releases: https://lamborn.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2194
Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press
This data as json
| url | title | date | year | month | party | chamber | state | member_name | bioguide_id | domain | scraper | source | date_source | text | has_text | collected_at | updated_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://lamborn.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2194 | SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments for Masterpiece Cakeshop | 2017-12-05 | 2017 | 2017-12 | Republican | House | CO | Doug Lamborn | L000564 | lamborn.house.gov | legacy | SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments for Masterpiece Cakeshop f t # e Washington, December 5, 2017 Today the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments for the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case. The Justices will decide if Jack Phillips' freedom of speech protects his choice not to make a special-event cake for a gay wedding, which goes against his religious beliefs. "I support Jack 100 percent on this issue. I believe the Constitution protects his right to refuse to use his artistic talents in a ceremony that he does not agree with religiously. Legal precedent also backs him up and provides many examples of free speech protection. If Jack wins, this is a huge step for artists and creators everywhere. If not, everyone's freedom is at risk when the government can punish citizens because the government doesn't approve of his artistic choice.” f t # e | 1 | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z |