home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: https://spartz.house.gov/media/press-releases/spartz-co-leads-bipartisan-bicameral-legislation-providing-critical-new

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
https://spartz.house.gov/media/press-releases/spartz-co-leads-bipartisan-bicameral-legislation-providing-critical-new Spartz Co-leads Bipartisan, Bicameral Legislation Providing Critical New Resources to Federal Judiciary 2021-08-03 2021 2021-08 Republican House IN Victoria Spartz S000929 spartz.house.gov spartz https://spartz.house.gov/media/press-releases scraper WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Victoria Spartz (IN-05), member of the House Judiciary Committee, joined representatives Darrell Issa (CA-50), Juan Vargas (CA-51), and Scott Peters (CA-52) in introducing bipartisan and bicameral legislation to provide the federal judiciary critical resources in the form of new judges to relieve overcrowded dockets and streamline vital court proceedings. A Senate companion bill of this legislation was introduced by Senators Todd Young (IN) and Chris Coons (DE). “Our judicial system is overwhelmed with hundreds of thousands of pending cases. It has long been said that justice delayed is justice denied,” said Congresswoman Spartz. “This legislation addresses this issue for the most overworked regions of our country, including Indiana, in a productive not political manner.” “California courts are both overburdened by caseload and facing a chronic shortage of federal judges, and the negative impacts of this twin inefficiency are serious. When there is an insufficient number of judges on the bench, cases are delayed – and justice right along with it. We now again have the chance to work in good faith and craft legislation that does not give a partisan advantage. This framework has the potential to achieve bipartisan consensus on a critical issue for our courts and for our country, while continuing to guide future legislation on this vital issue,” said Congressman Issa. “We now again have the chance to work in good faith and craft legislation that does not give a partisan advantage. This framework has the potential to achieve bipartisan consensus on a critical issue for our courts and for our country, while continuing to guide future legislation on this vital issue.” “Like many courts across the country, courts in California face a shortage of federal judges. This is dangerous, as it places extreme burdens on the already overtaxed court system,” said Congressman Peters. “The bipartisan, bicameral bill we introduced today addresses the issue head-on by adding 77 judgeships over the next decade. It’s a commonsense solution and I look forward to working with our colleagues in the House and Senate to get this done.” “Bicameral and bipartisan support for the JUDGES Act underscores the urgency of the judicial crisis we are facing in America. The overload of cases and shortage of judges, which has only worsened during the pandemic, is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. Our legislation will help ensure all Americans receive a timely day in federal court,” said Senator Young. “Lower courts across the country, including in Delaware, are struggling to keep up with growing caseloads,” said Senator Coons. “For too long, Congress has failed to provide the federal bench the resources it needs to give every litigant their day in court. I’m glad to see bipartisan momentum in both the House and Senate to finally address this issue and ensure our judicial system is accessible to all.” Background Congress last increased the number of federal district court judgeships more than 17 years ago – the longest gap since the original establishment of federal district courts in 1789. As of March 31, 2021, there were 696,789 pending cases in federal district courts across the country, averaging 803 filings per judgeship. These cases include civil rights claims, criminal prosecutions, environmental and consumer protection litigation, discrimination claims, challenges to government power, and holding corporations accountable for misconduct. 1 2026-03-30T01:40:41Z 2026-04-06T20:11:17Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.605ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press