home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: https://www.flake.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ContentRecord_id=3B51540D-BCC7-458D-A50A-529981680D24

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
https://www.flake.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ContentRecord_id=3B51540D-BCC7-458D-A50A-529981680D24 Flake Seeks Answers from Pentagon over $125 Billion in Egregious Bureaucratic Waste 2016-12-06 2016 2016-12 Republican House AZ Jeff Flake F000444 www.flake.senate.gov     legacy Washington, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) today sent a letter to Defense Secretary Ash Carter seeking information related to $125 billion in egregious bureaucratic waste at the Pentagon uncovered during a recent investigation by The Washington Post: “Then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen stated in 2010 that 'the most significant threat to our national security is our debt.' Since that time, Pentagon officials have come before Congress to scare off efforts to reduce unnecessary spending at the Department with nightmare scenarios including reduced combat readiness and cuts to military operations.   “The recent findings by the Defense Business Board that nearly a quarter of the Pentagon’s $580 billion budget is being spent on overhead and operations is, therefore, of both great concern and promise.”The signed letter can be viewed here.Text of the letter can be viewed below. *** December 6, 2016 The Honorable Ash Carter Secretary of Defense 1300 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301 Dear Secretary Carter, National defense is the single most important role the federal government serves.  As such, I am committed to ensuring our courageous men and women in uniform are equipped with the best and most sophisticated gear, weapons, and machinery to protect our nation, defend our rights and interests, and ensure decisive victory in every potential battlefield. Then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen stated in 2010 that “the most significant threat to our national security is our debt.”  Since that time, Pentagon officials have come before Congress to scare off efforts to reduce unnecessary spending at the Department with nightmare scenarios including reduced combat readiness and cuts to military operations. The recent findings by the Defense Business Board that nearly a quarter of the Pentagon’s $580 billion budget is being spent on overhead and operations is, therefore, of both great concern and promise.  The Defense Business Board outlined “a clear path to saving over $125 billion in the next five years” while avoiding any dire consequences to our national defense.  In fact, more resources for the troops and weapons could be achieved by simply reallocating billions of dollars currently being wasted on excessive bureaucracy.  This is a win-win scenario for taxpayers and the military. I understand that providing for the nation’s defense comes at a steep price, but with our national debt approaching $20 trillion we all need to be focused combatting the new red menace threatening our national security, which is red ink. In January I will be releasing the annual Wastebook report, which includes hundreds of millions of dollars in spending by the Pentagon that I consider frivolous or unnecessary.  I hope that we can work together to cut wasteful spending while strengthening our nation’s defenses. Would you please provide answers to the following questions: What actions, if any, are being taken to address the findings of the Defense Business Board? Following the presentation of the Board’s findings, what directives or action items were made to implement the recommended cost savings and are those efforts still underway?  What office is overseeing those efforts to ensure compliance?  How are savings being calculated? What statutory obstacles may exist that would require legislative fixes from Congress to achieve these savings? Which of the Board’s findings and cost savings suggestions do you think should be included in the Department’s Fiscal Year 2018 budget request? Thank you for your service. Sincerely, JEFF FLAKEUnited States Senator 1 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.058ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press