribal Nation to enhance lifelong learning and cultural preservation. Specifically, Head Start teachers and assistant teachers, and Early Head Start teachers would be able to enter the field more readily, gain advanced credentials over a period of time, and take advantage of long-term support toward attaining higher degrees,"" said Ahniwake Rose, President and CEO of the American Indian Higher Education Consortium. “AIHEC stands with Senators Heinrich and Armstrong in support of modernizing this legislation to recognize Early Childhood Education certifications and credentials offered by more than 50 percent of TCUs to help fill these workforce gaps.”

“The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) supports the Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act, which recognizes that Native languages and cultural knowledge are essential to the success of Native children enrolled in Tribal Head Start programs. By creating more flexible pathways for qualified Native language and cultural educators, this legislation will help remove barriers to employment that too often leave classrooms without the educators they need. Native youth are our future leaders and they deserve the ability to learn their Native languages and culture. NCAI urges Congress to advance this bipartisan legislation and provide Tribal communities with greater flexibility to recruit and retain the Native language and culture educators their children need,” said Larry Wright Jr., National Congress of American Indians Executive Director.

“The National Head Start Association (NHSA) supports the Native Language Educators in Classrooms Act as a bipartisan solution to the unique challenges faced by American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Head Start programs,” said National Head Start Association Executive Director Yasmina Vinci. “The legislation recognizes the unique language and cultural qualifications of AI/AN Head Start teachers and provides flexible paths to alternative credentialing that meet or exceed existing degree requirements. NHSA looks forward to supporting Sens. Heinrich and Armstrong to move this legislation forward.”

The full text of the bill is here.",1,2026-09-04T09:19:37Z,2026-09-04T09:20:58Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-tierra-amarilla-lujan-meets-with-local-leaders-to-fight-back-against-trump-administration-attacks-on-public-lands/,"In Tierra Amarilla, Luján Meets with Local Leaders to Fight Back Against Trump Administration Attacks on Public Lands",2026-09-03,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Tierra Amarilla, N.M. – On Wednesday, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) met with community leaders and public lands advocates in Tierra Amarilla to hear directly about the impact of the Trump administration’s attacks on New Mexico’s public lands and highlight his efforts to protect New Mexico’s public lands.

During the discussion, Senator Luján met with community leaders and public lands advocates from Northern Rio Arriba County to discuss their policy priorities and concerns regarding the Trump administration’s recent attacks on public lands, including concerns about efforts to increase oil, gas, and mining development on public lands. Senator Luján heard directly about how these changes could impact Northern New Mexico communities and shared updates on his work in the Senate to push back against policies that threaten New Mexico’s public lands.

“New Mexico’s public lands are central to our way of life,” said Senator Luján. “In Tierra Amarilla, I heard directly from local leaders and advocates about their concerns with the Trump administration’s attacks on our public lands. From drilling and mining proposals to the rollback of protections that New Mexicans depend on, we’ve seen this administration go after lands that have meant so much to generations of New Mexicans. I will continue fighting back against these attacks and working alongside our communities to protect New Mexico’s cherished lands and water for generations to come.”

Senator Luján has long fought to protect New Mexico’s public lands and cherished sites. Recently, Senator Luján introduced the Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act, legislation to permanently withdraw certain federal lands in the Rio Chama Watershed from mineral development. Additionally, Senator Luján has fought to establish permanent protections for Chaco Canyon.

###",1,2026-09-04T09:19:37Z,2026-09-04T09:20:58Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-bennet-hickenlooper-demand-trump-administration-comply-with-injunction-to-ensure-prompt-approvals-of-wind-and-solar-energy-projects/,"Luján, Bennet, Hickenlooper Demand Trump Administration Comply with Injunction to Ensure Prompt Approvals of Wind and Solar Energy Projects",2026-09-03,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. — U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a member of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee, joined U.S. Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee’s Rural Development and Energy Subcommittee, and John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) in demanding Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and the Department of the Interior (DOI) comply with a preliminary injunction and ensure covered wind and solar permitting reviews are conducted promptly and without illegal bureaucratic roadblocks.

In July 2025, the DOI released an order requiring Secretary Burgum’s personal approval for routine wind and solar energy project permitting decisions, which led to massive delays in power projects across the West. In November 2025, Luján, Bennet, and Hickenlooper sent a letter demanding answers to the DOI’s order and highlighting its harmful effects to energy prices and reliability, but never received a response.

In April 2026, the U.S. District Court issued a preliminary injunction to prohibit the DOI and its officials from applying the July 2025 order and other internal DOI orders that make wind and solar permitting processes needlessly delayed and difficult while the court case proceeds. Since then, numerous wind and solar developers report that DOI personnel have illegally continued to force project applicants to repeatedly document and prove their eligibility for these court protections.

“[…] Applicants also report that DOI staff have received little or no internal guidance regarding implementation of the Court’s injunction. These reports are not isolated or short-lived: developers continue to describe these delays more than three months after the injunction took effect, indicating an ongoing pattern of noncompliance rather than a transitional implementation issue. DOI’s actions are creating severe regulatory uncertainty, threatening to permanently sideline projects at a time when Western families, farmers, and businesses are facing rising energy demand and higher costs,” wrote the senators.

“Western states depend on reliable and affordable energy to keep our grid secure and our economies competitive. Wind and solar are the least expensive and fastest-to-deploy sources of new electricity generation available. Dragging out permitting timelines in direct violation of a federal court order is not only illegal, but it also needlessly stalls private investment and drives up household energy costs. Furthermore, your recent testimony before the House Natural Resources Committee, where you reportedly rejected the premise of the ruling and called it “absurd” for a judge to dictate internal processes, raises concerns. While DOI has the right to appeal, it is legally obligated to comply with the injunction. Moreover, impeding the deployment of the lowest-cost energy sources directly undermines the administration’s stated goals of unleashing American energy and ensuring affordability,” continued the senators.

The text of the letter is available HERE and below.

Dear Secretary Burgum:

We write to express serious concerns regarding reports of the Department of Interior’s (DOI) failure to fully comply with the U.S. District Court’s April 21, 2026 preliminary injunction in Renew Northeast v. U.S. Department of the Interior, No. 1:25-cv-13961 (D. Mass.). In November 2025, we sent you a letter with questions regarding one of the DOI memos addressed in the case, but never received a response. While this injunction took immediate effect and remains in force, reports from industry participants raise serious questions regarding whether DOI has fully complied with the Court’s injunction.

As you know, the Court’s injunction explicitly prohibits DOI and its officials from applying the DOI Review Procedures Memorandum, the Wind and Solar Fish and Wildlife Service database Ban, Section 4 of the DOI Land Order, Section 4(c) of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Memorandum, and M-Opinion 37086. The Court clearly intended for the covered wind and solar permitting reviews to proceed to timely decisions without these needless bureaucratic roadblocks. Yet, wind and solar developers continue to report that DOI personnel are forcing covered project applicants to repeatedly document and prove their eligibility for these protections, despite the fact that plaintiffs previously provided DOI with a list of covered members. Applicants also report that DOI staff have received little or no internal guidance regarding implementation of the Court’s injunction. These reports are not isolated or short-lived: developers continue to describe these delays more than three months after the injunction took effect, indicating an ongoing pattern of noncompliance rather than a transitional implementation issue. DOI’s actions are creating severe regulatory uncertainty, threatening to permanently sideline projects at a time when Western families, farmers, and businesses are facing rising energy demand and higher costs.

Western states depend on reliable and affordable energy to keep our grid secure and our economies competitive. Wind and solar are the least expensive and fastest-to-deploy sources of new electricity generation available. Dragging out permitting timelines in direct violation of a federal court order is not only illegal, but it also needlessly stalls private investment and drives up household energy costs. Furthermore, your recent testimony before the House Natural Resources Committee, where you reportedly rejected the premise of the ruling and called it “absurd” for a judge to dictate internal processes, raises concerns. While DOI has the right to appeal, it is legally obligated to comply with the injunction. Moreover, impeding the deployment of the lowest-cost energy sources directly undermines the administration’s stated goals of unleashing American energy and ensuring affordability.

To ensure compliance with the law and restore certainty to energy developers and Western stakeholders, we request answers to the following questions:

Internal Guidance – What types of written internal guidance or implementation instructions regarding compliance with the Court’s injunction has DOI provided to staff? Please provide copies of any implementation memoranda, directives, guidance documents, training materials, emails, or other instructions on this topic. If no such materials exist, explain what alternative measures DOI has taken to ensure consistent compliance throughout DOI;

Applicant Identification – What instructions has DOI provided staff for identifying plaintiffs and their members? Please provide communications to DOI staff and explain the steps that DOI is taking to minimize duplicative verification procedures.

Permitting Progress – What steps has DOI taken since the Court injunction to ensure that covered permitting reviews are proceeding to timely agency action? Please identify, by bureau or office where practicable, the number of covered permitting reviews that have advanced since entry of the Court’s injunction, including consultations completed, biological opinions issued, permits or other authorizations issued or denied.

Stalled Reviews – Which covered permitting reviews remain paused or materially delayed following entry of the Court’s injunction? Please provide a list and explain the specific reason for any such delay, including whether it is related to eligibility verification, lack of implementation guidance, application of one of the court-blocked policies, or some other basis. The lists from questions 3 and 4 should add up to the total number of permitting reviews under consideration by DOI between April 21 and now.

We respectfully request a written response to these questions no later than September 1, 2026. We urge you to follow the law and comply with federal court orders to ensure that federal permitting supports, rather than undermines, an affordable and secure energy future.

###",1,2026-09-04T09:19:37Z,2026-09-04T09:20:58Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-speaks-at-national-conference-of-tribal-historic-preservation-officers-visits-spiritus-pilot-facility-on-nambe-pueblo-meets-with-community-leaders-in-canjilon-to-protect-northern-new-mexico-from-uranium-mining,"Heinrich Speaks at National Conference of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, Visits Spiritus Pilot Facility on Nambé Pueblo, Meets with Community Leaders in Canjilon to Protect Northern New Mexico from Uranium Mining",2026-09-02,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"ALBUQUERQUE & ABIQUIÚ, N.M. — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) attended the 26th Annual Conference of the National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (NATHPO), where he advocated for increased funding for Tribal Historic Preservation Offices and meaningful consultation; toured Spiritus Direct Air Capture pilot facility at Nambé Pueblo; and visited Canjilon in northern New Mexico to meet with community members opposed to a potential uranium mine.

On Tuesday, August 25, Heinrich joined U.S. Representative Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.) at the NATHPO Conference for a discussion moderated by Santo Domingo Pueblo Governor Raymond Aguilar, Jr., and Acoma Governor Charles Riley. The discussion focused on the need for greater federal investment in Tribal historic preservation, and the importance of meaningful Tribal consultation in federal decision-making. Heinrich highlighted Tribal Historic Preservation Officers’ role in protecting and preserving cultural, historical, archaeological, and traditional Tribal resources, and called for the Historic Preservation Fund to be made permanent, adequately funded, and expanded. He has previously introduced legislation establishing a goal of $300 million annually for the Fund and requiring at least 20 percent of funding for Tribal Historic Preservation Officers — providing at least $60 million annually for Tribal Historic Preservation Offices.

“We need to make the Historic Preservation Fund permanent. We need to adequately resource the fund as a whole. And we especially need to make sure that we're dedicating more of those funds to Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, so that you can expand your efforts and do the work that we all know has to get done,” said Heinrich.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) speaking with Acoma Governor Charles Riley, Santo Domingo Pueblo Governor Raymond Aguilar, Jr., and U.S. Representative Teresa Ledger Fernández (D-N.M.) at the Annual NATHPO Conference, August 25, 2026.

During the conversation, Heinrich also emphasized the need for bipartisan collaboration to make stronger federal protections for Tribal historic preservation durable over the long term.

“One of the things we really need is to build more Republican support. So having Tribes that are represented, in particular, by Republican senators, reach out. We need some champions on the other side of the aisle to be successful with this — we don't want to just be in a position where we're able to get this done when we're in complete control of the White House, the Senate, the House. We want this to be durable for the long term, and we need some good Republican partners,” said Heinrich.

Heinrich criticized the Advisory Council of History Preservation’s proposed revisions for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), warning that the changes could undermine Tribal sovereignty and meaningful consultation.

“I don't know how to characterize the draft that we've seen as anything other than complete hostility to the government-to-government relationship and to meaningful consultation,” said Heinrich, stressing the importance of meaningful and effective Tribal consultation. “A comment period is not consultation. Full stop. These proposals are a way of cutting Tribes out of the conversation. And the irony is, that's not going to get projects built.”

On Thursday, August 27, Heinrich toured Spiritus, a Direct Air Capture pilot facility at Nambé Pueblo.

The facility builds on a Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) technology transfer and uses a new approach to capture carbon dioxide with less energy than previous methods. Spiritus’ partnership with the NPDC will bring sustainable, high-skill jobs to New Mexico and cement the state as a key player in the future of large-scale carbon sequestration.

Heinrich submitted a $1 million Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) Congressionally Directed Spending request to improve Tova Muusa Poe, the road serving the Nambé Pueblo Development Corporation facility where Spiritus is a tenant.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) touring Spiritus Pilot Facility at Nambé Pueblo, August 27, 2026.

On Friday, August 28, Heinrich met with Rio Arriba County ranchers, acequia parciantes, and Land Grant heirs at the U.S. Forest Service’s Canjilon Ranger Station to speak out against uranium mining in Northern New Mexico and discuss the Mesa Arc Project, a uranium exploration project in the Upper Chama watershed.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) speaking with Rio Arriba County community members about protecting the Upper Chama watershed from proposed uranium mining, August 28, 2026.

Heinrich is fighting to protect communities in Northern New Mexico and the Chama Watershed from uranium mining and mineral development.

Earlier this month, Heinrich co-sponsored U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján’s (D-N.M.) Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act, legislation to permanently ban uranium mining on federal lands in Northern New Mexico’s Rio Chama Watershed.

In April, Heinrich, Luján, and Leger Fernández wrote to Carson National Forest Supervisor James Duran expressing strong opposition to a proposal to conduct uranium mining within the Carson National Forest.

###",1,2026-09-03T09:29:33Z,2026-09-03T09:31:32Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-las-vegas-lujan-meets-with-hospital-leaders-highlights-fight-to-protect-rural-health-care-for-new-mexicans/,"In Las Vegas, Luján Meets with Hospital Leaders, Highlights Fight to Protect Rural Health Care for New Mexicans",2026-09-02,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Las Vegas, N.M. – On Tuesday, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) joined hospital leaders from Northern New Mexico at Alta Vista Regional Hospital to hear directly about the challenges facing rural health care. During the visit, Senator Luján met with leaders from Alta Vista Regional Hospital, Union County General Hospital, New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute, and Miners Colfax Medical Center. Senator Luján and the hospital leaders discussed the state of rural health care in Northern New Mexico and examined how cuts to Medicaid and other critical health programs impact their ability to provide care to rural communities.

“New Mexicans in rural communities deserve ready access to quality, affordable health care, but Republican cuts to Medicaid and other critical health programs threaten the hospitals and services that families depend on,” said Senator Luján. “This week in Las Vegas, I heard directly from hospital leaders about the challenges they are facing and their concerns about what these cuts will mean for the patients and communities they serve. Rural hospitals are lifelines for communities across New Mexico, and I will continue fighting back against these devastating cuts and working to protect access to care across our state.”

During the conversation, Senator Luján also provided an update on his work in the Senate to protect access to health care and highlighted his continued efforts to fight back against cuts that threaten rural hospitals and the New Mexicans they serve. Following Republican cuts to critical health care programs, Senator Luján introduced legislation to reverse all of the Republican health care cuts.

###",1,2026-09-03T09:29:33Z,2026-09-03T09:31:32Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/trump-gains-155-million-from-oil-and-gas-stocks-amid-his-war-in-iran-meanwhile-new-mexicans-pay-526-million-more-for-gas,"Trump Gains $15.5 Million From Oil & Gas Stocks Amid His War in Iran, Meanwhile New Mexicans Pay $526 Million More for Gas",2026-09-01,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and a member and former Chairman of the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee, highlighted a new analysis finding that New Mexicans have spent an additional $526.2 million on gas since the start of President Trump’s Iran War — an average of $666 per New Mexico household.

Meanwhile, according to the Joint Economic Committee’s analysis, President Trump’s portfolio of $45.6 million in oil and gas stocks has gone up since the end of 2025 by up to $61.1 million. That’s due to the sky-high oil and gas profits and stock prices tied to Trump’s war in Iran. And in just the first three months of 2026 – a period that covers both the U.S. operation in Venezuela and the start of the Iran War – the Committee found that Trump bought as much as $3.6 million in additional oil and gas stocks.

“President Trump continues to put his personal financial interests and the interests of his ultrawealthy friends ahead of New Mexico families – folks who are already struggling with higher costs created by the President’s tariffs and reckless, illegal war in Iran,” said Heinrich. “New Mexicans shouldn’t have to pay more at the pump while Donald Trump and oil and gas executives rake in record returns.”

Heinrich continued, “When a President uses the power of his office to benefit himself and his wealthy friends while working families are left to foot the bill, that’s corruption — plain and simple. We need energy policies that actually lower costs for families, not actions that pad the pockets of the President and his friends and family.”

As detailed in the new Joint Economic Committee report, throughout his campaign and early in his term, Trump received millions in donations from oil company executives, and his administration began to enact favorable rules and regulations for the industry – including billions in tax giveaways. These companies have seen massive profits since the President launched his war with Iran. Recent estimates show that oil companies reported more than $125 billion in profits so far this year, including $12 billion for Chevron in the second quarter – its highest quarterly profits in six years – and a sky-high $14.7 billion for Exxon Mobil in that same period.

Heinrich has been working to hold President Trump and his administration accountable for putting the President’s personal projects and financial interests ahead of New Mexico families.

In August, Heinrich demanded accountability from the Department of the Interior (DOI) following reports that agency officials destroyed official records and used disappearing-message applications to avoid preserving government communications. He also called for a full Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit of President Trump’s ballroom project and demanded a GAO investigation into potential conflicts of interest and preferential treatment in the Trump administration’s use of taxpayer dollars to invest in private mining companies. Heinrich also joined a letter calling for an investigation into what DOI officials knew about engineering failures at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and whether Department employees withheld evidence from federal prosecutors.

In June, Heinrich led a letter demanding answers from DOI Secretary Doug Burgum regarding the Department’s rushed rehabilitation project of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. He also sent a letter with U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) pressing Burgum for answers about the Trump administration redirecting tens of millions of dollars from fees paid to the National Park Service — including fees collected at New Mexico sites such as Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Bandelier National Monument — to fund President Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C.

In May, Heinrich successfully blocked Senate Republicans from funding Trump’s ballroom project with $1 billion in taxpayer dollars through their budget bill.

Read the Joint Economic Committee’s full report with state-by-state data here.

###",1,2026-09-02T09:19:58Z,2026-09-02T09:20:51Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-taos-lujan-hosts-roundtable-on-ticketing-marketplace-unveils-new-legislation-to-protect-ticket-buyers-from-ticket-scams/,"In Taos, Luján Hosts Roundtable on Ticketing Marketplace, Unveils New Legislation to Protect Ticket Buyers from Ticket Scams",2026-09-01,2026,2026-09,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Taos, N.M. – On Monday, at Taos Mothership, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) unveiled the Guaranteeing Honest Ownership in Secondary Ticketing (GHOST) Act, legislation to protect fans and concertgoers from deceptive ticket resale practices by prohibiting resellers from selling tickets they do not actually possess.

During the event, Senator Luján held a roundtable conversation with nonprofit promoters, small venue leaders, artists, and community members to hear directly about the challenges they face in the ticketing marketplace. Senator Luján discussed speculative ticketing, local and federal ticketing issues, and his efforts to protect consumers while supporting artists and independent venues.

“This week in Taos, I was proud to announce my new legislation to protect ticket buyers because when New Mexicans spend their hard-earned money on a concert or event, they deserve to know the ticket they are buying actually exists,” said Senator Luján. “Too often, fans are misled into purchasing tickets from resellers who don’t even have them. I was grateful for the conversation and the opportunity to hear directly from local leaders about the challenges facing fans, artists, and venues. That’s why I introduced the GHOST Act to protect consumers, hold bad actors accountable, and bring greater transparency and fairness to the ticket marketplace.”

Too often, consumers unknowingly purchase “speculative” or “ghost” tickets listed by resellers who do not actually have the tickets they are advertising. In some cases, buyers may not learn until shortly before an event that their tickets are unavailable, leaving them with little time to find legitimate replacements that may be sold out or significantly more expensive. Currently, there is no federal law specifically prohibiting speculative ticketing. The GHOST Act would establish nationwide protections to prevent resellers from advertising and selling tickets they do not possess.

Specifically, the GHOST Act would:

Ban ticket resellers from selling tickets they do not have actual possession of;

Empower the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to take action against violators and seek injunctive and monetary relief;

Require the FTC to establish a website where consumers can report potential violations of the GHOST Act and the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act of 2016; and

Allow state attorneys general to bring actions to enforce the law.

The legislation is supported by the National Independent Venue Association (NIVA).

Full bill text is available here.

###",1,2026-09-02T09:19:58Z,2026-09-02T09:20:51Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-joins-grand-opening-of-dreamtrees-new-resource-center-and-housing-shelter-in-taos-made-possible-with-15-million-he-secured,"Heinrich Joins Grand Opening of DreamTree’s New Resource Center & Housing Shelter in Taos, Made Possible with $1.5 Million He Secured",2026-08-31,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"PHOTOS

TAOS, N.M. — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, joined a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the grand opening of DreamTree’s NEST Resource Center, a new space in Taos dedicated to helping New Mexicans access emergency housing, basic necessities and internet access, employment opportunities, connections to healthcare providers, case management services, and help navigating federal and state benefits.

Heinrich secured a $1.5 million Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) grant in Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) appropriations funding for DreamTree to complete the final phase of renovations to the NEST Resource Center and purchase land for future on-site permanent supportive housing.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, joins a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the grand opening of DreamTree’s NEST Resource Center, August 28, 2026.

“This economy has been pretty tough. A lot of folks are having a hard time, and they're having to make some really difficult decisions here in Taos and around the country. And that is where an incredible organization like DreamTree comes in – by breaking the stigma of receiving support in the first place. Through a culture of care and compassion, DreamTree is taking care of hundreds of Taoseños and helping them find clean clothing and warm food, and, most importantly, a pathway to stability,” said Heinrich.

Heinrich continued, “Throughout my career, I've always advocated for funding to address housing and homelessness. It's because I truly believe that as a society, that we should be judged by how we treat those who are most in need, and I believe that every person deserves dignity and a real shot at a stable life, including the basics like food and shelter.”

Heinrich continues to lead efforts to lower housing costs, help New Mexico families become first-time homeowners, and expand housing options for New Mexicans experiencing homelessness:

Last month, Heinrich announced that the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act is now law. Heinrich supported this bipartisan legislation as it made its way through Congress. Provisions specifically championed by Heinrich will expand access to affordable housing, streamline the construction of new homes, and preserve affordable housing in rural communities. The legislation will make it easier for families to access Housing Choice Vouchers, strengthen federal investments in affordable housing and homeownership, cut red tape for rural housing development, and protect affordable rental units in small towns and rural communities. For more information on the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, click here.

Heinrich has highlighted how the housing crisis has been exacerbated by Wall Street landlords artificially decreasing the housing supply and driving up home prices and rents, and President Trump’s broad, cost raising tariffs on critical homebuilding materials.

For more background on Heinrich’s actions to lower housing costs, address homelessness, and build more housing for New Mexico working families, click here.

###",1,2026-09-01T09:48:49Z,2026-09-01T09:49:51Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-wyden-klobuchar-demand-answers-from-trump-official-who-diverted-federal-firefighting-resources-to-private-ranch,"Heinrich, Wyden, Klobuchar Demand Answers from Trump Official Who Diverted Federal Firefighting Resources to Private Ranch",2026-08-31,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"Amid record wildfire season in Western U.S., top Trump official at USDA diverted scarce firefighting resources to a 7 acre fire near his private ranch in Idaho

WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, joined U.S. Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) in sending a letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins demanding answers from the Trump administration following reports that USDA Undersecretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment Michael Boren diverted federal firefighting resources away from active wildfires, in order to fight a seven acre fire near his personal ranch in Idaho.

“Mr. Boren’s actions constitute potentially a misuse of taxpayer funds and put American families at further risk by diverting scarce resources from high-priority wildfires threatening communities elsewhere in the region and country,” the Senators wrote. “We request a full investigation into the nature and extent of Boren’s involvement in response to the Cabin Creek Fire and a detailed accounting of the safeguards the agency has implemented or plans to implement to prevent political interference and conflicts of interest in wildfire response.”

Earlier this month, it was reported that Mr. Boren used his position to pressure U.S. Forest Service personnel to divert already scarce firefighting resources away from other fires to suppress a small fire near his 480-acre ranch in the Sawtooth National Forest.

Nine aircraft were reportedly assigned to the fire, an extremely high number for a fire of this size. Western states are already facing a shortage of firefighting personnel and resources as a direct result of the Trump administration’s staffing and funding cuts. During this record setting fire season, fires of much larger size threatening American lives and homes have not received even a fraction of the same commitment of resources.

In their letter, the Senators requested details on how the Department would prevent similar interference by administration officials for personal gain in the future and requested the findings of a Department investigation of the incident be provided to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Read the full text of the letter here and below.

Secretary Rollins:

We write to express serious concern regarding reports that Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment Michael Boren used his position to remove firefighting personnel and resources from active fires elsewhere to suppress a fire near his private ranch in Idaho. We request a full investigation into the nature and extent of Boren’s involvement in response to the Cabin Creek Fire and a detailed accounting of the safeguards the agency has implemented or plans to implement to prevent political interference and conflicts of interest in wildfire response.

Earlier this month, The Washington Post reported that Mr. Boren used his position to pressure U.S. Forest Service personnel to divert much-needed resources away from other fires to instead suppress a fire near his own property. The Cabin Creek Fire began on July 12, 2026, near Mr. Boren’s 480-acre ranch on the Sawtooth National Forest in Idaho. The fire burned seven acres before it was fully contained. During that time, nine aircraft were reportedly assigned to the fire, an extremely high number for a fire of this size. Mr. Boren reportedly called Forest Service officials multiple times – questioning why more aircrafts were not deployed to fight the fire and asking when more assets would arrive at the scene. One official quoted in the Post’s report described Boren’s interactions as “putting pressure on [staff] to throw more resources” to fight the fire.

During this record setting fire season, fires of much larger size have not received even a fraction of the same commitment of resources. For example, the Grasshopper Fire on the Mt. Hood National Forest is over 90,000 acres and less than 50% contained with a similar number of aviation resources assigned to it. The personal interests of political employees should not be a factor that influences the allocation of wildfire resources to communities threatened with devastation. Most states are already lacking the sufficient personnel and resources needed for this historic fire season due to the Trump administration’s own budget and staffing cuts and illconceived reorganization plans. Mr. Boren’s actions constitute potentially a misuse of taxpayer funds and put American families at further risk by diverting scarce resources from high-priority wildfires threatening communities elsewhere in the region and country.

As Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment, Mr. Boren’s duties include overseeing the Forest Service. His history of conflict with the agency is well documented and came up during the pendency of his nomination before the Senate. In fact, Mr. Boren was pointedly asked during the nomination process whether he would commit to recusing himself from matters involving his properties. Those concerns now appear to be validated by this incident. It has been nearly a year since Mr. Boren was confirmed by the Senate to serve in his current role. We must ask what, if any, safeguards have the administration put in place to ensure against this type of reported abuse of power. Political interference in wildfire response jeopardizes lives, property and federal resources.

We request that you respond by Thursday, September 10th detailing how the Department will prevent this type of inappropriate interference, or even the appearance of it, in wildfire response going forward. Additionally, we request transparent communication of the findings of the investigation to all members of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.

Sincerely

###",1,2026-09-01T09:48:49Z,2026-09-01T09:49:51Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-colleagues-oppose-ice-rollout-of-electric-shock-gloves/,"Luján, Colleagues Oppose ICE Rollout of Electric Shock Gloves",2026-08-28,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) joined U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and 14 Senate colleagues in calling on the Trump Administration to abandon its reckless plan to outfit U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers with gloves that deliver painful electric shocks. Their letter also demands that if ICE proceeds with this purchase, it first provide Congress with answers and documentation for over 30 questions about how these devices will be used, the protocol for using them, safety guardrails, and accountability measures.

On August 10, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a notice concerning ICE’s planned acquisition of the CTG-5 G.L.O.V.E., a glove designed to deliver a painful electric shock. The notice estimates the potential value of the acquisition between $10 million and $20 million.

“We write to express deep concern about U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) plans to spend up to $20 million on gloves that deliver electric shocks,” the Senators began. “…The blatant and tragic misuse of force in Los Angeles, Chicago, Minneapolis, Houston, Maine, and other locations around the country raises significant skepticism about the agency’s professional capability to safely deploy a new tool that could be used to harm Americans without cause. Therefore, we urge ICE to cancel the contract and reconsider the purchase.”

“The proposed acquisition raises serious questions about necessity, proportionality, medical safety, training, accountability, and constitutional rights,” the Senators continued. “Those questions are particularly important given the significant public scrutiny surrounding ICE’s excessive use of force. A device capable of delivering an electrical shock through direct contact with an individual presents substantial risks if deployed during civil arrests – even more so if it is deployed without clear limits, appropriate training, and comprehensive oversight.”

“At a time when the American people have demanded de-escalation in immigration enforcement, it is not clear why existing tools and tactics are insufficient for the agency,” the Senators wrote. “In the past year, DHS has repeatedly spent millions of taxpayer dollars on purchases it ends up not using, including $464 million for airplanes, $700 million on warehouses, and more than $2.25 million for SUVs wrapped with ICE branding. Many of these ICE transactions, including the planned electric-shock glove purchase, are completed through no-bid contracts that circumvent the normal competitive procurement process without a sufficient rationale.”

“If ICE proceeds with purchasing $20 million worth of electric-shock gloves, Congress needs a clear understanding of the device’s safety and authorized uses,” the Senators concluded.

In addition to Senators Luján and Cortez Masto, the letter was signed by Senators Angus King (I-Maine), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.).

The full text of the letter, including the demands from the Senators should ICE proceed with this plan, can be found HERE.

###",1,2026-08-28T17:11:49Z,2026-08-28T17:13:14Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-colleagues-urge-blm-to-stop-rollback-of-waste-prevention-rule,"Heinrich, Colleagues Urge BLM to Stop Rollback of Waste Prevention Rule",2026-08-28,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, joined U.S. Senator Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), and U.S. Representative Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee, in opposing BLM’s proposal to overturn the 2024 Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation rule (the 2024 Waste Prevention Rule).

The BLM’s reversal of this commonsense rule will increase pollution on public lands, reduce domestic energy supply, expose nearby communities to avoidable health risks, and waste publicly owned natural gas, costing Americans tens of millions in foregone revenue.

“Reversing these common-sense standards will waste publicly owned natural gas, cost the American people tens of millions in foregone revenue, and increase pollution on our public lands,” the lawmakers wrote.

“We strongly urge BLM to reject this proposed rescission and maintain the 2024 Waste Prevention rule. The oil and gas resources on these lands belong to the American public and Tribal nations, and they deserve to benefit from the full value and benefits of responsible resource stewardship,” the lawmakers continued.

Read the full text of the letter HERE and below.

Dear Secretary Burgum and Director Pearce,

We write to express our strong opposition to the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) proposed rule to overturn the 2024 Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation rule (the “2024 Waste Prevention Rule”). Reversing these common-sense standards will waste publicly owned natural gas, cost the American people tens of millions in foregone revenue, and increase pollution on our public lands.

Between 2012 and 2021, operators lost an estimated 300 billion cubic feet of natural gas on federal lands to flaring and venting, valued at nearly $950 million, and resulting in a loss of between $76 and $135 million in potential taxpayer revenue. Routine venting and flaring of natural gas is unnecessary and harmful, turning natural gas into a waste product instead of a valuable energy commodity.

In addition to creating this financial loss, rolling back the 2024 Waste Prevention Rule would reduce our domestic energy supply and expose nearby communities to avoidable health risks. Methane is a greenhouse gas over 20 times as powerful as carbon dioxide. In addition to methane, the primary component of natural gas, venting and flaring releases volatile organic compounds that are carcinogenic, increase ground-level ozone, and lead directly to illness for both individuals and communities exposed.

Many states across the country have already demonstrated that limiting venting and flaring is compatible with robust energy production. Colorado adopted regulations in 2020 and New Mexico in 2021 that ended almost all venting and flaring. In addition, many major oil and gas producers have voluntarily agreed to avoid routine flaring on new wells by 2030. Furthermore, cost-effective technologies to detect and reduce methane waste, such as satellite monitoring, drones, and infrared cameras, are widely used across the oil and gas industry. Reversing the 2024 Waste Prevention Rule would prolong years of regulatory uncertainty, penalizing proactive operators that have invested in efficient operations while rewarding those that have not.

We strongly urge BLM to reject this proposed rescission and maintain the 2024 Waste Prevention rule. The oil and gas resources on these lands belong to the American public and Tribal nations, and they deserve to benefit from the full value and benefits of responsible resource stewardship.

Sincerely,",1,2026-08-29T11:31:28Z,2026-08-29T11:32:37Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-visits-boundary-waters-canoe-area-wilderness-meets-with-local-nonprofits-advocates-and-tribal-leaders-vows-to-continue-to-fight-to-protect-public-lands,"Heinrich Visits Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, Meets with Local Nonprofits, Advocates, and Tribal Leaders, Vows to Continue to Fight to Protect Public Lands",2026-08-28,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"PHOTOS HERE

ELY, MINN. — Last week, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, visited gateway communities to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW), where he met with local advocates, volunteers, non-profit leaders, and the Three Chippewa Bands, on how Senate Republicans and President Trump’s plan to allow sulfide-ore copper mining near the BWCAW will open up the pristine wilderness to permanent pollution, harming Tribes, local communities, and businesses in the area. Heinrich saw the proposed mining sites firsthand and observed how the mining pollution would affect the community and the watershed.

Heinrich’s visit comes as Minnesota Governor Tim Walz announced that his administration is taking steps to constrain future sulfide-ore copper mining development in the Rainy River Headwaters, slowing Twin Metals’ path forward to mine near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.

“I come from a mining family. I'm not against every mine everywhere. My dad worked for Anaconda Copper, and my grandfather was a gold miner. But I learned, negotiating with big companies over natural resource damages, that there are smart places to put mines — and there are places where they really don't belong. And you don't know which is which unless you get out on the landscape and see it. I think it's really hard to look at maps and listen to rhetoric in Washington, D.C., and make a good decision,” said Heinrich.

Heinrich continued, “To put a mine where we went this week just seems insane to me. It would put at risk one of the last great wilderness areas in North America — not just the Boundary Waters, but the Boundary Waters, Quetico and Voyageurs. This is one of those last great landscapes in North America. I don't think these battles are ever won in one fell swoop. It takes decades. But I can tell from the passion of people on the ground, the polling I’m seeing in Minnesota, and the elected leaders who have stepped up and staked out a position that this is on a trajectory where I believe that the watershed is going to be protected. I want to say, from the bottom of my heart, as somebody who truly believes in the value and the importance of public lands and wilderness: thank you all for protecting this very special place.”

In April, President Trump signed into law H. J. Res 140, rolling back protections for the watershed, allowing for mining and mineral extraction in the headwaters of the wilderness area.

Heinrich has consistently pushed to protect the Boundary Waters from mining. In February, Heinrich called on Americans to use their voices and oppose H.J. Res. 140. In April, Heinrich delivered remarks on the Senate floor, urging his colleagues to oppose H.J. 140. When the resolution passed the Senate, Heinrich delivered remarks, blasting his colleagues for gutting protections for the Boundary Waters.

In his April remarks, Heinrich emphasized that the Boundary Waters are not simply a Minnesota issue, but an issue for the entire country, calling the area part of our “shared inheritance.” He also argued that there are many places where mining can be done responsibly, but that the Boundary Waters is not one of them.

Heinrich began his trip with a boat tour through Birch Lake and the proposed Twin Metals mining sites, where he spoke with staff from Voyageur Outward Bound School (VOBS), a nonprofit outdoor education organization that has been operating adjacent to the proposed sulfide-ore copper site since 1964, underscoring how mining in the area will adversely impact its operations.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, speaks to local nonprofit staff on how mining in the Boundary Waters will impact their operations, Wednesday, August 19, 2026.

Additionally, Heinrich toured YMCA Camp Widjiwagan, which provides wilderness experiences for youth, and met with the camp’s Executive Director, Ben Hoffman, to discuss the camp’s history and the extensive outdoor education opportunities that rely on the Boundary Waters.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, tours YMCA Camp Widjiwagan and speaks with camp Executive Director Ben Hoffman, Wednesday, August 19, 2026.

Next, Heinrich met with Tribal officials from the Three Chippewa Bands to discuss how mining in the Boundary Waters will threaten their treaty rights to hunt, fish, and gather in their ancestral homeland.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, meets with the Three Chippewa Bands about how mining in the Boundary Waters threatens Tribes and their ancestral homeland, Wednesday, August 19, 2026.

Following his meeting with Tribal leaders, Heinrich spoke at a dinner at Ely Folk School, a community center that provides learning experiences that celebrate the heritage, art, history, and culture of northern Minnesota, and thanked advocates for fighting to protect the Boundary Waters.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, speaks at dinner, thanking advocates for fighting to protect Boundary Waters, Wednesday, August 19, 2026.

After his visits on Wednesday, the Senator launched into the Boundary Waters from Snowbank Lake to Ima Lake, spending the next two days exploring the local ecosystem, hunting and fishing culture, and native history before paddling to Ensign Lake on Saturday.",1,2026-08-29T11:31:28Z,2026-08-29T11:32:37Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-visits-frijoles-fire-command-center-meets-with-firefighters-and-incident-commanders,"Heinrich Visits Frijoles Fire Command Center, Meets with Firefighters and Incident Commanders",2026-08-28,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"PHOTOS and VIDEOS

SANTA FE, N.M. — This week, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, visited the Frijoles Fire Command Center to receive a briefing on the operations and status of the fire and meet with Incident Commanders, firefighters, first responders, and support staff working to contain the blaze. The Frijoles Fire has burned 15,333 acres and is 59% contained, with 803 personnel currently engaged in the firefighting effort.

“I’m grateful to the firefighters, Incident Commanders, and support and medical crews who are working around the clock to protect New Mexico communities from the Frijoles Fire,” said Heinrich. “I also want to extend my deepest condolences to the family of Randy Lupe, who tragically lost his life supporting the response. Everyone who responds to wildfires puts themselves in harm’s way to keep our communities safe, and we have a responsibility to make sure they have the resources, equipment, and support they need to do their jobs safely and effectively.”

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, meets with firefighters and emergency responders at the Frijoles Fire Incident Command Center, August 27, 2026.

During the visit, Heinrich received a briefing from the Southwest Complex Incident Management Team 4, which is managing the firefighting operations, and met with crews and support staff.

BACKGROUND:

Heinrich has led efforts to strengthen the nation’s wildland firefighting workforce, improve wildfire preparedness and response, and ensure New Mexico communities have the federal resources they need in wildfire emergencies.

Last month, Heinrich sent a letter urging the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to ensure that communities in New Mexico and nationwide receive the federal resources they need to respond to and prevent wildfires, including by promptly approving and distributing Fire Management Assistance Grant and post-fire mitigation funding.

In June, Heinrich introduced legislation to support the development of next-generation, PFAS-free protective gear to better protect firefighters from the dangers of their work.

In May, Heinrich criticized the Trump Administration’s cuts to the Forest Service workforce and its plans to reorganize federal firefighting efforts during wildfire season. He warned that losing staff who support incident command teams and wildfire response undermines the nation’s ability to prepare for and fight fires.

In February, Heinrich urged U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary Doug Burgum to halt efforts to create the Department’s new U.S. Wildland Fire Service (USWFS), citing potential life-or-death consequences that could come as a result of decoupling wildfire management from land management agencies, and emphasizing a number of concerns related to recent reductions in staffing, combined with improperly severing wildfire management from land stewardship.

In February, Heinrich pressed Associate Chief of the U.S. Forest Service Christopher French about the impact of workforce cuts on wildfire preparedness and asked whether federal firefighters are paid enough. Heinrich pointedly asked French if firefighters were being paid enough; French acknowledged that they are not, citing longer fire seasons and growing demands on firefighters and their families.

Last December, Heinrich led his colleagues in demanding answers from the Forest Service about staffing cuts that had left the agency approximately 38% behind on hazardous fuels reduction work compared with recent years, warning that the decline posed serious risks to public safety and wildfire prevention.

Last September, Heinrich cosponsored the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act, bipartisan legislation that will expand health care coverage and benefits for first responders who become permanently disabled from service-related cancers and the families of those who pass away from these cancers.

Last August, Heinrich secured $1.1 million for Rio Arriba County to purchase radios and repeater towers for Rio Arriba County Volunteer Fire Departments to facilitate communications when firefighters are on duty.

Last July, Heinrich sent a letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins and DOI Secretary Doug Burgum following reports that staff reductions have required the deployment of fire personnel to fill administrative gaps, leaving fire crews understaffed and overwhelmed. In the letter, Heinrich urged the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior to provide adequate resources and support to wildland firefighters. .

In June of 2025, Heinrich’s Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act of 2025, legislation to strengthen the aerial wildfire suppression fleet and better combat the year-round threat of catastrophic wildfire, was signed into law after passing the U.S. Senate in April.

In September 2023, Heinrich cosponsored the bipartisan Wildland Firefighter Paycheck Protection Act, legislation to permanently increase wildland firefighter pay and establish incident response premium pay to account for the 24/7 nature of the work.

In June 2022, Heinrich helped secure a temporary pay increase for the wildland firefighter workforce, funded by $600 million from the Infrastructure Law. He led calls for the administration to implement the pay increase, which ultimately raised federal wildland firefighter pay by up to $20,000 or 50% of base salary, whichever was less.

In May 2022, Heinrich secured over $15 million to improve wildfire response capabilities at Kirtland Air Force Base to upgrade facilities to allow the use of Very Large Air Tankers (VLATs) to fight wildfires throughout the state and region.",1,2026-08-29T11:31:28Z,2026-08-29T11:32:37Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-cosponsors-bipartisan-legislation-to-advance-responsible-international-nuclear-energy-cooperation,"Heinrich Cosponsors Bipartisan Legislation to Advance Responsible, International Nuclear Energy Cooperation",2026-08-25,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, along with Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Ted Budd (R-N.C.), introduced the Foundational Infrastructure for Responsible Use of Small Modular Reactor Technology (FIRST) Act to codify the U.S. State Department’s FIRST program advocating for the responsible deployment of civil nuclear energy around the world.

“Nuclear energy is an important part of our clean energy future, and the United States should lead in advancing its safe and responsible deployment around the world. By working with our allies and partners through the FIRST program, we can strengthen energy security, support American innovation, and promote the highest standards for nuclear safety and nonproliferation,” said Heinrich.

“Nuclear energy is a source of clean and abundant power, and its growth in the U.S. and around the world will lower costs for consumers and combat climate change,” said Coons. “Right now, too many nations that want to embrace nuclear power need to buy Chinese and Russian technology at huge cost, trapping them in debt. The United States should offer an alternative that keeps us on the cutting edge, strengthens our relationships around the world and keeps Americans safe.”

“The responsible development of civil nuclear energy, on an international scale, contributes to U.S. national security and bolsters our economy. The FIRST program has been a productive way for our nation to partner with good-faith actors who are building their nuclear arsenals, and continuing to leverage these public and private partnerships will help us advance our own energy dominance. Since North Carolina is a leader in next-generation nuclear technology, I am proud to partner with Senator Coons to bring this bipartisan solution forward and codify this program that will expand markets for our great innovators into law,” said Budd.

Launched in 2019, the FIRST program has worked to leverage U.S. public-private partnerships and expand our nuclear energy programs to bolster the United States’ position as a nuclear energy industry leader with partner countries. Currently, the State Department’s FIRST program partners with over 50 countries that are working towards exploring civil nuclear energy solutions and looking to achieve energy security through small modular reactors. The program also helps establish sustainable financial partnerships that support reactor financing to avoid debt-trap influence. This bill will solidify the goals of the FIRST program as a priority for the Department of State to build a better, safer, and cleaner infrastructure for nuclear energy.

The FIRST ACT would:

Promote responsible deployment of civil nuclear energy internationally

Advocate bilateral and multilateral diplomatic engagements and forums for civil nuclear energy projects

Engage in diplomacy with partner governments prioritizing the highest safety, security, and nonproliferation standards

Provide consultation to partner countries regarding best practices of licensing, legal, and regulatory frameworks

Supply early-stage commercial project development support critical to launching United States commercial civil nuclear projects abroad

Cooperate with partner countries in the areas of training programs, technical resource sharing, and potential coordination of codes and standards

The legislation is led by U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Ted Budd (R-N.C.). Alongside Heinrich, the bill is cosponsored by U.S. Senator Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.).

The FIRST Act is endorsed by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), ClearPath, Breakthrough Institute (BTI), and Third Way.

The full text of the bill here.

Additional Background on Heinrich’s Efforts to Develop Nuclear Energy Responsibly:

Heinrich has long championed policies that develop nuclear energy responsibly, modernize and improve facilities that handle nuclear waste, and provide compensation and support for communities and workers harmed by radiation exposure.

In April, Heinrich pressed National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) officials on addressing the housing shortage around Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), accelerating cleanup of the hexavalent chromium plume near the Lab, strengthening public-private partnerships to advance America's fusion capabilities, and modernizing critical nuclear security infrastructure at Sandia National Laboratories.

In April, Heinrich cosponsored legislation to amend the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act to ensure sustained, inflation-adjusted funding for New Mexico communities to maintain vital infrastructure projects, such as road maintenance and repairs, for the duration of WIPP’s operation.

In January, Heinrich secured $10 million in the FY2026 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill to improve roads leading to and from WIPP through recommended payments from the DOE to the State of New Mexico. This investment was the first time that funds had been appropriated for this purpose since 2014.

Last November, Heinrich introduced the No Nuclear Testing Without Approval Act, legislation to ensure that no president can unilaterally resume explosive nuclear testing in response to President Trump announcing that the United States would resume testing nuclear weapons, a practice that the U.S. abandoned in 1992.

Last November, Heinrich and U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) led Senate Democrats in urging President Trump to reverse course on resuming explosive nuclear weapons testing, warning that restarting tests would endanger public health, undermine global nonproliferation efforts, and needlessly increase national security risks.

After more than a decade of advocacy, Heinrich helped secure the expansion of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) into law last July, finally providing compensation to New Mexico's Trinity Downwinders, uranium workers, and other communities harmed by radiation exposure. Heinrich reintroduced legislation to extend and expand RECA since his first Senate term, starting in 2013.",1,2026-08-26T05:33:32Z,2026-08-26T05:34:56Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-joins-colleagues-in-fight-against-rescission-of-key-energy-leasing-that-will-harm-access-to-americas-public-lands,Heinrich Joins Colleagues in Fight Against Rescission of Key Energy Leasing That Will Harm Access to America’s Public Lands,2026-08-25,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, joined U.S. Senator Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and U.S. Representative Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee, in denouncing the BLM’s proposal to rescind the 2024 Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing Process rule (the 2024 Onshore Leasing Rule). The recission, if approved, will harm public lands, reduce community input, increase pollution, and raise taxpayer costs.

The 2024 Onshore Leasing Rule ensured that the concerns of states, Tribes, and local communities were included in decision-making and was a long-overdue correction to decades of BLM policies that favored oil and gas development over other uses and led to tens of thousands of dangerous abandoned wells that became the financial responsibility of taxpayers instead of the oil and gas companies. This rule had immense public support and established a balanced framework that saved taxpayer money, ensured multi-use management of public lands, and protected cultural resources and rural communities that depend on public lands.

In this letter, the lawmakers ask that the administration specifically reconsider oil and gas bonding requirements; public participation, Tribal consultation, and landowner involvement; and leasing preference criteria.

“We write to express our strong opposition to the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) proposal to rescind the 2024 Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing Process rule (“2024 Leasing Rule”). The proposed replacement undermines the agency’s multiple-use mandate, promotes irresponsible oil and gas leasing, and fails to protect American taxpayers and private landowners,” the lawmakers began.

“[…] BLM’s newly proposed rule threatens to dismantle this common-sense progress. We are deeply concerned that the proposed changes shift cleanup liabilities back to the public, restrict community and private landowner participation, and distort the balance required to manage America’s public lands responsibly,” the lawmakers continued.

Read the full text of the letter HERE and below.

Dear Secretary Burgum and Director Pearce,

We write to express our strong opposition to the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) proposal to rescind the 2024 Fluid Mineral Leases and Leasing Process rule (“2024 Leasing Rule”). The proposed replacement undermines the agency’s multiple-use mandate, promotes irresponsible oil and gas leasing, and fails to protect American taxpayers and private landowners.

Our public lands support diverse economies rooted in fishing, hunting, livestock grazing, energy development, and outdoor recreation. For decades, as documented in the Department of Interior’s 2021 Report on the Federal Oil and Gas Leasing Program, BLM’s policies and management favored oil and gas development at the expense of other multiple uses. The 2024 Leasing Rule provided a long-overdue correction by directly addressing Government Accountability Office findings showing that BLM’s outdated leasing practices shortchanged the American public, invited speculation, and left taxpayers to foot the bill for cleaning up toxic, dangerous orphaned wells.

As the first comprehensive update to the onshore oil and gas program in nearly forty years, the 2024 Leasing Rule was finalized after robust public engagement, with 99 percent of the 260,000 public comments in support. It established a balanced framework that saves taxpayer dollars, ensures multi-use management, and protects cultural resources and rural communities that depend on public lands.

By contrast, BLM’s newly proposed rule threatens to dismantle this common-sense progress. We are deeply concerned that the proposed changes shift cleanup liabilities back to the public, restrict community and private landowner participation, and distort the balance required to manage America’s public lands responsibly. In particular, we request that you reconsider the following provisions:

Oil and Gas Bonding Requirements

The bonding requirements in the 2024 Leasing Rule represent a pragmatic, responsible approach to public land stewardship. Modernizing individual and statewide lease bonds is a fiscal necessity to ensure the “complete” and “timely” reclamation of federal well sites, as required by the Mineral Leasing Act (MLA). Reverting to outdated 1950s-era bonding levels is fiscally irresponsible, going against the wishes of Western states, many of which are increasing bonding rates for state lands, not decreasing them. Lowering bonding levels could also allow companies to abandon wells and shift hundreds of millions of dollars in clean-up costs to the American public. Furthermore, reinstating nationwide bonds allows operators to cover vast, multi-state liabilities, potentially up to thousands of wells, with a single, inadequate financial assurance. We urge BLM not to reauthorize nationwide bonding.

Over 89% of Westerners believe that energy developers, not taxpayers, should pay to clean up their own drilling sites. Weakening these federal bonding requirements ignores this overwhelming majority and the potential $753 billion in clean-up liability across 200 million acres of federal lands that would shift to taxpayers.

Public Participation, Tribal Consultation, & Landowner Involvement

Public participation and meaningful consultation with states, Tribes, and local stakeholders enables the agency to produce better, more thoughtful leasing decisions. Truncating public notice and comment periods unnecessarily and unfairly sidelines the Tribes, rural communities, hunters, anglers, and local business owners who know these lands best. Restricting public input does not streamline operations. It reduces transparency and degrades the quality of land-use decisions.

Further, it is illegal, as federal courts have specifically rejected efforts to cut the public out of the oil and gas leasing decision-making process. We urge BLM to maintain robust public comment and Tribal consultation periods.

In addition, there are over 57 million acres across the country of “split-estate” lands, where the federal government owns oil and gas resources, but the surface lands are privately owned. Since 2009 BLM has required oil and gas companies to identify the owners of split-estate lands prior to leasing, a requirement based on a recommendation from the George W. Bush administration. This proposed rule eliminates the long-standing notification requirements for private landowners, stripping ranchers, farmers, and homeowners of their ability to negotiate on how developers access and use their land while leaving them vulnerable to the permanent surface disruptions of industrial drilling.

Leasing Preference Criteria

The leasing preference criteria, adopted to ensure BLM’s multi-use mandate, have been highly effective at proactively directing leasing away from critical wildlife habitats and high-value recreation and livestock management areas, providing certainty to local communities, energy developers, ranchers, and local businesses. Erasing these clear criteria will inevitably revive conflicts between users, leading to costly litigation and regulatory uncertainty. A predictable leasing framework benefits everyone, and abandoning it is a step backwards.

For these reasons, we strongly oppose BLM’s proposal to rescind the 2024 Leasing Rule and urge BLM to maintain and continue to implement the current, balanced regulations. The 2024 Leasing Rule brought much-needed fiscal responsibility and balance for federal land management. The proposed rollbacks would jeopardize Western economies, abandon fiscal discipline, and undermine BLM’s multi-use mandate.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,",1,2026-08-26T05:33:32Z,2026-08-26T05:34:56Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-joins-ribbon-cutting-for-new-blackve-headquarters-and-manufacturing-facility-highlights-job-training-for-new-mexicans-living-with-disabilities-joins-groundbreaking-celebration-for-new-pacific-fusion-facility_leads-panel-with-former-google-ceo-on-unlocking-americas-clean-energy-future,"Heinrich Joins Ribbon-Cutting for New BlackVe Headquarters & Manufacturing Facility, Highlights Job Training for New Mexicans Living with Disabilities, Joins Groundbreaking Celebration for New Pacific Fusion Facility & Leads Panel with Former Google CEO on Unlocking America’s Clean Energy Future",2026-08-25,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, joined events in Albuquerque celebrating BlackVe’s new 30,000-square-foot headquarters and satellite manufacturing facility at MaxQ and Pacific Fusion’s new $1 billion state-of-the-art facility that positions New Mexico at the forefront of the emerging fusion energy industry.

