releases: https://web.archive.org/web/20130912001711/http://coffman.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=851:update-on-syria&catid=36:latest-news&Itemid=10
Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press
This data as json
| url | title | date | year | month | party | chamber | state | member_name | bioguide_id | domain | scraper | source | date_source | text | has_text | collected_at | updated_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://web.archive.org/web/20130912001711/http://coffman.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=851:update-on-syria&catid=36:latest-news&Itemid=10 | Coffman Gives Updated Statement on Syria | 2013-09-04 | 2013 | 2013-09 | Republican | House | CO | Mike Coffman | C001077 | web.archive.org | legacy | (Washington, DC) I'm undecided at this point. There are three questions that I will be asking during the debate on Syria before making my decision. The first is how strong is the evidence that the Assad regime directed a chemical attack against civilians? The second is whether a limited strike would be effective in deterring Assad from the further use of chemical weapons? My third question will be whether a limited strike could ultimately drag the United States into an intractable sectarian civil war in Syria? I was on an unclassified conference call on Friday afternoon for members of the House Armed Services Committee with senior officials from President Obama's national security team and another on Sunday with Republican members of the committee. I'm looking forward to the classified briefings that I have scheduled for Monday and Tuesday to ask the hard questions about the evidence of who directed the chemical attacks, the probability of success of a limited strike, and the risk of escalating U.S. involvement. September 4, 2013 | 1 | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z |