home / press / releases

Menu
  • Search all tables

releases: http://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-says-us-court-of-appeals-ruling-on-dc-concealed-carry-law-should

One row per release. Full-text search runs over title + body text.

Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press

This data as json

url title date year month party chamber state member_name bioguide_id domain scraper source date_source text has_text collected_at updated_at
http://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-says-us-court-of-appeals-ruling-on-dc-concealed-carry-law-should Norton Says U.S. Court of Appeals Ruling on D.C. Concealed Carry Law Should Send Signal to Rand Paul to Stop Trying to Overturn D.C. Gun Safety Laws 2015-12-15 2015 2015-12 Democrat House DC Eleanor Norton N000147 norton.house.gov     legacy WASHINGTON, D.C.Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) today said she was relieved, candidly, as expected, that a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated Judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr.s decisionthat D.C.s good reason requirement for issuing a concealed carry permit was unconstitutionalbecause the decision was outside his jurisdiction as a visiting judge. D.C.s carry requirements are similar to those that have been upheld by other federal circuit courts. Norton said todays decision once again demonstrates that D.C. gun safety laws should be left to the city and courts, not Congress, and should send a strong signal to Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) to withdraw his extreme bill to overturn all of D.C.s gun safety laws. Judge Scullin is a federal district court judge from the Northern District of New York, but in 2011 was assigned to fill in as a visiting judge for the District Court for D.C. The Court of Appeals ruled that he did not have the authority to decide this particular case. Norton said the Court of Appeals decision demonstrates the need for federal district judges who serve D.C. to live within the city limits. Norton, who has senatorial courtesy to recommend federal district judges for D.C., has been able to get the President to nominate federal judges who reside here. However, they are not required to be D.C. residents under federal law. In contrast, judges in every other jurisdiction in the United Stateswith the exception of New York City, which is the only jurisdiction divided between two federal districtsare required by federal law to reside within the jurisdictions where they have been appointed. Norton introduced a bill last month to require those federal officials serving D.C. to live in the city. Todays decision once again demonstrates that D.C.s gun safety laws should be left to D.C. or, if necessary, to the courts, not politically-motivated politicians running for President in need of raising their national profiles, Norton said. Rand Paul has not succeeded to overturn our gun safety laws in the Senate this year. However, his two desperate attempts to do so are another argument for D.C. statehood. ### 1 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.867ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press