Heinrich began the day at BlackVe’s new facility, which will support the rapid design, production, integration, and operation of next-generation spacecraft — creating 200 high-quality jobs and strengthening New Mexico’s leadership in the space industry.

ABOVE: U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) attends a ribbon-cutting ceremony to officially open BlackVe’s new 30,000-square-foot headquarters and satellite manufacturing facility, August 25, 2026. Additional pictures here.

|“BlackVe is a homegrown company committed to staying, building, and growing right here in New Mexico. Its brand-new manufacturing facility in Albuquerque will produce satellites and defense technology that will help keep our country safe, while creating more than 200 high-quality jobs New Mexicans can build their families around,” said Heinrich. “As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I’ll continue working to bring more investments to New Mexico that strengthen our leadership in space and defense technologies, grow our local workforce and businesses, and give the next generation the opportunity to build their careers right here at home.”

Heinrich’s support of BlackVe includes continued funding for U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) satellite and space technology at Kirtland Air Force Base, helping the company expand local manufacturing in New Mexico, and meetingwith BlackVe workers.

Prior to the ribbon-cutting ceremony, Heinrich joined students from the Albuquerque Sign Language Academy (ASLA) to highlight a $300,000 Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) grant he secured to develop the Adult Workforce Training Program Hub. The funding helped ASLA refurbish a trolley into a coffee bar to bolster career opportunities for deaf and hard-of-hearing students and students with disabilities.

ABOVE: U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) joins students from the Albuquerque Sign Language Academy to discuss a $300,000 CDS grant he secured to bolster career opportunities for deaf, hard of hearing, and students with disabilities, August 25, 2026. Additional pictures here.

Heinrich also joined a groundbreaking celebration for Pacific Fusion’s new $1 billion state-of-the-art facility that cements New Mexico’s role as a national leader in advanced energy innovation. At the groundbreaking, Heinrich led a panel discussion with former Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, on fusion energy’s potential to strengthen America’s national security and unlock our clean energy future. The panel was moderated by Pacific Fusion Co-Founder and CEO, Eric Lander. The full video of the panel discussion led by Heinrich and Schmidt is here.

“Pacific Fusion’s $1 billion investment in New Mexico is a testament to the strength of our state’s workforce and national labs. This high-yield, high-gain fusion facility will advance our understanding of what it will take to bring fusion power to the grid, while supporting Albuquerque’s economy, creating 200 permanent jobs, and cementing New Mexico’s leadership in energy innovation,”said Heinrich, Ranking Member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and founder of the Senate Fusion Caucus.“Fusion has the potential to transform how we power our economy, in addition to its role in strengthening our national security. I’m excited to see Pacific Fusion and New Mexico leading the way in turning that potential into reality.”

Heinrich helped Pacific Fusion choose New Mexico as the new home for its state-of-the-art fusion facility.",1,2026-08-26T05:33:32Z,2026-08-26T05:34:56Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-releases-statement-on-110th-anniversary-of-the-national-park-service-celebrates-national-park-week,"Heinrich Releases Statement on 110th Anniversary of the National Park Service, Celebrates National Park Week",2026-08-25,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released the following statement celebrating the 110th anniversary of the National Park Service (NPS) today, August 25, 2026, during National Park Week, which runs from August 22 to August 30 this year. All entrance fees to national parks are waived for U.S. citizens and residents today, August 25, 2026.

“110 years ago, President Woodrow Wilson signed the law creating the National Park Service to protect some of the most treasured places in our country and ensure they belong to all Americans.

“Our national parks and public lands are part of our shared identity. They are literally the anvil on which our collective identity was forged. They preserve the stories of generations who came before us, give everyone a place to explore and connect with the outdoors, and serve as an economic engine for communities across the country. In 2024 alone, visitors to our national parks spent $29 billion in communities near parks, supporting 340,000 jobs and generating more than $56 billion in economic activity.

“But as the National Park Service celebrates 110 years, our parks face a $24 billion maintenance backlog and severe staffing shortages. The Trump administration has forced out thousands of employees, proposed deep cuts to the agency, and taken steps to erase history at our parks.

“Instead of working to address these maintenance needs and keep visitors safe and our parks accessible, the administration is making hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars available for the President’s vanity projects. That’s bullshit. We should be investing in the national parks that belong to all of us – not a golden ballroom for the President.

“This week, I encourage every American to get outside, enjoy a national park or public land, and help protect these national treasures for generations to come.”

As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Heinrich is leading the fight in Congress to protect our public lands, expand access to national parks, and hold the Trump administration accountable for its attacks on these treasured places — from efforts to erase history in our national parks and divert funding to Trump’s vanity projects, to the President’s proposed golden White House ballroom, his botched Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool rehabilitation project, and his actions that make our national parks less safe for visitors.

This month, Heinrich joined top Senate Democrats in sending a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) Acting Comptroller General Orice Williams Brown to audit and assess the full scope and cost of the White House ballroom project.

Also, this month, Heinrich sent a letter requesting that the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Deputy Inspector General Caryl Brzymialkiewicz investigate what Department officials knew – and when they knew it – about engineering failures at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and whether DOI employees withheld evidence from federal prosecutors.

In July, Heinrich criticized legislation that removes protections for public lands, emphasizing the need for bipartisan collaboration within the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Heinrich additionally fact-checked Trump administration actions that undo protections for the Chaco Canyon Cultural Protection Zone. You can read about Heinrich’s actions to protect Chaco Canyon here and here.

In July, Heinrich sent a letter to DOI Secretary Doug Burgum and U.S Park Chief of Police Scott Brecht demanding answers and transparency about the U.S. Park Police’s new vehicle pursuit policy following news reports that an innocent bystander, Nolberto Armando Sanabria Meza, a 46-year-old food delivery driver, was hit and tragically killed in D.C. by a driver being chased by U.S. Park Police.

In June, Heinrich helped advance the America the Beautiful Act, bipartisan legislation introduced by U.S. Senators Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Angus King (I-Maine) to reauthorize the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund, out of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

In June, Heinrich sent a letter demanding answers from DOI Secretary Doug Burgum about the Trump administration redirecting tens of millions of dollars from fees paid to the NPS to fund President Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C. – including redirecting funds collected at New Mexico sites such as Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Bandelier National Monument.

In April, during a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing to examine the Trump administration’s Budget Request for the DOI Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27), Heinrich grilled DOI Secretary Doug Burgum about the Department’s draconian staff cuts at the NPS.

In March, Heinrich joined lawmakers in filing an amicus brief that would put a stop to President Trump’s plan to construct a commemorative arch on federal property. The amicus brief argues that the President’s plan is illegal unless Congress authorizes it.

In March, Heinrich led his colleagues in delivering remarks on the Senate floor in condemning and drawing attention to the Trump administration’s efforts to erase American history from public lands.

In March, Heinrich sent a letter to DOI demanding answers from the NPS following reports that NPS staff across the country are removing signage from national parks about slavery, Tribal history, and climate change.

In February, Heinrich led his colleagues in calling on DOI Secretary Doug Burgum to halt efforts to create the Department’s new U.S. Wildland Fire Service (USWFS), citing potential life-or-death consequences that could come as a result of decoupling wildfire management from land management agencies, and emphasizing concerns related to recent reductions in staffing, combined with improperly severing wildfire management from land stewardship.

Last December, during a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks hearing to consider 26 pending bills, Heinrich criticized the Trump administration for removing fee-free admission on Juneteenth and Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.

Last October, Heinrich delivered remarks on the Senate floor, criticizing Republicans for pushing forward Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions of disapproval targeting Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Resource Management Plans (RMPs) that would undo protections for national parks, including the Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve.

Last October, during the government shutdown, Heinrich urged the DOI Secretary Doug Burgum to classify the Department’s staff as essential during the Republican government shutdown to maintain the health and safety of Americans who visit public lands, wildlife refuges, and national park sites.

In June of 2025, Heinrich successfully fought Senate Republican provisions to sell off public lands in the Big Bad Bill, lead an amendment to prevent the privatization of our public lands, hosted a roundtable and sounded the alarm about New Mexico public lands that were at risk of being sold off by Republicans, continuously uplifted New Mexicans’ voices who called his office to raise their concern with Republicans’ plan to sell off these lands, and released a statement immediately criticizing Senate Republicans’ plan to sell off public lands following the release of the reconciliation text.

In June of 2025, Heinrich blasted the Trump administration for its plans to transfer national park units to state control, criticizing the administration for “cutting off our access to public lands and devastating state economies in the process, overwhelming state budgets and dismantling the systems that keep public lands running.”

In June of 2025, Heinrich grilled the DOI Secretary Doug Burgum over the Trump administration’s Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) budget request for the Department, which slashes funding for national parks and guts staffing for the agency.

In May of 2025, Heinrich sent a letter to DOI Secretary Doug Burgum, demanding answers from the Trump administration regarding its plans to transfer National Park System units from federal management. The letter follows Heinrich’s questioning of Secretary Burgum during a Senate Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, where Burgum failed to provide sufficient answers on the Trump administration’s plan to transfer hundreds of sites managed by the NPS to the states.

In January of 2025, Heinrich’s Simplifying Outdoor Access for Recreation (SOAR) Act and Every Kid Outdoors Extension Act, which extends free access to national parks and other public lands to all American fourth grade students and their families through 2031 — were signed into law as part of the Expanding Public Lands Outdoor Recreation Experiences (EXPLORE) Act. The broader bipartisan package bolsters outdoor recreation and promotes public lands in New Mexico and across the United States.",1,2026-08-26T05:33:32Z,2026-08-26T05:34:56Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-northwest-new-mexico-lujan-highlights-efforts-to-strengthen-care-for-seniors-and-protect-nutrition-assistance-for-new-mexicans/,"In Northwest New Mexico, Luján Highlights Efforts to Strengthen Care for Seniors and Protect Nutrition Assistance for New Mexicans",2026-08-24,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO – Last week in Farmington and Grants, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) held events highlighting his efforts to expand access to home and long-term care for older New Mexicans and people with disabilities and protect nutrition assistance for New Mexico families.

“Whether it’s making sure our parents and grandparents can receive care in the place they call home or ensuring families have enough food on the table, New Mexicans deserve the support they need to live healthy lives with dignity,” said Senator Luján. “Last week, I heard directly from local leaders and providers about the challenges facing families in Northwest New Mexico. I’ll continue fighting to strengthen home-based care, support caregivers, and protect SNAP from attacks that would make it harder for families to get the food they need.”

Supporting Care for Older New Mexicans in Farmington

In Farmington at the Native American Disability Law Center, Senator Luján met with local leaders and providers to learn more about their work providing home- and community-based care in San Juan County. Senator Luján heard directly from providers about the challenges facing rural and Tribal communities and discussed how his recently introduced Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Access Act would expand access to long-term care for older adults and people with disabilities.

Fighting to Protect Nutrition Assistance in Grants

In Grants at the Grants Community Pantry, Senator Luján met with local food and nutrition leaders to discuss the impact of Republican cuts to SNAP on families and communities in Northwest New Mexico. During the event, Senator Luján heard directly about the challenges facing SNAP recipients and the local organizations that serve them. Senator Luján also highlighted his efforts to fight back against cuts to nutrition assistance and protect SNAP for New Mexico families, including families in rural and Tribal communities.

###",1,2026-08-25T05:31:37Z,2026-08-25T05:33:09Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/icymi-ranking-member-heinrich-on-supreme-court-allowing-continued-construction-for-president-trumps-ballroom,ICYMI: Ranking Member Heinrich on Supreme Court Allowing Continued Construction 	for President Trump’s Ballroom,2026-08-24,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"MEMORANDUM

To: Reporters and Editors

From: Caty Payette, Office of U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.)

Date: August 24, 2026

Re: ICYMI: Ranking Member Heinrich on Supreme Court Allowing Continued Construction for President Trump’s Ballroom

WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, published the following post online, reacting to the news that the Supreme Court has allowed President Trump to continue construction for his $400 million ballroom:

“This doesn’t change the fact that Congress never authorized spending YOUR hard-earned taxpayer dollars on Trump’s golden ballroom.

“I’ll keep fighting to ensure taxpayers aren’t footing the bill for Trump’s vanity projects while the cost of everyday expenses continues to soar.”

Ranking Member Heinrich has led the fight to prevent taxpayer dollars from being used to fund President Trump’s ballroom.

Earlier this month, Heinrich sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) Acting Comptroller General Orice Williams Brown, calling for the GAO to audit and assess the full scope and cost of the White House ballroom project.

In June, Heinrich sent a letter demanding answers from U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on the Trump administration redirecting tens of millions of dollars from fees paid to the National Park Service (NPS) to fund President Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C. – including redirecting funds collected at New Mexico sites such as Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Bandelier National Monument.

In May, Heinrich?successfully blocked Senate Republicans from funding Trump’s ballroom project through their partisan reconciliation budget bill, arguing it violated the Byrd Rule — a Senate rule designed to prevent unrelated policy provisions from being jammed into reconciliation bills that can pass with a simple majority instead of the usual 60-vote threshold.

Last October, Heinrich demanded that President Trump follow the rule of law and for Congress to have oversight over the demolition of the East Wing of the White House and the ongoing construction of the ballroom in its place.",1,2026-08-26T05:33:32Z,2026-08-26T05:34:56Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-cosponsors-legislation-to-combat-maternal-health-crisis,Heinrich Cosponsors Legislation to Combat Maternal Health Crisis,2026-08-20,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M) joined U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.), alongside U.S. Representatives Gwen Moore (D-Wis.), Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), Alma Adams (D-N.C.), Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.), and Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) in reintroducing the Mamas First Act, legislation that would address the maternal mortality crisis by expanding Medicaid coverage to include prenatal, delivery, and postpartum care provided by doulas, midwives, Tribal midwives, and lactation support providers. These services have been proven to reduce C-sections, decrease maternal anxiety, and improve communication between pregnant women and their health care providers.

""By expanding access to trusted providers like doulas, midwives, Tribal midwives, and lactation support professionals, this legislation can help make sure mothers get the care they need. That’s especially important in New Mexico, where more than half of all births are covered by Medicaid,” said Heinrich.“The Mamas First Act will particularly help mothers in rural and Tribal communities to access quality care before, during, and after childbirth – because every mother deserves the support she needs to have a healthy pregnancy and a safe delivery.”

“Instead of slashing healthcare for millions of Americans like Republicans in Congress are hellbent on doing, we should be expanding access to care to protect every momma and baby,” said Warren. “It’s unthinkable that the richest country in the world would also have one of the highest maternal mortality rates. The Mamas First Act will help fix this crisis by improving access to high-quality care and rooting out the deep disparities and systemic racism in our health care system.”

“The Mamas First Act meets a crisis that is costing mothers their lives—especially Black and Indigenous women who walk into delivery rooms carrying risks no family should bear,” said Booker. “By ensuring Medicaid reimburses doulas, midwives, tribal midwives, and lactation support professionals, this bill delivers the trusted care that keeps mothers safe and babies alive. Congress must act now.”

Specifically, the Mamas First Act would:

Amend the Social Security Act to allow doulas, midwives, Tribal midwives, and lactation support providers to be reimbursed by Medicaid.

Improve access to care before, during and after delivery for underserved and under-resourced communities.

Connect mothers and babies to culturally competent and patient-centered care to facilitate better health outcomes.

In addition to Heinrich, Warren, and Booker, the bill is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.).

In addition to Moore, Dingell, Adams, Underwood, and Pressley, the bill is cosponsored by Representatives Eleanor Homes Norton (D-D.C), Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), Al Green (D-Texas), Adelita Grijalva (D- Ariz.), and Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.).

It is endorsed by Ujima, The National Center on Violence Against Women in the Black Community, the Academy of Lactation Policy and Practice, the National Health Law Program, Health Connect One, BMMA Inc. (Black Mamas Matter Alliance, Incorporated), Futures Without Violence, Every Mother Counts, the American Association of Birth Centers, In Our Own Voice: National Black Women's Reproductive Justice Agenda, the National Partnership for Women and Families, Birth Center Equity, Families USA, and the What to Expect Project.

“The Mamas First act will help address our country’s devastating maternal health crisis, which is causing vast, disproportionate harm to Black and Indigenous mothers and newborns, by ensuring that Medicaid reimburses doulas, midwives, and other birthing care workers for vitally important care they provide,”said Esta Soler, President and Founder of Futures Without Violence. “We thank Senator Warren and Representative Moore for championing this legislation, which will ensure these critical providers can continue providing quality care to the millions of people who rely on Medicaid for coverage. We urge leaders in both the House and the Senate to prioritize its passage.”

“The Mamas First Act recognizes a simple but important truth: better support leads to better outcomes for mothers and babies,” said Anthony Wright, Executive Director of Families USA. “By expanding access to trusted community-based providers, including doulas, midwives, tribal midwives, and lactation support professionals, this legislation will help ensure that more families receive the high-quality, culturally congruent care they deserve during a time of immense change, vulnerability and excitement. Families USA is proud to endorse it.”

To read a one pager on the bill, click here.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

###",1,2026-08-21T05:30:57Z,2026-08-21T05:32:22Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-gallup-lujan-holds-forum-to-raise-awareness-of-expanded-reca-compensation-for-new-mexicans/,"In Gallup, Luján Holds Forum to Raise Awareness of Expanded RECA Compensation for New Mexicans",2026-08-20,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Gallup, N.M. – On Wednesday, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) led a public outreach forum in Gallup to raise awareness about expanded compensation available through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) and help New Mexicans understand how they can apply for the compensation they deserve.

During the forum, Senator Luján joined local leaders and advocates to provide information about expanded eligibility under RECA and the resources available to help New Mexicans apply for compensation. The forum included a presentation on how eligible individuals can submit claims through the U.S. Department of Justice and access resources to assist with the application process.

“For generations, New Mexicans have carried the burden of our nation’s nuclear legacy, and for far too long, many were denied the recognition and compensation they deserved,” said Senator Luján. “After fighting alongside survivors, uranium workers, and their families, we secured a historic expansion of RECA to finally deliver justice to more New Mexicans. Now, we have to make sure every eligible New Mexican has the resources they need to apply. I will continue working to ensure no New Mexican who sacrificed for our national security is left behind.”

More information regarding RECA eligibility and the application process can be found here.

Since being elected to Congress, Senator Luján has played a leading role in advancing legislation to strengthen the RECA program, introducing RECA legislation in every Congress and twice passing it through the Senate.

In January, Senator Luján announced that DOJ launched a new online portal for RECA claims. In September of last year, Senator Luján and the New Mexico Delegation sent an open letter to New Mexico’s holders of health care records, birth and death records, tax records, school records and any other necessary records to request their full cooperation in delivering long overdue justice for New Mexicans exposed to radiation. Last year, Senator Luján announced that he secured clear guidance to provide claimants the instructions they need to apply for and receive compensation through RECA.

###",1,2026-08-21T05:30:57Z,2026-08-21T05:32:22Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-statement-condemning-trump-administration-proposal-to-repeal-the-roadless-rule-remove-protections-for-millions-of-acres-of-public-lands,"Heinrich Statement Condemning Trump Administration Proposal to Repeal the Roadless Rule, Remove Protections for Millions of Acres of Public Lands",2026-08-19,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released the following statement reacting to the Trump administration’s announcement that the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) has filed a proposed rule to rescind the Roadless Rule.

Established more than 20 years ago, the Roadless Rule protects nearly 45 million acres of public lands administered by the USFS. The Trump administration is proposing to repeal the Roadless Rule, which would increase the risk of wildfires in these areas, carve up wildlife habitat, degrade opportunities for recreation, and threaten the headwaters that communities across the country rely on for clean drinking water.

The public has until September 21 to submit comments on the Trump administration’s proposed rule. This comment period is the last chance for Americans to voice their opposition to the Trump administration’s proposal to repeal the Roadless Rule before it is enacted, and help keep millions of acres of public lands in public hands.

""Hunters, anglers, and public land lovers of all stripes will not take the Trump administration’s assault on the Roadless Rule sitting down. These are our backcountry campsites, our wild trout streams, and the security habitat where we chase elk in the fall,” said Heinrich. “These roadless areas are irreplaceable, and the Roadless Rule is what protects them. Americans have been clear – repeatedly and across party lines – that we don’t want President Trump screwing with our public lands. Someone needs to tell him to get out of his golf cart and touch some grass.”

As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Heinrich is leading the fight in Congress to protect the Roadless Rule and keep public lands in public hands.

Earlier this summer, Heinrich hosted a press conference on Senate Republicans’ efforts to repeal the Roadless Rule and spoke out against the Trump administration’s efforts to rescind the Roadless Rule.

Additionally, Heinrich wrote an op-ed in Outside News about how the Roadless Rule helps conserve our public lands and prevent wildfires – and how it represents years of input from Americans who have made it clear they want the Roadless Rule to stay in place.

In May, Heinrich and the N.M. congressional delegation urged New Mexicans to voice their opposition to the looming Roadless Rule repeal.

In February, Heinrich attended the “Camo at the Capitol Day” rally in the Roundhouse where he stated, “It makes me incredibly proud to be a New Mexican. They’ll never take our public lands from our public hands.”

Last September, Heinrich and the N.M. congressional delegation sent a letter to USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins requesting that New Mexico be excluded from the Trump administration’s proposed repeal of the Roadless Rule.

During a U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hearing to examine pending legislation, Heinrich brought attention to the Trump administration’s refusal to take public opinion into account prior to repealing the Roadless Rule.

In June 2025, Heinrich released a statement slamming USDA Secretary Rollins’ efforts to rescind the roadless rule.",1,2026-08-20T05:28:41Z,2026-08-20T05:29:58Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-wyden-demand-accountability-from-doi-following-report-that-agency-officials-destroyed-official-records,"Heinrich, Wyden Demand Accountability From DOI Following Report that Agency Officials Destroyed Official Records",2026-08-19,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) sent a letter to the Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary Doug Burgum demanding answers on whether DOI complies with federal records retention requirements, calling for accountability and transparency regarding the agency’s records preservation processes.

The letter follows reporting that DOI officials have destroyed official documents and used encrypted mobile applications with disappearing message configurations to avoid preserving records. These actions would violate the Federal Records Act, which requires the head of each federal agency to properly preserve all records documenting the organization, policies, and functions of the agency.

“We write to request information regarding the Department of the Interior’s compliance with federal records retention requirements. We are deeply concerned by recent reports that officials at the Department have reportedly engaged in actions in violation of the Federal Records Act,”the Senators began.

“It is imperative that all employees at the Department – regardless of title or position – understand and comply with federal records retention requirements. Government must be transparent and accountable to the American people,” the Senators continued.

The Senators concluded the letter by demanding Burgum provide clarity on DOI's record retention policies and procedures, how these procedures relate to encrypted mobile devices and mobile applications on government devices, and whether he has ever directed, ordered, or been aware of any DOI official destroying or concealing federal records.

Read the full text of the letter here and below.

Secretary Burgum:

We write to request information regarding the Department of the Interior’s compliance with federal records retention requirements. We are deeply concerned by recent reports that officials at the Department have reportedly engaged in actions in violation of the Federal Records Act.

According to a recent report in Politico, officials at the Department have reportedly destroyed official documents and used encrypted mobile applications equipped with disappearing message configurations to avoid preserving records. One employee quoted in the article stated, “[t]hey’re [Department officials] terrified of written records.”

Under the Federal Records Act, the head of each federal agency is required to “make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency….” The Federal Records Act broadly defines “record” and includes “all recorded information, regardless of form or characteristics, made or received by a Federal agency under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency.” Any employee that conceals or destroys a federal record may be subject to fine or imprisonment.

It is imperative that all employees at the Department – regardless of title or position – understand and comply with federal records retention requirements. Government must be transparent and accountable to the American people. We therefore request that you clearly communicate to all employees their legal obligation to comply with the Federal Records Act. Additionally, in light of the serious nature of this matter, we request you provide responses to the following questions by September 2, 2026:

Please describe the Department’s record retention policies and procedures. Since the start of this Administration, please provide all guidance the Department has shared with employees regarding their obligation to comply with federal records retention requirements.

Please describe the Department’s policies and procedures related to encrypted mobile applications, including whether the Department permits the use of such applications on government devices. Since the start of this Administration, please provide all guidance the Department has shared with employees regarding their obligation to comply with federal records retention requirements when using encrypted mobile applications.

Please provide responses to the following questions:

Have you directed or ordered any Department employee to destroy or conceal a federal record?

Are you aware of any Department official destroying or concealing a federal record?

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.",1,2026-08-20T05:28:41Z,2026-08-20T05:29:58Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-trump-administration-rescinding-roadless-rule/,Luján Statement on Trump Administration Rescinding “Roadless Rule”,2026-08-19,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) issued the following statement on the Trump administration’s announcement that it will end the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule:

“New Mexicans are facing another devastating fire season, and the Trump administration needs to listen to the communities living with these impacts every day. The Roadless Rule protects nearly 1.6 million acres, preserving our forests and the outdoor recreation economy that supports nearly 30,000 jobs and brings billions of dollars to our state. As fires continue to threaten our state, adding roads and increasing development could make communities even more vulnerable to the impacts of wildfire. New Mexicans must be heard.”",1,2026-08-26T05:33:32Z,2026-08-26T05:34:56Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-joins-schiff-senate-colleagues-in-demanding-epa-drop-efforts-to-weaken-health-protections-for-millions-of-americans,"Heinrich Joins Schiff, Senate Colleagues in Demanding EPA Drop Efforts to Weaken Health Protections for Millions of Americans",2026-08-17,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.– U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) joined U.S. Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) in sending a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) demanding the agency withdraw their proposal to roll back drinking water protections – which, if finalized, would remove federal public health limits on the amount of certain PFAS compounds in drinking water.

The senators emphasized in the letter to EPA administration Lee Zeldin that removing these health limits will expose Americans to unsafe levels of chemical that have been linked to kidney and testicular cancer, immune suppression problems, developmental harm, thyroid disease, pregnancy complication, and liver damage.

“Safe drinking water is not a partisan issue. Families across the country expect that when they turn on the tap, their water is safe to drink. Congress enacted the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure EPA relies on the best available science to protect public health – not to weaken existing protections once the sciences has been established,” the senators wrote.

Despite the Trump administration’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ agenda, if enacted, EPA’s proposal would rescind the 2024 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for PFAS and delay compliance for the PFOA and PFOS standard until 2031, putting the health of millions of Americans at risk.

“As far back as the 1950s, scientists observed that PFAS compound could accumulate in human bloodstreams. It took decades of advocacy and heroic scientific research to reach the historic moment in 2024 when EPA finally promulgated the very first national drinking water standards for PFAS compounds. We cannot afford to go backwards and make Americans’ health worse,” the senators concluded.

