home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: https://welch.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/new-york-times-trump-proposes-lower-drug-prices-basing-them-other-countries

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
https://welch.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/new-york-times-trump-proposes-lower-drug-prices-basing-them-other-countries New York Times: Trump Proposes to Lower Drug Prices by Basing Them on Other Countries Costs 2018-10-25 2018 2018-10 Democrat House VT Peter Welch W000800 welch.house.gov     legacy The current international drug-pricing system has put America in last place, Alex M. Azar II, the secretary of health and human services, said in unveiling the report. Mr. Trump cited the government's international drug-pricing report in his speech on Thursday, saying he was taking aim at global free riding that forces Americans to subsidize drug prices in other countries. Americans pay more so that other countries can pay less, Mr. Trump said. The report compares prices charged by drug manufacturers in the United States and 16 other countries for 27 drugs that are covered by Part B of Medicare. Over all, the report said, prices and reimbursement rates for Part B drugs are significantly higher for U.S. providers than purchasers outside the U.S. Medicare could achieve significant savings, it added, if prices in the U.S. were similar to those of other large market-based economies. In a Twitter post, Mr. Azar said, Medicare was found to be paying the highest price for 19 out of the 27 drugs studied. In only one case was Medicare paying less than the international average, he said. Medicare beneficiaries are generally responsible for 20 percent of the cost of drugs covered by Part B of the program. So if Medicare reduces its payment, the cost to beneficiaries will be similarly proportionately reduced, the administration said. However, most beneficiaries now have supplemental insurance, such as a Medigap policy or retiree health benefits, to help pay their share of the bill for drugs covered under Part B of Medicare. The new method of payment proposed by the Trump administration would be phased in from 2020 to 2025. Overall savings for American taxpayers and patients are projected to total $17.2 billion over five years, Mr. Azar said. Among the drugs included in the study were Aranesp, for patients with anemia caused by chemotherapy or chronic kidney disease; several cancer medicines, such as Avastin, Herceptin and Keytruda; Lucentis, for eye conditions that can cause vision loss; and Rituxan, for rheumatoid arthritis and certain types of cancer. The list prices for Keytruda and many other new cancer medicines are substantially more than $100,000 a year. As an example, Mr. Trump said: One common cancer drug is nearly seven times as expensive for Medicare as it is for other countries. This is a highly used and very effective drug. The president was apparently referring to Treanda, a cancer treatment sold by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. The report was notable for several reasons. It uses foreign drug prices as a reference or benchmark to judge prices in the United States. In many foreign countries, officials negotiate prices with drug manufacturers. While Democrats have long pushed for such negotiations, Republicans in this country have blocked them, fearing Medicare could eventually dictate prices or restrict access to drugs deemed to be too expensive. Mr. Trump campaigned for president on the promise of allowing the government to negotiate drug prices, but then backed away from that position when he unveiled his first drug-price proposals last spring. The new proposal moves back toward that plan, not by having the federal government negotiate drug prices directly, but by piggybacking on price negotiations in other countries. Foreign countries use their national health systems to negotiate lower prices in exchange for market access, the Trump administration said in its report. Democrats were still pushing a more direct route. On the eve of the midterm elections, the president is proposing a small step on drug price relief when a giant leap is urgently needed, said Representative Peter Welch, Democrat of Vermont. Instead of nibbling around the edges, he should demand in his State of the Union speech that Congress send to his desk within 30 days a broad price negotiation bill that applies to all drugs in the Medicare program. Medicare has historically paid 106 percent of the average sales price for drugs that patients receive by infusion or injection in doctors' offices. Medicare drug spending has been growing rapidly at an average rate of about 9.5 percent a year since 2009, according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, an independent agency that advises Congress. The Trump administration said the current payment formula could provide financial incentives for some doctors and hospitals to use the highest-priced clinically beneficial product. The new report acknowledged many limitations in the data used for its international price comparisons. The formulation of drugs, their dosage and their strength may differ from country to country, it said. Prices cited in the study may not accurately reflect the actual amount paid in the U.S. or abroad, because they generally do not show the effects of rebates offered by drug manufacturers, the report said. Obama administration officials were also troubled by the rapid growth of spending for drugs covered by Part B of Medicare. In March 2016, they proposed a nationwide experiment to reduce payments for many of these drugs. But they scrapped the plan nine months later after it was criticized by pharmaceutical companies, doctors, patients and members of Congress from both parties, who said it could jeopardize access to important medicines. Mr. Azar said the Trump administration proposal was more radical than Mr. Obama's. About two-thirds of Part B drug spending is for biotechnology drugs known as biologics. Countries included in the Trump administration's drug price comparisons, besides the United States, were Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. 1 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.939ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press