home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: https://bucshon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3734

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
https://bucshon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3734 House Democrats Try to Seize Control of the Nation’s Election Process 2019-12-06 2019 2019-12 Republican House IN Larry Bucshon B001275 bucshon.house.gov     legacy (Washington, D.C.) Congressman Larry Bucshon, M.D. (IN-08) released the following statement after voting against the Voting Rights Advancement Act (H.R. 4), a federal power grab that gives the Department of Justice control over state and local elections without any proof of voter discrimination: An American citizen's right to vote is one of our most cherished freedoms. That is why our nation has robust protections in law, such as the Voting Rights Act, to ensure that discrimination doesn't impact an American citizen's ability to exercise their right to vote. However, House Democrats continue to protest the results of the 2016 presidential election because it did not go their way. H.R. 4 is just another cynical attempt by House Democrats to enact heavy-handed government regulations at the federal level that will give Washington the ability to micromanage state and local election laws and give Democrats an unfair advantage at the ballot box that will silence the voices of Americans that do not agree with them. Background The Voting Rights Act(VRA)is permanent law and does not require reauthorization.It includes robust protections and remedies to protect Americans from voter discrimination. Section 2 of the VRA already allows lawsuits to challenge state and local voting laws, including through preliminary injunctions. Section 3 of the VRA already allows federal judges to put jurisdictions under preclearance requirements when those jurisdictions have a record of actual discrimination in voting. 1 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.776ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press