Heinrich has led efforts to protect New Mexicans from PFAS contamination. Most recently, Heinrich introduced legislation to support the development of next-generation, PFAS-free protective gear to better protect firefighters from the dangers of their work. In February, Heinrich announced he had successfully secured $159 million in the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) appropriations legislation for PFAs testing and remediation, supporting six military sites in New Mexico suspected of contamination from DOD activities.

In addition to Heinrich, the letter was signed by Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and U.S. Senators Tammy Bladwin (D-Wis.), Kristen Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Richard Blumental (D-Conn.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Jack Reed (D- R.I.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Dick Durbim (D-Ill.), Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.).

Read the full text of the letter here and below:

Dear Administrator Zeldin:

We write in strong opposition to EPA’s proposal to rescind the 2024 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, and the Hazard Index mixtures, while also delaying compliance for the PFOA and PFOS standards until 2031. These actions would reverse the first-ever national drinking water protections for six of the most dangerous and well-studied PFAS chemicals, despite overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrating that there is no safe level of exposure to many of these chemicals. Furthermore, there is a strong case to be made that this proposal contravenes the Safe Drinking Water Act’s anti-backsliding provision.

The agency’s proposal is inconsistent with both the scientific record and EPA’s own prior findings. The 2024 drinking water standards followed years of scientific review, public input, and economic analysis. EPA concluded that the standards would protect up to 105 million people from exposure to toxic PFAS in drinking water, prevent thousands of premature deaths, reduce tens of thousands of serious illnesses, and generate billions of dollars in public health benefits.

PFAS contamination is one of the most widespread public health concerns facing our nation. Nearly every American has PFAS in their blood, and millions of people continue to rely on drinking water contaminated with these persistent chemicals. Exposure to PFAS has been linked to kidney and testicular cancer, immune suppression, developmental harm, thyroid disease, pregnancy complications, and liver damage.

EPA has repeatedly stated that protecting Americans from PFAS is a top priority. Yet these proposed rollbacks move in the opposite direction. In addressing revisions to drinking water regulations, the Safe Drinking Water Act itself states that “each revision shall maintain, or provide for greater, protection of the health of persons.” Rather than strengthening protections, the proposal eliminates enforceable standards for four PFAS entirely and delays protections for the two most prevalent PFAS. Communities living with contamination should not be forced to wait additional years for clean drinking water while polluters and regulated entities receive regulatory relief.

Your agency has suggested that regulating only PFOA and PFOS is sufficient because these chemicals are often found alongside other PFAS. However, EPA’s own scientific record demonstrates otherwise. Other PFAS occur independently, contribute to cumulative health risks, and warrant their own enforceable protections. Removing standards for these contaminants will leave significant gaps in public health protections and create unnecessary uncertainty for water systems and states that have already begun compliance planning.

Moreover, many utilities and states have already invested substantial resources to comply with the 2024 standards using Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funding and other federal assistance. Weakening the standards now undermines those investments, creates regulatory uncertainty, and penalizes communities that have acted responsibly to protect public health.

Safe drinking water is not a partisan issue. Families across the country expect that when they turn on the tap, their water is safe to drink. Congress enacted the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure EPA relies on the best available science to protect public health—not to weaken existing protections once the science has been established.

We therefore urge EPA to withdraw its proposal to rescind the 2024 drinking water standards for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, and the Hazard Index mixtures, reject the proposed delay for the PFOA and PFOS standards, and fully implement the 2024 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations as finalized.

As far back as the 1950s, scientists observed that PFAS compounds could accumulate in human bloodstreams. It took decades of advocacy and heroic scientific research to reach the historic moment in 2024 when EPA finally promulgated the very first national drinking water standards for PFAS compounds. We cannot afford to go backwards and make Americans’ health worse. Thank you for your consideration.

###",1,2026-08-18T05:27:41Z,2026-08-18T05:29:06Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-huffman-thompson-and-hernandez-want-answers-on-puerto-ricos-water-crisis-from-government-watchdog,"Heinrich, Huffman, Thompson, and Hernandez Want Answers on Puerto Rico’s Water Crisis from Government Watchdog",2026-08-14,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – This week, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, U.S. Representatives Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee, and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), Ranking Member of the House Homeland Security Committee, along with Pablo José Hernández (D-P.R.), Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico, sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting a briefing and a full investigation into Puerto Rico’s drinking water shortage, the condition of its water and wastewater systems, and what federal agencies are doing to help.

“Puerto Rico is experiencing drinking water supply shortages and service interruptions affecting households and economic activity,” the lawmakers wrote. “Failing pipelines and infrastructure regularly leak about half of the territory’s treated water.”

Almost 3.2 million people on the island depend on that system for the water they drink, cook with, and bathe their kids in. Half of what gets cleaned and treated for them leaks away before it reaches a single home, and nine years of federal repair funding has yet to stop it.

The lawmakers point to nearly a decade of federal spending that has yet to produce a reliable system. Puerto Rico’s water utility, the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA) runs 21,000 miles of pipeline along with dams, filter plants, and tanks that supply most of the island. Since Hurricane Maria in 2017, the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) “have provided almost $9 billion to pay for much of the PRASA infrastructure repair,” while earthquakes in 2020 and additional hurricanes in 2022 and 2023 further damaged facilities and contributed to delaying repairs.

The utility finished a strategic plan, a Capital Investment Plan, and a new rate structure in 2025. The lawmakers write that those plans “identify what the territory and water utility need to do to rebuild from disaster and prepare for future challenges such as drought and flooding. However, these projects are long-term capital projects and do not help resolve the immediate water crisis facing Puerto Rico.”

The letter asks GAO to answer, at a minimum:

The members also request a deeper review covering the conditions and resilience of reservoir, treatment facilities, pumping stations, and distribution networks; the reliability of the wastewater system; how much federal funding has been obligated disbursed, and expended; the status and completion dates of federally funding projects; and the extent to which funded projects are expected to reduce water losses.

They close by asking GAO to look at “legislative, regulatory, administrative, or operational recommendations that could improve project delivery, accountability and long-term water system reliability in Puerto Rico.”

Read the full text of the letter here and below:

Acting Comptroller General Williams Brown:

Puerto Rico is experiencing drinking water supply shortages and service interruptions affecting households and economic activity. Failing pipelines and infrastructure regularly leak about half of the territory’s treated water. In mid-July, the Puerto Rico government announced rationing to preserve water supplies. The archipelago is facing drought and high temperatures from the current El Niño weather pattern. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) drought monitor, the current drought will extend through the fall, and NOAA anticipates that the Caribbean region will continue to experience drought and dry periods from stronger El Niño weather and increasing temperatures in the future.

Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA) is the public entity responsible for providing water and wastewater for the majority of the territory. It manages eight dams, 112 filter plants and intakes for drinking water supply, 50 wastewater plants, 3,800 tanks and other facilities, and 21,000 miles of pipelines. It serves almost 3.2 million people. It is overseen by the Puerto Rico Department of Health and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which administers the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act.

Puerto Rico has been repairing damaged water facilities since 2017, when Hurricane Maria damaged many water treatment buildings, tanks, pipelines, and equipment. Federal agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the EPA, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Department of Agriculture (USDA) have provided almost $9 billion to pay for much of the PRASA infrastructure repair. Additional hurricanes in 2022 and 2023, and earthquakes in 2020, further damaged facilities and contributed to delaying repairs.

In 2025, PRASA completed a strategic plan for repairing and replacing deteriorating and failing infrastructure for fiscal years 2026-2029. It also completed a Capital Investment Plan and established a new rate structure. Together, these plans identify what the territory and water utility need to do to rebuild from disasters and prepare for future challenges such as drought and flooding. However, these projects are long-term capital projects and do not help to resolve the immediate water crisis facing Puerto Rico.

GAO recently reported on the recovery of Puerto Rico’s electric grid, finding that progress in spending federal recovery funds is slow.1 We request that GAO conduct work to respond to the following questions about Puerto Rico’s water systems.

First, we request a briefing that covers the following questions at a minimum:

(1) What are the causes of Puerto Rico’s drinking water shortages and rationing? What is known about the reasons that the distribution system is in an advanced state of disrepair despite federal funding and PRASA’s creditworthiness? What is the relative contribution of drought?

(2) What are federal agencies doing to help address Puerto Rico’s drinking water supply shortage, in the short-term and long-term? What have federal agencies done to help address drinking water supply shortages in other parts of the U.S. in the short-term and long-term?

We are also requesting a more in-depth examination of the following questions:

(1) What challenges, including infrastructure, operational, and management decisions within PRASA, are contributing to Puerto Rico’s water service interruptions?

(2) What is the condition and resilience of Puerto Rico’s potable water infrastructure, including its reservoirs, treatment facilities, pumping stations, transmission systems, and distribution networks?

(3) What are the principal issues affecting the reliability and performance of Puerto Rico’s wastewater system, including its sanitary sewer lines, pumping stations, treatment facilities, and discharge systems?

(4) What financial assistance have FEMA, HUD, EPA, and USDA provided to support Puerto Rico’s water system recovery since 2017, and how has this contributed to building infrastructure that is resilient to hurricanes, drought, and other natural hazards?

(5) What is the status of federally funded water infrastructure projects, including:

a. Total federal funding obligated, disbursed, and expended;

b. The number and value of completed, ongoing, and planned projects;

c. Project implementation schedules and anticipated completion dates; and

d. The extent to which funded projects are expected to reduce water losses or improve reliability of potable water system reliability and resilience?

(6) To what extent have federal and commonwealth agencies coordinated and what factors have hindered progress in recovery, modernization, and resilience of Puerto Rico’s water system?

(7) What are legislative, regulatory, administrative, or operational recommendations that could improve project delivery, accountability, and long-term water system reliability in Puerto Rico?

We look forward to your help in putting the people of Puerto Rico on a path to water security.

###",1,2026-08-15T05:23:20Z,2026-08-15T05:24:50Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/this-week-lujan-highlights-fight-to-lower-costs-protect-nutrition-assistance-and-expand-access-to-health-care-across-albuquerque/,"This Week, Luján Highlights Fight to Lower Costs, Protect Nutrition Assistance, and Expand Access to Health Care Across Albuquerque",2026-08-14,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Albuquerque, N.M. – This week, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) held a series of events across Albuquerque to highlight how he is fighting to protect nutrition assistance, expand affordable housing, and defend access to health care for New Mexicans.

“From putting food on the table to finding an affordable place to call home and accessing quality health care, New Mexicans deserve the support and resources they need to thrive,” said Senator Luján. “This week, I heard directly from local leaders about the challenges facing our communities and highlighted how I’m fighting in Washington to lower costs and deliver for New Mexico. I will continue fighting to protect SNAP, expand access to affordable housing, and defend quality, affordable health care for all New Mexicans.”

At the South Valley Economic Development Center, Senator Luján met with local nutrition and agricultural organizations to examine the impact of Republican cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in New Mexico and highlight his efforts to protect and expand nutrition assistance for New Mexico families. During the event, Senator Luján highlighted his efforts to protect SNAP and reinforced his commitment to working on the Senate Agriculture Committee to deliver a Farm Bill that addresses devastating cuts to nutrition assistance and supports families, farmers, and ranchers. In the Senate, Senator Lujan leads legislation to reverse the devastating Republican cuts to SNAP.

At Calle Cuarta Apartments, Senator Luján toured affordable housing units and met with housing leaders, experts, and advocates to discuss solutions to lower housing costs and increase access for New Mexicans. During the visit, Senator Luján heard from housing leaders and highlighted his efforts to deliver more affordable housing for New Mexico, including helping pass the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, affordable housing legislation that President Trump refused to sign into law.

At Presbyterian Rust Medical Center, Senator Luján met with hospital leadership and staff to highlight how Republican cuts to critical health programs threaten hospital services and access to care for New Mexicans. During the discussion, Senator Luján heard directly from health care leaders about the impacts of these cuts and outlined his efforts to fight back and protect access to quality, affordable health care across the state.

###",1,2026-08-15T05:23:20Z,2026-08-15T05:24:50Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-calls-for-a-full-gao-audit-of-trumps-ballroom-project,Heinrich Calls for a Full GAO Audit of Trump’s Ballroom Project,2026-08-13,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, joined top Senate Democrats in sending a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) Acting Comptroller General Orice Williams Brown to audit and assess the full scope and cost of the White House ballroom project.

After Heinrich successfully defeated Republicans’ attempt to gift President Trump $1 billion in federal funding through their partisan reconciliation bill in June, and although President Trump repeatedly claimed that the ballroom and demolition of the East Wing would be privately funded, reporting shows that the administration has inappropriately and illegally diverted more than $300 million in federal funding for the President’s White House ballroom project.

“Congress has neither authorized nor appropriated funding for the ‘East Wing Modernization Project,’ nor has Congress been provided any planning details or justifications that would allow for informed consideration of the White House’s plans that would be a prerequisite for authorization or appropriation of funds. The lack of congressional authorization has been central to the ongoing litigation challenging the ballroom project, National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. National Park Service. This month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed that President Trump lacks the legal authority to construct a White House ballroom without congressional authorization,” the Senators wrote.

“Simply put, no president has the authority to unilaterally demolish and remodel the country’s White House in such a significant manner without congressional approval,” the Senators continued.

“The Trump administration has not provided transparency into the use of federal funds for the East Wing project, and they have limited congressional oversight, meaningful public input, and adherence to established federal processes,” the Senators wrote.

The ballroom is part of a larger White House construction project that has ballooned to a cost of at least $900 million, the majority of which would be borne by American taxpayers.

The letter was led by U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee. In addition to Heinrich, the letter was co-signed by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and U.S. Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Jack Reed (R-RI.), and Gary Peters (D-Mich.).

As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate and Natural Resources Committee, Heinrich has led the fight to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not being spent on Trump’s vanity projects, especially as working families are being squeezed by skyrocketing costs on everyday essentials due to the President’s tariffs and reckless, illegal war with Iran.

In June, Heinrich led a letter demanding answers from U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary Doug Burgum regarding the Department's rushed rehabilitation project of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. In August, he joined a letter with U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Public Works Committee, calling for an investigation from DOI Deputy Inspector General Caryl Brzymialkiewicz into what Department officials knew about engineering failures at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and whether DOI employees withheld evidence from federal prosecutors.

In June, Heinrich also joined a letter with U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), where he pressed DOI Secretary Doug Burgum for answers on the Trump administration redirecting tens of millions of dollars from fees paid to the National Park Service (NPS) to fund President Trump’s vanity projects in Washington, D.C. – including redirecting funds collected at New Mexico sites such as Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Bandelier National Monument.

In May, Heinrich successfully blocked Senate Republicans from funding Trump’s ballroom project with $1 billion in taxpayer dollars through their partisan reconciliation budget bill, arguing it violated the Byrd Rule — a Senate rule designed to prevent unrelated policy provisions from being jammed into reconciliation bills that can pass with a simple majority instead of the usual 60-vote threshold.

Heinrich has also voted to prohibit the construction of a ‘‘Triumphal Arch,’’ proposed by President Trump in 2025.

Read the full text of the letter here and below:

Dear Acting Comptroller General Williams Brown:

Many of us in Congress have watched with alarm as the Trump administration unilaterally made the decision to demolish the East Wing of the White House—an historic and symbolic structure—without congressional authorization, meaningful public engagement, or following long-established practice for government facilities modernization and historic preservation. The subsequent construction of a new White House ballroom represents one of the most sweeping alterations to the White House complex in modern history. The scale of this project, the destruction of historic architecture, the opaque and unorthodox combination of public funds with private funding sources, and the absence of standard federal review processes raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and stewardship of this national landmark.

Congress has neither authorized nor appropriated funding for the “East Wing Modernization Project,” nor has Congress been provided any planning details or justifications that would allow for informed consideration of the White House’s plans that would be a prerequisite for authorization or appropriation of funds. The lack of congressional authorization has been central to the ongoing litigation challenging the ballroom project, National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. National Park Service. This month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed that President Trump lacks the legal authority to construct a White House ballroom without congressional authorization. Simply put, no president has the authority to unilaterally demolish and remodel the country’s White House in such a significant manner without congressional approval.

President Trump repeatedly claimed that the demolition of the East Wing and construction of a dramatically expanded gilded ballroom would be carried out solely using private donations, and that no taxpayer funds would be used. Despite those assurances, the administration first tried and failed to secure $1 billion in federal funding for the ballroom through a partisan Republican reconciliation bill, then shifted tact to inappropriately and illegally pay for over half of the $600 million ballroom with previously appropriated funding not intended for this project. It has also been reported that the Trump Administration is utilizing a $500 million no-bid contract to fund the construction of the ballroom—funding that Congress did not approve.

The Trump administration has not provided transparency into the use of federal funds for the East Wing project, and they have limited congressional oversight, meaningful public input, and adherence to established federal processes.

To support Congress’s oversight responsibilities, we request that GAO conduct an audit and assessment of the White House ballroom project and related documentation, including the following:

Planning, Review and Approval Processes: What design, review, and construction approval processes are being applied to the ballroom project? How do these processes and timelines compare to those used for other similar federal construction efforts involving the White House, other historic properties, executive facilities, or national security sensitive sites? Please assess whether required architectural, preservation, environmental, and interagency reviews were conducted and whether any were bypassed, abbreviated or ignored. What documents, if any, were filed with required approval entities prior to initiation of work?

Funding Sources and Cost Transparency: How is the project being funded, including appropriated funds, reconciliation funds, transfers, reprogramming actions, or donated materials and services? Was an initial cost estimate prepared and if so, by what agency or entity and what were the projections from that estimate? What are the total estimated project costs, how much has been obligated and expended to date, and what is the anticipated timeline for completion? What cost control measures were specified for use under this project? Are the funds that were transferred from U.S. Secret Service account to a “White House Repair and Restoration” account within the Executive Residence at the White House, as reported by the Office of Management and Budget, intended for use in the East Wing Modernization Project? Have any federal agencies involved in the East Wing Modernization Project included funding for this project in spend plans submitted to the Office of Management and Budget?

Security Related Components and Interagency Roles: Which elements of the project have been designated as national security related, what criteria were used to make those determinations, and what funding sources are being used for those components? How have appropriate congressional committees been updated on cost and design planning considerations? What is the role of the U.S. Secret Service, the White House Military Office, the White House Communications Agency and the Department of Defense in planning, approving, and coordinating construction activities (including facility communications upgrades and installation of security equipment and other non-construction features), and how are these agencies collaborating among themselves and with other federal entities?

Public Input and Transparency: What opportunities, if any, were provided for public input, expert consultation, or stakeholder engagement prior to demolition of the East Wing and initiation of the ballroom project? Please assess whether federal agencies followed standard public notice and comment practices for major alterations to historic federal properties, whether relevant preservation and advisory bodies were consulted, and how the level of public transparency compares to similar federal construction projects involving historic or iconic sites.

Contractor Donations, Potential Corruption, and Safeguards: Recent public reporting indicates that several contractors and donors associated with the ballroom project have subsequently received substantial federal contract awards, reportedly totaling more than $50 billion. Please assess what safeguards, if any, federal agencies applied to prevent conflicts of interest, preferential treatment, or corruption related to contractors who donated materials, services, or funds to the project. Specifically, what controls exist to ensure that contributions to the project did not influence contract award decisions, and how do these safeguards compare to standard federal procurement integrity requirements? What evaluation criteria were used in identifying and selecting contractors for this effort? Please evaluate whether agencies documented their rationale for contract awards to donor contractors and whether any deviations from standard competitive procedures occurred.

Given the scale, visibility, and long-term implications of this project, an independent GAO review is essential to ensure accountability, transparency, and responsible management of federal resources and historic assets. We request that you provide an update on your proposed plan for this audit by no later than December 1, 2026, with subsequent updates and a final report to be provided at a mutually agreed upon date.

Sincerely,

###",1,2026-08-14T06:13:05Z,2026-08-14T06:14:08Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ranking-members-heinrich-and-huffman-call-for-gao-investigation-into-potential-conflicts-of-interest-and-preferential-treatment-in-trump-administrations-financing-of-private-mining-investments,Ranking Members Heinrich and Huffman Call for GAO Investigation into Potential Conflicts of Interest and Preferential Treatment in Trump Administration’s Financing of Private Mining Investments,2026-08-12,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and U.S. Representative Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee, called on the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to investigate use of taxpayer dollars to acquire financial stakes in private mining companies and the potential conflicts that could arise when the federal government serves as both an investor in and regulator of those companies.

Since the implementation of Executive Order 14241 and the passage of President Trump’s Big, Bad Bill, the federal government has actively acquired financial stakes in several mining firms. In their letter, Heinrich and Huffman raised concerns about whether the administration is adequately assessing the financial risks of those investments, protecting taxpayer dollars, and preventing conflicts of interest – particularly when these mining operations involve public lands.

“The government’s expanded use of these new financial tools has raised concerns that we request the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) examine, including whether and how the federal government is assessing financial risks, protecting taxpayer funds, and managing potential conflicts between its roles as investor and regulator,” Heinrich and Huffman began.

“Citing Executive Order 14241, federal agencies have waived standard disclosure rules, which legally require public mining companies to demonstrate commercial viability. By bypassing these disclosures, agencies may be committing billions in taxpayer funds to speculative mining projects on federal lands without objective, documented verification of their economic viability,” the lawmakers continued.

“These equity acquisitions also create potential conflicts of interest for federal agencies because a significant portion of the planned mining operations are located on federal lands... As billions of public dollars flow into these private ventures, oversight is needed to ensure the transparency of these investments, manage inherent conflicts of interest, and protect taxpayer funds from potential fraud, waste, abuse, and corruption,” the Ranking Members wrote.

The Ranking Members ended their letter asking GAO to investigate whether the proper safeguards, transparency mechanisms, and internal coordinating processes are in place to ensure taxpayer dollars are protected from potential fraud, waste, and abuse. Heinrich and Huffman have worked to hold the Trump administration accountable for potential conflicts of interest in dealings with mining companies. Last February, Heinrich and Huffman sent a letter to the U.S. Secretaries of Defense, Energy, Commerce, and the Interior demanding documents and a briefing on the Trump administration's unprecedented acquisition of equity stakes in multiple mining and mineral companies using taxpayer dollars.

Read the full letter here and below:

Dear Ms. Williams Brown:

In response to Executive Order 14241 and authorities provided under Public Law 119-21 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act), the federal government has actively acquired direct equity stakes, preferred stock, and warrants in several private mining firms. However, the government’s expanded use of these new financial tools has raised concerns that we request the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) examine, including whether and how the federal government is assessing financial risks, protecting taxpayer funds, and managing potential conflicts between its roles as investor and regulator.

Citing Executive Order 14241, federal agencies have waived standard disclosure rules, which legally require public mining companies to demonstrate commercial viability. By bypassing these disclosures, agencies may be committing billions in taxpayer funds to speculative mining projects on federal lands without objective, documented verification of their economic viability.

These equity acquisitions also create potential conflicts of interest for federal agencies because a significant portion of the planned mining operations are located on federal lands. With the executive branch now holding direct financial equity in these private mining operations, the federal government is required to act simultaneously as a mining investor and land-use regulator, an inherent conflict of interest.

As billions of public dollars flow into these private ventures, oversight is needed to ensure the transparency of these investments, manage inherent conflicts of interest, and protect taxpayer funds from potential fraud, waste, abuse, and corruption.

Accordingly, we request that GAO examine:

To what extent did the National Energy Dominance Council, including its member federal agencies, implement transparency measures and assess financial risks to taxpayers—including by evaluating independent economic feasibility studies—prior to executing equity agreements for projects extracting minerals from federal lands? What role does the National Energy Dominance Council play in conducting due diligence on potential investments, and what due diligence is required of member federal agencies? Are those roles and procedures standardized? If so, how?

What mechanisms and safeguards, if any, have the Bureau of Land Management, the Forest Service, and other relevant federal agencies established to manage potential regulatory and permitting conflicts of interest arising from the federal government’s dual role as both an equity investor and regulator of mineral mining operations on federal lands? If mechanisms and safeguards exist, how are they being implemented?

To what extent has the National Energy Dominance Council, including its member federal agencies, designed and implemented internal controls to prevent, detect, and respond to fraud, waste, abuse, and conflict-of-interest risks associated with the structuring and execution of corporate equity investments involving the extraction of minerals from federal lands?

To what extent is the National Energy Dominance Council coordinating additional federal involvement or investment in minerals projects in which the federal government has taken an equity stake? Is the National Energy Dominance Council coordinating with the Export-Import Bank of the United States-funded Project VAULT to assess the impact of import-focused federal stockpiling on federal equity investments in domestic mining? To what extent, if at all, is the National Energy Dominance Council coordinating with the State Department and other relevant federal agencies to understand the impact of their activities upon federal equity investments in domestic mining? If so, how does this process interact with conflict-of-interest safeguards?

Thank you for your prompt attention to this request.

Sincerely,",1,2026-08-13T06:17:16Z,2026-08-13T06:18:13Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-appointed-to-the-board-of-the-institute-of-american-indian-arts/,Luján Appointed to the Board of the Institute of American Indian Arts,2026-08-12,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Santa Fe, N.M. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a member of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, issued the following statement on being appointed to the Board of the Institute of American Indian Arts (IAIA) by U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.):

“As the Senator for New Mexico, and as the longtime U.S. Representative for IAIA’s home in Santa Fe, I’m honored to be appointed to this important leadership position. I’ve secured funding for IAIA’s academic programs, fought back against dangerous budget cuts from the Trump administration, and I’ll continue to be a strong advocate for this institution.

“The innovation and creativity that IAIA inspires to solve some of our greatest challenges – both here at home and around the world – is why I’m so proud to support this institution.”

###",1,2026-08-13T06:17:16Z,2026-08-13T06:18:13Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-leads-letter-opposing-interiors-wilderness-policy-review-another-ploy-by-the-trump-administration-to-weaken-public-lands-protections,"Heinrich Leads Letter Opposing Interior’s Wilderness Policy Review, Another Ploy by the Trump Administration to Weaken Public Lands Protections",2026-08-11,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"Heinrich, colleagues: “Given this administration’s obsession with development and disposal of public lands, it seems clear that this comment period is really just a ploy to weaken protections for public lands”

WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, led nine colleagues in sending a letter to U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum strongly opposing Interior’s wilderness management policy review, which may threaten the wilderness character of public lands and disqualify them for future designation by Congress — undermining Congress’ role in wilderness management, and placing nearly 200 million acres of public land at risk.

Heinrich was joined by U.S. Senators Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Jeffrey Merkley (D-Ore.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.).

“Lands with wilderness characteristics, wilderness study areas, and designated wilderness areas protect millions of acres of intact habitat, watersheds, ecological and cultural resources, scenic and backcountry values. The undisturbed nature of the entire wilderness system protects whole swaths of habitat and protects migration corridors that aid in the protection of endangered species from the Canada Lynx to the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker,” Heinrich and his colleagues wrote. “These areas are some of the best places to fish, hunt, hike, or backpack. They are unparalleled and protected for the sake of solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation and are beloved lands.”

