releases: https://sensenbrenner.house.gov/2018/11/us-congressman-wants-doj-to-weigh-in-on-sports-betting
Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press
This data as json
| url | title | date | year | month | party | chamber | state | member_name | bioguide_id | domain | scraper | source | date_source | text | has_text | collected_at | updated_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://sensenbrenner.house.gov/2018/11/us-congressman-wants-doj-to-weigh-in-on-sports-betting | US CONGRESSMAN WANTS DOJ TO WEIGH IN ON SPORTS BETTING | 2018-11-20 | 2018 | 2018-11 | Republican | House | WI | F. Sensenbrenner | S000244 | sensenbrenner.house.gov | legacy | By: Nicholaus Garcia of Play USA At least onecongressmanis on board with theU.S. Department of Justiceweighing in onsports bettingin the post-PASPA era. Last week,Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.)addressed a letter toDeputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein,asking the DOJfor guidance on how to proceed in the current sports betting landscape. ENTERING THE POST-PASPA ERA In September, theHouse Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and Investigations, which Sensenbrenner chairs, heardpublic testimony on sports betting. Following the hearing, Sensenbrenner declared for Congress todo nothing was the worst possible choice. In his letter to Rosenstein, Sensenbrenner has this to say: As you are well aware, until 2011, the federal government consistently interpreted the Wire Act to prohibit all forms of gambling involving interstate wire transmissions including transmissions over the internet. Revising its own longstanding interpretation, the Office of Legal Counsel issued a legal opinion stating the Wire Act only bans sports betting and does not apply to online gambling. Read the full letterhere. It appears the congressman is looking for theDOJ to answer three specific questions: Do you support the 2011 Office of Legal Counsel's opinion that reinterpreted theWire Actto permit online gambling? What guidance, if any, is the Department of Justice providing to states that are entering the sports betting realm? What issues do you foresee in sports betting, both legal and illegal, if Congress does not act in response to the Supreme Court's PASPA decision? OPTIONS FOR CONGRESS TO CONSIDER Additionally, Sensenbrenner laid outthree viable optionsCongress could consider: Re-enact a federal ban on sports betting Defer completely to states to regulate the activity Adopt uniform federal standards After hearing from a panel of experts representing a broad range of positions related to sports betting, it is clear that Congress has work to do to ensure the public is protected, and any potential for exploitation by criminals is minimized in the post-PASPA era, Sensenbrenner wrote. It remains unknown what path Congress or the DOJ will take, but the conversation will continue. Next year,several states are looking to pass sports betting bills. The clock is ticking on federal oversight should it ever make an appearance. Because of the breath of issues involved in establishing a federal framework for sports wagering, and the number of interested parties, it will likely take Congress months, if not years, to develop and enact comprehensive legislation, he wrote. | 1 | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z |