releases: http://tipton.house.gov/press-release/tipton%E2%80%99s-bill-increase-transparency-public-land-transfers-gets-hearing-endorsement-blm
Data license: MIT · Data source: dwillis/congress-press
This data as json
| url | title | date | year | month | party | chamber | state | member_name | bioguide_id | domain | scraper | source | date_source | text | has_text | collected_at | updated_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| http://tipton.house.gov/press-release/tipton%E2%80%99s-bill-increase-transparency-public-land-transfers-gets-hearing-endorsement-blm | Tiptons Bill to Increase Transparency in Public Land Transfers Gets Hearing, Endorsement by BLM Witness | 2014-09-09 | 2014 | 2014-09 | Republican | House | CO | Scott Tipton | T000470 | tipton.house.gov | legacy | WASHINGTON—Congressman Scott Tipton’s (CO-03) legislation to increase transparency in public land transfers received a hearing in the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation today. Tipton’s bill seeks to improve the transparency, oversight and notification of land exchanges involving U.S. Forest Service (USFS) lands or public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Jose Lopez, a rancher and President of the New Mexico Cattle Growers’ Association, testified in a July hearing that he had received no notification when BLM began buying-up and locking-down lands surrounding his property. The BLM’s land transfers resulted in the decrease of his property value and loss of his ability to utilize his land. In his conversations with the local BLM, he learned that normally the BLM does not notify the adjoining landowners when they make agreements with certain nonprofits and others. Lopez stated, “If I had known about this before this happened we could have come to some agreement in doing a land exchange or something like that that would have benefited both of us. It’s usually a hush-hush deal. They don’t want anybody to know what they’re doing, and so when I found out about all of these things it was after the fact.” Under the status quo, Mr. Lopez and many others have seen the value of their land plummet following land transfers, as the BLM views these pieces of land as ‘inholdings.’ During today’s hearing, when asked by Tipton if the BLM supports his bill, Karen Mouritsen, Deputy Assistant Director for Energy, Minerals and Realty Management at BLM, responded, “Yes, we do support the intentions of this legislation.” “Of all people affected by the BLM's land exchanges, adjacent landowners have the most to lose. Loss of property values and land use patterns are certain risks. Anyone thinking of buying property near public land, or already owning it, needs to be fully informed about the BLM's intentions to sell or exchange the land surrounding it,” said Tipton. “H.R. 5074 speaks to something that Coloradans and Westerners have experienced for far too long—federal land management agency secrecy. It seems to be commonsense that impacted landowners receive proper advance notification whenever the federal government is involved in a land exchange. This will increase accountability and transparency in federal land transactions and give affected neighboring landowners an opportunity to take action to protect their livelihoods.” Additional background on H.R. 5074 is available HERE. | 1 | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z | 2026-03-30T12:14:52Z |