Since the passage of the Wilderness Act of 1964, Congress has had the authority to designate wilderness areas to protect and conserve some of this country’s wildest places. Congress also has the authority to decide not to designate certain areas as wilderness and release them for general use. The agencies under Burgum’s jurisdiction can identify lands with wilderness characteristics; but each agency is required to manage these lands with the goal of protecting their wilderness characteristics. But regardless of how they are selected, the final decision about designation rests with Congress.

“It is atypical for the Interior Department to conduct land management planning by asking for comment on its agencies’ general operating procedures. And given this Administration’s obsession with development and disposal of public lands, it seems clear that this comment period is really just a ploy to weaken protections for public lands,” the lawmakers continued. “This sweeping review comes in addition to the Administration’s efforts to strip protections from national monuments and cultural resource areas, sell vast amounts of public lands in the West, repeal Roadless Rule protections, and change how travel management is developed on public lands.”

The lawmakers went on, vocalizing concern that the Department’s proposed management changes place nearly 200 million acres of public lands at risk, “The management changes that you are seeking will threaten the wilderness character of these lands and may disqualify them for future designation by Congress. Not only does this undermine Congress’ role in wilderness management, but it places nearly 200 million acres of public land at risk. Further, we respectfully request that your Department consider the 60-year history of wilderness management in this country before taking extreme actions that will jeopardize some of our most valued lands. These lands must be managed at the non-impairment standard so that they can remain untrammeled.”

Comment to protect America’s wildest lands:

Read the full text of the letter here and below:

Dear Secretary Burgum,

We write to express our deep concern about the Interior Department’s review of its wilderness management policies. Lands with wilderness characteristics, wilderness study areas, and designated wilderness areas protect millions of acres of intact habitat, watersheds, ecological and cultural resources, scenic and backcountry values. The undisturbed nature of the entire wilderness system protects whole swaths of habitat and protects migration corridors that aid in the protection of endangered species from the Canada Lynx to the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker. The security from pollution protects millions of acres of headwaters and clean water that benefit communities across the country. Further, wilderness and future wilderness areas contribute to the vastness of the outdoor recreation economy, inviting visitors to enjoy the wildness of the areas. These areas are some of the best places to fish, hunt, hike, or backpack. They are unparalleled and protected for the sake of solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation and are beloved lands.

Since the passage of the Wilderness Act of 1964, Congress has had the authority to designate wilderness areas to protect and conserve some of this country’s wildest places. Congress also has the authority to decide not to designate certain areas as wilderness and release them for general use. The agencies under your jurisdiction can identify lands with wilderness characteristics; but each agency is required to manage these lands with the goal of protecting their wilderness characteristics. But regardless of how they are selected, the final decision about designation rests with Congress.

It is atypical for the Interior Department to conduct land management planning by asking for comment on its agencies’ general operating procedures. And given this Administration’s obsession with development and disposal of public lands, it seems clear that this comment period is really just a ploy to weaken protections for public lands. This sweeping review comes in addition to the Administration’s efforts to strip protections from national monuments and cultural resource areas, sell vast amounts of public lands in the West, repeal Roadless Rule protections, and change how travel management is developed on public lands. Opening five different comment periods for three different agencies to solicit changes to a myriad of wilderness policies only creates confusion. Soliciting comments on how designated wilderness is managed by the Bureau of Land Management is not in line with the Wilderness Act or the Federal Land Policy and Management Act.

The management changes that you are seeking will threaten the wilderness character of these lands and may disqualify them for future designation by Congress. Not only does this undermine Congress’ role in wilderness management, but it places nearly 200 million acres of public land at risk.

Lands with wilderness characteristics and parcels that qualify for future designation need to be properly stewarded until Congress decides their permanent status. Each of these areas have management plan that were developed with public input and comments specific to the landscape. Opening a general comment period does not compare to the qualified review, public engagement, and specificity that each unit of the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management, or the Fish and Wildlife Service receives in land management planning.

Therefore, we write in opposition to any policy changes that place congressionally designated wilderness areas, wilderness study areas, lands with wilderness characteristics, or lands that agencies have identified as eligible or suitable for designation, at risk. Further, we respectfully request that your Department consider the 60-year history of wilderness management in this country before taking extreme actions that will jeopardize some of our most valued lands. These lands must be managed at the non-impairment standard so that they can remain untrammeled.",1,2026-08-12T06:18:38Z,2026-08-12T06:20:33Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-albuquerque-lujan-highlights-key-new-mexico-investments-at-rotary-club-unveils-new-legislation-to-strengthen-stroke-prevention-at-unmh/,"In Albuquerque, Luján Highlights Key New Mexico Investments at Rotary Club, Unveils New Legislation to Strengthen Stroke Prevention at UNMH",2026-08-11,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Albuquerque, N.M. – On Monday, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) joined the Rotary Club of Albuquerque and UNM Hospital & Health Sciences leadership to discuss critical investments he secured for New Mexico and unveil new legislation to strengthen stroke prevention in New Mexico and across the country.

“In Albuquerque, I was honored to visit the Rotary Club and UNMH to hear from leaders and highlight how I am fighting for New Mexicans in Washington, D.C.,” said Senator Luján. “At both the Rotary Club and UNMH, I was proud to speak with local leaders who are committed to improving the lives of those in their communities. From boosting funding for businesses developing next-generation technologies to championing legislation to strengthen stroke prevention, I was grateful for the opportunity to share some of the work I’m leading in Washington to improve the lives of New Mexicans.”

At the Rotary Club of Albuquerque, Senator Luján met with local business owners, nonprofit leaders, and professionals and delivered remarks highlighting critical investments he secured for New Mexico. Additionally, Senator Luján highlighted legislative efforts he is leading to bolster scientific innovation and boost broadband access in every corner of New Mexico.

At UNMH, Senator Luján, a stroke survivor, met with UNM Hospital & Health Sciences leadership and staff to spotlight his recently introduced Stroke Act, legislation that would improve stroke prevention, treatment, recovery, and data collection in New Mexico and across the United States. The legislation would invest in research, strengthen emergency response and rehabilitation services, expand access to care, and help people recognize stroke symptoms and seek lifesaving treatment. Additionally, Senator Luján discussed how Republican cuts to critical health programs are creating new barriers for New Mexicans to access care and highlighted his efforts to fight back against these cuts and protect and expand access to health care.

###",1,2026-08-12T06:18:38Z,2026-08-12T06:20:33Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-leads-whitehouse-van-hollen-fetterman-and-king-in-urging-usda-secretary-to-reverse-course-on-efforts-to-slow-walk-clean-energy-development,"Heinrich Leads Whitehouse, Van Hollen, Fetterman, and King in Urging USDA Secretary to Reverse Course on Efforts to Slow-Walk Clean Energy Development",2026-08-10,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, led U.S. Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), and Angus King (I-Maine), in sending a letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins, urging the Secretary to make changes to the proposed Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 (AFIDA) rule that would dramatically expand federal reporting requirements for land and infrastructure projects, including clean energy development, causing energy and food prices to go up further and risking our national security.

The Senators raised concerns that USDA’s proposed rule goes far beyond AFIDA’s original purpose of increasing transparency around foreign ownership of agricultural land by dramatically expanding the definition of “agricultural land” to include renewable energy facilities, pipeline corridors, conservation lands, and other infrastructure. They argued the proposal would create unnecessary barriers for energy developers, rural communities, and investors while doing little to improve national security.

“On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) published a proposed rule (Docket No. USDA-2026-0001) to update the regulations governing the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 (AFIDA). If finalized, the proposed rule could have damaging consequences for national and energy security. We urge USDA to make changes to the proposed rule to address these serious impacts,” the Senators began.

In the letter, the Senators acknowledged the importance of ensuring AFIDA provides transparency into foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land and helps protect against potential threats from foreign adversaries. However, they warned that USDA’s proposed changes could impact national security and undermine efforts to address rising energy and food prices.

The Senators wrote, “We are concerned that USDA's proposed rule may exceed what is necessary to address those objectives, have unintended national security consequences, and may create substantial new compliance burdens on agricultural producers, landowners, infrastructure operators, energy developers, and investors that could undermine efforts to address rising energy and food prices without a corresponding national security benefit.”

The Senators also raised concerns that USDA’s proposal is built upon an expansive definition of “agricultural land” that would sweep in projects and facilities that have little connection to traditional agricultural production, including renewable energy projects and other critical infrastructure.

“Current definitions of agricultural production in the Code of Federal Regulations are narrowly focused on the plain understanding of the term, ‘the cultivation, growing, or harvesting of plants and crops (including farming), breeding, raising, feeding, or housing of livestock (including ranching); forestry products, hydroponics, or nursery stock; or aquaculture.’ It stretches credibility to suggest that, in enacting AFIDA in 1978, Congress envisioned something beyond this narrow commonsense definition to something so expansive as to include renewable energy production, pipeline corridors, warehousing, supply-chain facilities, or land that is currently under conservation,” the Senators continued.

The Senators additionally raised concerns about the potential unintended national security consequences of the proposed rule and its requirement for geospatial mapping information about energy and food processing infrastructure to be made available in an online database accessible to the nation’s adversaries.

“Rather than improving national security, we believe the proposed rule creates new serious vulnerabilities and national security risks by imposing significant new geospatial mapping compliance obligations. Companies would be required to provide detailed boundary mapping, land-use information, and amended filings within 90 days of assignments, transfers, ownership changes, or land-use conversions. The expansion of who must report and the requirement to disclose geospatial mapping information about energy production infrastructure and food processing facilities into a central online database essentially provides our adversaries with targeting information for critical infrastructure and unnecessarily exposes business sensitive information,” the Senators continued.

The Senators continued the letter by emphasizing the importance of both the threats from foreign adversaries and the high energy and food prices crisis that is hurting American workers and families: “The United States should continue to protect its agricultural land, food supply, and critical infrastructure from threats posed by foreign adversaries. At the same time, regulatory policy should be carefully calibrated to ensure that federal resources remain focused on genuine national security risks and that compliance burdens do not unnecessarily discourage lawful investment that supports American farmers, rural communities, and affordable energy and food.”

The Senators concluded the letter by requesting a briefing from USDA on the proposed rule, its impacts on key sectors, the legal basis for expanding the definition of “agricultural land,” and the Department’s plan to protect sensitive information.

Read the full letter here and below:

Dear Secretary Rollins:

On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) published a proposed rule (Docket No. USDA-2026-0001)1 to update the regulations governing the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 (AFIDA). If finalized, the proposed rule could have damaging consequences for national and energy security. We urge USDA to make changes to the proposed rule to address these serious impacts.

We have a strong interest in ensuring that AFIDA effectively supports transparency about foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land and provides policymakers with accurate information necessary to protect America's food security and national security interests. We also recognize the legitimate need to ensure that foreign adversaries cannot exploit weaknesses in federal oversight of investments involving agricultural land and critical infrastructure.

However, we are concerned that USDA's proposed rule may exceed what is necessary to address those objectives, have unintended national security consequences, and may create substantial new compliance burdens on agricultural producers, landowners, infrastructure operators, energy developers, and investors that could undermine efforts to address rising energy and food prices without a corresponding national security benefit.

At the foundation of the proposed rule is a dramatic expansion of the definition of “agricultural land” that goes well beyond the scope envisioned statutorily by AFIDA or the plain commonsense understanding of the phrase. The proposed rule would expand “agricultural land” to include renewable energy facilities, pipeline corridors, warehousing activities, conservation lands, agricultural research facilities, easements, leases, and rights-of-way. The underlying statute defines “agricultural land” as land “used for agricultural, forestry or timber production purposes.” Current definitions of agricultural production in the Code of Federal Regulations are narrowly focused on the plain understanding of the term, “the cultivation, growing, or harvesting of plants and crops (including farming) breeding, raising, feeding, or housing of livestock (including ranching); forestry products, hydroponics, or nursery stock; or aquaculture.” It stretches credibility to suggest that, in enacting AFIDA in 1978, Congress envisioned something beyond this narrow commonsense definition to something so expansive as to include renewable energy production, pipeline corridors, warehousing, supply-chain facilities, or land that is currently under conservation.

The proposed rule also reduces the “significant interest or substantial control” threshold regarding what transactions need to be reported from 50% to 10% aggregate non-U.S. equity interests, in any direct or indirect combination. Further, the rule redefines beneficial ownership to include any foreign person with decision-making authority over agricultural land under the expanded categorical definitions.

The 10% aggregate equity interest threshold is especially unworkable for a publicly traded company, because ordinary institutional trading could trigger AFIDA reporting without the company knowing the threshold has been crossed. Real-time foreign equity ownership is not something a public company can verify with accuracy, let alone within the 90-day window before penalties begin.

Even more troubling is that the aggregate ownership test and the beneficial owner test contain no carve-out for allied capital. A Canadian pension fund or a European infrastructure investor triggers the same 10% threshold and the same no-floor beneficial owner standard as a known adversary-linked entity, despite posing none of the risk the rule is meant to address.

Rather than improving national security, we believe the proposed rule creates new serious vulnerabilities and national security risks by imposing significant new geospatial mapping compliance obligations. Companies would be required to provide detailed boundary mapping, land-use information, and amended filings within 90 days of assignments, transfers, ownership changes, or land-use conversions. The expansion of who must report and the requirement to disclose geospatial mapping information about energy production infrastructure and food processing facilities into a central online database essentially provides our adversaries with targeting information for critical infrastructure and unnecessarily exposes business sensitive information.

The cumulative impact of expanding who must report and what filers must disclose, along with increased penalties for compliance errors and delays will have a chilling effect on investment in both energy production and food processing at a time when families and small businesses are already struggling with high energy and food prices.

The United States should continue to protect its agricultural land, food supply, and critical infrastructure from threats posed by foreign adversaries. At the same time, regulatory policy should be carefully calibrated to ensure that federal resources remain focused on genuine national security risks and that compliance burdens do not unnecessarily discourage lawful investment that supports American farmers, rural communities, and affordable energy and food.

We respectfully request a briefing from USDA on the proposed rule, including its anticipated impacts on the energy, infrastructure, and agricultural sectors, the legal basis for expanding the definition of ""agricultural land,"" and how the Department intends to protect sensitive infrastructure and investor information collected under the rule. We also request a written response addressing the concerns raised in this letter.

We appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to your response.",1,2026-08-11T05:54:29Z,2026-08-11T05:56:25Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-lujan-durbin-lead-colleagues-in-opposing-trumps-move-to-strip-protections-from-bears-ears-and-grand-staircase-escalante-national-monuments,"Heinrich, Luján, Durbin Lead Colleagues in Opposing Trump’s Move to Strip Protections From Bears Ears & Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments",2026-08-10,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) led 34 Senators in a letter to President Trump expressing strong opposition to his executive order reducing the boundaries and stripping protections from the Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears National Monuments in southern Utah. In the letter, the senators highlight how the executive order places irreplaceable cultural, historic, scientific, ecological, and recreational resources at risk of destruction and loss.

“By attempting, yet again, to eliminate vast portions of these monuments, your Administration invites needless uncertainty to the stability that local communities, Tribes, land managers, scientists, recreation users, and businesses need. Not just in Utah, but for all local communities that rely on the stability of our national monuments,” the Senators wrote.

“The Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments are national treasures. The American people deserve public lands policy grounded in law, science, respect for Tribal sovereignty, and stewardship—not political decisions against the desires of the vast majority of Americans,” the Senators concluded.

In addition to Heinrich, Luján, and Durbin, the letter was signed by Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and U.S. Senators Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Brian Schatz (D- Hawai‘i), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).

Heinrich is a leader in public lands protections and a staunch supporter of protecting and expanding Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante Monuments.

In July 2026, Heinrich spoke out against the Trump administration’s renewed efforts to strip protections from Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, describing it as a “War on the West” and criticizing the removal of protections for the monuments.

In 2021, Heinrich led Senate Democrats in urging Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary Deb Haaland and the Biden administration to restore Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, reversing the Trump administration’s reductions. This move was ultimately successful, and President Biden restored both monuments.

In 2019, Heinrich spoke out against the Trump administration’s final Bears Ears management plan, arguing DOI should not weaken protections while the legality of Trump’s reductions remained in courts.

In 2018, Heinrich continued pushing back against the Trump administration’s monument reductions, joining multiple letters urging the Interior to pause new management plans, preserve existing protections, and consult Tribal nations before imposing sweeping changes.

Heinrich co-sponsored the ANTIQUITIES Act in 2018 to reaffirm that only Congress has the authority to reduce or revoke a national monument designation.

Following President Trump’s 2017 decision to shrink the boundaries of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, Heinrich condemned the action for its attack on sacred lands and Tribal sovereignty, along with the precedent it sets for public lands across the country.

In 2016, Heinrich praised President Obama’s designation of Bears National Monument, recognizing the years-long effort and co-management framework of Tribal nations to protect the landscape.

Read the full text of the letter here and below.

Dear Mr. President:

We write to express our strong opposition to your July 13, 2026, proclamations that stripped protections for Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in southern Utah. These actions attempt to remove nearly three million acres from monument protection and placed irreplaceable cultural, historic, scientific, ecological, and recreational resources at risk of destruction and loss.

National monuments have preserved our country’s unique public lands, extraordinary history, and common culture for 120 years. Grand Staircase-Escalante, established in 1996, contains world-class paleontological resources, the ancestral and current homelands of multiple Tribal Nations, striking geologic formations, unique plants and animals, stunning dark night skies, and landscapes that support robust local outdoor recreation economies. Bears Ears, established in 2016, is America's first truly tribally-driven national monument. The proposal was led by five sovereign Tribal Nations.

Each monument is a living cultural landscape with deep spiritual and ancestral importance to multiple Tribal Nations, including the Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Pueblo of Zuni, and Ute Indian Tribe and the Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians. These places are not abstractions on a map; they are homelands and sacred sites that deserve enduring protection, and enhanced recognition secured by the previous monument declaration.

We are especially troubled that the Bears Ears proclamation disbanded the Bears Ears Commission, a landmark model of collaborative management between sovereign Tribal Nations and the federal government. Tribal leaders have made clear that Bears Ears is a sacred ancestral homeland, and that decisions affecting it must be made through meaningful government-to government consultation. The Department of the Interior had previously committed to meeting with the Bears Ears Commission if changes to the monument were under consideration; no such meeting occurred before these proclamations were signed. Any major policy action regarding these culturally important places requires meaningful government-to-government consultation.

National monuments enjoy widespread public support and serve as economic drivers across the United States. The outdoor recreation economy generates $1.3 trillion in gross output and accounts for $9.75 billion in Utah alone. The localities surrounding national monuments have seen growth in income and employment since their designations. We reject the premise that monuments are incompatible with rural prosperity or responsible public access. Despite your false claims that people cannot walk, hunt or fish in these monuments, monument designations support outdoor recreation, heritage tourism, hunting and fishing, scientific research, grazing under appropriate management, and durable local economies. At the same time, monument status prevents the loss of cultural and natural resources that cannot be replaced once damaged. By attempting, yet again, to eliminate vast portions of these monuments, your Administration invites needless uncertainty to the stability that local communities, Tribes, land managers, scientists, recreation users, and businesses need. Not just in Utah, but for all local communities that rely on the stability of our national monuments.

The Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments are national treasures. The American people deserve public lands policy grounded in law, science, respect for Tribal sovereignty, and stewardship—not political decisions against the desires of the vast majority of Americans. We stand with Tribal Nations, local communities, scientists, conservationists, outdoor recreation businesses, and Americans across the country who believe these landscapes should remain protected.

###",1,2026-08-11T05:54:29Z,2026-08-11T05:56:25Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-statement-opposing-todd-blanches-nomination-for-attorney-general,Heinrich Statement Opposing Todd Blanche’s Nomination for Attorney General,2026-08-08,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) released the following statement in response to the Senate’s confirmation of Todd Blanche, President Trump’s former personal lawyer, to be the U.S. Attorney General.

“I voted against Mr. Blanche’s nomination because he has repeatedly shown that his loyalty is to Donald Trump – not to the Constitution or the American people.

“He has transformed the Department of Justice into the President’s personal law firm, using it to enrich and protect Donald Trump and his family. Mr. Blanche also helped establish a nearly $2 billion slush fund that rewards President Trump’s allies, including violent criminals who attacked cops on January 6. And he has withheld critical information related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes at Zorro Ranch by refusing to provide full, unredacted investigative records from the Department of Justice to New Mexico law enforcement authorities. Time and again, Mr. Blanche has put politics and personal loyalty ahead of justice.

“The Attorney General’s job is to uphold the rule of law, deliver on public safety, and ensure that justice is applied fairly and independently. The American people deserve an Attorney General they can trust to do that. Todd Blanche has made it abundantly clear that he is not that person.”

Heinrich recently pressed Jay Clayton, former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and current Director of National Intelligence (DNI), to provide evidence related to Jeffrey Epsein’s alleged crimes at Zorro Ranch in New Mexico to the New Mexico Attorney General. Heinrich also questioned Clayton about his role in the unconscionable, improper public release of sensitive information belonging to Epstein survivors and his comments about President Trump’s attempt to use a $1.8 billion slush fund to compensate violent criminals who beat up cops on January 6, 2021.

Heinrich’s questioning of Clayton followed a recent letter from New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez to Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche and Associate Deputy Attorney General Diego Pestana, demanding that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) immediately turn over unredacted Epstein records that the Department has held for years. In the letter, AG Torrez stated that “more than 130 days have now elapsed since the New Mexico Department of Justice’s initial request” for unredacted records and called the DOJ’s delay “unreasonable under any rule of reason.”

###",1,2026-08-09T05:47:57Z,2026-08-09T05:49:40Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-voting-against-trumps-personal-attorney-to-serve-as-ag/,Luján Statement on Voting Against Trump’s Personal Attorney to Serve as AG,2026-08-08,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Blanche Recently Caught on Tape Saying He Will Restrict Reproductive Rights Nationwide

Luján Introduced Epstein Files Transparency Act II and No Trump Immunity Act Ahead of Blanche’s Confirmation

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) issued the following statement after voting against Todd Blanche to serve as Attorney General:

“The Attorney General’s duty is to uphold the rule of law, defend the Constitution, and ensure that justice is applied fairly and equally to every American. Todd Blanche’s record makes it clear that he cannot carry out those responsibilities independently of President Trump.

“The survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s horrific crimes — and the American people — deserve transparency and accountability, not continued efforts to withhold information or shield those in positions of power. Under Todd Blanche’s leadership, the DOJ will continue putting President Trump’s personal and political interests ahead of justice and accountability for victims.

“Todd Blanche’s confirmation will only further erode public trust in one of our nation’s most important institutions. I will continue fighting to protect the independence of the DOJ and ensure that no one is above the law.”

###",1,2026-08-09T05:47:57Z,2026-08-09T05:49:40Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-voting-for-a-continuing-resolution-to-keep-the-government-funded/,Luján Statement on Voting for a Continuing Resolution to Keep the Government Funded,2026-08-08,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) issued the following statement after voting to pass a Continuing Resolution to keep the federal government funded through December 11, 2026:

“This continuing resolution averts another Republican government shutdown, provides stability for families and communities, and gives Congress time to negotiate bipartisan funding bills.

“Critically, it also prevents Trump from further politicizing and disrupting federal grants that communities across New Mexico rely on. I will continue fighting for a final funding agreement that protects critical investments, holds the administration accountable, and delivers for New Mexicans.”

###",1,2026-08-09T05:47:57Z,2026-08-09T05:49:40Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-demands-doe-preserve-all-documents-and-records-regarding-the-illegal-cancellation-of-energy-project-grants-in-democratic-led-states,Heinrich Demands DOE Preserve All Documents and Records Regarding the Illegal Cancellation of Energy Project Grants in Democratic-Led States,2026-08-07,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, sent a letter to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Chris Wright demanding the Department preserve all documents and records of the Trump administration's cancellation of more than $7.5 billion of energy project grants in Democratic-led states.

“I write to demand that you preserve all records and communications related to the administration’s cancellation of more than $7.5 billion of energy project grants,” Heinrich began.

“Following reports that the Trump administration acknowledged in court filings that it terminated more than $7.5 billion of energy grants due to political motivations, I wrote to you along with 38 senators demanding the administration restore funding to those projects that were illegally canceled,” Heinrich continued. “Today, I write to request that you preserve all documents, communications, and records related to the termination of those energy projects. As you know, under the law, you are required to comply with records preservation requirements.”

In his letter, Heinrich demands that the DOE preserve all forms of communications (including, but not limited to, e-mails, electronic documents, and data) since January 20, 2025, related to the termination of the above-mentioned energy projects. The letter also requests that all former DOE employees who may have access to such records are immediately identified and notified.

Heinrich is leading the effort to secure accountability and transparency into DOE’s illegal cancellation of energy project grants. Last week, following the Trump administration's admission that it canceled projects in states that did not vote for President Trump in the 2024 election, Heinrich led 38 Senators in demanding that funding be restored.

In October 2025, following the news that the Trump administration illegally canceled clean energy project grants, Heinrich led 36 of his Senate colleagues in sending a letter to DOE Secretary Chris Wright and the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought, demanding that they restore the projects’ funding.

Read the full text of the letter here and below:

Secretary Wright:

I write to demand that you preserve all records and communications related to the administration’s cancellation of more than $7.5 billion of energy project grants.

Following reports that the Trump administration acknowledged in court filings that it terminated more than $7.5 billion of energy grants due to political motivations, I wrote to you along with 38 senators demanding the administration restore funding to those projects that were illegally canceled. Today, I write to request that you preserve all documents, communications, and records related to the termination of those energy projects. As you know, under the law, you are required to comply with records preservation requirements.

To ensure that the records are produced to the Committee in potential future document requests without undue delay, I request that you do the following immediately:

Preserve all records and communications, not limited to e-mail, electronic documents, and data, created since January 20, 2025, related to the termination of the above-mentioned energy projects; and

Identify and immediately notify any former employees, including contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and any other individuals or entities who may have access to such records. Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this request.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this request.",1,2026-08-08T05:41:38Z,2026-08-08T05:43:24Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-introduces-legislation-ending-outdated-tax-breaks-for-oil-and-gas-companies-to-drill-overseas,Heinrich Introduces Legislation Ending Outdated Tax Breaks for Oil and Gas Companies to Drill Overseas,2026-08-07,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, introduced the American Energy Independence & Tax Fairness Act, legislation to repeal outdated tax breaks that allow major oil and gas companies to reduce their U.S. tax obligations for overseas oil and gas production. The legislation would ensure the tax code no longer rewards companies for investing abroad instead of here at home, while strengthening American energy security and requiring some of the world’s most profitable corporations to pay their fair share.

This legislation comes as the largest oil and gas companies continue to rake in record profits while American families feel the squeeze from rising energy costs. President Trump’s reckless and costly war has driven up global oil prices and increased pressure on consumers at the pump, while outdated tax breaks continue to give some of the world’s most profitable companies special treatment for overseas oil and gas production.

