releases: https://boebert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-boebert-leads-colorado-republicans-opposing-taxpayer-dollars-going-sex
Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press
This data as json
| url | title | date | year | month | party | chamber | state | member_name | bioguide_id | domain | scraper | source | date_source | text | has_text | collected_at | updated_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://boebert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-boebert-leads-colorado-republicans-opposing-taxpayer-dollars-going-sex | Rep. Boebert Leads Colorado Republicans in Opposing Taxpayer Dollars Going to Sex Change/Sterilization Surgeries for Minors | 2021-10-27 | 2021 | 2021-10 | Republican | House | CO | Lauren Boebert | B000825 | boebert.house.gov | boebert | https://boebert.house.gov/media/press-releases | scraper | Today, Rep. Boebert led a letter with Congressmen Ken Buck and Doug Lamborn in condemning the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for approving Governor Polis’ request to include gender-affirming care as an essential health benefit in Colorado. This will require Medicaid, Medicare, the Children's Health Insurance Program, and private health insurance companies to cover taxpayer-funded permanent, life-altering sex change surgeries for minors. Rep. Boebert stated: “Sex change surgeries render a person sterile for life, and taxpayer dollars should not be used to permanently maim confused children. It is barbaric that Governor Polis is trying to use Colorado to mandate CMS provide taxpayer funding for these immoral procedures nationwide. Children should never be used as pawns to advance radical gender ideology. Using taxpayer dollars to fund sex changes and sterilization surgeries is one of the most reprehensible, disgusting, extreme, and grotesque policies I’ve ever seen. Permanently altering and disabling the physical bodies of children is never ok—and it is especially deplorable when done to gain cheap political points with the radical left.” Background: The new policy of the Biden regime is to use taxpayer dollars to fund: Puberty blockers Laser hair removal Surgical sterilization Eye and lid modifications Medically unnecessary plastic surgery Medically unnecessary mastectomies Breast implants Life-altering, irreversible drugs Face tightening Facial bone remodeling for facial feminization Mental wellness exams Reps. Boebert, Buck, and Lamborn’s letter to the Administrator for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, is available here and below: We write in response to your October 12, 2021, announcement that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has approved Colorado’s proposal to “provide gender-affirming care in the individual and small group health insurance markets.” We strongly oppose these proposed actions and urge you to immediately withdraw CMS’s approval. Essential Health Benefits are defined by Section 1302(b)(1) of 42 U.S.C. 18022 and require individually purchased health insurance plans in small-group markets to cover a minimum federal standard of care. The decision to require gender-affirming care as an extension of mental health benefits is a blatant misinterpretation of the statute. There is little evidence that the treatment approved by CMS improves mental health and we should not be placing new private sector mandates on insurance companies to serve progressive priorities over science. In the press release announcing this decision, you stated, “To truly break down barriers to care, we must expand access to the full scope of health care, including gender-affirming surgery and other treatments, for people who rely on coverage through Medicare, Medicaid & CHIP and the Marketplaces.” Mandating coverage of unproven, experimental gender-affirming care for children covered under the Children's Health Insurance Program is inappropriate and a misuse of taxpayer dollars. Additionally, there is evidence that gender-affirming care, like puberty blockers, causes children to face more mental health struggles and long-term consequences. Furthermore, this decision infringes upon the conscience rights of small, private health insurance companies by forcing them to comply with this government mandate. The Colorado proposal includes no religious exemptions for insurance companies that have moral objections to carrying out these policies. As we have seen in recent Supreme Court rulings, forcing private companies to act against their sincerely held religious beliefs is unconstitutional. | 1 | 2026-03-30T01:40:41Z | 2026-04-06T20:24:51Z |