releases: https://troycarter.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-carter-statement-scotus-louisiana-congressional-maps-ruling
Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press
This data as json
| url | title | date | year | month | party | chamber | state | member_name | bioguide_id | domain | scraper | source | date_source | text | has_text | collected_at | updated_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://troycarter.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-carter-statement-scotus-louisiana-congressional-maps-ruling | Congressman Carter Statement on SCOTUS Louisiana Congressional Maps Ruling | 2025-06-27 | 2025 | 2025-06 | Democrat | House | LA | Troy A. Carter | C001125 | troycarter.house.gov | troycarter | https://troycarter.house.gov/media/press-releases | scraper | WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congressman Troy A. Carter, Sr. (D-LA) released the following statement after the Supreme Court ruled on Louisiana’s congressional maps: “The Supreme Court’s decision to rehear this case is a disappointing but not unfamiliar step in the long struggle for fair representation in Louisiana. While the Court did not overturn the map today, its refusal to resolve the issue only prolongs uncertainty. “Let me be clear: the map currently in place reflects the demographic reality of our state and the legal mandates of the Voting Rights Act. Louisiana is one-third Black, and our congressional delegation should reflect that. Both the Middle District of Louisiana and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this principle when they ruled that a second majority-minority district is not just fair—it is required by law. “The map adopted by the legislature was a product of bipartisan negotiation, judicial review, and compliance with federal law. It is not a racial gerrymander—it is a remedial measure responding to decades of underrepresentation. The fact that two Black members of Congress were elected under this map is not evidence of unfairness; it is evidence that the system can work when fairness is the goal. “The ongoing legal challenges are deeply troubling, especially when they are driven by bad-faith arguments that twist the Equal Protection Clause into a weapon against equitable representation. Attempts to roll back the progress we’ve made are not about the Constitution—they're about power. “As the Court prepares to revisit this case, I’m reminded of what’s at stake: the right of every Louisianian—regardless of race—to have a voice in our democracy. The Voting Rights Act was designed to protect that right. It’s time we uphold it, not undermine it." ### | 1 | 2026-03-30T01:40:41Z | 2026-04-07T01:08:28Z |