Recent analysis by the FACT Coalition found that from 2017 to 2025, major U.S. oil companies paid $135 billion in foreign taxes while only paying $29 billion in U.S. taxes. At the same time, the oil and gas industry continues to report record profits. The disparity is driven by U.S. tax provisions that benefit overseas extraction. During this quarter, Exxon and Chevron alone reported more than $26 billion in combined net income, with Exxon doubling its profits and Chevron reporting one of its most profitable quarters ever.

""Oil majors shouldn’t get a tax break for going overseas to produce energy, but that’s essentially what our current tax policy does. That’s where my American Energy Independence & Tax Fairness Act comes in. It will help put American energy development on an even playing field with energy development that’s happening in the Middle East or anywhere else,” said Heinrich. “At a time when oil majors are making billions in profits per quarter, they can afford to pay their fair share.”

Heinrich's American Energy Independence & Tax Fairness Act would:

Eliminate preferential tax treatment for foreign oil and gas extraction income, ensuring overseas fossil fuels profits are treated like other foreign business income under the U.S. tax code;

Close loopholes that allow companies to generate additional foreign tax credits from shale oil and tar sands development;

Reform foreign tax credit rules to prevent oil and gas companies from misclassifying payments to foreign governments as taxes rather than royalties in order to reduce their U.S. tax liability.

For decades, the U.S. tax code included incentives to encourage overseas oil and gas production. Today, the United States is the world’s leading oil and gas producer and a net exporter of fossil fuels. And these outdated tax provisions provide special treatment to some of the world’s most profitable companies. By closing these loopholes, the legislation will strengthen American energy security, support domestic job creation, and help accelerate the transition to a more reliable and affordable energy future.

A one-page factsheet of the bill is here.

A section-by-section summary of the bill is here.

The full text of the bill is here.

As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Heinrich has repeatedly pressed the Trump administration to reverse policies that raise energy costs for working families, and hold corporations accountable, through hearings, oversight letters, and direct engagement with the Trump administration officials:

In June, Heinrich hosted a roundtable and discussed how the Trump administration’s policies, including the war with Iran, have driven up energy costs for families, consumers, communities, and small businesses.

In May, Heinrich hosted a roundtable with local small business owners, Roadrunner Food Bank, and Women’s Economic Self-Sufficiency Team, Corp. (WESST) to discuss how President Trump’s global tariffs and war with Iran are making gas, groceries, and everyday essentials more expensive for New Mexico families and businesses.

Heinrich also wrote to the CEOs of the six biggest U.S. airlines seeking information on the current economic conditions of the airline industry as President Trump’s war in Iran continues, requesting that the airlines detail their plan to address rising jet fuel costs, and whether companies will cap or reduce executive compensation to help offset rising costs.

For more information on Heinrich’s actions to hold President Trump accountable for his illegal, costly, and reckless war on Iran, click here.

For more information on Heinrich’s work to lower energy costs for New Mexico families, click here.

For more information on Heinrich’s work to combat President Trump’s tariffs and lower the cost of groceries and everyday essentials, click here.",1,2026-08-08T05:41:38Z,2026-08-08T05:43:24Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-lujan-announce-committee-passage-of-legislation-to-transfer-a-portion-of-the-former-albuquerque-indian-school-campus-to-pueblos-for-the-indian-pueblo-cultural-center,"Heinrich, Luján Announce Committee Passage of Legislation to Transfer a Portion of the Former Albuquerque Indian School Campus to Pueblos for the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center",2026-08-07,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, announced the Committee passage of their Albuquerque Indian School Act of 2026, legislation that places portions of the former Albuquerque Indian School campus and buildings, currently managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), into trust for the benefit of the 19 Pueblos of New Mexico.

The legislation is led by Heinrich and cosponsored by Luján in the Senate and led by U.S. Representative Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) and cosponsored by U.S. Representative Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.) in the House.

“Our legislation will help the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center expand its reach, create more economic opportunity, foster entrepreneurship, and support local small businesses,” said Heinrich. “Those are important wins for the 19 Pueblos and everyone who calls New Mexico home. Now that my bill has passed out of Committee, I will continue working to get it across the finish line and signed into law.”

“Expanding economic development and cultural education opportunities for the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center is critical for the 19 New Mexico Pueblos it serves. That is why I partnered with Senator Heinrich to introduce the Albuquerque Indian School Act, legislation that will help the center grow, support job creation, and generate new revenue for New Mexico’s Pueblos and our communities,”said Luján, a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. “I'm proud to see this legislation advance out of the Indian Affairs Committee, a vital step toward getting this bill across the finish line. I will continue working to ensure it passes the Senate and is signed into law.”

The Albuquerque Indian School Act now heads to the full Senate for consideration.

The Albuquerque Indian School Act of 2026 builds upon a longstanding, bipartisan effort to transfer the former Albuquerque Indian School campus and surrounding buildings to the 19 Pueblos in New Mexico for the development and growth of the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center. The Indian Pueblo Cultural Center is a nationally recognized museum and cultural institution owned and operated by the Pueblos, dedicated to both preserving and perpetuating pueblo history, culture, and art, while facilitating their future economic growth and long-term economic sustainability.

The text of the bill is here.

Earlier this summer, Heinrich testified in support of the bill and urged his colleagues to advance the legislation out of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Watch the full video of Heinrich’s testimony here.

In 2015, Heinrich, Luján, and the rest of the N.M. Delegation successfully passed into law the Albuquerque Indian School Land Transfer Act, legislation to place four tracts of land from the former Albuquerque Indian School into trust for the 19 Pueblos of New Mexico, consolidating the last parcels of the old school property into the Albuquerque Indian School campus. This followed several prior bipartisan efforts, from 1969 to 2008, led by former U.S. Senator Pete Domenici (R-N.M.), former U.S. Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), and former U.S. Representative Manuel Luján Jr. (R-N.M.).

###",1,2026-08-08T05:41:38Z,2026-08-08T05:43:24Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-votes-to-sanction-russia,Heinrich Votes to Sanction Russia,2026-08-07,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, released the following statement after securing Senate passage of the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act, bipartisan legislation he cosponsored to impose sanctions on Russian President Valdimir Putin, senior Russian political and military leaders, oligarchs, state-owned enterprises, and foreign companies for supporting and financing Russia’s war against Ukraine.

“New Mexicans stand with the Ukrainian people,” said Heinrich. “With this bill, we are sending a clear message to Vladimir Putin: You reap what you sow. End this war, work to achieve lasting peace with Ukraine, or face the consequences. The United States must continue to stand with Ukraine as it defends its freedom, its people, and the democratic values we share.”

The bill now heads to the U.S. House of Representatives for consideration.

Specifically, the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act deprives Vladimir Putin of the revenue financing Russia’s war against Ukraine by imposing mandatory sanctions on Russia’s political leadership, financial institutions, energy sector, and sanctions evasion networks, while using narrowly scoped tariffs to pressure the world’s largest purchasers of Russian energy to reduce their dependence on Moscow.

The legislation is led by U.S. Senator Darline Graham (R-S.C.). Alongside Heinrich, the bill is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), James Risch (R-Idaho), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Katie Britt (R-Ala.), Angus King (I-Maine), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), John Curtis (R-Utah), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jon Husted (R-Ohio), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Alan Armstrong (R-Okla.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), David McCormick (R-Pa.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Jim Justice (R-W.Va.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), John Kennedy (R-La.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Ted Budd (R-N.C.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Thune (R-S.D.), and Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.).

The full text of the bill is here.

Heinrich has staunchly supported the Ukrainian people in their fight for freedom against Russia’s unjustified, unprovoked, and unlawful invasion.

Heinrich met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the U.S. Capitol last week and released a statement reaffirming his strong support for Ukraine.

In April 2025, Heinrich introduced legislation to impose primary and secondary sanctions on Russia and actors supporting Russia’s aggression in Ukraine.

As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Heinrich secured a provision in the Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24) Defense Appropriations Bill to include $300 million in funding for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.

In February 2024, Heinrich passed an aid package that would strengthen America’s national security by delivering aid to Ukraine.

In January 2024, Heinrich met with Ukrainian families living in Farmington, New Mexico, who fled their country following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Heinrich also has an extensive history of standing up to Russia and Russian interference in the United States, detailed here.

###",1,2026-08-08T05:41:38Z,2026-08-08T05:43:24Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-wyden-reintroduce-legislation-to-expand-pathways-to-health-careers-and-address-healthcare-provider-shortages,"Heinrich, Wyden Reintroduce Legislation to Expand Pathways to Health Careers & Address Healthcare Provider Shortages",2026-08-07,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — This National Health Center Week, U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, reintroduced their Pathways to Health Careers Act, legislation to create pathways to in-demand, high-quality healthcare careers and help address provider shortages in New Mexico, Oregon, and nationwide.

In New Mexico, 32 out of 33 counties are designated as Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) for primary care, behavioral health, and/or dental health. New Mexico needs at least an additional 5,000 healthcare workers to address the current provider shortage.

The Pathways to Health Careers Act aims to address this shortage by restarting and modernizing the Health Profession Opportunity Grant (HPOG) program, which has a proven track record of preparing workers for jobs in the healthcare industry by providing career coaching, job placement, and a range of other support services.

“The healthcare provider shortage in New Mexico isn’t theoretical. It’s an everyday reality. New Mexicans are being forced to either endure months-long appointment wait times or, if they can, paying the high costs of traveling out of state or going to the ER to get the health care they need, when they need it. Families in our state deserve better,” said Heinrich. “Our Pathways to Health Careers Act helps address the healthcare provider shortage by strengthening the pipeline to high-quality healthcare careers, to get more New Mexicans the care they need to live healthy lives.”

“In June 2026 alone, nearly 900 health care workers across 11 states were laid off due to Republicans’ shameful budget cuts,” said Wyden. “At a time when communities are facing health care workforce shortages, it has never been more important to invest in the next generation of health professionals. This legislation would provide families in Oregon and nationwide with the resources they need — including job training, childcare, transportation and more — to begin well-paying careers in health care.”

Companion legislation in the House is led by U.S. Representative Danny K. Davis (D-Ill.), Senior Democratic Member of the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee.

“Restoring and strengthening the Health Profession Opportunity Grant program will connect a new generation of workers with career pathways to in-demand health care jobs while addressing barriers to employment that too often prevent the full potential of our work force - especially women and people of color - from being realized,” said Davis.“Before its Republican-forced expiration, this proven initiative expanded economic opportunity for working families across America, which I saw first-hand in the work by Chicago State University. I am proud to lead this bill to create jobs and expand access to care with Senator Martin Heinrich, and I thank Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Richard E. Neal and my Democratic colleagues for their continued support of this critical program.”

Created by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Health Profession Opportunity Grant (HPOG) program stands out among other job training approaches because of its mix of career coaching, job placement, childcare, and post-employment support services included. The program aims to increase the number of qualified health professionals in rural, Tribal, and urban areas experiencing health professional shortages. Despite its success, the HPOG program expired in September 2021.

This bill would mandate that New Mexico receives a minimum of two HPOG awards. And further guarantees grant set asides for entities that are an Indian tribe, a Tribal organization, or a Tribal college or university.

The Pathways to Health Careers Act reauthorizes and modernizes the demonstration program by providing $435 million annually through 2031 to expand HPOG programs to every state in the country. The dozens of career pathways available through the HPOG program model include becoming a nurse, an emergency medical technician (EMT), a health information technician, a surgical technician, and beyond. The promising model includes:

A Career Pathway Approach: Apprenticeships, stackable credentials, and ongoing training to support advancement;

Work Supports: Childcare, transportation, stipends, work supplies, uniforms, and application fees; and

Case Management: Goal setting, mentoring and career coaching, education planning, interview coaching, and job placement.

To date, the HPOG program has served over 60,000 participants in 32 programs across 23 states.

The legislation is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and Michael Bennet (D-Col0.).

The legislation is endorsed by the University of New Mexico Health System.

“The healthcare workforce shortage is one of the most significant challenges facing our nation's health system. The Pathways to Health Careers Act invests in people who are ready to serve but often face financial and logistical barriers to entering the healthcare workforce. By supporting training alongside services like childcare, transportation and career coaching, this legislation helps build a stronger workforce and expands access to care where it is needed most,” said Michael Richards, MD, MPA, Executive Vice President of UNM Health Sciences and CEO of the UNM Health System.

A fact sheet of the bill is here.

The full text of the bill is here.

For more information on Heinrich’s work to expand opportunities for New Mexico workers, click here.

###",1,2026-08-08T05:41:38Z,2026-08-08T05:43:24Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-kaine-lead-legislation-to-expand-access-to-home-and-community-based-care-for-older-adults-and-people-with-disabilities/,"Luján, Kaine Lead Legislation to Expand Access to Home and Community-Based Care for Older Adults and People with Disabilities",2026-08-07,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced the Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Access Act, legislation to ensure older adults and people with disabilities have a real choice between receiving long-term care at home or in institutional settings. The legislation would make home and community-based care a mandatory Medicaid benefit, gradually eliminate waiting lists for services, strengthen the home and community-based care workforce, and provide greater support for family caregivers.

Under current Medicaid policy, many older adults and people with disabilities have access to nursing homes and other institutional care, but if they want to remain in their home and community, access to home and community-based services often depends on state waiver programs that can leave people waiting years — or even decades — for the care they need. The HCBS Access Act would expand access to home and community-based care and ensure that people who want to stay in their home and receive care can.

“Every American deserves the opportunity to receive care in the place they call home,” said Senator Luján. “Far too many older adults and people with disabilities are forced into getting care in a setting far from home, not because it’s what they want, but because it’s the only option they have. My legislation would give families the freedom to choose the care that best meets their needs, while strengthening the caregiving workforce and providing critical support for family caregivers.”

“Many Virginians want to age with dignity in their homes, where they can remain connected with their family, friends, and community,” said Senator Kaine. “The HCBS Access Act will help give millions of people the opportunity to receive essential at-home services, while boosting support for the family caregivers and direct care workers who make independent living possible. I’m proud to support this legislation to help put at-home care within reach for more Virginians.”

Specifically, the Home and Community-Based Services Access Act would:

Make HCBS a mandatory Medicaid benefit, ensuring eligible individuals can choose between receiving care at home or in an institutional setting.

Eliminate the need for administratively burdensome Medicaid HCBS waiver programs.

Increase federal Medicaid funding for home and community-based services.

Provide grants to help states expand their HCBS capacity and reduce waiting lists.

Strengthen the direct care workforce by improving job quality, stability, and workforce availability.

Support states in providing caregiving workers with stable, quality jobs and living wages.

Expand training and support for family caregivers.

Improve oversight and quality assurance for home and community-based services.

In addition to Luján and Kaine the HCBS Access Act is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), and Patty Murray (D-Wash.).

The Home and Community-Based Services Access Act is supported by Justice in Aging, National Health Law Program, PHI, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Caring Across, National Domestic Workers Alliance (NDWA), Autism Society of America, The Arc of the United States, Well Spouse Association, Little Lobbyists, Partnership for Inclusive Disaster Strategies, CommunicationFIRST, Independence Center, Cure SMA, Lakeshore Foundation, American Association on Health and Disability, Care in Action, National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities (NACDD), National Alliance for Caregiving, National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA), National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors (NACBHDD), Easterseals, Autism Speaks, ANCOR, ADAPT, and MomsRising.

Supporting quotes can be found here.

Full bill text is available here.

###",1,2026-08-08T05:41:38Z,2026-08-08T05:43:24Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-cosponsors-cows-act-to-reduce-greenhouse-emissions-support-sustainable-waste-practices,"Heinrich Cosponsors COWS Act to Reduce Greenhouse Emissions, Support Sustainable Waste Practices",2026-08-07,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) a member of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development and Food and Drug Administration today cosponsored the Converting Our Waste Sustainably Act (COWS Act) reintroduced by U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), a member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. The COWS Act would help producers reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air and water quality, and implement more sustainable alternative manure management practices. U.S. Representative Jim Costa (D-Calif.) introduced companion legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“New Mexico is the ninth-largest dairy milk producer in the country, and fifth in cheese production. It’s important that our dairy and livestock producers have access the innovative alternative manure management tools they need to be resilient, support our local economies, and help us keep healthy and nutritious food on our tables,” said Heinrich. “The COWS Act will help equip New Mexico producers with cost-effective sustainable manure management practices that protect our air and water while strengthening their operations for years to come.”

“As California continues to provide food for families across the country, it’s critical we equip our producers with resources and tools to ensure sustainable and cost-effective practices,” said Padilla. “Yet, today’s climate crisis demands that we adopt a more sustainable agricultural model. This bill would invest in long-term and low-cost pasture management treatments – ultimately supporting our family dairies, improving the quality of the air we breathe, protecting our environment, and keeping California’s cows happy.”

The COWS Act supports the adoption of manure management conservation practices, that will help the New Mexico livestock industry achieve three goals: (1) modernize technologies for manure management that help boost profitability; (2) improve water and soil quality; and (3) reduce methane and nitrogen oxide emissions by fostering climate-smart farming. The legislation also directs the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to prioritize awards for underserved communities and beginning farmers or ranchers.

Specifically, the COWS Act would:

This legislation is based on California’s Alternative Manure Management Program (AMMP), which was established in 2017 to support non-digester approaches to manage manure. The program has since supported 198 projects that are estimated to reduce 1.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent over five years.

In addition to Heinrich, this bill is cosponsored by U.S. Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

The COWS act is also similar to Section 505 of Senator Heinrich’s Agricultural Resilience Act, which proposes to create a stand-alone alternative manure management program at the USDA, as part of a larger more comprehensive package of programs and policies intended to help reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in U.S. agriculture by 2040.

The COWS Act is endorsed by California Dairies, California Dairy Campaign, Environmental Working Group, National Farmers Union, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, Milk Producers Council, and the National Milk Producers Federation.

“The COWS Act gives dairy farmers of all sizes practical tools to cut methane emissions, improve water quality, and generate valuable compost as an alternative to synthetic fertilizers. At a time when California dairies are under real economic pressure due to low milk prices and high input costs this kind of flexible, EQIP-backed support is exactly what family dairies need. The California Dairy Campaign is proud to support Senator Padilla’s leadership on this bill,” said Lynne McBride, Executive Director of California Dairy Campaign.

“Milk Producers Council strongly supports the COWS Act,” said Kevin Abernathy, General Manager of Milk Producers Council. “The science has shown that the implementation of post-conservation practices in the dairy ecosystem helps improve soil health, provides cleaner air and water, and leads to healthier animals. California’s Alternative Manure Management Program has been a model for smart conservation practices, and the COWS Act would help expand this model nationwide.”

“Dairy farmers do exceptional work on their farms to practice sound manure management, a critical conservation priority for maintaining healthy operations and protecting local land and water resources,” said Gregg Doud, President and CEO of National Milk Producers Federation. “Yet despite that leadership, oversubscribed conservation programs limit farmers’ access to the tools and support they need. Expanding these opportunities will recognize the great work farmers are already doing and improve their ability to innovate on a much greater scale. We thank Sens. Padilla, Schiff, and Heinrich for introducing the COWS Act, which will support the variety of manure management systems dairy farmers rely on.”

A one-pager of the bill is available here.

Full text of the bill is available here.

###",1,2026-08-13T06:17:16Z,2026-08-13T06:18:13Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-leads-letter-urging-doe-to-withdraw-proposed-rule-for-the-efficiency-standards-program-that-would-raise-energy-prices-for-american-families,Heinrich Leads Letter Urging DOE to Withdraw Proposed Rule for the Efficiency Standards Program that would Raise Energy Prices for American Families,2026-08-06,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, led a letter to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Chris Wright urging DOE to abandon a proposal that would hamstring its long-standing efficiency standards program—a move that could raise utility bills for American families by an estimated $150 a year.

DOE claims that the proposed revision to the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program process rule, issued in July 2026, would effectively end the federal program that has helped lower energy bills and improve the efficiency of home appliances for nearly 40 years.

Heinrich was joined by U.S. Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Catherine Cortez-Masto (D-Nev.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawai‘i), Angus King (I-Maine), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.).

“At a time when energy prices are skyrocketing, this administration should be focused on making energy affordable and increasing grid capacity — not hamstringing a program that has consistently reduced bills for American families,” the Senators began.

“Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates that existing standards have reduced total U.S. energy consumption by 6.5 percent and saved the average households $576 per year. By eliminating this program going forward, the Trump administration would increase utility bills for households by $150 each year, increase peak electricity demand by 32 gigawatts (GW) in 2040, and increase cumulative CO2 emissions by nearly 1 billion metric tons through 2050,” the Senators continued.

“The law requires DOE to adopt standards ‘designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy efficiency..., which the Secretary determines is technologically feasible and economically justified,’ and that results in ‘significant’ energy savings,” the Senators concluded. “The proposed rule undermines the letter and purpose of the appliance standards statute by the administration’s own admission: the rule is designed to “permanently end” appliance and equipment standards.”

The Senators concluded the letter urging Wright to withdraw the provision and implement the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program as Congress mandated.

Read the full text of the letter here and below:

Secretary Wright:

We write to express strong opposition to the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) proposed revision to the process rule for the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program. At a time when energy prices are skyrocketing, this Administration should be focused on making energy affordable and increasing grid capacity — not hamstringing a program that has consistently reduced bills for American families.

In July, DOE issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to “permanently end home appliance and equipment mandates.” This is concerning as energy efficiency standards save American families and businesses billions of dollars a year, and Congress explicitly directed DOE to carry out the program faithfully.

The efficiency standards program has been lowering utility bills and cutting emissions since the late 1980s — under Democratic and Republican Administrations alike. Since 1987, Congress has directed DOE to set efficiency standards for upwards of 60 products. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates that existing standards have reduced total U.S. energy consumption by 6.5 percent and saved the average households $576 per year. By eliminating this program going forward, the Trump Administration would increase utility bills for households by $150 each year, increase peak electricity demand by 32 gigawatts (GW) in 2040, and increase cumulative CO2 emissions by nearly 1 billion metric tons through 2050.

Under current statute, DOE is required to consider consumer impacts, manufacturer impacts, technological feasibility, and economic justification before finalizing a standard. The proposed rule would layer on needless additional requirements, including undue deference to industry-developed test procedures and an unlawful minimum savings threshold set at 2 quadrillion btus of source energy or 10% of a product’s total consumption. The law requires DOE to adopt standards ""designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy efficiency..., which the Secretary determines is technologically feasible and economically justified,"" and that results in ""significant"" energy savings. The proposed rule undermines the letter and purpose of the appliance standards statute by the administration’s own admission: the rule is designed to “permanently end” appliance and equipment standards.

We therefore urge you to withdraw the proposed rule and implement the program as Congress originally mandated.",1,2026-08-07T06:11:19Z,2026-08-07T06:12:42Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-lujan-leger-fernandez-introduce-legislation-to-protect-chama-watershed-from-uranium-mining,"Heinrich, Luján, Leger Fernández Introduce Legislation to Protect Chama Watershed from Uranium Mining",2026-08-06,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON– Today, U.S. Senator U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, and U.S. Representative Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources, introduced the Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act, legislation to permanently withdraw the federal lands of the Rio Chama Watershed in Northern New Mexico from all forms of location, entry, and patent under the mining laws.

The Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act responds directly to a proposal by the Canadian-based uranium company, Gamma Resources Ltd. to conduct exploratory uranium drilling in the Carson National Forest near Canjilon — the first step in the company’s publicly stated plan to extract uranium from a four-mile stretch of the Chama Basin. The bill will prevent new mining claims across the watershed, protecting the headwaters that sustain acequia communities, Tribal Nations, land grant communities, ranchers, and downstream water users throughout the Rio Grande system and ensuring these waters are never put at risk for the benefit of a speculative foreign mining venture.

“We will not allow a foreign mining company to threaten the Chama Watershed with radioactive uranium waste. That is unacceptable,” said Heinrich. “Our Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act sends a clear message: Back off. The Chama Watershed belongs to the acequia parciantes, Tribal communities, ranchers, and rural families who care for and depend on this landscape and its water — not a foreign mining company looking to exploit it for profit.”

“The communities of the Chama Valley – acequia farmers, Land Grant communities, Tribal members, ranchers, and rural families – have cared for their land and water for generations,” said Luján. “These cherished lands and waters must be protected for future generations. That is why I’m leading this legislation to permanently withdraw the Chama Watershed from mineral development. I remain committed to protecting the communities and waters of Northern New Mexico, and this legislation will do just that for generations to come.”

""New Mexicans know the true cost of uranium mining,” said Leger Fernández. “Across our state, abandoned uranium mines have poisoned our land, threatened our water, and harmed generations of families. Before anyone talks about opening another uranium mine, we should finish cleaning up the mess that was left behind. The Chama watershed is too precious to sell off to a foreign corporation. At a time when every drop of clean water matters, we should protect the rivers that sustain our communities—not open the door for a foreign mining corporation to profit from our public lands. The Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act protects our water, our people, and our future.""

Heinrich, Luján, and Leger Fernández have been fighting to protect communities in Northern New Mexico and the Chama Watershed from uranium mining and mineral development.

In April, Heinrich, Luján, and Leger Fernández wrote to Carson National Forest Supervisor James Duran expressing strong opposition to a proposal to conduct uranium drilling within the Carson National Forest.

Supporting quotes for the Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act can be found here.

The full text of the bill is here.

The boundary map of the withdrawal area is here.

###",1,2026-08-07T06:11:19Z,2026-08-07T06:12:42Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-nm-congressional-delegation-demand-answers-from-secretary-hegseth-on-the-dods-involvement-in-new-mexico-medical-plane-crash,"Heinrich, N.M. Congressional Delegation Demand Answers from Secretary Hegseth on the DoD’s Involvement in New Mexico Medical Plane Crash",2026-08-06,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and members of the N.M. Congressional Delegation, including U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) sent a letter demanding answers from U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Secretary Pete Hegseth on the Department’s involvement in and response to the tragic May 13, 2026, medical plane crash in Lincoln County, New Mexico.

Just before midnight on May 13, a Beechcraft King Air medical plane with a crew of four — two pilots and two flight nurses — took off from Roswell heading to Sierra Blanca Regional Airport in Ruidoso for patient pickup and transport to Albuquerque. According to reports, because the aircraft’s GPS was jammed by U.S. military activities in the region, the flight overshot their landing pattern by 10 miles, leading the plane to crash into the side of the Capitan Mountains. As a result, all four crew members died, and the crash sparked a wildfire that took three weeks to contain.

By the time that wildfire was contained, it had burned 31,860 acres and at its peak had over 1,000 personnel assigned utilizing 7 helicopters, numerous bulldozers, water tenders and fixed-wing air tankers. This fire was New Mexico’s first incident of the fire season that required a Complex Incident Management Team, and one of only two such complex fires this year. There were no structures lost but the fire forced evacuation orders that remained in place for several weeks, which cost taxpayers an estimated $37.7 million in fire suppression activities.

“By any account, this crash was tragic. While this is reportedly the first time GPS jamming activities by the U.S. military have caused or contributed to the crash of a civilian plane, that does little to comfort the families of those lost in that crash or impacted by the wildfire it triggered,” the lawmakers wrote to DoD Secretary Hegseth.

