home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: https://www.cochran.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/news-releases?ContentRecord_id=d39bbccb-238d-486c-ac3f-8af7b438ba7e

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
https://www.cochran.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/news-releases?ContentRecord_id=d39bbccb-238d-486c-ac3f-8af7b438ba7e COCHRAN: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE HIKES COULD UNDERMINE POSITIVE REFORMS 2013-11-19 2013 2013-11 Republican House MS Thad Cochran C000567 www.cochran.senate.gov     legacy Audio of Cochran remarks available below.  WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) today helped build support for Senate passage of legislation intended to ensure that National Flood Insurance Program reforms enacted last year do not undermine the overall program. Cochran on Tuesday joined six other Senators, including Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Mary Landrieu (D-La.), to discuss problems arising from implementation of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012, including “skyrocketing flood insurance premiums” being levied on homeowners and businesses around the country. “The reform legislation enacted in 2012 made positive changes to the program.  Today, some of those changes are now working in opposition to the broader goals of reform, hence the importance of this legislation.  These shortcomings existed in the law, and they actually threaten to weaken the flood insurance program,” Cochran said.   Cochran, an original cosponsor of the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act (S.1610), took part in a dialogue on the Senate floor to advocate for consideration of that legislation.  Provisions from S.1610 have been offered as an amendment the National Defense Authorization Act (S.1197) now being considered by the Senate. “Before allowing unaffordable flood insurance rates to devalue private property and harm local communities and economies, we should be absolutely sure the government’s engineering practices and procedures are as sound as possible.  It will be very difficult to rebuild communities or restore home equity once they are lost.  So, we had better get it right,” Cochran told his colleagues. “Our bill does not create new programs to address rising premiums.  It simply leaves in place some current practices so that we can make sure that the productive reforms we enacted last year will actually improve the credibility of the program among communities and homeowners.  Our bill would not affect positive reforms related to expanding program participation, or the phase-out of subsidized flood insurance premiums for vacation homes and homes that have a history of repeated flooding,” he said. S.1610 would require FEMA to certify that it has implemented a flood mapping approach that relies on sound scientific and engineering methodologies to determine varying levels of flood risk in all areas with NFIP participation.  FEMA must also propose a draft affordability framework for congressional review.  The bill sets a 24-month deadline for FEMA to take these actions and could delay rate hikes until affordability regulations authorized by Congress are finalized.  (Bill summary: http://1.usa.gov/1gan2xU) Supporters of S.1610 and the House companion measure (HR.3370) advocate passage of this legislation this year, either as a stand-alone measure or part of another bill expected to clear Congress this year. The following are Cochran’s remarks to the Senate today: It is a fact that the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act, which we’re discussing, seeks to protect homeowners from increases in the cost of flood insurance premiums until the Administration reviews and reports to Congress on the flood mapping technologies, methodologies, and insurance affordability that are being issued under existing law.  One problem that we’re concerned about is that the program was supposed to protect taxpayer investments, communicate perceived flood risk to homeowners, and encourage communities to protect themselves against flood risks.  The reform legislation enacted in 2012 made positive changes to the program.  Today, some of those changes are now working in opposition to the broader goals of reform, hence the importance of this legislation.  These shortcomings existed in the law, and they actually threaten to weaken the flood insurance program. The success of flood insurance is so important to many inland and coastal states, such as mine and Louisiana, where the distinguished Senator is from.  Communities there continue to work to overcome damages caused by the greatest natural disaster in our nation’s history, the effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, and now skyrocketing flood insurance premiums. Under the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act, the Administration would be required to provide assurances to Congress that it is using sound mapping methods to make flood insurance rate determinations.  A study by the National Academies of Science produced in March of this year has called into question some of the engineering practices the government uses to determine rates.  Before allowing unaffordable flood insurance rates to devalue private property and harm local communities and economies, we should be absolutely sure the government’s engineering practices and procedures are as sound as possible.  It will be very difficult to rebuild communities or restore home equity once they are lost.  So, we had better get it right. Our bill does not create new programs to address rising premiums.  It simply leaves in place some current practices so that we can make sure that the productive reforms we enacted last year will actually improve the credibility of the program among communities and homeowners.  Our bill would not affect positive reforms related to expanding program participation, or the phase-out of subsidized flood insurance premiums for vacation homes and homes that have a history of repeated flooding. ### 1 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.891ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press