home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: https://rosen.house.gov/media/press-releases/rosen-cortez-masto-send-letter-urging-senate-appropriators-not-fund-yucca

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
https://rosen.house.gov/media/press-releases/rosen-cortez-masto-send-letter-urging-senate-appropriators-not-fund-yucca ROSEN, CORTEZ MASTO SEND LETTER URGING SENATE APPROPRIATORS TO NOT FUND YUCCA IN OMNIBUS 2018-11-30 2018 2018-11 Democrat House NV Jacky Rosen R000608 rosen.house.gov     legacy WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Today, Congresswoman Jacky Rosen (NV-03) joined Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) in sending the following letter to Senate Appropriators requesting that no funds be appropriated for Yucca Mountain in the FY 2019 omnibus legislation. The State of Nevada, the Nevada Congressional Delegation, and the majority of Nevadans are adamantly opposed to the storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste in our state. The development of Yucca Mountain is also opposed by Southern Nevada's prominent travel and entertainment industries, SEIU-Nevada and UNITE HERE, as well as several conservation groups, including the League of Conservation Voters, NRDC, Sierra Club, and others, wrote the Members. We strongly oppose the construction of a repository at Yucca Mountain because it threatens the health and safety of Nevadans, putting at risk those residents that live near the site and in the 44 states that the transportation routes would travel through by train or highway. The massive amount of infrastructure required for the safe operation of this facility is non-existent. The costly 300 miles of new railroad track and 42 miles of tunnels to accommodate nuclear material and its infrastructure only infringes upon and further endangers the livelihoods of Nevada's residents and businesses, concluded the Members. Read the text of the letter below: LETTER TEXT Dear Leader Schumer, Vice Chairman Leahy, and Ranking Member Feinstein: As the Senate works with the House to craft an FY19 Appropriations Omnibus, we respectfully ask you to oppose any efforts and funding requests to restart the licensing process for the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository project in our home state of Nevada. Considering the FY19 Energy & Water Appropriations bill has already been signed into law, we see no reason to include funding for Yucca Mountain in an omnibus package. The State of Nevada, the Nevada Congressional Delegation, and the majority of Nevadans are adamantly opposed to the storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste in our state. The development of Yucca Mountain is also opposed by Southern Nevada's prominent travel and entertainment industries, SEIU-Nevada and UNITE HERE, as well as several conservation groups, including the League of Conservation Voters, NRDC, Sierra Club, and others. In 1987, Congress amended the Nuclear Waste Policy Act and targeted Yucca Mountain, Nevada, as the sole site for our nation's geological repository. The State of Nevada and local communities have repeatedly and consistently opposed this site recommendation. Nevadans have never given their consent to such a facility. To otherwise force Nevada to store nuclear waste would infringe upon Nevada's right to protect and ensure the safety of its residents as it chooses. Furthermore, the State of Nevada stands ready to fully adjudicate the nearly 300 legal contentions should this process move forward further halting any progress on resolving the nation's nuclear waste disposal dilemma for years to come. We strongly oppose the construction of a repository at Yucca Mountain because it threatens the health and safety of Nevadans, putting at risk those residents that live near the site and in the 44 states that the transportation routes would travel through by train or highway. The massive amount of infrastructure required for the safe operation of this facility is non-existent. The costly 300 miles of new railroad track and 42 miles of tunnels to accommodate nuclear material and its infrastructure only infringes upon and further endangers the livelihoods of Nevada's residents and businesses. Importantly, the Yucca Mountain project is also a threat to our national security and the readiness of our Air Force, because there is no transportation route to Yucca Mountain that would not impact testing and training at the Nevada Test and Training Range. Yucca Mountain sits directly adjacent to the Range, which provides the largest air and ground military training space in the contiguous US, and is home to 75 percent of stateside Air Force live fire exercises and munitions training. Furthermore, numerous scientific studies show that Yucca Mountain's geology and location make it unsafe for nuclear waste disposal. The Yucca Mountain site is seismically and volcanically active and contains faults and fractures that over time could move groundwater and any radioactive waste through to the aquifer beneath the site. In its 2013 final report, the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future recommended that any plan to address nuclear waste storage must be based on scientific analysis as well as consent from affected parties. Yucca Mountain does not have that kind of consensus. The majority of Nevadans agree that storing nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain is not a viable or sustainable solution. Consent must be at the center of any conversation related to depositing nuclear waste. If Yucca has taught us anything, it is that forcing a repository on an unwilling state only gets the nation further away from a workable and safe solution. As such, we respectfully request that you reject any effort to restart the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository project, now and in the future. Thank you for your consideration of this very important matter. Sincerely, ### 1 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.455ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press