The lawmakers continued, “As the prevalence of drone warfare and electronic warfare grows globally and becomes central to our national defense, the risk of military and contractor activities disrupting civilian flights is likely to grow. In order to prevent future incidents and accidents, it is critical that we fully understand what happened on May 13 and 14, 2026, and what could have been done to prevent the accident.”

“If the DoD had not been jamming GPS in the region at the time of this crash it is very likely that the crash would have never occurred, four people would still be alive, and this wildfire would not have started. We owe those impacted by DoD’s actions transparency and action,” the lawmakers underscored.

In their letter, the N.M. Congressional Delegation urged Secretary Hegseth and the DoD to:

Fully cooperate with the National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) ongoing investigation into the crash;

Expeditiously develop systems and protocols, in concert with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), to prevent future, similar accidents; and

Work with the FAA and any other relevant agencies to fully implement recommendations from the NTSB.

The lawmakers concluded their letter by demanding answers on whether or not the DoD will compensate the victims' families, and compensate federal, state, county, and local agencies for the resources expended in the response to the crash and subsequent wildfire. Additionally, the N.M. Congressional Delegation inquired if the DoD is aware of any other incidents involving civilian aircraft that were impacted by GPS jamming activities surrounding NAVFEST or other DoD technologies.

The full text of the letter is here and below:

Dear Secretary Hegseth,

We write to you requesting answers on the Department of Defense’s (DoD) involvement in and response to the tragic May 13th medical plane crash in Lincoln County, New Mexico. This crash claimed the lives of all four on board the aircraft and sparked a wildfire that raged for three weeks and burned over 30,000 acres in the Capitan Mountain Wilderness area of the Lincoln National Forest.

On May 13, 2026, just before midnight a Beechcraft King Air medical plane with a crew of four, two pilots and two flight nurses, took off from Roswell, New Mexico heading to Sierra Blanca Regional Airport in Ruidoso, New Mexico, for patient pickup and transport to Albuquerque, New Mexico. Due to GPS jamming as part of the scheduled test event in the area, this routine medical ambulance flight overshot their landing pattern by 10 miles and crashed into the side of the Capitan Mountains at 12:15 AM on May 14th, destroying the plane, killing the four-member crew, and sparking a wildfire that took three weeks to contain.

By the time that wildfire was contained, it had burned 31,860 acres and at its peak had over 1000 personnel assigned utilizing 7 helicopters, numerous bulldozers, water tenders and fixed-wing air tankers. This fire was New Mexico’s first incident of the fire season that required a Complex Incident Management Team, and one of only two such complex fires this year. There were no structures lost but the fire forced evacuation orders that remained in place for several weeks, all of which had a huge cost to taxpayers with all fire suppression activities totaling an estimated $37.7 million.

By any account, this crash was tragic. While this is reportedly the first time GPS jamming activities by the U.S. military have caused or contributed to the crash of a civilian plane, that does little to comfort the families of those lost in that crash or impacted by the wildfire it triggered.

As the prevalence of drone warfare and electronic warfare grows globally and becomes central to our national defense, the risk of military and contractor activities disrupting civilian flights is likely to grow. In order to prevent future incidents and accidents, it is critical that we fully understand what happened on May 13 and 14, 2026, and what could have been done to prevent the accident. To that end, we urge DoD to fully cooperate with the National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) ongoing investigation into the crash. We also urge DoD to expeditiously develop systems and protocols, in concert with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), to prevent future, similar accidents. Upon completion of NTSB’s investigation, it is imperative that DoD also work with the FAA and any other relevant agencies to fully implement recommendations from NTSB.

We further request DoD’s responses to the following questions:

Will the DoD compensate the victims' families of this terrible accident?

Will the DoD compensate the federal, state, county, and local agencies for the resources expended in the response to the crash and subsequent wildfire?

Is the DoD aware of any other incidents involving civilian aircraft that were impacted by GPS jamming activities surrounding NAVFEST in May 2026?

Is the DoD aware of any other incidents involving civilian aircraft that were impacted by GPS jamming activities across the country prior to or after this incident that were unrelated to NAVFEST?

If the DoD had not been jamming GPS in the region at the time of this crash it is very likely that the crash would have never occurred, four people would still be alive, and this wildfire would not have started. We owe those impacted by DoD’s actions transparency and action.

Sincerely,

###",1,2026-08-07T06:11:19Z,2026-08-07T06:12:42Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-heinrich-leger-fernandez-introduce-legislation-to-protect-chama-watershed-from-uranium-mining/,"Luján, Heinrich, Leger Fernández Introduce Legislation to Protect Chama Watershed from Uranium Mining",2026-08-06,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Coalition of Local Leaders, Advocates, and Lawmakers Back Luján Push to Protect the Chama Watershed and Surrounding Communities in Northern New Mexico

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and U.S. Representative Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), a member of the House Committee on Natural Resources, introduced the Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act. The legislation would permanently withdraw the federal lands of the Rio Chama Watershed in Northern New Mexico from all forms of location, entry, and patent under the mining laws.

The Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act responds directly to a proposal by the Canadian-based uranium company, Gamma Resources Ltd. to conduct exploratory uranium drilling in the Carson National Forest near Canjilon — the first step in the company’s publicly stated plan to extract uranium from a four-mile stretch of the Chama Basin. The bill would prevent new mining claims across the watershed, protecting the headwaters that sustain acequia communities, Tribal Nations, land grant communities, ranchers, and downstream water users throughout the Rio Grande system and ensuring these waters are never put at risk for the benefit of a speculative foreign mining venture.

“The communities of the Chama Valley – acequia farmers, Land Grant communities, Tribal members, ranchers, and rural families – have cared for their land and water for generations,” said Senator Luján. “These cherished lands and waters must be protected for future generations. I will not stand by and allow a foreign mining company to threaten the communities of the Chama Valley and disregard the respect these communities deserve. That is why I’m leading this legislation to permanently withdraw the Chama Watershed from mineral development. I remain committed to protecting the communities and waters of Northern New Mexico, and this legislation will do just that for generations to come.”

“We will not allow a foreign mining company to threaten the Chama Watershed with radioactive uranium waste. That is unacceptable,” said Senator Heinrich, Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. “Our Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act sends a clear message: Back off. The Chama Watershed belongs to the acequia parciantes, Tribal communities, ranchers, and rural families who care for and depend on this landscape and its water — not a foreign mining company looking to exploit it for profit.”

“New Mexicans know the true cost of uranium mining,” said Congresswoman Leger Fernández. “Across our state, abandoned uranium mines have poisoned our land, threatened our water, and harmed generations of families. Before anyone talks about opening another uranium mine, we should finish cleaning up the mess that was left behind. The Chama watershed is too precious to sell off to a foreign corporation. At a time when every drop of clean water matters, we should protect the rivers that sustain our communities—not open the door for a foreign mining corporation to profit from our public lands. The Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act protects our water, our people, and our future.”

Senators Luján and Heinrich and Representative Leger Fernández have been fighting to protect communities in Northern New Mexico and the Chama Watershed from uranium mining and mineral development.

In June Senator Luján questioned Tom Schultz, Chief of the Forest Service, regarding the proposal to conduct uranium mining within the Carson National Forest by the Canadian-based uranium company, Gamma Resources Ltd. During the exchange, Senator Luján pressed Chief Tom Schultz on Gamma Resources Ltd. and emphasized his commitment to protect communities in Northern New Mexico and the Chama Watershed from uranium mining and mineral development in the region.

In May, Senator Luján convened local, state, and Tribal officials, community members, ranchers, farmers, acequia members and Land Grant Members to hear their concerns regarding the uranium drilling and mineral development proposal in the region. Senator Luján also toured the area that is being proposed for uranium drilling and mineral development in the region.

In April, Senators Luján and Heinrich and Representative Leger Fernández wrote to Carson National Forest Supervisor James Duran expressing strong opposition to a proposal to conduct uranium drilling within the Carson National Forest.

Supporting quotes for the Chama Basin Watershed Protection Act can be found here.

Full text of the bill can be found here.

The boundary map of the withdrawal area can be found here.

###",1,2026-08-07T06:11:19Z,2026-08-07T06:12:42Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-murray-advocates-sound-the-alarm-on-trumps-latest-attack-on-head-start-vow-to-save-head-start/,"Luján, Murray, Advocates Sound the Alarm on Trump’s Latest Attack on Head Start, Vow to Save Head Start",2026-08-06,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Earlier This Week, Luján Introduced Legislation to Support and Strengthen New Mexico’s Early Childhood Education Workforce

*** WATCH PRESS CONFERENCE HERE, DOWNLOAD HERE***

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), one of two Head Start graduates to serve in the U.S. Senate, joined U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, and advocates for a virtual press conference in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued today by the Department of Health and Human Services that guts Head Start by shredding basic standards that keep kids safe and advance their education. The rule removes most of Head Start’s 133 pages of requirements for math and literacy curriculums, class sizes, medical screenings, home visits and more.

“I know the value of Head Start, it got me to the U.S. Senate,” said Senator Luján. “Since President Trump took office, he and his administration have made it harder and harder for young children to get an early education. Now, he is moving forward with a proposed rule to gut Head Start and strip basic education, health, and safety standards our kids rely on. That is why I joined Senator Murray and advocates today and will continue to fight to protect Head Start.”

“Your child’s safety should not depend on their zip code. That has been the entire point of Head Start since 1965. If they wanted to serve more kids, they could ask Congress for more funding. I’d write that bill this afternoon. Instead, they’re saying they might be able to serve more children by promising each child less. Nobody should pretend this came out of nowhere. President Trump has all but declared war on Head Start,” said Senator Murray. “This rule is not final. There is a public comment period. I want parents to weigh in. I want teachers to weigh in. Because I have seen what happens when enough ordinary people refuse to let something get ripped away from them. And on my end: I will press administration officials when they come before Congress. I will sound the alarm as loudly as I possibly can. I will carry this fight into every negotiation I walk into. And Congress just funded Head Start at an increase, on a bipartisan basis, so let me be clear: Congress funds Head Start to be Head Start. Trump is coming after America’s kids. That is so unacceptable. This isn’t partisan. This is a program red and blue states rely on. Parents, teachers, and communities across America need to speak up and speak out—together we will beat this rule and save Head Start.”

Head Start currently serves over 750,000 kids nationwide, and the program has served more than 40 million children and their families nationwide since its inception in 1965. There are over 17,000 Head Start centers nationwide and these centers are particularly important in serving rural communities with fewer options for care.

Throughout his second term, President Trump has gutted the offices that keep Head Start centers and child care programs across the country running. Since taking office, the Trump administration has fired 40 to 50% of the staff at the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Head Start and Office of Child Care. In April of 2025, Trump continued to hollow out HHS, by shuttering five of the 10 regional offices for both Office of Child Care and Office of Head Start, which served 22 states and five territories. President Trump also illegally impounded funding provided by Congress for Head Start programs across America, in violation of the Impoundment Control Act (ICA).

Senator Luján has long fought to protect and defend Head Start. Senator Luján has led efforts to reverse the mass firings at Head Start, demanded action and answers regarding the disruption of Head Start programs, and pressed Trump administration nominees on cuts to Head Start.

###",1,2026-08-07T06:11:19Z,2026-08-07T06:12:42Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-republican-farm-bill-fails-to-meet-the-needs-of-new-mexico-families-and-farmers/,Luján: Republican Farm Bill Fails to Meet the Needs of New Mexico Families and Farmers,2026-08-06,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, issued the following statement after voting against advancing the Republican Farm Bill in committee:

“The Farm Bill must meet the needs of families and farmers in New Mexico and across America. This Republican bill fails to do so. We need a Farm Bill that addresses devastating cuts to SNAP and delays the cost shift to states while delivering the support families, farmers, and ranchers deserve.

“Unfortunately, during today’s markup, my Republican colleagues rejected efforts to strengthen the Farm Bill, including my CHILE Act to strengthen emergency assistance and provide much-needed aid to New Mexico’s chile, pecan, and other specialty crop growers.

“Farmers, ranchers, and families across the country are hurting. This is our opportunity to support families, strengthen rural America, and ensure our producers have the tools they need to succeed. I remain committed to working with my colleagues to advance a bipartisan Farm Bill that delivers for New Mexico and communities across the country.”

###",1,2026-08-07T06:11:19Z,2026-08-07T06:12:42Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-merkley-padilla-shaheen-schiff-rosen-cortez-masto-wyden-klobuchar-cftc-must-rein-in-wildfire-bets-on-prediction-markets,"Heinrich, Merkley, Padilla, Shaheen, Schiff, Rosen, Cortez Masto, Wyden, Klobuchar: CFTC Must Rein in Wildfire Bets on Prediction Markets",2026-08-05,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – This week, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate and Natural Resources Committee, joined U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) to press the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on its plans to crack down on prediction markets now offering event contracts for individuals to bet on wildfires.

As wildfires burn across the nation, the Senators are demanding action from the CFTC following the public safety and insider trading concerns of allowing prediction market platforms to offer bets on natural disasters such as wildfires.

“Offering bets on destructive wildfires threatens to minimize communities’ suffering all so the rich and powerful can profit,” the Senators wrote in a letter to CFTC Chair Michael Selig. “There’s also the heightened risk – according to state and local fire officials – that individuals could be tempted to commit arson in order to make sure their bets are successful. By offering contracts on fires, prediction market sites run the risk of encouraging people to influence fires that have already started, creating additional concerns around public safety and insider trading.”

The Senators pressed the CFTC to swiftly tackle unrestricted betting on wildfires and put in place common-sense guardrails to prevent gamblers from making a profit as wildfires threaten communities nationwide.

Heinrich has previously sounded the alarm on the dangers of prediction markets and the threat the industry poses to New Mexicans. Previously, he urged the leadership of the U.S. Senate Committees on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; and Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry to rein in prediction markets offering nationwide sports and event wagering, which abuse federal commodity and derivatives rules, infringe on state regulatory powers, and violate Tribal gaming rights and sovereignty.

Read the full text of the letter here and below:

Dear Chair Selig,

We write to express concern regarding the disturbing news that prediction markets are now offering event contracts for individuals to bet on wildfires. Prediction markets have been enabled to expand rapidly, increasingly inviting speculation on war, political violence, disasters, and public emergencies that raise ethical and public policy concerns. These markets risk creating perverse incentives, undermining public trust and commodifying human suffering in ways that warrant careful scrutiny.

Recent public reports have highlighted how Polymarket—the largest prediction market platform in the world—accepted more than $1.2 million in bets surrounding the Palisades and Eaton fires in January 2025. These fires devastated the Los Angeles area, claiming the lives of 31 people and destroying more than 16,000 structures. Another report even spotlighted the launch of a new prediction market platform that accepts only simulated bets on wildfires in California and whose slogan boasts, “You can’t predict fire, but you can trade on it.”

Offering bets on destructive wildfires threatens to minimize communities’ suffering all so the rich and powerful can profit. There’s also the heightened risk—according to state and local fire officials—that individuals could be tempted to commit arson in order to make sure their bets are successful. By offering contracts on fires, prediction market sites run the risk of encouraging people to influence fires that have already started, creating additional concerns around public safety and insider trading.

As the United States faces yet another record-breaking fire season this year, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) cannot allow these prediction markets to offer unrestricted betting on wildfires. While these bets appear to be offered only on the offshore Polymarket site, it is only a matter of time before other U.S. based Designated Contract Markets (DCMs) try to offer these. The CFTC must lead the charge to rein in these contracts in the U.S. and offshore and put in place common-sense guardrails to prevent people from profiting as wildfires threaten communities.

As such, we request you provide answers to the following questions by August 14, 2026:",1,2026-08-06T07:37:31Z,2026-08-06T07:38:34Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-whitehouse-call-for-interior-inspector-general-investigation-into-trump-administrations-handling-of-failed-lincoln-memorial-reflecting-pool-project,"Heinrich, Whitehouse Call For Interior Inspector General Investigation into Trump Administration's Handling of Failed Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Project",2026-08-05,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, sent a letter requesting that the Department of the Interior (DOI) Deputy Inspector General Caryl Brzymialkiewicz investigate what Department officials knew – and when they knew it – about engineering failures at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and whether DOI employees withheld evidence from federal prosecutors.

The request follows explosive new court filings from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, which moved to dismiss felony vandalism charges against the three-time Olympian David Hearn after acknowledging that DOI had failed to provide prosecutors with information showing the Reflecting Pool’s lining was already peeling because of a rushed and flawed installation process before Hearn was arrested.

“We write to request that the Office of Inspector General investigate what employees of the Department of the Interior (DOI) knew—and when they knew it—regarding the peeling of the coating and other engineering issues at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. On July 31, 2026, the U.S. Attorneys’ Office for the District of Columbia (USAO-DC) filed a voluntary motion to dismiss felony vandalism charges against David Hearn, noting in its pleading that documents it received from DOI after the indictment ‘indicated a rushed and flawed installation process, with repeated failures of the lining during the installation process, and extensive peeling of the lining throughout the Reflecting Pool.’ Additional details provided in the motion—and prior (and continuing) contradictory statements by DOI leadership — deserve immediate scrutiny,’” the Senators began.

The Senators note that the DOJ’s filing states prosecutors relied on incomplete and faulty information from DOI and only obtained critical evidence after repeatedly requesting documents from the Department. According to the filing, had DOI disclosed information already in its possession, prosecutors never would have sought a grand jury indictment against Hearn. The filing further reveals that a National Park Service engineer alerted DOI officials on June 11 – eight days before Hearn’s arrest – that the Reflecting Pool’s new lining was already peeling.

“These events, and the information and documents that DOI apparently possesses that remain non-public, provide ample predicate for an investigation by your office. Numerous questions remain: How was the vandalism lie cooked up? How did it get to President Trump’s desk? Or did it originate from the White House? What knowledge of the peeling did DOI employees (including DOI leadership) possess, when did they possess it, and what were their respective roles? Who received and was copied on the June 11 email thread? Why did DOI hold relevant documents from USAO-DC?” the Senators pressed, raising questions about what DOI officials knew, who was aware of the engineering failures, why key information was withheld from prosecutors, and whether senior Department officials continued to promote false claims even after evidence contradicted them.

The Senators concluded their letter urging the Interior Inspector General to investigate DOI’s knowledge of the coating failures and whether DOI employees intentionally withheld evidence from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, “Accordingly, we urge your office to open an immediate investigation into DOI’s knowledge of coating and peeling issues with the Reflecting Pool—including what was known, who knew it, and when they knew it—and whether DOI employees intentionally withheld evidence from USAO-DC.”

The request builds on Heinrich's June oversight letter demanding answers from Secretary Burgum after the Reflecting Pool rehabilitation project spiraled from an estimated $1.5-2 million to more than $16 million, noting that the issues facing the reflecting pool were not simply maintenance concerns, but failures in project execution and government oversight.

The full letter is available here and below.

Dear Deputy Inspector General Brzymialkiewicz:

We write to request that the Office of Inspector General investigate what employees of the Department of the Interior (DOI) knew—and when they knew it—regarding the peeling of the coating and other engineering issues at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. On July 31, 2026, the U.S. Attorneys’ Office for the District of Columbia (USAO-DC) filed a voluntary motion to dismiss felony vandalism charges against David Hearn, noting in its pleading that documents it received from DOI after the indictment “indicated a rushed and flawed installation process, with repeated failures of the lining during the installation process, and extensive peeling of the lining throughout the Reflecting Pool.” Additional details provided in the motion—and prior (and continuing) contradictory statements by DOI leadership—deserve immediate scrutiny.

Here are the relevant facts surrounding the Reflecting Pool renovations and subsequent arrests:

In April 2026, the Trump administration launched a project to seal seams and re-coat the basin bottom of the Reflecting Pool, estimating costs at $1.5 to $2 million. To complete the work, the administration entered into two no-bid contracts on April 3 and 13, respectively, with Atlantic Industrial Coatings (AIC) and Greenwater Services.

During April and May 2026, the project ran into various delays and the scope of work expanded as contractors discovered complications. Costs also began to balloon, eventually reaching more than $16 million.

On May 7, 2026, President Trump visited the Reflecting Pool, and his motorcade drove directly over the drained, coated basin. DOI Secretary Doug Burgum joined President Trump.

On June 4, 2026, the administration announced that the re-coating was complete and crews would begin refilling the pool.

On June 10, 2026, observers and news media began noting algal blooms in the pool water, and maintenance crews used hydrogen peroxide to clear the algae.

On June 18, 2026, news outlets first reported that the Reflecting Pool’s new coating had begun to peel.

On June 19, 2026, three-time Olympian David Hearn was arrested and charged with felony vandalism after he reached into the pool and touched a piece of peeling paint.

Also on June 19, 2026, President Trump first posed on Truth Social that there were “some real problems with Vandalism at the beautiful Reflecting Pool.” He repeated the claims on June 20, 2026, adding that vandals had made a 250-foot long gash. And on June 23, 2026, he increased his claims to a “350 foot gash, made by a very sharp knife or razors,” but indicated that the length was the combined total of multiple smaller gashes. He provided no evidence.

New information in the court documents filed on July 31, 2026, provides the basis for this request. USAO-DC attorneys, including U.S. Attorney Jeannine Pirro, filed a voluntary motion to dismiss the felony charges against Mr. Hearn. In their motion, the attorneys explicitly stated they had relied on incomplete and faulty information provided by DOI in bringing the charges:

DOI provided less than fulsome information at the outset of this case. However, the information subsequently demanded by USAO disclosed by DOI—which was not known to the prosecutors or the grand jury before the return of the indictment—strongly suggest that a rushed and botched installation by AIC, the primary contractor, led to the damage to the lining of the Reflecting Pool. It was not until USAO-DC repeatedly reached out to DOI dozens and dozens of times that DOI slowly started trickling information to USAO-DC. Had DOI been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment.

Among other things, the motion to dismiss included the revelation that, on June 11, 2026, “a[] [National Park Service] engineer was alerted to peeling of the Reflecting Pool lining. He sent an email at 12:00 p.m. that day to other NPS and DOI personnel detailing the [peeling].” This June 11, 2026, email was sent 8 days before the arrest of Mr. Hearn.

Furthermore, the withholding of this exculpatory information walked DOJ lawyers into a violation of their Brady and Giglio obligations. Brady v. Maryland held that due process requires prosecutors to disclose to the accused all “favorable” and exculpatory evidence that is “material” to their case. Giglio v. United States requires that prosecutors disclose information about a government witness that could undermine that witness’s credibility, a requirement echoed in D.C. law, court rules, and the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. These disclosures protect “the defendant’s right to a fair trial” and “ensure that a miscarriage of justice does not occur.”

These events, and the information and documents that DOI apparently possesses that remain non-public, provide ample predicate for an investigation by your office. Numerous questions remain: How was the vandalism lie cooked up? How did it get to President Trump’s desk? Or did it originate from the White House? What knowledge of the peeling did DOI employees (including DOI leadership) possess, when did they possess it, and what were their respective roles? Who received and was copied on the June 11 email thread? Why did DOI hold relevant documents from USAO-DC?

These questions, and any attendant questions, are all squarely within the purview of the DOI IG. Investigation by your office is especially warranted given that DOI’s leadership continues to advance President Trump’s false claims notwithstanding the admissions in USAO-DC’s motion to dismiss; indeed, a day after USAO-DC filed that motion, Secretary Burgum tweeted: “The evidence is clear, vandals have repeatedly caused damage to the Reflecting Pool.”

Accordingly, we urge your office to open an immediate investigation into DOI’s knowledge of coating and peeling issues with the Reflecting Pool—including what was known, who knew it, and when they knew it—and whether DOI employees intentionally withheld evidence from USAO-DC.

We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to your findings.",1,2026-08-06T07:37:31Z,2026-08-06T07:38:34Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-champions-legislation-to-strengthen-stroke-prevention-treatment-and-recovery/,"Luján Champions Legislation to Strengthen Stroke Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery",2026-08-05,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), a stroke survivor, introduced the Stroke Act, legislation to improve stroke prevention, treatment, recovery, and data collection across the United States. The legislation would invest in research, strengthen emergency response and rehabilitation services, expand access to telestroke care, establish a national stroke registry, and launch a nationwide public education campaign to help people recognize stroke symptoms and seek lifesaving treatment.

Stroke remains one of the nation’s most pressing public health challenges. Someone in the United States experiences a stroke every 40 seconds, making stroke the fourth-leading cause of death and a leading cause of serious long-term disability. Rapid identification and treatment significantly improve survival and recovery outcomes, yet the quality and availability of stroke care continue to vary across communities. These disparities are particularly severe in rural and underserved areas, where patients often face limited access to specialized stroke care, rehabilitation services, coordinated systems of care, and telestroke technology.

“Every second matters when someone experiences a stroke. As a stroke survivor, I know firsthand how critical it is to receive the right care at the right time. Yet far too many Americans, especially in our rural and underserved communities, continue to face barriers to timely, high-quality care,” said Senator Luján. “My Stroke Act invests in research, strengthens emergency response systems, and equips communities with the tools they need to improve stroke care from prevention through recovery. This legislation will help save lives, reduce preventable disability, and ensure more Americans can access the care they need when every minute counts.”

“This legislation would increase our understanding of stroke care, improve the quality of stroke treatment delivered to communities nationwide and ultimately save lives,” said Mark Schoeberl, Executive Vice President of Advocacy of the American Heart Association. “Someone dies of a stroke every 3 minutes and 14 seconds in the United States, yet many strokes can be prevented, and recognizing the warning signs can help save lives. We thank Sen. Luján for turning his personal experience with stroke into action by championing this legislation.”

Specifically, the Stroke Act would:

Authorize $3 million annually for five years for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to support research on improving stroke care, including post-acute and emergency room care.

Authorize $10 million annually for five years for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to establish and maintain a national stroke registry that supports standardized, confidential data collection across states.

Authorize $10 million annually for five years for CDC grants to strengthen systems of stroke care by improving emergency medical services training, pre-hospital protocols, post-stroke rehabilitation, care coordination, and access to telestroke services.

Authorize $2 million annually for five years for CDC to conduct a national stroke prevention and education campaign focused on helping Americans recognize stroke symptoms and seek immediate medical treatment.

The legislation is endorsed by the American Heart Association, Adult Congenital Heart Association, and the American Stroke Association.

The Stroke Act is cosponsored by Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and U.S. Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.).

Full bill text is available here.

###",1,2026-08-06T07:37:31Z,2026-08-06T07:38:34Z
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-introduces-legislation-to-support-and-strengthen-new-mexicos-early-childhood-education-workforce/,Luján Introduces Legislation to Support and Strengthen New Mexico’s Early Childhood Education Workforce,2026-08-05,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Ben Ray Luján,L000570,www.lujan.senate.gov,lujan,https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/?jsf=jet-engine:press-list,scraper,"Introduction Comes as Trump Looks to Gut Critical Early Childhood Education Programs Like Head Start

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) – one of two Head Start graduates to serve in the U.S. Senate – introduced the Early Childhood Educator Professional Improvement Act of 2026, legislation to strengthen our nation’s early childhood workforce by creating a federal grant program for states to prepare, develop and support early childhood educators. U.S. Representative Grace Meng (D-N.Y.) leads companion legislation in the House of Representatives.

