home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: http://franken.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=3574

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
http://franken.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=3574 Sen. Franken Fights to End Questionable Chinese Trade Restrictions on U.S. Pork and Poultry Products 2016-11-22 2016 2016-11 Democrat House MN Al Franken F000457 franken.senate.gov     legacy With U.S.-Chinese trade and commerce talks underway right now in Washington, Sen. Al Franken is publicly calling for an end to questionable trade restrictions by China on certain U.S. pork and poultry products.Although China claims that it's limiting U.S. produced pork and poultry due to health standards, it appears that their underlying goal is to block U.S. exports, which hurts the bottom lines of Minnesota ag producers and keeps them from accessing key markets.In a letter sent today, Sen. Franken pressed U.S. trade officials to closely engage their Chinese counterparts at the 2016 Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade on ending this trade policy, and he said that lifting restrictions would be good for both U.S. producers and Chinese consumers."While I believe that sanitary and phytosanitary standards are critical to protecting a nation's food supply, it appears some of China's current restrictions on poultry and pork have a questionable scientific basis and seem to be targeted toward blocking U.S. exports rather than ensuring food safety," wrote Sen. Franken in his letter to Trade Representative Michael Froman and Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker. "This issue is particularly important to U.S. producers of certain offal and other poultry and pork products that are of limited value in the U.S. market.  In some cases, these products may be highly valued by Chinese consumers.  Allowing exports of these products would be favorable for both U.S. producers, who currently earn little from these products, and for Chinese consumers, who could get a product they value - potentially at lower prices."Earlier this year, Sen. Franken held a roundtable discussion at the Minnesota Farmers Union in St. Paul, where he heard strong concerns from local ag producers about China's pork and poultry trade policy.You can read the full text of today's letter by clicking here or reading below. November 22, 2016   The Honorable Michael Froman U.S. Trade Representative 600 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20508   The Honorable Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20230Dear Ambassador Froman and Secretary Pritzker:As you continue discussions with your Chinese counterparts during the 2016 Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade, I write to urge your close engagement regarding China's policies on poultry and pork imports. As you know, China is currently using sanitary and phytosanitary standards in order to block U.S. poultry products and some U.S. pork products from being exported to China.  As a result, U.S. producers have been harmed by the loss of access to this key market.  While I believe that sanitary and phytosanitary standards are critical to protecting a nation's food supply, it appears some of China's current restrictions on poultry and pork have a questionable scientific basis and seem to be targeted toward blocking U.S. exports rather than ensuring food safety.  For example, China maintains a ban on all U.S. poultry and poultry products dating back to January 2015 due to high pathogenic avian influenza, despite the fact that concerns from the outbreak have long since subsided.This issue is particularly important to U.S. producers of certain offal and other poultry and pork products that are of limited value in the U.S. market.  In some cases, these products may be highly valued by Chinese consumers.  Allowing exports of these products would be favorable for both U.S. producers, who currently earn little from these products, and for Chinese consumers, who could get a product they value - potentially at lower prices.I commend your recent efforts with your Chinese counterparts to begin to lift restrictions on exports of U.S. beef to China.  U.S. producers and Chinese consumers will be well-served by the lifting of those beef restrictions, and I urge you to continue your engagement with a similar dialogue regarding pork and poultry.Thank you for your attention to this important matter, and appreciate your engagement on this issue.Sincerely,   ### 1 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.438ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press