Early childhood educators are essential to children’s learning and development, yet challenges continue to strain the workforce and reduce access to child care for families. The Early Childhood Educator Professional Improvement Act would strengthen the early childhood workforce by investing in professional development, expanding career pathways, and improving educator recruitment and retention.

“As one of only two Senators who attended Head Start, I know firsthand the lasting impact early childhood education can have on a child’s future,” said Senator Luján. “To ensure our next generation is prepared for success, we must invest to support and strengthen our early childhood workforce. I’m proud to champion this legislation to strengthen the early childhood workforce in New Mexico and across the country by expanding career pathways, professional development, and the support educators need.”

The Early Childhood Educator Professional Improvement Act specifically would:

Establish a five-year, renewable state grant program to support comprehensive early childhood professional development systems.

Require states to develop and submit a workforce plan in partnership with key stakeholders—including State Advisory Councils on Early Childhood Education, State Education Agencies, Head Start State Directors, institutions of higher education, and early childhood educator organizations—that outlines educator standards, career pathways, higher education partnerships, workforce data, and long-term sustainability strategies.

Require states to use grant funding to:

Provide scholarships for early childhood educators pursuing bachelor’s degrees in early childhood education or related fields.

Help educators with degrees in other fields earn early childhood credentials or licensure.

Increase compensation for educators while they complete degree programs and ensure pay parity after degree completion.

Expand professional development focused on child development, teacher-child interactions, family engagement, and culturally responsive practices.

“Supporting our educators is the best and most meaningful investment we can make in our shared future. Thank you to the leaders behind this valuable and important initiative.” – The Teacher Salary Project

“The Early Care and Education Consortium (ECEC) commends Senator Luján and Representative Meng for championing the Early Childhood Educator Professional Improvement Act of 2026. This legislation makes much-needed investments in early childhood educators’ higher education, professional development, and compensation, including scholarships, clear pathways to credentials and degrees, and wage parity for those who advance their education, which will help address high turnover, recruitment and retention challenges, and the shrinking teacher pipeline. Well-prepared and fairly compensated early childhood educators are essential to the success of our schools, our workforce, and our society.” – The Early Care and Education Consortium (ECEC)

The Early Childhood Educator Professional Improvement Act is cosponsored by U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).

The Early Childhood Educator Professional Improvement Act is supported by: The National Association for Family Child Care, AACTE (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education), National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), Early Care & Education Consortium, Educators for Excellence, Public Advocacy for Kids (PAK), and the Teacher Salary Project.

Full bill text is available here.

###",1,2026-08-06T07:37:31Z,2026-08-06T07:38:34Z
https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/icymi-ranking-member-heinrich-and-energy-secretary-granholm-interview-with-heatmap-news-on-energy-costs-permitting-reform-and-ai-data-centers,"ICYMI: Ranking Member Heinrich and Energy Secretary Granholm Interview with Heatmap News on Energy Costs, Permitting Reform, and AI Data Centers",2026-08-04,2026,2026-08,Democrat,Senate,NM,Martin Heinrich,H001046,www.heinrich.senate.gov,heinrich,https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases,scraper,"WASHINGTON – During an interview with Heatmap News’ Robinson Meyer, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, was joined by former U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm to discuss President Trump’s actions that are skyrocketing gas and energy costs on families and small businesses, permitting reform, Heinrich’s Grid Connection and Congestion Management Act, AI data centers, and lessons learned from the Inflation Reduction Act.

“This is an administration that has chosen to take actions that have negatively impacted prices in so many different sectors. And I hear about that at the grocery store, at the gas station, wherever I go. Energy prices are going up across the board,” said Heinrich.

“What Democrats should always keep in their minds is that you cannot create and manage the energy transition on the backs of consumers,” continued Heinrich. “They already have their plates full. They're doing everything they can to make our economy work. We can't ask them to do more, especially in this environment. That doesn't mean we quit managing that transition, and it just means we can't ask consumers to pay for it.”

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, answers questions on energy costs, permitting reform, AI data centers, and the Inflation Reduction Act, August 3, 2026.

On President Trump’s War with Iran and High Gas Prices

Meyer asked, “Yesterday, Defense Secretary, as it were, announced that the cost of Iran was $37 billion, and we've already seen fuel prices go up. I know you wanted to start the conversation by talking about the huge spikes in energy costs that your constituents have seen, and I just wanted to ask at the beginning, you know, what are you hearing here? Because it does seem to me that at this point, there was an initial spike after the war, went back down, and now they're steadily climbing up again, and so you know, obviously New Mexico is also a producing state. But what are you hearing?”

Heinrich answered, “Just that people are feeling the pinch on energy prices everywhere, and it's across all forms of energy. This is an administration that has chosen to take actions that have negatively impacted prices in so many different sectors. So, you know what they're doing in the electricity sector by not permitting all this new generation that is just waiting to be connected to the grid – that's raising electricity prices. You have the war in Iran, which has constrained international oil and gas supplies, and that is raising both natural gas, gasoline, and also diesel costs. And that diesel cost is really important because the reality is, once you run up the cost of diesel, then you see that every place that things move, you see it immediately in the grocery store because it costs more to move food from one part of the country to the other. You see it in building supply prices. What they're doing, making old coal plants that are ready to shut down stay on the grid, that actually costs money, and those costs are being passed on to consumers in those places. No matter where you look in the energy map, what they're doing is increasing costs. And I hear about that at the grocery store, at the gas station, wherever I go. Really, it's like energy prices are going up across the board.”

Meyer turned to Granholm, “Secretary Granholm, I'm curious. You know, at this point, we've had about a year and a half of watching the new Department of Energy in action... but I want to start by asking what has stood out to you about how it's operating, what you don't like, and maybe one thing you like, if there's anything.”

Granholm answered, “I will say, you know, there was a big diaspora of the team, an incredibly smart team that had to leave, or that chose to leave because of some of the things they're describing. I will say I'm going to give you a silver lining on some of this because I really do think that the actions of this administration unintentionally caused a rush to clean energy and other solutions. So the old triple B, the One Big Beautiful Bill, didn't take away the tax credits. It used to be solar plus storage. Solar plus storage. Now it's solar plus storage, and you know it's great that those tax credits still exist, and you're seeing developers really take advantage of it. Putting a cliff on when those tax credits, when the solar tax credits and land tax credits expired, obviously caused a rush for developers to build up, so the amount of gigawatts that are being added to the grid, I mean, it’s so ironic. At the end of 2024, when we added almost 60 gigawatts of clean power to the grid and batteries, we thought that was going to be the top because of what the administration knew. But the unintended consequences of this action is that this huge rate of gigawatts, added to the grid of clean power and batteries. Amazing, amazing. So I'm glad that some of that foundation is still existing. The private sector even understands the importance of this move, and I will say because of the war, you know, it only accelerates the move toward non-fossil fuel, people with local powers, energy sovereignty, and that means clean power.”

Heinrich followed, “And we've seen other economies accelerate those shifts, seeing what's going on in the Strait of Hormuz, and in some cases, in China's case, really anticipating it, moving large portions of their economy from molecules to electricity.”

Meyer asked, “Do you have any theories? I'm injecting this, but do you have any theories for why? I feel like after the Strait of Hormuz closed, there were doomsday predictions about where oil would go, and obviously oil prices increased significantly, but they didn't hit $150 or $22 a barrel. Do you have any theories about why that is?”

Heinrich answered, “It's a couple of things. There's more buffer in the system than we used to have. China built up big reserves ahead of time. There are the commercial reserves. There's the strategic petroleum reserve. We haven't exhausted those buffers, so that really has worked to mitigate. You know, prices are bad. It's just not as bad as some of the predictions are. We're not at the bottom now because the Strait’s closed again, and those commercial reserves are now, after a little bump when the MOU happened and was announced, they're ticking back down, and there is a point at which the system stops working like it's designed to work. You need a certain amount of oil in the system, and we're getting closer to that than I think any of us. And then you're one hurricane away from really bad prices.”

On Permitting Reform and the Grid Connection and Congestion Management Act

Meyer asked, “So obviously, one way to lower prices, or one potential way to lower prices over the long term, is permitting reform. I know you're in negotiations right now about a deal here. So can you give us an update on where that stands?”

Heinrich answered, “I don't want to get in the weeds on it because the negotiations are actually very active right now, but I do think there's a path there, and I think both Republican and Democratic leaders in the relevant committees want to get to yes on permitting. I think the biggest wild card is actually the White House because the White House continues to do things that sort of poison the well. They did that with the Historic Preservation Act new regulations this week. They've done that with stop-work orders on offshore wind, with the Department of Defense stopping the process of processing very straightforward onshore wind permitting projects on public lands. Time and time again, they have entered this debate in ways that have not been healthy, that haven't been helpful for getting a product across the line. We're working hard. We're trying to negotiate, you know, a middle ground, but I worry about the impact of the White House.”

Granholm followed, “The utter frustration about waiting for Congress, you know, present company exempted, to get permitting reform done suggests that there may be another path, and you know I know that there is an effort on the part of hyperscalers or AI companies to look at how can AI do this instead of waiting for Congress. So, for example, I think you probably covered this: the effort that Google has, through tapestry at PJM, the notion that you should be able to take the interconnection queue and move it more quickly because you can do concurrent studies, et cetera, rather than all these consecutive wait in line blah blah blah, and if you can do that there, or if you can do it with permitting and respect the intent of NEPA or the National Historic Preservation Act, and use AI to get some of this done and accelerate, then you might end up leapfrogging over Congress, which doesn't mean that you shouldn't be doing it. But I just worry that...”

Heinrich interjected, “I do think that the interconnection queues are a perfect place to apply machine learning, AI, advanced modeling, and we had all five FERC commissioners in front of us today on the Energy Natural Resources Committee. And one of the commissioners walked through an example where they were able to do, historically, what had been an over 600-day analysis of adding this generation to the grid became a 10-day process, and so we should absolutely do all that. I still think we're going to need to reform permitting and be able to get to yes or no faster and make sure that those permits flow.”

Granholm followed, “Your mouth to God's ears.”

Meyer stated, “I do wonder, with the AI acceleration of permitting, it seems like there are a lot of places to speed things up. It also seems like it's only so long until we are already used to these massive dockets and huge studies for a lot of energy projects or infrastructure projects. It does seem like AI only increases the ability to expand those dockets and make every study bigger and allow more people to file more documents that then have to be reviewed. It just seems like a both ways thing, but maybe...”

Granholm followed, “But hopefully, at least you can truncate the amount of time that is. It should not take 10 years for a transmission, or 17 in your case, it's insane.”

Heinrich followed, “There's only so much capital in that world, and so many competent developers I think it will generate additional demand, but the advantage of being able to do modeling quickly is really, it seems like, a very unlinear advantage. I think we're going to see a lot of, of juice for the squeeze from that.”

Granholm followed, “I love what you have introduced, though, the [Grid] Connect[ion] and [Congestion] Manage[ment] Act. Can I ask him this question? You probably have that on your list, but I mean, describe what that is because it's so smart to be able to jump the queue essentially if you agree to certain conditions.”

Heinrich answered, “I mean, we've always been modeling based on what's the worst-case scenario, what's the worst hour of the worst month when in the middle of July everybody's coming home and turning on their air conditioning at the same time. There are vast stretches of time when the grid just has a lot more capacity, and so what our bill says is, if you will commit to curtail power when the grid is full, you can just plug into the grid, and we'll let you sell power whenever the grid still has excess capacity, but you're going to have to dial it down when it doesn't have that capacity, and so that's something that we've seen work in ERCOT, and I think has huge potential for getting a lot more generation on the grid quickly if we apply that nationally.”

Meyer asked, “Do you anticipate a law like that or some kind of policy like that being in the permitting reform field this year, or is that a future policy you'd like to see?”

Heinrich answered, “We’ll have the conversation. We're rolling this out obviously late in the game, and I'm a big believer in get what you can done in any given Congress. Don't wait for the next Congress and think it's all going to be perfect. It never is around here, so we'll get everything we can done in this Congress. That's my position, and if that's not part of the mix, then of course we're going... permitting reform is not going to go away.”

Meyer pressed, “And then one more on this, just because I have a news responsibility, which is, where do we like? What would a timeline look like? I once heard the timeline was, you'd want to see text by August recess, but that's pretty soon.”

Heinrich answered, “We're very thick in the negotiations right now, and whether or not we could land something before August, I'm not going to speculate. But my goal has always been just to get something out of this Congress. I don't care when that happens, but I'd like to get a product out of this Congress.”

On the Implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act and Energy Costs

Meyer asked, “Secretary Granholm, I wonder what, watching now 18 months of the Trump administration, you think, you know ‘we should have done this differently when during the Biden administration,’ or ‘there's an issue here that I would have handled differently,’ or now that I see what's happened and how they've approached governing.”

Granholm answered, “Yeah, it's such a, it's a great question because I think every one of the cabinet officials looks at what has happened in the Trump administration and says, ‘Man, I should have broken more eggs, not more laws, but I should have like really insisted on much more quicker,’ you know, all the negotiations that took forever on, you know, getting the Treasury guidelines and all of that. It was like a cannonball should have dropped through, and I think that's a good lesson that will be taken away for the next administration.”

Meyer pressed, “And why didn't it happen?”

Granholm answered, “Because there's process, because there's lawyers. I mean, there was a sense that this is the way you do things, et cetera.”

Heinrich interjected, “And we accepted that status quo.”

Granholm continued, “Yeah, we all accepted it.”

Heinrich interjected, “And we shouldn’t have. We should have built programs that don't take two years of analysis, and that is definitely the lesson that I took from the rapid... the things that were fairly straightforward, like the tax credits, were able to move quickly. But there were whole programs like the green bank that got stood up just in time to be turned off.”

Meyer asked, “Is that a drafting failure or an implementation failure?”

Granholm answered, “I mean, to be fair, there was a lot in implementation, but there are a lot of rules around all of this that have certain timelines, et cetera. So I think taking a look at all of that. I mean, Democrats have been very-we're going to follow the rules, and we're not going to bust. You know, we're not going to break norms. And I think this administration has broken a lot of norms and shown that you can get stuff done more quickly. Not likely they've been done quickly, but nonetheless, I think it's a lesson for us about challenging the status quo.”

Meyer asked, “On energy costs. I want to just observe a kind of interesting dynamic here, which is that I think as Trump has taken steps that have driven up energy costs, I think we all agree it's making costs higher than they would be otherwise. Certainly, the Iran War, likely the permitting obstacles that they put up to wind and solar, tariffs. He has driven up. I think his administration has driven up energy costs, and we hear a lot from Democrats about how that's bad. It does seem a little bit to me like there's a bit of an effort to play both sides because I think when right now Trump is doing things that are driving up costs and costs are going up and everyone agrees that's bad. Democrats get in office and they have a lot of different goals for the energy system. Some are procedural and some are about environmental goals, and that tends to slow things down. People take a long time to approve, say, oil and gas permits. And so, do you think that watching this experience, you know, watching the Trump administration, the Democrats are now ready to embrace or looking at, let's say, an affordability-first or affordability-only agenda, where it's like we'll take clean, we'll take fossil, we'll take whatever, as long as costs are low.”

Heinrich answered, “I think what Democrats should always keep in their minds is that you cannot create and manage the energy transition on the backs of consumers. They already have their plates full. They're doing everything they can to make our economy work. We can't ask them to do more, especially in this environment. That doesn't mean we quit managing that transition; it just means we can't ask consumers to pay for it.”

Granholm answered, “But if we're to be honest, the cheapest energy is clean energy, and so if you want to go cheap, then let abundant clean energy be prolific and deployed throughout the land, and it will bring the rates down.”

Meyer pressed, “Let me just push back a little and say I think watching, let's say, the Trump administration revoke permits and block permits and block construction for wind and solar, it does put you in mind of the Keystone XL pipeline, which was not necessarily an affordability project, but which Democrats did block. Now, it was, there were good climate reasons to block it…”

Heinrich interjected, “But it was also an export project, and the reality is exports raise costs. They just do. You can export a certain amount of natural gas, and that can be okay, but when you hit a certain threshold, you're going to start to see natural gas prices increase, and that's why we built into those exports the fact that the Secretary of Energy is supposed to sign off on a project by project basis. It wasn't meant to be infinite, because if you do make it infinite, eventually exports, by virtue of those exports, you're actually going to raise domestic prices for both consumers and for manufacturers, and they've taken the opposite approach, which is let's export as much as we can. At a certain point, you see that have an impact on the costs and on the jobs that those manufacturers create, right?”

Granholm followed, “Right. The studies that have been shown, I mean, it's the question of supply and demand, right? If, in fact, the capacity fills everything that's been authorized, you will have double the amount of exports of natural gas. Even though we have such an abundant supply of natural gas in this country, that is going to put upward pressure on prices.”

Heinrich interjected, “It connects us to the international price market, and we've seen this this before in places like Australia. We don't want to be connected to that because those prices are much higher. There's more advantage in having moderate prices here that can that can really incentivize good jobs in things like manufacturing.”

On AI Data Centers

Meyer asked, “Secretary Granholm, I wonder, we've seen this explosion — I feel like, just dated almost to when the Biden-Trump transition happened in AI data centers and in electricity demand — I know you're working, you're thinking about these issues right now. So, I guess take us to the end of your time in government versus what's happened since then. And was this scale of demand forecasted?”

Granholm answered, “No, no. I mean, even, I mean, you guys noticed, noted that Bloomberg New Energy Finance increased their projection, their forecast, for how many gigawatts are going to be necessary to feed the beast by 2035, and just from December of last year, of you know 2025 to now, it has increased by 80 percent. I mean, it's just, it's voracious the appetite for power. So it is really quite astonishing. Now, will all of that come to fruition? Will the chips be more efficient? Are these going to be sited because of the NIMBY issues? All of those are legitimate questions. But if the demand projections are accurate, it is going to require a massive amount of buildout of power.”

Meyer asked, “What's the right way to make sure as much of that power is as green as possible? Because I think right now it's going to be met by gas. Now maybe that's...”

Granholm answered, “Maybe, or maybe not. I mean, is that the smart way to go? When I mean, you know, it's mind-blowing to me a little bit that there's all this assumption that it's all going to be natural gas, when first of all you have to have the infrastructure for natural gas, or you have to build it out. It takes a lot of time to build out that infrastructure. Secondly, the wait for natural gas turbines, as everybody knows, is years. So the time frame of getting natural gas turbines and a natural gas plant is long, whereas the time frame for getting solar and batteries you can get within months, say, rather than years, so I don't necessarily buy the fact. Maybe natural gas ends up being a backup power. Maybe the, you know, bloom energy, et cetera, ends up being your backup source. But even that, when you look at the technology associated with long duration energy storage and how that is really coming to bear, I mean, there's, you know, example after example of that, or you know, geothermal, enhanced geothermal. There's any number of solutions that end up being clean and don't incur the wrath of citizens as much as fossil fuel solutions.”

Heinrich answered, “It’s worth considering, too, that if we do see the level, the scale of natural gas generation that some people are proposing, it will markedly increase the cost of gas for other uses. So, if your house electricity is generated by natural gas, those prices are going to go up. If you heat your house with natural gas directly, those prices are going to go up. If you're a manufacturer and you're using gas, those prices are going to go up. So it is in our interest to find cheaper, cleaner sources of power to power as much of this transition as we can possibly get.”

Meyer asked, “How do you balance making the big investments that the power system needs or the energy system needs to meet future energy demand, which is going to come from data centers or electrification or manufacturing. Even if you curtain off data centers and be like, ‘This is a bad energy use. We're going to need a lot more energy in the future to do a lot of the things we want to do.’ How do you balance the long-term need to make big investments in the energy system or the power system to meet future demand versus the need to keep costs low in the short term because right now the way we pay for future big investments is to raise costs today?”

Granholm answered, “Right, rate base. What if these data centers that come on are required to pay for those infrastructure upgrades, which you know everybody's talking about. The president has pledged that he's having people sign. Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan has pledged. I mean, everybody's talking about... In fact, you guys, meaning Congress, just passed out of the E&C Committee, a ratepayer pledge. Great. Let's get a pledge that the hyperscalers pay for the upgrades that they bring clean power that they have responsible, if not replenishment water use, using advanced technologies to be able to do that. You know, maybe you take down some of the opposition, but maybe you also make the grid stronger as well. Maybe these data centers become grid assets because they are supplying power back to the grid, or they have created additional battery usage to make the grid more reliable, or they inject power when the grid is at maximum capacity. But more than that, those are kind of table stakes for data centers. What if they brought more than that? What if, you know, in community benefit agreements. What is the stake that the community has, and what do they give to the community? And to me, this is where the most interesting part of this conversation can happen. Not only should they pay for all those upgrades, but maybe they also pay for distributed energy resources, for home solar and storage, or maybe they help to subsidize EV batteries, etc., EV vehicles — and use the batteries to create a virtual power plant for a portion of their capacity needs to get that flexibility. Now the community has a stake. They get a battery in their home, or they get a heat pump, or whatever... It’s interesting, Volltus has done this with the PJM market. They're going to bid 100 megawatts of distributed capacity into the PJM capacity auction. How great is that? Because they're going to cobble together enough to create a virtual power plant. Why aren't we looking at that? Why aren't we looking at using the grid more efficiently with the resources we have? What Voltus is doing is taking existing assets and cobbling them together to create a virtual power plant. What if hyperscalers pay for new stuff in a community that they're coming into? So I think there's a real opportunity here.”

Heinrich followed, “I think given the premium that a lot of these developers have been willing to pay – you can reduce price pressure on consumers, and you can invest in more infrastructure.”

Meyer asked, “What does this look like in policy? Because I think there's a lot of good ideas. There's a lot of goals. Obviously, the Trump administration has advanced their ratepayer protection pledge, which is kind of all of this stuff, but without emphasizing clean as much or at all. There's still a ton of demand to build data centers. What's the policy to focus that demand look like, and what goals should Democrats bring to the, you know, the process of regulating and shaping the data center building?”

Granholm answered, “There may be a sort of floor that the federal government puts into place and then states take it to the next level. So maybe the ratepayer protection pledge, maybe the table stakes, as I call it, are happening at the federal level, and they're required to meet those. And I think many of the responsible tech companies are willing to do that. And then the states go and follow behind. Maybe they require buffer zones. Maybe they require community consultation, and they have a menu of options that a hyperscaler might be able to bring to make not just a community home, but make a community better than when the hyperscaler got here. Politically, this is hard because there's such an aversion, and people can't imagine that this is enforceable and that you trust them that they're going to be transparent. The transparency issue is a real big deal. If I were running for office right now, I'd say no data centers in my state unless you do these five things, and if those five things are done, then we'll have a conversation.”

Meyer asked, “What did you think of? Sorry, say your five things. Say your five things.”

Granholm answered, “No, which is what Gretchen Whitmer did in Michigan, and she's asking the legislature to codify that, or the Public Service Commission in Michigan to do that. That's what needs to happen.”

Meyer asked, “What did you? I interrupted you. You should say the five things.”

Granholm continued, “Well, so making sure that you don't socialize the cost to the rate base. Bring your own clean energy. You have a long-term commitment, so there's an exit fee if you if you go early. You have responsible water use. You are flexible. You agree to flexibility within the system, just as a startup, but you must enter into a community benefit agreement, and that community benefit agreement has to be in consultation with the community in question, and it might include jobs, it might include job training and apprenticeships, and there's a whole menu of things that might be possible that I think hyperscalers would be willing to look at.”

Meyer asked, “Are you worried, if you were to do this, that a lot of data center developers look at that and they go ‘thank you, that's tough, we're going to take this to Texas to build this?’”

Granholm responded, “Local communities, no matter where they are, I mean, there's been over 100 moratoria passed, local communities in red states and in blue states... my message to these local folks is you have leverage. You have leverage right now.”

Heinrich interjected, “You've got to be transparent. You've got to bring real value, which is what the Secretary is talking about, to the community from day one, and build trust.”

Granholm continued, “Raise the bar for all of them, because there's some data center companies who might not be eager to do this, but if you raise the bar as a community and insist on it, maybe they'll go to a place, another place, but maybe, just maybe, that other place is going to be insistent on using its leverage as well.”

Lessons from the Inflation Reduction Act

Meyer asked, “Last question. So, the IRA, it was a big bill, and you both played a major role in it, implementation or writing or passage. It tried to electrify a lot of the economy, and obviously, it did a lot of good. Maybe it wasn't going to meet its targets, had everything remained in the case, but it’s impossible to know what would happen with a Harris administration. It was trying to electrify more of the economy and create this big surge of electricity. Now we have the data center boom, huge, huge demand for electricity, and a ton of electricity infrastructure is getting built out now, on the back of the demand boom. What are the lessons from the IRA that we should take? I mean, in your head, maybe you both experienced the IRA. You both experienced, I would say, the IRA era of governance. So, what should we learn from that and apply to the data center growth...”

Granholm asked, “To the data centers?”

Meyer clarified, “Or to the next few years, yeah.”

Granholm answered, “I would like to see a revising of the Inflation Reduction Act. I mean, a rebirth of the pieces that were carved out, so tax credits for solar and for wind, et cetera. I'd like to see an investment tax credit for the grid as well. But I think the lesson in terms of implementation was pretty clear that we just didn't do a good job of selling it. It took too long, so we did a lot of ribbon cuttings, but we didn't do a lot of groundbreakings. Or excuse me, we did a lot of groundbreakings, but we didn't do a lot of ribbon cuttings, meaning, people weren't hired yet for all of these announcements that were made, and so people didn't feel it on the ground, and so they didn't attribute it to the administration from a political point of view, or certainly to the Inflation Reduction Act, which people, everyday citizens, have no idea what that was. So, doing a much better job in getting the word out about why is this factory opening up in my area, why am I hearing about a job fair over here? And connecting those dots, I think, was one of the big areas.”

Heinrich answered, “Speed number one, and then doing a better job of telling the story. I think that's where we lost the narrative. We had a great story to tell. I really focused, and it was an election year for me, so I focused heavily on the specific factories that were making solar and wind components for these big projects in New Mexico, and I tied it to big construction projects like the SunZia generation and transmission line. I don't think we did that nationally as effectively as we could have.”

Meyer asked, “Do you think it needs a big, charismatic idea at the center next time, National Grid or Big Underground? We're going to underground all the lines, or something, or would just selling it have been better?”

Granholm answered, “When I tell people that there were 950 factories that came or announced they were coming or expanding in the United States just to build clean energy stuff as a result of the Inflation Reduction Act, people are like 950 factories coming? I mean, there was a good story there. There really was, and you know, I was on, you know, the main cable networks, but I didn't go on all of the side, you know. And most people aren't getting their news from main cable, so we have to think better strategically about how we communicate, where we communicate, use social media a lot more to be able to get the word out.”",1,2026-08-05T07:37:37Z,2026-08-05T07:38:44Z